Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of pamidronate and synthetic human calcitonin in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a double-blind controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy of pamidronate (PAM) and synthetic human calcitonin (CT) in intravenous infusion for recent painful benign vertebral compression in a randomised prospective double-blind study. Twenty-seven patients aged 49–85 years with painful benign non-traumatic vertebral compression were included in the study. They received either PAM (1 mg/kg) or synthetic human CT (1.5 mg) as an intravenous infusion. Pain and functional disability were evaluated before infusion, and 4 and 30 days afterwards. The pain score assessed on a visual analogue scale at day 0 was 5.94±2.47 in patients treated with PAM and 6.27±2.50 in patients treated with CT (p=0.74); at day 4, 4.8±2.80 with PAM vs 3.9±2.68 with CT (p=0.37); and at day 30, 3.6±3.13 with PAM vs 3.10±2.76 with CT (p=0.70). Spinal function scores were 18.21±3.17 at day 0 in patients treated with PAM vs 17.23±4.42 in patients treated with CT (p=0.69) and at day 30, 13.7±5.36 with PAM vs 12.33±3.22 with CT (p=0.68). We found no advantage of PAM over CT in a single intravenous infusion for the treatment of painful recent benign vertebral compression. Since CT is ten times less costly, its use should be preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJ, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129:1000–1011

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blau LA, Hoehns JD (2003) Analgesic efficacy of calcitonin for vertebral fracture pain. Ann Pharmacother 37:564–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hortobagyi GN, Thériault RL, Porter L, Blayney D, Lipton A, Sinoff C, Wheeler H, Simeone JF, Seaman J, Knight RD (1996) Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 335:1785–1791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappagallo M, Breuer B, Schneider A, Sperber K (2003) Treatment of chronic mechanical spinal pain with intravenous pamidronate: a review of medical records. J Pain Symptom Manage 26:678–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of a semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 11:626–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coste J, Le Parc JM, Berge E, Delecoeuillerie G, Paolaggi JB (1993) French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire). Rev Rhum 60:335–341 (article in French)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Silverman SL, Azria M (2002) The analgesic role of calcitonin following osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:858–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gennari C, Agnusdei D, Camporeale A (1991) Use of calcitonin in the treatment of bone pain associated with osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 49(Suppl 2):S9–S13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maresca V (1985) Human calcitonin in the management of osteoporosis: a multicentre study. J Int Med Res 13:311–316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wuster C, Schurr W, Scharla S, Raue F, Minne HW, Ziegler R (1991) Superior local tolerability of human versus salmon calcitonin preparations in young healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41:211–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lyritis GP, Tsakalakos N, Magiasis B, Karachalios T, Yiatzides A, Tsekoura M (1991) Analgesic effect of salmon calcitonin in osteoporotic vertébra fractures: a double-blind-placebo controlled clinical study. Calcif Tissue Int 49(6):369–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paterson AH (1997) Should bisphosphonates be standard therapy for bone pain? Support Care Cancer 5:200–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gangji V, Appelboom T (1999) Analgesic effect of intravenous pamidronate on chronic back pain due to osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Clin Rheumatol 18:266–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Godfrin B, Alvarez M, Laroche M, Ollier S, Dingremont C, Sailler L, Arlet P (2000) Analgesic effect of a diphosphonate perfusion during the acute phase of vertebral compression in the elderly subject. Rev Med Interne 21:1004–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fleisch H (1998) Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. Endocr Rev 19:80–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coukell AJ, Markham A (1998) Pamidronate. A review of its use in the management of osteolytic bone metastases, tumour-induced hypercalcaemia and Paget’s disease of bone. Drugs Aging 12:149–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gold DT (1996) The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone 18(3 Suppl):185S–189S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross PD (1997) Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103(2A):30S–43S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ryan PJ, Blake G, Herd R, Fogelman I (1994) A clinical profile of back pain and disability in patients with spinal osteoporosis. Bone 15:27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Melton LJ (1997) Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis. Spine 22(24 Suppl):2S–11S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, Flipo RM, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Delcambre B (1999) Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol 26:2222–2228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Laroche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laroche, M., Cantogrel, S., Jamard, B. et al. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of pamidronate and synthetic human calcitonin in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a double-blind controlled study. Clin Rheumatol 25, 683–686 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-005-0159-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-005-0159-0

Keywords

Navigation