Advertisement

Review of World Economics

, Volume 151, Issue 2, pp 353–376 | Cite as

Globalization and social justice in OECD countries

  • Björn KauderEmail author
  • Niklas Potrafke
Original Paper

Abstract

Social justice is a topic of importance to social scientists and also political decision makers. We examine the relationship between globalization and social justice as measured by a new indicator for 31 OECD countries. The results show that countries that experienced rapid globalization enjoy social justice. When the KOF index of globalization increases by one standard deviation, the social justice indicator increases by about 0.4 points (on a scale from 1 to 10). The policy implication is that permitting a national economy to become globally integrated is consistent with and promotes social justice.

Keywords

Globalization Social justice Economic integration 

JEL Classification

D63 F61 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We received helpful comments from Niclas Berggren, Andreas Bergh, Christian Bjørnskov, Arye L. Hillman, Heinrich W. Ursprung, and an anonymous referee. Miriam Breckner, David Happersberger, Danny Kurban, and Felix-Sebastian Weber provided excellent research assistance.

References

  1. Acosta, P., & Montes-Rojas, G. V. (2008). Trade reform and inequality: The case of Mexico and Argentina in the 1990s. World Economy, 31, 763–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 651–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K., Bowles, S., & Durlauf, S. (2000). Meritocracy and economic inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berggren, N. (1999). Economic freedom and equality: Friends or foes? Public Choice, 100, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2014). Globalization and the transmission of social values: The case of tolerance. IFN Working Paper 1007.Google Scholar
  6. Bergh, A., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Historical trust levels predict the current size of the welfare state. Kyklos, 64, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalization increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergh, A., & Nilsson, T. (2014). Is globalization reducing absolute poverty? World Development, 62, 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertelsmann Stiftung (2010). Soziale Gerechtigkeit in der OECDWo steht Deutschland? Sustainable Governance Indicators 2011. Gütersloh. http://www.sgi-network.org
  10. Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bjørnskov, C. (2005). Does political ideology affect economic growth? Public Choice, 123, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). The growth-inequality association: Government ideology matters. Journal of Development Economics, 87, 300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2008). Cross-country determinants of life satisfaction: Exploring different determinants across groups in society. Social Choice and Welfare, 30, 119–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bjørnskov, C., & Méon, P.-G. (2013). Is trust the missing root of institutions, education, and development? Public Choice, 157, 641–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bjørnskov, C., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Politics and privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: A panel data analysis. Economics of Transition, 19, 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003). Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics, 55, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Budge, I., Keman, H., & Woldendorp, J. (1993). Political data 1945–1990. Party government in 20 democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 24, 1–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cho, S.-Y. (2013). Integrating equality: Globalization, women’s rights, and human trafficking. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Das, S. P. (2005). Gradual globalization and inequality between and within countries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 38, 852–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davies, R. B., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2013). A race to the bottom in labor standards? An empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Soysa, I., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2011). Does being bound together suffocate, or liberate? The effects of economic, social, and political globalization on human rights, 1981–2005. Kyklos, 64, 20–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doerrenberg, P., & Peichl, A. (2014). The impact of redistributive policies on inequality in OECD countries. Applied Economics, 46, 2066–2086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dreher, A. (2006a). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: An empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dreher, A. (2006b). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38, 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dreher, A., Gassebner, M., & Siemers, L.-H. R. (2012). Globalization, economic freedom, and human rights. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 516–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dreher, A., & Gaston, N. (2008). Has globalization increased inequality? Review of International Economics, 16, 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008a). Measuring globalisation: Gauging its consequences. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dreher, A., Sturm, J. E., & Ursprung, H. W. (2008b). The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: Evidence from panel data. Public Choice, 134, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards, S. (1997). Trade policy, growth, and income distribution. American economic review (Papers and proceedings of the hundred and fourth annual meeting of the American Economic Association), 87, 205–210.Google Scholar
  30. Gandolfo, G., & Marzano, F. (1999). Economic theory and social justice. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  31. Garmann, S. (2014). Does globalization influence protectionism? Empirical evidence from agricultural support. Food Policy, 49, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaston, N., & Rajaguru, G. (2013). International migration and the welfare state revisited. European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gray, M. M., Kittilson, M. C., & Sandholtz, W. (2006). Women and globalization: A study of 180 countries, 1975–2000. International Organization, 60, 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hansson, S. O. (2004). What are opportunities and why should they be equal? Social Choice and Welfare, 22, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heine, J., & Thakur, R. (2011). The dark side of globalization. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2012). Penn world table version 7.1. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  37. Hibbs, D. A, Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71, 1467–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hicks, A., & Swank, D. (1984). On the political economy of welfare expansion: A comparative analysis of 18 advanced capitalist democracies, 1960–1971. Comparative Political Studies, 17, 81–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hillman, A. L. (2008). Globalization and social justice. Singapore Economic Review, 53, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hillman, A. L. (2009). Public finance and public policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 221–233.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, A. (2010). Globalization: Key thinkers. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kilby, C., & Scholz S. J. (2011). The impact of globalization on women: Testing Vandana Shiva’s critique of development. Villanova School of Business Economics Working Paper 15.Google Scholar
  44. Kitching, G. (2001). Seeking social justice through globalization: Escaping a nationalist perspective. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kumar, U., & Mishra, P. (2008). Trade liberalization and wage inequality: Evidence from India. Review of Development Economics, 12, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 15, 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leibrecht, M., Klien, M., & Onaran, O. (2011). Globalization, welfare regimes and social protection expenditures in Western and Eastern European countries. Public Choice, 148, 569–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martens, P., Caselli, M., De Lombaerde, P., Figge, L., & Scholte, J. A. (2014). New directions in globalization indices. Globalizations. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2014.944336.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, H.-P., & Schumann, H. (1997). The global trap: Globalization and the assault on prosperity and democracy. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  50. Meinhard, S., & Potrafke, N. (2012). The globalization-welfare state nexus reconsidered. Review of International Economics, 20, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merkel, W. (2007). Soziale Gerechtigkeit im OECD-Vergleich. In S. Empter & R. B. Vehrkamp (Eds.), Soziale Gerechtigkeit—eine Bestandsaufnahme (pp. 233–257). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  52. Merkel, W., & Giebler, H. (2009). Measuring social justice and sustainable governance in the OECD. In Bertelsmann Stiftung (Ed.), Sustainable governance indicators 2009, policy performance and executive capacity in the OECD (pp. 187–215). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  53. Mezzetti, C. (1987). Paretian efficiency, rawlsian justice and the Nozick theory of rights. Social Choice and Welfare, 4, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds Apart: Measuring international and global inequality. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Norberg, J. (2003). In defense of global capitalism. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  56. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy. New York and Utopia: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  57. Pickering, A., & Rockey, J. (2011). Ideology and the growth of government. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Potrafke, N. (2009). Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice, 140, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Potrafke, N. (2010). Labor market deregulation and globalization: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 146, 545–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Potrafke, N. (2013). Globalization and labor market institutions: International empirical evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41, 829–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Potrafke, N. (2014). The evidence on globalisation. World Economy. doi: 10.1111/twec.12174.Google Scholar
  62. Potrafke, N., & Ursprung, H. W. (2012). Globalization and gender equality in the course of development. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raphael, D. D. (2001). Concepts of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Richardson, J. D. (1995). Income inequality and trade: How to think, what to conclude. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far?. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  67. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  69. Roemer, J. E. (2002). Equality of opportunity: A progress report. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roemer, J. E., Aaberge, R., Colombino, U., Fritzell, J., Jenkins, S. P., Lefranc, A., et al. (2003). To what extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens? Journal of Public Economics, 87, 539–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rudra, N. (2002). Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less-developed countries. International Organization, 56, 411–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Savvides, A. (1998). Trade policy and income inequality: New evidence. Economics Letters, 61, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schulze, G. G., & Ursprung, H. W. (1999). Globalisation of the economy and the nation state. World Economy, 22, 295–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what?. In The tanner lecture on human values I (pp. 197–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  76. Sinn, H.-W. (1997). The selection principle and market failure in systems competition. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sinn, H.-W. (2003). The new systems competition. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  79. Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Making globalization work. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  80. Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sugden, R. (2004). Living with unfairness: The limits of equal opportunity in a market economy. Social Choice and Welfare, 22, 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Traub, S., Seidl, C., Schmidt, U., & Levati, M. V. (2005). Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding—Or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice. Social Choice and Welfare, 24, 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ursprung, H. W. (1991). Economic policies and political competition. In A. L. Hillman (Ed.), Markets and politicians: Politicized economic choice (pp. 1–25). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ursprung, H. W. (2008). Globalization and the welfare state. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed.). Köln: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  85. Vadlamannati, K. C. (2015). Rewards of (dis)integration: Economic, social, and political globalization and freedom of association and collective bargaining rights of workers in developing countries. ILR Review, 68, 3–27.Google Scholar
  86. von Hayek, F. A. (1976). The mirage of social justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  87. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (1998). Party government in 20 democracies: An Update 1990–1995. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 125–164.Google Scholar
  89. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2000). Party Government in 48 Democracies 1945–1998: Composition, Duration, Personnel. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolf, M. (2005). Why globalization works. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Wood, A. (1995). How trade hurt unskilled workers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. World Bank (2002). Globalization, growth, and poverty: Building an inclusive world economy. New York: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ifo Center for Public Finance and Political EconomyIfo InstituteMunichGermany
  2. 2.University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations