Aerobiologia

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Occurrence of Didymella ascospores in western and southern Poland in 2004–2006

  • Danuta Stępalska
  • Agnieszka Grinn-Gofroń
  • Katarzyna Piotrowicz
Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

The concentration of airborne Didymella spores has been investigated at two monitoring sites situated along the west–south transect in Poland (Szczecin, Kraków), i.e. from a height of 100 to 219 m, respectively, above sea level. The aerobiological monitoring of fungal spores was performed by means of two Lanzoni volumetric spore traps. The high Didymella spore numbers were observed at both cities in June, July and August. Statistically significant correlations have been found mainly between the Didymella spore concentrations in the air and the minimum air temperature and relative air humidity. The spore count of Didymella is determined by the diversity of local flora and weather conditions, especially by the relative air humidity. The identification of factors that influence and shape spore concentrations may significantly improve the current methods of allergy prevention.

Keywords

Aerobiological monitoring Didymella spores Meteorological parameters 

1 Introduction

Fungal spores play a significant role in the plant pathology and human respiratory allergy. In industrialized countries, the prevalence of allergy is increasing. Aerobiological studies describe the aeroallergens’ seasonal distribution in a given area. The combination of allergological and aerobiological studies is useful in adjusting allergy-alerting systems. Spore concentration in the atmosphere results from a complex interaction between biological and environmental factors. Quite pragmatically, one may speak of fungi producing ‘dry spores’ and those producing ‘wet spores’.

Members of the Ascomycetes class are characterized by the production of sexual spores (ascospores) within a sac-like structure called an ascus. Within the ascus, karyogamy and meiosis occur followed by an additional mitotic division to produce eight haploid ascospores. In most Ascomycetes, active release of ascospores takes place. Release frequently depends upon the activity of turgid cells, which requires a supply of water. The increasing pressure causes the ascus tip to burst open, forcing the spores out explosively. Spores can be ejected for distance of 2–300 mm depending on species. Asexual reproduction is accomplished by the production of conidia. Most of the recognized fungal allergens are derived from conidial Ascomycetes. Dutch elm disease, chestnut blight and powdery mildews are among diseases caused by the members of Ascomycetes, which damaged plants (Levetin 1995). Ascospores vary morphologically, and often they are difficult to identify microscopically in air samples. In general, they are recognizable by the fact that they have no attachment points, and are sometimes enclosed in gelatinous sheaths or within a sac.

Ascospore concentrations increase during and after rainstorms (Bush 1989). Also Allit (1986) observed that ascospores occurred abundantly in the atmosphere with high levels of relative humidity. Spores of Ascomycetes found in the air are numerous, and many of them are known to produce positive reactions in the skin prick test (Kendrick 1990).

One of the fungi producing ‘wet spores’ is Didymella belonging to the Pleosporaceae family. Spores are one-septate and hyaline. Generally, spore shape is ellipsoid or biconic (Fig. 1). Didymella is a saprobic or weakly pathogenic fungus. Spores fitting the description of Didymella have been reported above the fields of wheat and barley as a possible reason for the infection of both crops. Because Didymella relies upon a crop as a substrate, spore numbers drop dramatically after the crops are harvested.
Fig. 1

Didymella ascospore (Szczecin)

Allit (1986) found that hyaline, one-septate ascospores reached high levels following rainfall during July and August. The majority of these spores belong to various species of Didymella. The high spore concentrations in Poland occur during June, July and August (Stępalska and Wołek 2005).

The aim of the study was to analyse the Didymella seasons in Szczecin and Cracow (western and southern Poland) in 2004–2006 and to find a relationship between meteorological factors and the Didymella spore counts.

2 Materials and methods

The investigation of the Didymella spore concentrations in the atmosphere was carried out in two cities in Poland, Szczecin and Cracow in 2004–2006 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Map of Poland showing the monitoring sites and their coordinates: Szczecin—149 m a. s. l.; 53°25′N, 14°35′E; Kraków—220 m a. s. l.; 50°03′N, 19°57′E. Arrows-prevailing wind directions; cereals-locality of croplands

Both cities are surrounded by forests, farmlands and abandoned farmland areas, which provide suitable media for the spore production. The present, ‘baltic’ climate of Szczecin is influenced by the impact of the air masses from over the northern Atlantic and is characterized by mild winters and cool summers. Cracow is situated in a region where weather changes are frequent due to the friction of both humid air masses arriving from over the northern Atlantic Ocean and dry, continental masses of air incoming from the east. In Szczecin and Cracow, the mean annual precipitation is relatively low, 500 mm and 750 mm, respectively. The dominant wind directions for both cities are west and south-west (Fig. 2). Vegetation seasons in the cities differ in length: 210–220 days in Szczecin and over 220 days in Cracow (Woś 1999) (Table 1; Fig. 2).
Table 1

Meteorological parameters for examined cities

 

Szczecin

Kraków

2004

  

 Air temperature annual mean [°C]

8.6

8.7

 Relative humidity annual mean [%]

80.6

76.6

 Wind velocities annual mean [m/s]

3.4

2.6

 Wind directions

W, SW

W, SW

2005

  

 Air temperature annual mean [°C]

8.8

8.4

 Relative humidity annual mean [%]

79.8

77.4

 Wind velocities annual mean [m/s]

3.3

2.5

 Wind directions

W, SW

W, SW

2006

  

 Air temperature annual mean [°C]

9.2

8.4

 Relative humidity annual mean [%]

80.1

78.6

 Wind velocities annual mean [m/s]

3.1

2.2

 Wind directions

S, SW

W, SW

For this study, the volumetric method has been employed using Hirst spore trap (Hirst 1952) made by Lanzoni with a flow rate of 10 l min−1. The VPPS Lanzoni 2000 trap is equipped with wind vane that orients the air inlet according to the wind direction. The traps were installed on the rooftops in the centres of the cities at the same height (20 m) above ground level. In Szczecin, both samplers (Lanzoni spore trap and weather station) were located approximately 30 km on the south from croplands and in Cracow, approximately 42 km on the west from croplands. The farmlands in the vicinity of Cracow are twice larger than those around Szczecin (Fig. 2).

Airborne spores were sampled continuously, 12 months a year in 2004, 2005 and 2006. The Melinex tape used for catching spores was replaced at the same day every week and cut into segments corresponding to 24 h periods. Then, the segments were stained using a solution of glycerine, distilled water and gelatin in a proportion of 6:6:1. Samples were stained with basic fuchsine (saturated aqueous solution) 0.25%. Daily records of the airborne fungal spores were obtained using the tangent field counting method. With this method, successive tangent fields positioned along one line were examined. After having counted the fungal spores in one field, the slide was moved to the next tangential field. All spores were counted per a microscopical slide at 400× magnification and an appropriate conversion factor was applied. The factor (F) was calculated using following formula:
$$ F\ \, = \, a/\left[ {\left( b \right)c} \right] $$
where a is total area of a daily tape segment, b area of analysed traverse = width × length × 1, c volume of analysed air = 10 l/min = 14.4 m3/24 h

Results (average daily concentration) were expressed as the number of spores m−3 air/24 h.

The meteorological parameters taken into consideration to assess their effect on the airborne fungal spores were wind speed, relative humidity and air temperature. In Szczecin, the meteorological data covering 3 years of the studies were provided by the automatic weather station (Vaisala MAWS101 and MAWS201, Finland). The meteorological station was located in the immediate neighbourhood of the Lanzoni trap. In Cracow, the meteorological data were obtained from the weather station of the Department of Climatology, Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Jagiellonian University, situated also in the immediate vicinity of the monitoring site.

The spore data were analysed to determine the start, the end and the duration of the season using the 90% method. The start of the season was defined as the date when 5% of the seasonal cumulative spore count was trapped and the end of the season as the date when 95% of the seasonal cumulative spore count was reached (British Aerobiology Federation 1995).

The statistical relationship between spore concentration and meteorological factors was established using the Statistica program version 8.0 (StatSoft, Inc. 2008).

3 Results

In Szczecin as well as in Cracow, the Didymella spores were present in large numbers during the summer period with the high levels being reached in June, July and August. In both cities, the highest concentrations were noted in July. The lowest sum of spores occurred in 2006 (1,075 and 968 in Szczecin and Cracow, respectively) and the highest in 2004 (5,095 and 5,901).

The Spearman’s rank correlations analysis was performed in order to determine which meteorological variables influenced spore concentrations. Meteorological data used in the analysis included minimum and maximum temperature, relative humidity and wind speed.

Results of the Spearman’s rank correlations analysis suggest that temperature was the most influential factor for Didymella spore concentrations during the studied period. The positive, significant correlation between minimum temperature and Didymella spore count occurred in two analysed seasons (2005, 2006) in Cracow and in one season in Szczecin (2005) (Tables 2,3).
Table 2

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between Didymella spore concentrations in Kraków and meteorological variables

Variables and years

Didymella

2004

 Maximum temperature

−0.340*

2005

 Minimum temperature

0.325**

2006

 Minimum temperature

0.305*

P-valueP < 0.05; ** P < 0.01

Table 3

Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between Didymella spore concentrations in Szczecin and meteorological variables

Variables and years

Didymella

2004

 Relative humidity

0.498*

2005

 Minimum temperature

0.325***

2006

 Relative humidity

0.380*

 Wind speed

0.220*

P-valueP < 0.05; *** P < 0.001

In Cracow only in one out of the three studied seasons (2004), a negative and statistically significant correlation between Didymella spore count and the maximum temperature was noted (Table 2).

The positive, significant correlation occurred in Szczecin between Didymella spore count and relative humidity during two seasons studied (2004 and 2006). The wind speed was correlated with the number of spores only in one season (2006) in Szczecin (Table 3).

In Cracow, the dynamics of the spore season was similar in each analysed period. The differences in length between single stages were not larger than a couple of days. Contrary to the seasons of 2004 and 2006, the 2005 season was markedly shorter. In 2004, the fourth and fifth stages (50–75%; 75–95%) were prolonged in comparison with 2005, 2006; in 2006, the same situation occurred in the second and third stage (5–25%; 25–50%) (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

a Dynamics of Didymella seasons in Kraków, 2004–2006. Diagrams of consecutive stages of the fungal season: 1%, 5%, 25%, 50%, (vertical line), 75%, 95% and 99%. b Dynamics of Didymella seasons in Szczecin 2004–2006. Diagrams of consecutive stages of the fungal season: 1%, 5%, 25%, 50%, (vertical line), 75%, 95% and 99%

In Szczecin, the dynamics of the Didymella season was more differentiated than in Cracow. In 2004, the fifth (75–95%) stage was long; in 2005, the second and sixth stages (5–25%; 95–99%) were significantly longer and the fourth and fifth (50–75%; 75–95%) the shortest; in 2006, the second and fifth stages (5–25%; 75–95%) were prolonged and first and sixth (1–5%; 95–99%) the shortest (Fig. 3b).

4 Discussion

The occurrence of Didymella spores in the atmosphere throughout summer (June, July and August) is consistent with previous findings (Adams 1964; Allit 1986; Corden and Millington 1994; Frankland and Gregory 1973; Grinn-Gofroń and Mika 2008; Harries et al. 1985; Richardson 1996). The Didymella spores are important from an allergological point of view because they have been known to trigger allergic respiratory disease such as late summer asthma. Since the Didymella spore presence in the air is known to be influenced by meteorological parameters, some researchers undertook the studies to find which parameters have the strongest effect on spore concentration changes in a season (Corden and Millington 1994; Frankland and Gregory 1973; Packe and Ayres 1985; Stępalska and Wołek 2005; Wahl and Kersten 1991).

Earlier studies (Harries et al. 1985; Wahl and Kersten 1991) monitored Didymella spore concentrations over short periods. This paper deals with concentration of spores sampled in 2004–2006 and the relationship between spore concentrations and meteorological factors. Results of the analysis of Spearman’s rank correlations showed that temperature correlated with spore concentration the strongest. The results agree with those reported by Corden and Millington (1994), Grinn-Gofroń and Mika (2008), Jones and Harrison (2004) and Stępalska and Wołek (2005). However, Wahl and Kersten (1991) found that the release and dispersal of Didymella spores was not greatly affected by air temperature. Similarly, Arseniuk et al. (1998) found a weak association between ascospore concentrations and temperature but this occurred probably due to the effect of temperature on ascospore growth rather than on release. In Cracow, minimum temperature was the most important factor in 2005 and 2006 and maximum temperature in 2004. Li and Kendrick (1995) found that in general, the concentrations of various fungal spores varied with mean, minimum and maximum temperature, mean wind speed, relative humidity and rainfall, but minimum temperature was the most important in the growing season. In Szczecin also minimum temperature influenced concentrations the strongest but only in 2005. In 2004 and 2006, relative humidity was the most influential variable correlating significantly and positively with the concentration. In the earlier study performed in Cracow, the relative humidity appeared to be correlated with Didymella spore concentration in the pre-peak period but the percentage of explained variation was very low (Stępalska and Wołek 2005).

The association between the Didymella spore release and moist conditions has been well established (Corden and Millington 1994; Frankland and Gregory 1973; Harries et al. 1985). Wahl and Kersten (1991) suggested that Didymella spores might be dispersed by rain splashes but this was not supported by their own data, which showed that on a rainless night the spore release occurred at the same time as on rainy nights and it was 15% greater. The studies in Edinburgh showed clearly that rain was not essential for peak concentrations. A sharp peak occurred a few days after the last rain was recorded (Richardson 1996). Since Didymella spores are actively discharged in the early morning (Corden and Millington 1994; Frankland and Gregory 1973; Stępalska and Wołek 2009), Richardson (1996) concluded that the high humidity resulting from low temperature and dew formation in the early hours was the reason for high concentrations in the atmosphere, rather than rainfall. Significant and positive correlation of spore concentrations with the relative humidity in Szczecin is consistent with the results given by Richardson (1996).

In Szczecin in 2006, wind speed correlated positively with the spore numbers. However, it is not supported by the earlier study performed in Cracow where wind speed and direction showed weak correlation with Didymella spore concentration, and in some cases, correlation was non-significant (Stępalska and Wołek 2005). McCartney (1991), reviewing spore take-off mechanisms and the threshold wind speed required for spore removal noted that information on the strength of spore attachment and values of threshold wind speed are not known for the majority of fungi. Dispersal patterns are varied and appear to be different for different species and for the same species at different locations and times. However, the mechanisms of dispersal are essentially the same for all spores. Understanding dispersal processes is by no means complete. Methods to deal with dispersal in complex flows such as near field boundaries, hedges or obstructions or over non-uniform terrain have still to be developed. More work is needed to realize the potential of random walk dispersal models. A greater understanding of spore release mechanisms is also needed for use with such models when they are available. Burt et al. (1997) analysing the concentrations of ascospores in banana and plantain plantations stated no relationship between wind speed and ascospore concentrations. Ascospore concentration was nearly significantly related (at the 90% level) to updraught and was significantly inversely related to turbulent intensity. In the covariance analysis of mean wind speed and log ascospore catches, the correlation was not statistically significant, even at the 10% level (P > 0.1). Lyon et al. (1984) found for Ascomycetes that radiation, minimum humidity, changes in humidity and minimum wind speed were related to airborne spore concentrations.

From the above discussion, it is seen that the same meteorological variables may have different effects on different parts of the life cycle (spore growth, source size and spore emission) and also that the effect of any meteorological factor on spore concentration may differ from year to year because of extremes in other factors (Jones and Harrison 2004).

The dynamics of Didymella spore seasons in Cracow and Szczecin described by the graphs illustrates the consecutive phases in which the cumulative spore sums attain the designated levels of the annual totals. Throughout the years monitored, the Didymella spore season shows variations with respect to its dynamics that are larger in Szczecin. More differentiated dynamics (different length of consecutive phases) of the Didymella spore season in Szczecin than in Cracow could possibly be explained by variability in weather conditions in Szczecin caused by the vicinity of the Baltic Sea. Two phases (25–50% and 50–75%) of the Didymella spore season, when the cumulative spore sums obtain value between 25 and 75% of the annual total spore count, are usually defined as a peak concentration period (Corden and Millington 1994; Richardson 1996; Stępalska and Wołek 2005).

There are only few publications describing the Didymella spores in the air and the influence of meteorological factors on changes in their concentrations. We hope that our present studies will be stimulative for scientists to undertake further investigations on Didymella spores in view of their importance for medicine (allergies) and agriculture (crop parasites).

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Adams, K. F. (1964). Year to year variation in the fungus spore content of the atmosphere. Acta Allergologica, 19, 11–50.Google Scholar
  2. Allit, U. (1986). Identity of hyaline, one-septate ascospores and their relation to inhalant allergy. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 87, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arseniuk, E., Goral, T., & Scharen, A. L. (1998). Seasonal pattern of spore dispersal of Phaeosphaeria spp. and Stagonospora spp. Plant Disease, 82, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. British Aerobiology Federation. (1995). Airborne pollens and spores. A guide to trapping and counting (1st ed.). Rotherham, UK: National Pollen & Hayfever Bureau.Google Scholar
  5. Burt, P. J. A., Rutter, J., & Gonzales, H. (1997). Short-distance wind dispersal of the fungal pathogens causing Sigatoka diseases in banana and plantain. Plant Pathology, 46, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush, R. K. (1989). Aerobiology of pollen and fungal allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 84, 1120–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corden, J. M., & Millington, W. M. (1994). Didymella ascospores in Derby. Grana, 33, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frankland, A. W., & Gregory, P. H. (1973). Allergenic and agricultural implications of airborne ascospore concentration from a fungus Didymella exitialis. Nature, 245, 336–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grinn-Gofroń, A., & Mika, A. (2008). Selected airborne allergenic fungal spores and meteorological factors in Szczecin, Poland, 2004–2006. Aerobiologia, 24, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harries, M. G., Lacey, J., Tee, R. D., Cayley, C. R., & Newman Taylor, A. J. (1985). Didymella exitialis and late summer asthma. Lancet, 1, 1063–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirst, J. M. (1952). An automatic spore trap. Annals of Applied Biology, 39, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, A. M., & Harrison, R. M. (2004). The effects of meteorological factors on atmospheric bioaerosol concentrations—a review. Science of the Total Environment, 326, 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kendrick, B. (1990). Fungal allergens. In E. G. Smith (Ed.), Sampling and identifying allergenic pollen and moulds. San Antonio, USA: Blewstone Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levetin, E. (1995). In H. Burge (Ed.) Bioaerosols. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Li, D., & Kendrick, B. (1995). A year-round outdoor aeromycological study in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Grana, 34, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lyon, F. L., Kramer, C. L., & Eversmeyer, M. G. (1984). Variation of airspora in the atmosphere due to weather conditions. Grana, 23, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCartney, H. A. (1991). Airborne dissemination of plant pathogens. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 70, 498–598.Google Scholar
  18. Packe, G. E., & Ayres, J. G. (1985). Asthma outbreak during a thunderstorm. Lancet, 326, 199–204.Google Scholar
  19. Richardson, M. J. (1996). The occurrence of airborne Didymella spores in Edinburgh. Mycological Research, 100(2), 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stępalska, D., & Wołek, J. (2005). Variation in fungal spore concentrations of selected taxa associated to weather conditions in Cracow, Poland, in 1997. Aerobiologia, 21, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stępalska, D., & Wołek, J. (2009). Intradiurnal periodicity of fungal spore concentrations (Alternaria, Botrytis, Cladosporium, Didymella, Ganoderma) in Cracow, Poland. Aerobiologia, 25, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wahl, P. G., & Kersten, W. (1991). Fusarium and Didymella-neglected spores of the air. Aerobiologia, 7, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Woś, A. (1999). Klimat Polski (Climate of Poland). Warszawa: PWN. (in Polish).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danuta Stępalska
    • 1
  • Agnieszka Grinn-Gofroń
    • 2
  • Katarzyna Piotrowicz
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of BotanyJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Department of Plant Taxonomy and PhytogeographyUniversity of SzczecinSzczecinPoland
  3. 3.Department of Climatology, Institute of Geography and Spatial ManagementJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations