Skip to main content
Log in

Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines whether government ideology has influenced the allocation of public expenditures in OECD countries. I analyze two datasets that report different expenditure categories and cover the time periods 1970–1997 and 1990–2006, respectively. The results suggest that government ideology has had a rather weak influence on the composition of governments’ budgets. Leftist governments, however, increased spending on “Public Services” in the period 1970–1997 and on “Education” in the period 1990–2006. These findings imply, first, that government ideology hardly influenced budgetary affairs in the last decades, and thus, if ideology plays a role at all, it influences non-budgetary affairs. Second, education has become an important expenditure category for leftist parties to signal their political visions to voters belonging to all societal groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina A (1987) Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Q J Econ 102: 651–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Roubini N, Cohen GD (1997) Political cycles and the macroeconomy. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt JE, Lassen DD (2006) Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. Eur Econ Rev 50: 1403–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelopoulos K, Economides G (2008) Fiscal policy, rent seeking, and growth under electoral uncertainty: theory and evidence from the OECD. Can J Econ 41: 1375–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell BW (2008) University challenges explaining institutional change in higher education. World Polit 60: 189–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck N, Katz JN (1996) Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time-series cross section models. Polit Anal 6: 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr A (2003) A comparison of dynamic panel data estimators: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to the investment function. Discussion paper 05/03, Economic Research Center of the Deutsche Bundesbank

  • Bel G, Elias-Moreno F (2009) Institutional determinants of military spending. Working Paper 2009/22, Research Institute of Applied Economics, Barcelona

  • Bercoff JJ, Meloni O (2009) Federal budget allocation in an emergent democracy: evidence from Argentina. Econ Gov 10: 65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts JR, Morrell D (1999) The determinants of undergraduate grade point average: The relative importance of family background, high school resources, and peer group effects. J Hum Resour 34: 268–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbrauer F (2009) Optimal income taxation and public good provision with endogenous interest groups. J Public Econ Theory 11: 311–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov C (2005) Does political ideology affect economic growth?. Public Choice 123: 133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov C (2008a) The growth-inequality association: government ideology matters. J Dev Econ 87: 300–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov C (2008b) Political ideology and the structure of national accounts in the Nordic countries, 1950–2004. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Jena 27–30, March 2008

  • Bjørnskov C, Potrafke N (2011a) Politics and privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: a panel data analysis. Econ Transit (forthcoming)

  • Bjørnskov C, Potrafke N (2011b) Political ideology and economic freedom across Canadian provinces. East Econ J (forthcoming)

  • Bloom D, Canning D, Mansfield RK, Moore M (2007) Demographic change, social security systems, and savings. J Monet Econ 54: 92–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell RW, Bond SR (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic Panel data models. J Econ 87: 115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix C (1997) Political parties and the supply side of the economy: the provision of Physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–1990. Am J Polit Sci 41: 814–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix C (1998) Political parties, growth and equality—conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bräuninger T (2005) A partisan model of government expenditure. Public Choice 125: 409–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno GSF (2005a) Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Econ Lett 87: 361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno GSF (2005b) Estimation and inference in dynamic unbalanced panel data models with a small number of individuals. Stata J 5: 473–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge I, Keman H, Woldendorp J (1993) Political data 1945–1990. Party government in 20 democracies. Eur J Polit Res 24: 1–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer MR (2007) Determinants of public education spending in 21 OECD democracies, 1980–2001. J Eur Public Policy 14: 582–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer MR (2009a) Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education. J Eur Public Policy 16: 107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer MR (2009b) From myth to reality: globalization and public spending in OECD countries revisited. Eur J Polit Res 48: 455–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcagno PT, Escaleras M (2007) Party alternation, divided government, and fiscal performance within US states. Econ Gov 8: 111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congleton RD, Bose F (2010) The rise of the modern welfare state, ideology, institutions and income security: analysis and evidence. Public Choice 144: 535–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa H, Kim J-W (1992) A causal analysis of defence expenditures of the USA and the USSR. J Peace Res 29: 161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer H, De Donder P, Gahvari F (2008) Political competition within and between parties: an application to environmental policy. J Public Econ 92: 532–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Donder P, Hindriks J (2007) Equilibrium social insurance with policy-motivated parties. Eur J Polit Econ 23: 624–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen A, Eslava M (2010) Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: Theory and evidence. J Dev Econ 92: 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38: 1091–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Sturm J-E, Ursprung HW (2008) The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: Evidence from panel data. Public Choice 134: 263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008) Measuring globalization—gauging its consequences. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemmell N, Kneller R, Sanz I (2008) Foreign investment, international trade and the size and structure of public expenditures. Eur J Polit Econ 24: 151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman JC (2002) Variable rational partisan business cycles: theory and some evidence. Can J Econ 35: 568–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz W (2000) The institutional environment for growth. Econ Polit 12: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs DA Jr (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 71: 1467–1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks AM, Swank D (1992) Politics, institutions and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960-82. Am Polit Sci Rev 86: 658–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber E, Stephens JD (2001) Development and crisis of the welfare state. Parties and policies in global markets. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut EM (1992) Health politics—interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen T, Stephens JD (2008) Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comp Polit Stud 41: 600–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen C (2010) Issue compensation and right-wing social spending. Eur J Polit Res 49: 282–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen C (2011a) Marketization via compensation: Health care and the politics of the right in advanced industrialized nations. Br J Polit Sci (forthcoming)

  • Jensen C (2011b) Determinants of welfare service provision after the Golden Age. Int J Soc Welf (forthcoming)

  • Jensen C (2011c) Capitalist systems, de-industrialization, and the politics of public education. Comp Polit Stud (forthcoming)

  • Johansen K, Mydland Ø, Strøm B (2007) Politics in wage setting: does government colour matter?. Econ Gov 8: 95–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsimi M, Sarantides V (2010) Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy? CESifo working paper series no. 2908

  • Kittel B, Obinger H (2003) Politicial parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. J Eur Public Policy 10: 20–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone RD, McKenzie KJ (2001) Electoral and partisan cycles in fiscal policy: An examination of Canadian provinces. Int Tax Public Finance 8: 753–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lago-Peñas I, Lago-Peñas S (2009) Does the nationalization of party systems affect the composition of public spending?. Econ Gov 10: 85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange P, Garrett G (1985) The politics of growth: strategic interaction and economic performance in advanced industrialized democracies, 1974–1980. J Polit 47: 792–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurency P, Schindler D (2010) Why green parties should fear successful international climate agreements. Discussion paper no. 56, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut Kreuzlingen

  • Merzyn W, Ursprung HW (2005) Voter support for privatizing education: evidence, self-interest and ideology. Eur J Polit Econ 25: 33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nincic M, Cusack TR (1979) The political economy of US military spending. J Peace Res 16: 101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (1975) The political business cycle. Rev Econ Stud 42: 169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberndorfer U, Steiner V (2007) Generationen- oder Parteienkonflikt? Eine empirische Analyse der deutschen Hochschulausgaben. Perspekt Wirtsch 8: 165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) Health Data Base, Paris

  • OECD (2008a) Main Economic Indicators, Paris

  • OECD (2008b) Economic Outlook, Paris

  • Ono T (2009) The political economy of environmental and social security policies: The role of environmental lobbying. Econ Gov 10: 261–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Polit 48: 143–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P (2001) Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In: Pierson P (ed) The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke N (2009a) Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice 140: 105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke N (2009b) Does government ideology influence political alignment with the U.S.? An empirical analysis of voting in the UN General Assembly. Rev Int Organ 4: 245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke N (2010a) The growth of public health expenditures in OECD countries: Do government ideology and electoral motives matter?. J Health Econ 29: 797–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke N (2010) Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Public Choice 143: 135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke N (2010c) Ideology and cultural policy. Discussion paper no. 49, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut Kreuzlingen

  • Potrafke N (2011a) Public expenditures on education and cultural affairs in the West German states: Does government ideology influence the budget composition?. Ger Econ Rev 12: 124–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke N (2011b) Political cycles and economic performance in OECD countries: empirical evidence from 1951–2006. Public Choice (forthcoming)

  • Rogoff K, Sibert A (1988) Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Rev Econ Stud 55: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71: 135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2006) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to “Difference” and “System” GMM in Stata. Working paper 103, Center for Global Development

  • Rose R (1990) Inheritance before choice in public policy. J Theor Polit 2: 263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto T (2008) Economic policy and performance in industrial democracies – party governments, central banks and the fiscal-monetary policy mix. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz I, Velázquez F (2007) The role of aging in the growth of government and social welfare spending in the OECD. Eur J Polit Econ 23: 917–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MG (2007) Testing the retrenchment hypothesis: education spending, 1960–2002. In: Castles FG (ed) The disappearing state? Retrenchment realities in an age of globalization. Edward Elgar, Celtenham, pp 159–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider C, Urpelainen J (2010) Partisan waves in international cooperation. Working paper, University of California, San Diego

  • Schulze GG, Rose A (1998) Public orchestra funding in Germany—an empirical investigation. J Cult Econ 22: 227–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze GG, Ursprung HW (1999) Globalization of the economy and the nation state. World Econ 22: 295–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze GG, Ursprung HW (2000) La donna e mobile—or is she? Voter preferences and public support for the performing arts. Public Choice 102: 131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton CA (2007) The size and composition of government expenditure. J Public Econ 91: 2230–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi M, Svensson J (2006) Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why?. J Public Econ 90: 1367–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (2008) Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed-effects panel-data regression. Econometrica 76: 155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylwester K (2002) Can education expenditures reduce income inequality?. Econ Educ Rev 21: 43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares J (2004) Does right or left matter? Cabinets, credibility and fiscal adjustment. J Public Econ 88: 2447–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2009a) Educational business cycles—the political economy of teacher hiring across German states, 1992–2004. Public Choice 139: 61–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2009b) Are aging OECD welfare states on the path to gerontocracy? Evidence from 18 democracies, 1980–2002. J Public Policy 29: 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2010) Who cuts back and when? The politics of delays in social expenditure cutbacks, 1980–2005. West Eur Polit 33: 1214–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tridimas G (2001) The economics and politics of the structure of public expenditure. Public Choice 106: 299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsakloglou P, Antoninis M (1999) On the distributional impact of public education: evidence from Greece. Econ Educ Rev 18: 439–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ursprung HW (2008) Globalization and the welfare state. In: Durlauf SN, Blume L (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Köln

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergne C (2009) Democracy, elections and allocation of public expenditures in developing countries. Eur J Polit Econ 25: 63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp J, Keman H, Budge I (1998) Party government in 20 democracies: an update 1990–1995. Eur J Polit Res 33: 125–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp J, Keman H, Budge I (2000) Party government in 48 democracies 1945–1998: composition, duration, personnel. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) World development indicators. Washington, DC

  • World Bank (2008) World development indicators. Washington, DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niklas Potrafke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potrafke, N. Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Econ Gov 12, 101–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-010-0092-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-010-0092-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation