Abstract
Masonry buildings constitute a large part of the European building heritage. This building stock often presents plan or vertical irregularity generally caused by the architectural and structural modifications undergone over the time. In the context of historical city centres, the most recurring irregularity is the vertical one, due to sudden variations in mass, stiffness (and strength) of walls along the building height. In particular, in the case of Florence city centre (Italy), vertical irregularity is caused by the removing of large portions of masonry walls at the ground floor as a consequence of the changed use of these parts of the building; the functional modification of the openings scheme at the different levels of the building due to the internal renovation of the flats; the rooftop addition. In this paper vertical irregularity in historical masonry buildings is investigated through the analysis of single masonry walls. A simplified numerical procedure is adopted in order to evaluate the influence of vertical irregularity on the seismic response of masonry walls along the building height. The masonry structure is modelled through an assemblage of rigid and infinitely strong blocks, linked in-between and to the soil by means of deformable joints. Numerical results demonstrated that this simplified procedure is able to predict the behavior of masonry walls both before and after the typical structural modifications which involved, particularly, the historical buildings of Florence city center. This simplified procedure is suggested as a useful tool for both research purposes and professional practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alecci V, De Stefano M (2019) Building irregularity issues and architectural design in seismic areas. Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale 47:161–168. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.47.13
Alecci V, De Stefano M, Galassi S, Lapi M, Orlando M (2019) Evaluation of the American approach for detecting plan irregularity. Adv Civ Eng (ACE). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2861093
Alecci V, De Stefano M, Galassi S, Lapi M, Orlando M (2020). An assessment of American criterion for detecting plan irregularity. In: Köber D, De Stefano M, Zembaty Z (eds) Seismic behaviour and design of irregular and complex civil structures III. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 48. Springer, Cham, pp 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33532-8_18
Asikoglu A, Vasconcelos G, Lourenco P, Pantò B (2020) Pushover analysis of unreinforced irregular masonry buildings: lessons from different modeling approaches. Eng Struct 218:110830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110830
Augenti N, Cosenza E, Dolce M, Manfredi G, Masi A, Samela L (2004) Performance of school buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20(S1):S257–S270. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1769374
Basu D, Giri S (2015) Accidental eccentricity in multistory buildings due to torsional ground motion. Bull Earthq Eng 13:3779–3808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9788-0
Berti M, Salvatori L, Orlando M, Spinelli P (2017) Unreinforced masonry walls with irregular opening layouts: reliability of equivalent-frame modelling for seismic vulnerability assessment. Bull Earthq Eng 15:1213–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9985-5
Bothara JK, Dhakal RP, Mander JB (2010) Seismic performance of an unreinforced masonry building: an experimental investigation. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 39(1):45–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.932
Caniggia G, Maffei GL (1979) Composizione architettonica e tipologia edilizia 1. Lettura dell’edilizia di base. Venezia, Marsilio Editori
Cattari S, D’Altri AM, Camilletti D, Lagomarsino S (2022) Equivalent frame idealization of walls with irregular openings in masonry buildings. Eng Struct 256:114055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114055
Chopra AK, Goel RK (1991) Evaluation of torsional provisions in seismic codes. J Struct Eng 117(12):3762–3782. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:12(3762)
D’Altri AM, Sarhosis V, Milani G, Rots J, Cattari S, Lagomarsino S, Sacco E, Tralli A, Castellazzi G, de Miranda S (2019) A review of numerical models for masonry structures. Numerical modeling of masonry and historical structures. Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering. Woodhead Publishing, pp 3–53
De Stefano M, Pintucchi B (2008) A review of research on seismic behavior of irregular building structures since 2002. Bull Earthq Eng 6(2):285–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9052-3
De Stefano M, Rutenberg A (1997) A comparison of the present SEAOC/UBC torsional provisions with the old ones. Eng Struct 19(8):655–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00142-3
De Stefano M, Faella G, Ramasco R (1993) Inelastic response and design criteria of plan-wise asymmetric systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 22(3):245–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220306
Ercolino M, Ricci P, Magliulo G, Verderame GM (2016) Influence of infill panels on an irregular RC building designed according to seismic codes. Earthq Struct 10(2):261–291. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.261
Galassi S, Zampieri P (2023) A new automatic procedure for nonlinear analysis of masonry arches subjected to large support movements. Eng Struct 276:115359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115359
Galassi S, Ruggieri N, Tempesta G (2018) A novel numerical tool for seismic vulnerability analysis of ruins in archaeological sites. Int J Archit Herit 14(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1492647
Kalkbrenner P, Pelà L, Sandoval C (2019) Multi directional pushover analysis of irregular masonry buildings without box behavior. Eng Struct 201:109534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109534
Kayırga OM, Altun F (2021) Investigation of earthquake behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings having different opening sizes: experimental studies and numerical simulation. J Build Eng 40:102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102666
Lagomarsino S, Camilletti D, Cattari S, Marino S (2018) Seismic assessment of existing irregular masonry buildings by nonlinear static and dynamic analyses. In: Pitilakis K (eds) Recent advances in earthquake engineering in Europe. ECEE 2018. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75741-4_5
Maffei GL (1990) La casa fiorentina nella storia della città dalle origini all’Ottocento, Venezia, Marsilio Editori
Magliulo G, Capozzi V, Ramasco R (2012) Seismic performance of R/C frames with overstrength discontinuities in elevation. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):679–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9316-9
Mughal UA, Qazi AU, Ahmed A, Abbass W, Abbas A, Salmi A, Sayed MM (2022) Impact of openings on the in-plane strength of confined and unconfined masonry walls: a sustainable numerical study. Sustainability 14:7467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127467
Parisi F, Augenti N (2013) Seismic capacity of irregular unreinforced masonry walls with openings. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 42(1):101–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2195
Pulatsu B, Gonen S, Parisi F, Erdogmus E, Tuncay K, Funari MF, Lourenço P (2022) Probabilistic approach to assess URM walls with openings using discrete rigid block analysis (D-RBA). J Build Eng 61:105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105269
Sassu M, Puppio ML, Mannari E (2017) Seismic reinforcement of a R.C. school structure with strength irregularities throughout external bracing walls. Buildings 7:58. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7030058
Satta ML, Ruggieri N, Tempesta G, Galassi S (2021) Remains of the ancient colonnade in the archaeological site of Pompeii, Italy: vulnerability analysis and strengthening proposal. Int J Cult Herit 52:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.09.006
Shariq M, Abbas H, Irtaza H, Qamaruddin M (2008) Influence of openings on seismic performance of masonry building walls. Build Environ 43(7):1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.005
Yi T, Moon FL, Leon RT, Kahn LF (2006) Lateral load tests on a two-story unreinforced masonry building. J Struct Eng 132(5):643–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(643)
Acknowledgements
This research has been funded by the Italian Ministry of University and Research through the program PNRR, Extended Partnership n.3 (PE3) 'RETURN—Multi-Risk Science for Resilient Communities Under a Changing Climate', Project Code PE_0000005, CUP: B83C22004820002 and through the program PRIN 2020 - S-MoSES “Smart Monitoring for Safety of Existing Structures and Infrastructures”.
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Alecci, V., De Stefano, M., Galassi, S. et al. Evaluation of vertical irregularity effects of historical masonry buildings through a simplified procedure: the case of Florence city center. Bull Earthquake Eng 22, 2085–2104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01846-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01846-0