Abstract
Most scholarly investigations do not support the often heard claim that globalization impairs the welfare state: observed cuts in welfare programmes appear to be mainly driven by domestic factors. The empirical evidence supporting the converse claim – that globalization gains are used to compensate the losers from global economic integration – is, however, also inconclusive. In order to disentangle the multifaceted and potentially inconsistent globalization effects on the plethora of welfare state activities, future research will have to adopt a more explicit micro-orientation, better econometric techniques, and an empirical research strategy that is more firmly based on political economic theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Avelino, G., D. Brown, and W. Hunter. 2005. The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science 49: 625–641.
Bretschger, L., and F. Hettich. 2002. Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: Theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy 18: 695–716.
Dreher, A. 2006. The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy – an empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy 22: 179–201.
Garrett, G., and D. Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39: 145–177.
Hays, J., D. Ehrlich, and C. Peinhardt. 2005. Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: An empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization 59: 473–494.
Hicks, A., and C. Zorn. 2005. Economic globalization, the macro economy, and reversals of welfare: Expansion in affluent democracies, 1987–94. International Organization 59: 631–662.
Iversen, T., and T. Cusack. 2000. The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics 52: 313–349.
Jahn, D. 2006. Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization 60: 401–431.
Kittel, B., and H. Winner. 2005. How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization–welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research 44: 269–293.
Plümper, T., P. Manow, and V. Troeger. 2005. Pooled data analysis in the comparative political economy of the welfare state: A note on methodology and theory. European Journal of Political Research 44: 327–354.
Podesta, F. 2006. Comparing time series cross-section model specifications: The case of welfare state development. Quality & Quantity 40: 539–559.
Rodrik, D. 1998. Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106: 997–1032.
Ruggie, J.G. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36: 379–415.
Schulze, G., and H.W. Ursprung. 1999. Globalization of the economy and the nation state. World Economy 22: 295–352.
Swank, D. 2002. Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ursprung, H.W. (2018). Globalization and the Welfare State. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2099
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2099
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences