Abstract
Diabetes mellitus might be linked to the deterioration of certain physical properties of dentin and enamel. This study aimed to determine the effect of two types of diabetes on the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin, by using the single bond universal bonding system. Sixty specimens [from 15 teeth; 5 from each group—non-diabetic (ND), Diabetic type I (D1), and Diabetic type II (D2)], were prepared with equal amounts of dentin (n = 5) and enamel (n = 5). Enamel specimens (E20) were etched with 37% phosphoric acid, for 20 s, and dentin specimens (D15) were etched for 15 s. A standard shear bond strength test was performed on all specimens. Their failure modes were also studied under a scanning electron microscope, and the data were analyzed by using ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey’s test (a = 0.050). For the enamel groups, significant differences were only noticed between the ND and D1 (P < 0.050) groups, and between the ND and D2 (P < 0.050) groups. In the dentin groups, there was a significant difference only between the ND and D1 (P < 0.050) groups. The micrographs showed that the ND group had the highest number of specimens with cohesive failure and D1 had the highest number of specimens with adhesive failure. It can be concluded that both types of diabetes reduce the shear bond strength of composite resin on dentin and enamel. However, it seems that the negative effect of diabetes on shear bond strength of dental composite resin is more drastic in individuals with type I diabetes as compared with type II.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mellitus D. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:S5–10.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.
Nathan DM. Initial management of glycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus. NEJM. 2002;347:1342–9.
Guggenheimer J, Moore PA, Rossie K, Myers D, Mongelluzzo MB, Block HM, Weyant R, Orchard T. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and oral soft tissue pathologies: I. Prevalence and characteristics of non-candidal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:563–9.
Chomkhakhai U, Thanakun S, Khovidhunkit SO, Khovidhunkit W, Thaweboon S. Oral health in Thai patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2009;3:192–7.
Sandberg GE, Sundberg HE, Fjellstrom CA, Wikblad KF. Type 2 diabetes and oral health: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;50:27–34.
Fouad AF, Burleson J. The effect of diabetes mellitus on endodontic treatment outcome: data from an electronic patient record. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:43–51.
Saghiri MA, Karamifar K, Fakharzadeh A, Conte M, Morgano SM. Effect of diabetes on tubular density and push-out bond strength of MTA to Dentin. J Endod. 2020;46:1584–91.
Khader YS, Dauod AS, El-Qaderi SS, Alkafajei A, Batayha WQ. Periodontal status of diabetics compared with nondiabetics: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Complications. 2006;20:59–68.
Frantzis TG, Reeve CM, Brown AL Jr. The ultrastructure of capillary basement membranes in the attached gingiva of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 1971;42:406–11.
McMahon MM, Bistrian BR. Host defenses and susceptibility to infection in patients with diabetes mellitus. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 1995;9:1.
Rothwell BR, Richard EL. Diabetes mellitus: medical and dental considerations. Spec Care Dentist. 1984;4:58–65.
Saghiri MA, Aminsobhani M, Gutmann JL, Kawai T, Nath D, Hirschberg C. Effect of diabetes on rotary instrumentation of dentin. J Endod. 2021;47(8):1301–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.03.019.
Saghiri MA, Nath D, Rahmani B, Amini S, Karamifar K, Peters OA. The effect of diabetes on fracture resistance of teeth: an in vitro study. Aust Endod J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12512.
Seino Y, Ishida H. Diabetic osteopenia: pathophysiology and clinical aspects. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1995;11:21–35.
Bortolin RH, Abreu BJ, Ururahy MA, de Souza KS, Bezerra JF, Loureiro MB, da Silva FS, da Silva Marques DE, de Sousa Batista AA, Oliveira G, Luchessi AD. Protection against T1DM-induced bone loss by zinc supplementation: biomechanical, histomorphometric, and molecular analyses in STZ-induced diabetic rats. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125349-e.
Wu K, Schubeck KE, Frost HM, Villanueva A. Haversian bone formation rates determined by a new method in a mastodon, and in human diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res. 1970;6:204–19.
Bouillon R, Bex M, Van Herck E, Laureys J, Dooms L, Lesaffre E, Ravussin E. Influence of age, sex, and insulin on osteoblast function: osteoblast dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:1194–202.
Reddy GK, Stehno-Bittel L, Hamade S, Enwemeka CS. The biomechanical integrity of bone in experimental diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001;54:1–8.
Einhorn TA, Boskey AL, Gundberg CM, Vigorita VJ, Devlin VJ, Beyer MM. The mineral and mechanical properties of bone in chronic experimental diabetes. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:317–23.
Ten Cate A. Oral histology. Dev Struct Funct. 1994;4:173.
Vinagre A, Ramos J. Adhesion in restorative dentistry. Adhesives-applications and properties. New York: InTech; 2016. p. 59–97.
van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent. 1989;17:61–7.
Tantbirojn D, Cheng YS, Versluis A, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Nominal shear or fracture mechanics in the assessment of composite-dentin adhesion? J Dent Res. 2000;79:41–8.
Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: a critical review: Part I. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(4):305–11.
Linklater RA, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study to investigate bond strengths of different tooth types. J Orthod. 2001;28(1):59–65.
Garberoglio R, Brännström M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol. 1976;21(6):355–62.
Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res. 1984;63(8):1079–82.
Watanabe LG, Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ. Dentin shear strength: effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. Dent Mater J. 1996;12(2):109–15.
Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater J. 2001;17(2):122–6.
Obeidi A, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Beck P, Gutknecht N. Acid-etch interval and shear bond strength of Er, Cr: YSGG laser-prepared enamel and dentin. Lasers Med Sci. 2010;25:363–9.
Saghiri MA, Asgar K, Lotfi M, Karamifar K, Saghiri AM, Neelakantan P, Gutmann JL, Sheibaninia A. Back-scattered and secondary electron images of scanning electron microscopy in dentistry: a new method for surface analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70(6):603–9.
Oilo G. Bond strength testing–what does it mean? Int Dent J. 1993;43(5):492–8.
Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:57–67.
Retief DH. The intra-oral factors affecting adhesion. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1970;25(11):392–9.
Schwartz AV. Diabetes mellitus: does it affect bone? Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73:515–9.
Vestergaard P. Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes—a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:427–44.
Leslie WD, Rubin MR, Schwartz AV, Kanis JA. Type 2 diabetes and bone. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:2231–7.
Saito M, Kida Y, Kato S, Marumo K. Diabetes, collagen, and bone quality. Curr Osteoporo Rep. 2014;12:181–8.
Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity: a study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14(5):280–4.
Pashley DH. Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. J Endod. 1986;12(10):465–74.
Wang YL, Chang HH, Chiang YC, Lu YC, Lin CP. Effects of fluoride and epigallocatechin gallate on soft-drink-induced dental erosion of enamel and root dentin. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117(4):276–82.
Saeki K, Marshall GW, Gansky SA, Parkinson CR, Marshall SJ. Strontium effects on root dentin tubule occlusion and nanomechanical properties. Dent Mater J. 2016;32(2):240–51.
Addy M, Smith SR. Dentin hypersensitivity: a overview on which to base tubule occlusion as a management concept. J Clin Dent. 2010;21(Spec Iss):25–30.
Saghiri MA, Saghiri AM. In Memoriam: Dr. Hajar Afsar Lajevardi MD, MSc, MS (1955–2015). Iran J Pediatr. 2017;27(1):1.
Acknowledgements
MAS is a recipient of the New Jersey Health Foundation Innovation Award. This publication is dedicated to the memory of Dr. H. Afsar Lajevardi [45], a legendry pediatrician (1953–2015). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the affiliated organization. The authors hereby announce that they have had active cooperation in this scientific study and preparation of the present manuscript. The authors confirm that they have no financial involvement with any commercial company or organization with direct financial interest regarding the materials used in this study. Special thanks to Dr. Kasra Karamifar and Dr. Amir Fakrzadeh for their invaluable comments. The authors also greatly appreciate and would like to thank Dr. Saied Amini for reviewing the methodology and providing guidance for the statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saghiri, M.A., Obeidi, A., Nath, D. et al. The effect of diabetes mellitus on the shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin and enamel. Odontology 110, 92–98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00641-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00641-0