Abstract
Earthquakes are one of the most terrible and catastrophic natural disasters, responsible for widespread infrastructure and population losses. This study presented an integrated procedure to assess seismic risk considering the seismic hazard, vulnerability, coping capacity and resilience in the seismically active area in Northern, Pakistan. High-resolution satellite imageries coupled with extensive field investigations have led to the creation of building footprints along with building typological information. Twenty-eight envisaging subfactors related to seismic hazard, physical, social and economic vulnerability accompanied by response and recovery were utilized for the evaluation of detail and comprehensive seismic risk map. Overriding the constraint of limited factors and using the rich vulnerability data on a local scale, a detailed risk assessment at high resolution is performed to identify sites prone to high seismic risk. Prepared with Arc GIS grid technology and Analytical Hierarchy Process, the seismic vulnerability map revealed that 1.8 km2 (6.4%) and 0.5 km2 (1.8%) of the total area have high to very high vulnerability. The final seismic risk map shows that villages including Chella Bandi, Dhanni Mysiba, Makri, Dherian Syedian, Ranjata, Baila Noor Shah, Taami, Middle Gojra, Lower Gojra, Rasheed Abad and Upper Chattar lie in high-risk class while Pilot, Madina Market area, Shahnara and Domail villages fall in very high class taking up an area of 1.8 km2 (6.4%). Seismic risk hotspots identified in this study can help decision-makers in prioritizing the deployment of funds and other resource allocation in these areas. This knowledge informs building codes and land use planning, guaranteeing higher building standards in seismically active areas. Critical structures in designated hotspots are the main focus of infrastructure design and retrofitting efforts can be aimed at improving their seismic resilience framework. Plans for emergency responses can be created taking into account possible effects in high-risk regions to enable effective and focused crisis management. Furthermore, these results impact public awareness campaigns, insurance plans, and community involvement programs to lessen the overall damage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ahmad RA, Singh RP (2016) Use of remote sensing and topographic slope in evaluating seismic site-conditions in Damascus region. In: International geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS)
Ahmad RA, Singh RP, Adris A (2017) Seismic hazard assessment of Syria using seismicity, DEM, slope, active faults and GIS. Remote Sens Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.04.003
Ahmed T, Rehman K, Shafique M, Ali W (2023) GIS-based earthquake potential analysis in Northwest Himalayan, Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci 82:113
Alizadeh M, Ngah I, Hashim M et al (2018) A hybrid analytic network process and artificial neural network (ANP-ANN) model for urban earthquake vulnerability assessment. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060975
Allen TI, Wald DJ (2009) On the use of high-resolution topographic data as a proxy for seismic site conditions (VS30). Bull Seismol Soc Am. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080255
Armaş I, Ionescu R, Gavriş A, Toma-Danila D (2016) Identifying seismic vulnerability hotspots in Bucharest. Appl Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.10.001
Ayub M, Rahman A-U, Khan A (2021) Extent and evaluation of flood resilience in Muzaffarabad City, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. J Himal Earth Sci 54
Badawy A, Korrat I, El-Hadidy M, Gaber H (2017) Update earthquake risk assessment in Cairo, Egypt. J Seismol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9621-5
Bahadori H, Hasheminezhad A, Karimi A (2017) Development of an integrated model for seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings: application to Mahabad City, Iran. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.05.014
Balijepalli C, Oppong O (2014) Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas. J Transp Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.025
Basa N, Shafique M, Bacha AS et al (2016) Landslides induced vulnerability and risk assessment in Muzaffarabad and Balakot, Pakistan. J Himal Earth Sci 49
Båth M (1981) Earthquake magnitude—recent research and current trends. Earth Sci Rev 17
Beck E, André-Poyaud I, Davoine PA et al (2012) Risk perception and social vulnerability to earthquakes in Grenoble (French Alps). J Risk Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.652649
Blahut J, Glade T, Sterlacchini S (2014) Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy. J Mt Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
Cardona OD, Van Aalst MK, Birkmann J et al (2012) Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. In: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0008-8
Corominas J, van Westen C, Frattini P et al (2014) Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
Crespo MJ, Benjumea B, Moratalla JM et al (2022) A proxy-based model for estimating VS30 in the Iberian Peninsula. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 155:107165
Crowley H, Colombi M, Borzi B et al (2009) A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9100-7
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710375105
Davidson R (1997) A multidisciplinary urban earthquake disaster risk index. Earthq Spectra 13
Debnath R (2013) An assessment of spatio-temporal pattern of urban earthquake vulnerability using GIS: a study on Dhaka City. Ann GIS. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2013.782468
EM-DAT (2023) Database | EM-DAT
Fayaz M, Romshoo SA, Rashid I, Chandra R (2023) Earthquake vulnerability assessment of the built environment in the city of Srinagar, Kashmir Himalaya, using a geographic information system. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1593-2023
Galli M, Guzzetti F (2007) Landslide vulnerability criteria: a case study from Umbria, central Italy. Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0325-4
Gao Z, Ding M, Huang T, Hu X (2021) Geohazard vulnerability assessment in Qiaojia seismic zones, SW China. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101928
Hajibabaee M, Amini-Hosseini K, Ghayamghamian MR (2014) Earthquake risk assessment in urban fabrics based on physical, socioeconomic and response capacity parameters (a case study: Tehran city). Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1300-7
Hancilar U, El-Hussain I, Sesetyan K et al (2018) Earthquake risk assessment for the building inventory of Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3357-1
Iqbal T (2011) Seismicity of Pakistan and formulation of attenuation relationship
Jena R, Pradhan B (2020) Integrated ANN-cross-validation and AHP-TOPSIS model to improve earthquake risk assessment. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101723
Jena R, Pradhan B, Beydoun G et al (2020) Integrated model for earthquake risk assessment using neural network and analytic hierarchy process: Aceh province, Indonesia. Geosci Front. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.07.006
Kamranzad F, Memarian H, Zare M (2020) Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran, Iran. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070430
Karimiparidari S, Zaré M, Memarian H, Kijko A (2013) Iranian earthquakes, a uniform catalog with moment magnitudes. J Seismol 17:897–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-013-9360-9
Kaur H, Gupta S, Parkash S, Thapa R (2018) Application of geospatial technologies for multi-hazard mapping and characterization of associated risk at local scale. Ann GIS. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2018.1424739
Khazai B, Kilic O, Basmaci A et al (2008) Megacity indicators system for disaster risk management-implementation in Istanbul. Megacity Istanbul Project Reports Municipality Disaster Management Center (AKOM), Istanbul, Turkey
Mall DM, Singh AP, Sarkar D (2005) Structure and seismotectonics of Satpura, Central India. Curr Sci 88
McGowan SM, Jaiswal KS, Wald DJ (2017) Using structural damage statistics to derive macroseismic intensity within the Kathmandu valley for the 2015 M7.8 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake. Tectonophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.08.002
Mona L (2014) Seismic hazard assessment of District Mansehra, Khyber Pakhtoonkhawa, Pakistan. Acta Geol Sin Engl Ed 88:1157–1168
Pavel F, Vacareanu R (2016) Scenario-based earthquake risk assessment for Bucharest, Romania. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.006
Peiris N, Rossetto T, Burton P, Mahmoud S (2008) Kashmir Pakistand Earthquake of October 8 2005. A Field Report by EEFIT
Pelling M, Wisner B (2012) Disaster risk reduction: cases from urban Africa. Routledge
Rehman K, Burton PW (2020) Seismicity and seismic hazard parameters in and around Pakistan. J Seismol 24:635–653
Rehman K, Burton PW, Weatherill GA (2018) Application of Gumbel I and Monte Carlo methods to assess seismic hazard in and around Pakistan. J Seismol 22:575–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9723-8
Riaz MT, Basharat M, Brunetti MT, Riaz MT (2023) Semi-quantitative landslide risk assessment of district Muzaffarabad, northwestern Himalayas, Pakistan. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02462-9
Ricci P, Verderame GM, Manfredi G et al (2011) Seismic vulnerability assessment using field survey and remote sensing techniques. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics)
Robat Mili R, Amini Hosseini K, Izadkhah YO (2018) Developing a holistic model for earthquake risk assessment and disaster management interventions in urban fabrics. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.022
Saaty RW (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation (decision making series). Math Model
Sarmah T, Das S (2018) Earthquake vulnerability assessment for RCC buildings of Guwahati City using rapid visual screening. In: Procedia engineering
Sarris A, Loupasakis C, Soupios P et al (2010) Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of urban areas in high seismic regions: Application to Chania City, Crete Island, Greece. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9475-z
Scordilis EM (2006) Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. J Seismol 10:225–236
Shah NA, Shafique M, Ishfaq M et al (2023) Integrated approach for landslide risk assessment using geoinformation tools and field data in Hindukush Mountain Ranges, Northern Pakistan. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043102
Shahzad L, Akram K, Mansoor A, Iqbal F (2015) A study on Community Resilience Framework for a disaster prone area of Muzaffarabad
Shi Y, Seeland K (2019) Using RISKPLAN for earthquake risk assessment in Sichuan Province, China. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11061812
Silva V, Amo-Oduro D, Calderon A et al (2018) Global earthquake model (GEM) seismic risk map. 2018
Silva V, Crowley H, Varum H, Pinho R (2015) Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9630-0
Sinadinovski C, Edwards M, Corby N et al (2005) Earthquake risk. Natural hazard risk in Perth, WA, GeoCat
Tahirkheli RAK (1979) Geology of Kohistan and adjoining Eurasian and Indo-Pakistan continents, Pakistan. Geol Bull Univ Peshawar Spec Issue 15:1–51
Tahirkheli RAK (1982) Geology of the Himalaya, Karakoram and Hindukush in Pakistan. Geol Bull Univ Peshawar 15:1–51
Tapponnier P, Mattauer M, Proust F, Cassaigneau C (1981) Mesozoic ophiolites, sutures, and arge-scale tectonic movements in Afghanistan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 52:355–371
UNDRR (2022) Milestones in the history of disaster risk reduction. In: UNDRR history
Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Vicente R, Parodi S, Lagomarsino S et al (2011) Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3
Wald DJ, Allen TI (2007) Topographic slope as a proxy for seismic site conditions and amplification. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1379–1395
Wang J, Main IG, Musson RMW (2017) Earthquake clustering in modern seismicity and its relationship with strong historical earthquakes around Beijing, China. Geophys J Int. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx326
Waseem M, Khan S, Asif Khan M (2020) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Pakistan territory using an areal source model. Pure Appl Geophys 177
Waseem M, Lai CG, Spacone E (2018) Seismic hazard assessment of northern Pakistan. Nat Hazards 90:563–600
Wisner B (2013) Assessment of capability and vulnerability. In: Mapping vulnerability. Routledge, pp 183–193
Yariyan P, Zabihi H, Wolf ID et al (2020) Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with artificial neural networks based on GIS: a case study of Sanandaj in Iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101705
Yildiz SS, Karaman H (2013) Post-earthquake ignition vulnerability assessment of Küçü kçekmece district. Nat Hazard. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3357-2013
Yousefi M, Taghikhany T (2014) Incorporation of directivity effect in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and disaggregation of Tabriz city. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1096-5
Zou Q, Cui P, He J et al (2019) Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—an HRU-based approach. Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
Zuccaro G, Cacace F (2015) Seismic vulnerability assessment based on typological characteristics. The first level procedure “SAVE.” Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.003
(2018) Munich Re 2018. Munich Reinsurance Company MunichRe, NatCatSERVICE Analysis Tool, Natural Loss Events 1980–2018.
(2009) UNISDR, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to GIS and Space Applications in Geosciences (GSAG) Laboratory, National Centre of GIS and Space Applications (NCGSA), Pakistan for providing support and to the National Centre of Excellence in Geology (NCEG), the University of Peshawar, Pakistan to facilities the research work. The authors also appreciate Talha Mehbob (GSAG) and Gul Muhammad Khan (driver in NCEG) for their efforts in the collection of field data.
Funding
No funding is received for this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: TA. Methodology: TA, KR, MS. Formal analysis: WA. Resources: MS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, T., Rehman, K., Shafique, M. et al. Local-scale integrated seismic risk assessment using satellite data and field information in Northern Pakistan. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02661-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02661-y