Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Shear bond strength of different types of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel of deciduous teeth in vitro

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The present study aimed to evaluate the suitability of self-etch adhesives for restoration of deciduous teeth compared with etch and rinse approaches.

Materials and methods

One hundred twenty primary teeth were divided into five groups, each being assigned to an adhesive system. Self-etch adhesives XenoV (XV) and Clearfil S3 Bond (CB), Prime&Bond NT with (PBE)/without preliminary etching (PBN), and Optibond FL (OBFL) as an etch and rinse system were included. Enamel and dentin specimens were prepared (n = 36/group), adhesives applied, and compomer cylinders polymerized. After 24-h storage in 37 °C distilled water and thermo-cycling (1440 cycles, 5/55 °C, 27 s), shear bond tests and fracture mode classification based on SEM investigation were performed. Statistical analysis involved ANOVA and Scheffé procedure with Bonferroni-Holm correction (p ≤ 0.005).

Results

High shear bond strengths to primary enamel were determined for PBE (mean [M] = 22.48 ± 7.7 MPa) > OBFL (M = 19.06 ± 5.62 MPa) > CB (M = 17.6 ± 6.55 MPa), and XV (M = 16.85 ± 5.38 MPa) and PBN (M = 8.26 ± 4.46 MPa) formed significantly less reliable enamel-resin interfaces (p ≤ 0.005). PBE generated the highest bond strength on primary dentin (M = 21.97 ± 8.02 MPa); significantly lower values were measured for XV (M = 13.44 ± 5.43 MPa) and OBFL (M = 12.92 ± 4.31 MPa) (p ≤ 0.005).

Conclusions

Adhesives requiring preliminary etching ensure optimal bond strength to primary enamel. If separate etching is to be avoided, selected self-etch adhesives obtain acceptable shear bond values on primary enamel and dentin.

Clinical relevance

The treatment of pediatric patients presents a great challenge in dental practice, and optimization of treatment processes is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baelum V, Helderman WV, Hugoson A, Yee R, Fejerskov O (2007) A global perspective on changes in the burden of caries and periodontitis: implications for dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 34(12):872–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R (2007) Restorative materials in the primary dentition of poli-caries patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 8(1):29–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marks LA, Faict N, Welbury RR (2010) Literature review: restorations of class II cavities in the primary dentition with compomers. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 11(3):109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. el Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F (1998) Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. ASDC J Dent Child 65(3):169–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turgut MD, Tekcicek M, Olmez S (2004) Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth. Oper Dent 29(5):515–523

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krämer N, Tilch D, Lücker S, Frankenberger R (2013) Status of ten self-etch adhesives for bonding to dentin of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent

  7. Krämer N, Frankenberger R (2007) Compomers in restorative therapy of children: a literature review. Int J Paediatr Dent 17(1):2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atash R, Vanden Abbeele A (2005) Sealing ability and bond strength of four contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine. Eur J Paediatr Dent 6(4):185–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Angker L, Swain MV, Kilpatrick N (2003) Micro-mechanical characterisation of the properties of primary tooth dentine. J Dent 31(4):261–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borges AFS, Bitar RA, Kantovitzc KR, Correr AB, Martin AA, Puppin-Rontani RM (2007) New perspectives about molecular arrangement of primary and permanent dentin. Appl Surf Sci 254(5):1498–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheffel DL, Ricci HA, de Souza Costa CA, Pashley DH, Hebling J (2013) Effect of reducing acid etching time on bond strength to noncarious and caries-affected primary and permanent dentin. Pediatr Dent 35(7):199–204

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scheffel DL, Tenuta LM, Cury JA, Hebling J (2012) Effect of acid etching time on demineralization of primary and permanent coronal dentin. Am J Dent 25(4):235–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R (2001) Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 32(5):385–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. German Cecilia C, Garcia Ballesta C, Cortes Lillo O, Perez Lajarin L (2005) Shear bond strength of a self-etching adhesive in primary and permanent dentition. Am J Dent 18(5):331–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci HA, Sanabe ME, Costa CA, Hebling J (2010) Bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to the dentin of primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35(2):163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marquezan M, da Silveira BL, Burnett LH, Jr., Rodrigues CR, Kramer PF (2008) Microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesives to primary enamel and dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 32 (2):127–132

  17. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Felizardo KR, Lemos LV, de Carvalho RV, Gonini Junior A, Lopes MB, Moura SK (2011) Bond strength of HEMA-containing versus HEMA-free self-etch adhesive systems to dentin. Braz Dent J 22(6):468–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nikhil V, Singh V, Chaudhry S (2011) Comparative evaluation of bond strength of three contemporary self-etch adhesives: an ex vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent 2 (2):94–97

  20. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A (2000) Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25(1):11–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guelmann M, Shapira J, Silva DR, Fuks AB (2011) Esthetic restorative options for pulpotomized primary molars: a review of literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent 36(2):123–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA (2010) Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 26(2):e38–e49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B (2012) Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res 91(4):351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV (2010) Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater 26(2):e78–e93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salz U, Bock T (2010) Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue—a review. J Adhes Dent 12(5):343–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lemos LV, Felizardo KR, Myaki SI, Lopes MB, Moura SK (2012) Bond strength and morphology of resin materials applied to the occlusal surface of primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 22(6):435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lenzi TL, Guglielmi Cde A, Umakoshi CB, Raggio DP (2013) One-step self-etch adhesive bonding to pre-etched primary and permanent enamel. J Dent Child (Chic) 80(2):57–61

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hegde MN, Bhandary S (2008) An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent 11(2):71–75

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chandki R, Kala M (2011) Total etch vs self etch: still a controversy in the science of bonding. Archives of Oral Sciences & Research 1 (1):38–42

  30. Cehreli ZC, Akca T, Altay N (2003) Bond strengths of polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to primary dentin. Am J Dent 16 Spec No:47A-50A

  31. Park JW, Ferracane JL (2014) Water aging reverses residual stresses in hydrophilic dental composites. J Dent Res 93(2):195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gateva N, Kabaktchieva R (2012) Hybrid layer thickness in primary and permanent teeth—a comparison between total-etch adhesives. Journal of IMAB 18(2):191–199

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lenzi TL, Braga MM, Raggio DP (2014) Shortening the etching time for etch-and-rinse adhesives increases the bond stability to simulated caries-affected primary dentin. J Adhes Dent

  34. Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM (2008) Effect of acid etching time on bond strength of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to primary tooth dentine affected by amelogenesis imperfecta. Int J Paediatr Dent 18(3):224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM (1997) Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 25(5):355–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gonzalez G, Rich AP, Finkelman MD, Defuria C (2012) Shear bond strength of seventh generation bonding agents on dentin of primary teeth—an in vitro study. Gen Dent 60(1):46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Manhart J, Trumm C (2010) Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging. Clin Oral Investig 14(6):699–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahoney P (2013) Testing functional and morphological interpretations of enamel thickness along the deciduous tooth row in human children. Am J Phys Anthropol 151(4):518–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Lars Kaderali (Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry) for his support concerning the statistical evaluation of the measured data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic of Operative Dentistry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    A. Kensche, F. Dähne, C. Wagenschwanz, G. Viergutz & C. Hannig

  2. Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    G. Richter

Authors
  1. A. Kensche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Dähne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Wagenschwanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Richter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Viergutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Hannig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Kensche.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kensche, A., Dähne, F., Wagenschwanz, C. et al. Shear bond strength of different types of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel of deciduous teeth in vitro. Clin Oral Invest 20, 831–840 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1560-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1560-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation