Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the Principle of Subsidiarity in Organisational Forms

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper starts with a case study of a medium-sized company in which a strong and successful change in the organisational form and job design took place. A bureaucratic organisation with highly-specialised jobs was converted into a new organisation in which employees became much more autonomous in managing their own work. This not only entailed new techniques and managerial systems but also a new anthropological vision. Bureaucratic rules were reduced, but not eliminated completely, and management became less authoritarian. Employees could therefore apply greater entrepreneurial spirit, developing their talents in pursuit of the company’s common goals. It is argued that this new organisational form is ethically superior to the old, and reflects the basic requirements of the principle of subsidiarity. The ethical principle of subsidiarity holds that a larger and higher-ranking body should not exercise functions which could be efficiently carried out by a smaller and lesser body; rather the former should support the latter by aiding it in the coordination of its activities with those of the greater community. While the principle has usually been applied in a political context, this paper explores the principle as a moral base for organisational forms within business organisations. Finally, the principle of subsidiarity is analysed in the context of business organisations and proposed as an ethical guideline for organisational forms. This would help to mitigate the effects of those bureaucracies in which individuals, with their dignity, freedom, diversity and capacity for undertaking business activities with entrepreneurial spirit, are often not fully appreciated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez, C.: 1996,‘Cambios organizativos para un cambio cultural en la empresa. El caso Fremap’, in D. Melé (ed.), Ética en el gobierno de la empresa (Eunsa, Pamplona). pp. 175–183

  • C. Álvarez (2003) ArticleTitleEconomía y Humanismo: Nuevas Respuestas Acción Empresarial, Madrid 179, 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Andreu (2004) ‘Fremap 2004’, Case study DG 1479, IESE Business School IESE Publishing, Barcelona Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Andreu J. E. Ricart (1995) ‘Fremap (A)’, Case study DG 1127-E, IESE Business School IESE Publishing, Barcelona Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: 2003a, ‘S&P Affirms Spanish Insurer FREMAP ‘AA’ Ratings’, Insurance Journal, May 22, http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2003/ 05/22/29216.htm (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • Anonymous: 2003b, ‘FREMAP: A social-security work accident and occupational disease mutual’, AISAM News (Association Internationale Des Sociétés D’Assurance Mutuelle) October 3, http://www.aisam.org/upload/documents/AISAM_News_2003 –3_en.pdf (accessed on June 11, 2004), 5–6

  • G. A. Appelbraum R. Batt (1994) The New American Workplace ILR Press Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas T.: In Politica (Multiple editions), Available at: http://www.unav.es/filosofia/alarcon/amicis/cpo.html #79272 (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • Aristotle (1981) Politics Penguin London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Barrera (2001) Modern Catholic social documents and political economy Georgetown University Press Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Z. Bauman (1993) Postmodern Ethics Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • G. D. Búrca (1998) ArticleTitleThe Principle of Subsidiarity and the Court of Justice as an Institutional Actor Journal of Common Market Studies 36 IssueID2 217–235 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-5965.00107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Castells (1996) The Rise of Network Society Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cathechism of the Catholic Church: 1994, (Libreria Editice Vaticana/Liguori Publications, Vatican City). See also: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM.

  • Dumaine, B.: 1991, ‘The bureaucracy busters’, Fortune, June 17, 36–50

  • European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions/EPOC Research Group (ed.): 1997, New Forms of Work Organization: Can Europe Realize its Potential? Results of a Survey of Direct Employee Participation in Europe (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)

  • European Union: 1987, Single European Act, http://europa.eu.int/abc/obj/treaties/en/entoc113.htm (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • European Union: 2000, ‘Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, Official Journal of the European Communities, December 18, 2000/C 364/01, http://www.europarl.eu.int/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • H. Fitte (2003) ArticleTitlePope John Paul II, Community of Persons and Business Enterprise Annales Theologici 17 IssueID2 293–329

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Frederickson (2002) ArticleTitleConfucius and the Moral Basis of Bureaucracy Administration & Society 333 IssueID6 610–628

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Grey C. Garsten (2001) ArticleTitleTrust, Control and the Post-bureaucracy Organization Studies 22 IssueID2 229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez García, J. L.: 1971, Conceptos fundamentales de la Doctrina Social de la Iglesia (Centro de Estudios Sociales del Valle de los Caídos, Madrid)

  • C. Handy (1990) The Age of Unreason Harvard Business School Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Handy (1999) ArticleTitleSubsidiarity is the Word for it Across the Board 36 IssueID6 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Heckscher A. Donnellon (Eds) (1994) The Post-Bureaucratic Organization Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Henkel (2002) ArticleTitleThe Allocation of Powers in the European Union: A Closer Look at the Principle of Subsidiarity Berkeley Journal of International Law 20, 359–386

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Höffner (1996) Christian Social Teaching Ordo Socialis Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jackall (1983) ArticleTitleMoral mazes: bureaucracy and managerial work Harvard Business Review 61 IssueID5 118–130 Occurrence Handle10260059

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R. Jackall (1988) Moral Mazes.The World of Corporate Managers Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kallinikos (2003) ArticleTitleWork, human agency and organizational forms: an anatomy of fragmentation Organization Studies 24 IssueID4 595–618 Occurrence Handle10.1177/0170840603024004005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. V. Marsden C. R. Cook D. Knoke (1994) ArticleTitleMeasuring organizational structures and environments American Behavioral Scientist 37, 891–910

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Merton (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Muro J. E. Ricart (1998) ‘Fremap (B)’, Case study DG-E 1133 IESE Publishing Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Naughton H. J. Alford (2001) Managing as if Faith Mattered: Christian Social Principles in the Modern Organization University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame Ind

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNamePontifical Council for Justice (2004) Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church Libreria Editrice Vaticana Città del Vaticano

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope John Paul II: 1991, Encyclical ‘Centesiumus Annus’ (St. Paul Books & Media, Boston), http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0214/_INDEX.HTM (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • Pope Leo XIII: 1891, Encycliclal ‘Rerum novarum’ (St. Paul Books & Media, Boston), http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_ enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • Pope Pius XI: 1931, ‘Encyclical ‘Quadragesimo anno’, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/ documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19310515_quadragesimo-anno _en.html (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • Pope Pius XII: 1946, Address ‘La elevatezza’ (February, 20). Quoted from J. L. Gutiérrez (1971, Vol. IV, p.’304)

  • Schilling, T.: 1995, ‘Subsidiarity as a Rule and a Principle, or Taking Subsidiarity Seriously’, The Jean Monnet Working Papers No. 10/95, (New York School of Law, New York), http://www.jeanmonnetprogram. org/papers/95/9510ind.html (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • C. R. Solomon (1992) Ethics and Excellence: Cooperation and Integrity in Business Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatican Council II: 1965, “‘Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes’ on the Church in the Modern World”, in A. Flannery (ed.), 1988, Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents, revised edition (St. Paul Editions, Boston). See also on: http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en. html (accessed on June 11, 2004)

  • M. Weber (1947) The Theory of social and economic organization Free Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1978, in G. Roth and C. Wittich (eds.), Economy and Society (2 Vols.), (University of California Press, Berkeley)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domènec Melé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melé, D. Exploring the Principle of Subsidiarity in Organisational Forms. J Bus Ethics 60, 293–305 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0136-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0136-1

Key words

Navigation