Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 151, Issue 3, pp 479–500 | Cite as

Laboratory Experiments on Convective Entrainment Using a Saline Water Tank

  • Harmen J. J. JonkerEmail author
  • Maria A. Jiménez


Entrainment fluxes in a shear-free convective boundary layer have been measured with a saline water tank set-up. The experiments were targeted towards measuring the entrainment behaviour for medium to high Richardson numbers and use a two-layer design, i.e. two stacked non-stratified (neutral) layers with different densities. With laser induced fluorescence (LIF), the entrainment flux of a fluorescent dye is measured for bulk Richardson numbers in the range 30–260. It is proposed that a carefully chosen combination of top-down and bottom-up processes improves the accuracy of LIF-based entrainment observations. The observed entrainment fluxes are about an order of magnitude lower than reported for thermal water tanks: the derived buoyancy entrainment ratio, \(A\), is found to be \(A \approx 0.02\), which is to be compared with \(A\approx 0.25\) for a thermal convection tank (Deardorff et al., J Fluid Mech 100:41–64, 1980). An extensive discussion is devoted to the influence of the Reynolds and Prandtl numbers in laboratory experiments on entrainment.


Convective boundary layer Entrainment Laboratory experiments 



The authors thank Jos Verdoold, Thijs Heus, Esther Hagen, Jeroen Lebouille, Daniel Abrahams, Erwin de Beus and Rob Rodink for their efforts towards improving the set-up. One of us (MAJ) acknowledges research project CGL2006-12474 from the Spanish Government. Han van Dop, Peter Sullivan, Evgeni Fedorovich and Jeff Weil are gratefully acknowledged for contributing useful insights.


  1. Angevine WM, Grimsdell AW, McKeen SA, Warnock JM (1998) Entrainment results from the flatland boundary layer experiments. J Geophys Res 103:13,689–13,701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball FK (1960) Control of the inversion height by surface heating. Q J R Meteorol Soc 86(370):483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts AK, Ball JH (1994) Budget analysis of fife 1987 sonde data. J Geophys Res 99:3655–3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bretherton CS, MacVean MK, Bechtold P, Chlond A, Cuxart J, Khairoutdinov M, Kosovic B, Lewellen D, Moeng CH, Siebesma AP, Stevens B, Stevens DE, Sykes I, Wyant MG (1999) An intercomparison radiatively-driven entrainment and turbulence in a smoke cloud, as simulated by different numerical models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 125:391–423Google Scholar
  5. Deardorff JW (1970) Convective velocity and temperature scales for the unstable boundary layer and the Rayleigh convection. J Atmos Sci 23:1211–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deardorff JW, Willis GE, Stockton BH (1980) Laboratory studies of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer. J Fluid Mech 100:41–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fedorovich E, Mironov D (1995) A model for a shear-free convective boundary layer with parameterized capping inversion structure. J Atmos Sci 52:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fedorovich E, Conzemius R, Mironov D (2004) Convective entrainment into a shear-free, linearly stratified atmosphere: bulk models reevaluated through large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 61:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernando HJS (1991) Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:455–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernando HJS, Little L (1990) Molecular-diffusive effects in penetrative convection. Phys Fluids A 2:1592–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrier AJ, Funk DR, Roberts PJW (1993) Application of optical techniques to the study of plumes in stratified fluids. Dyn Atmos Oceans 20:155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hägeli P, Steyn DG, Strawbridge KB (2000) Spatial and temporal variability of mixed-layer depth and entrainment zone thickness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97:47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hibberd MF, Sawford BL (1994a) Design criteria for water tank models of dispersion in the planetary convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 67:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hibberd MF, Sawford BL (1994b) A saline laboratory model of the planetary convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 67:229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonker HJJ, Duynkerke P, Cuijpers JWM (1999) Mesoscale fluctuations in scalars generated by boundary layer convection. J Atmos Sci 56:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonker HJJ, van Reeuwijk M, Sullivan PP, Patton EG (2013) On the scaling of shear-driven entrainment: a DNS study. J Fluid Mech 732:150–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kantha L (1980) Turbulent entrainment at a buoyancy interface due to convective turbulence. In: Freeland H, Farmer D, Levings C (eds) Fjord Oceanography. Plenum, New York, pp 205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kantha LH, Phillips OM, Azad RS (1977) On turbulent entrainment at a stable density interface. J Fluid Mech 79:753–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kato H, Phillips OM (1969) On the penetration of a turbulent layer into stratified fluid. J Fluid Mech 37(04):643–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lilly DK (1968) Models of cloud-topped mixed layers under a strong inversion. Q J R Meteorol Soc 94:292–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mellado JP (2012) Direct numerical simulation of free convection over a heated plate. J Fluid Mech 712:418–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Niemela JJ, Skrbek L, Sreenivasan KR, Donnelly RJ (2000) Turbulent convection at very high Rayleigh numbers. Nature 404:837–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nieuwstadt F, Mason P, Moeng CH, Schumann U (1993) Large-eddy simulation of the convective boundary layer: a comparison of four computer codes. In: Durst F, Friedrich R, Launder B, Schmidt F, Schumann U, Whitelaw J (eds) Turbulent shear flows 8. Springer, Berlin, pp 343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sayler BJ, Breidenthal RE (1998) Laboratory simulations of radiatively induced entrainment in stratiform clouds. J Geophys Res 103:8827–8838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snyder WH, Lawson JRRE, Shipman MS, Lu J (2002) Fluid modelling of atmospheric dispersion in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 102:335–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stull RB (1976) The energetics of entrainment across a density interface. J Atmos Sci 33:1260–1267Google Scholar
  27. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 666 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Sullivan PP, Moeng CH, Stevens B, Lenschow DH, Major SD (1998) Structure of the entrainment zone capping the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 55:3042–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tennekes H (1973) A model for the dynamics of the inversion above a convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 30(4):558–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Townsend AA (1980) The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 429 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner J (1973) Buoyancy effects in fluids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 367 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Turner JS (1968) The influence of molecular diffusivity on turbulent entrainment across a density interface. J Fluid Mech 33:639–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Dop H, van As D, van Herwijnen A, Hibberd MF, Jonker H (2005) Length scales of scalar diffusion in the convective boundary layer: laboratory observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116(1):1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Driel R, Jonker HJJ (2011) Convective boundary layers driven by nonstationary surface heat fluxes. J Atmos Sci 68:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J, Gioli B, Miglietta F, Jonker HJJ, Baltink HK, Hutjes RWA, Holtslag AAM (2004) Entrainment process of carbon dioxide in the atmospheric boundary layer. J Geophys Res 109(D18):110Google Scholar
  36. Willis G, Deardorff JW (1974) A laboratory model of the unstable planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 31:1297–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolanski EJ, Brush LM Jr (1975) Turbulent entrainment across stable density step structures. Tellus 27:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wyngaard JC (2010) Turbulence in the atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 339 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Wyngaard JC, Brost RA (1984) Top-down and bottom-up diffusion of a scalar in the convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41(14):102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atmospheric Physics Section, Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Global Change ResearchInstitut Mediterrani d’Estudis Avançats, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB)Esporles (Illes Balears)Spain

Personalised recommendations