Skip to main content
Log in

Visual discrimination and object categorization in the cichlid Pseudotropheus sp.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object categorization is an important function of the visual system, quickly providing an animal with relevant information about its surrounding and current situation, as for example during predator detection. While the ability to categorize objects has already been observed in several vertebrate and even invertebrate species, no attempt has previously been made to evaluate this function in fish, the most species-rich vertebrate group. This study assessed form discrimination abilities and object categorization skills in the African cichlid Pseudotropheus sp. Fish could discriminate between a variety of two-dimensional geometrical shapes, forms and sizes and learned to distinguish between two categories, “fish” versus “snail”. Performance remained undisturbed by extensive modifications to the stimuli, as long as key features were maintained. Results indicate that fish not only memorized the features of the positive stimulus (categorized the positive stimulus), but also categorized the negative stimulus. During transfer trials involving a previously unknown object, fish were able to discriminate between both the negative and the positive stimulus and the unknown stimulus and responded accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aust U, Huber L (2001) The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 29:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt RS, Wasserman EA, Reynolds WF Jr, Knauss KS (1988) Conceptual behavior in pigeons: categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 14:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet D, Vauclair J (1998) Functional categorization of objects and of their pictures in baboons (Papio anubis). Learn Motiv 29:309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Laland K, Krause J (2006) Fish cognition and behavior, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RG, Smith JD (2006) Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning. Psychol Sci 17:1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato MR, Van Sant P (1988) The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 14:43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso FW, Basil JA (2009) The evolution of flexible behavioral repertoires in cephalopod molluscs. Brain Behav Evol 74:231–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science 146:549–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herter K (1929) Dressurversuche an Fischen, Report aus dem zoologischen Institut der Universität Berlin

  • Herter K (1930) Weitere Dressurversuche an Fischen, Report aus dem Zoologischen Institut der Universität Berlin

  • Hoffmann KL, Logothetis NK (2009) Cortical mechanisms of sensory learning and object recognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol 364:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Lenz R (1996) Categorization of prototypical stimulus classes by pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 48:134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Jitsumori M, Matsuzawa T (1991) Picture perception in monkey and pigeons: transfer of right-up versus upside-down discrimination of photographic objects across conceptual categories. Primates 32:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CD, Osorio D (2003) Discrimination of oriented visual textures by poultry chicks. Vis Res 44:83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser W, Liske E (1974) Die optomotorischen Reaktionen von fixiert fliegenden –Bienen bei Reizung mit Spektrallichtern. J Comp Physiol A 89:391–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Königs K (2003) Visual discrimination experiments concerning cognitive abilities in teleost fish (Lepomis gibbosus). Diplom Thesis, University of Bonn

  • Lazareva OF, Freiburger LK, Wassermann EA (2004) Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels. Pyschon Bull Rev 11:1111–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubow R (1974) High-order concept formation in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 21:475–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mauck B, Dehnhardt G (1997) Mental rotation in a California sea lion (Zalophus Californianus). J Exp Biol 200:1309–1316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meesters A (1940) Über die Organisation des Gesichtsfeldes der Fische. Z Tierpsychol 4:84–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervis CB, Rosch E (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Ann Rev Psychol 32:89–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murai C, Tomonaga M, Kamegai K, Terazawa N, Yamaguchi MK (2004) Do infant Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) categorize objects without specific training? Primates 45:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch F, Jarosch E (1972) Individuelle Lernstrategien von Totenkopfäffchen bei der Diskriminierung von visuellen Sequenzen. Psychol Res 35:335–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philips KA (1996) Natural conceptual behavior in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): an experimental investigation. Primates 37:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WA, Mazmanian DS (1988) Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 14:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller A (1926) Sinnesphysiologische und psychologische Untersuchungen an Wasserkäfern und Fischen. Report aus dem zoologischen Institut der Universität München

  • Schustermann RJ, Thomas T (1966) Shape discrimination and transfer in the California sea lion. Psychon Sci 5:21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebeck UE, Litherland L, Wallis GM (2009) Shape learning and discrimination in reef fish. J Exp Biol 212:2113–2119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EE, Medin DI (1981) Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovrano VA, Bisazza A (2008) Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish. Anim Cogn 11:161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spinozzi G (1996) Categorization in monkeys and chimpanzees. Behav Brain Res 74:17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spinozzi G, Lubrano G, Truppa V (2004) Categorization of above and below spatial relations by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 118:403–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV (2010) Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. Annu Rev Entomol 55:267–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland NS (1964) Visual discrimination of animals. Br Med Bull 20:54–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka K (2000) Mechanisms of visual object recognition studied in monkeys. Spat Vis 13:147–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Frisch K (1914) Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zoologischer Jahresbericht der Abteilung für Allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie 35:1–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk J, MacDonald SE (2002) Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction. J Exp Anal Behav 78:315–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, Kiedinger RE, Bhatt RS (1988) Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Proc 14:235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyzisk K (2005) Experimente zur Formen- und Größenwahrnehmung beim Goldfisch (Carassius auratus) unter Verwendung von Scheinkonturen und Größentäuschungen. PhD Thesis, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

  • Wyzisk K, Neumeyer C (2007) Perception of illusionary surfaces and contours in goldfish. Vis Neurosci 24:291–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikubo S (1985) Species discrimination and concept formation by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Primates 26:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoccolan D, Oertelt N, DiCarlo JJ, Cox DD (2009) A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106:8748–8753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Stefanie Gierszewski for help with the graphics in Fig. 1. The research reported herein was performed under the guidelines established by the current German animal protection law.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Schluessel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schluessel, V., Fricke, G. & Bleckmann, H. Visual discrimination and object categorization in the cichlid Pseudotropheus sp.. Anim Cogn 15, 525–537 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0480-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0480-3

Keywords

Navigation