Abstract
Risk has been defined, for management purposes, as the potential economic, social and environmental consequences of hazardous events that may occur in a specified period of time. However, in the past, the concept of risk has been defined in a fragmentary way in many cases, according to each scientific discipline involved in its appraisal. From the perspective of this article, risk requires a multidisciplinary evaluation that takes into account not only the expected physical damage, the number and type of casualties or economic losses, but also the conditions related to social fragility and lack of resilience conditions, which favour the second order effects (indirect effects) when a hazard event strikes an urban centre. The proposed general method of urban risk evaluation is multi hazard and holistic, that is, an integrated and comprehensive approach to guide decision-making. The evaluation of the potential physical damage (hard approach) as the result of the convolution of hazard and physical vulnerability of buildings and infrastructure is the first step of this method. Subsequently, a set of social context conditions that aggravate the physical effects are also considered (soft approach). In the method here proposed, the holistic risk evaluation is based on urban risk indicators. According to this procedure, a physical risk index is obtained, for each unit of analysis, from existing loss scenarios, whereas the total risk index is obtained by factoring the former index by an impact factor or aggravating coefficient, based on variables associated with the socio-economic conditions of each unit of analysis. Finally, the proposed method is applied in its single hazard form to the holistic seismic risk evaluation for the cities of Bogota (Colombia) and Barcelona (Spain).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbat, A. H. and Cardona O. D.: 2003, Vulnerability and disaster risk indices from engineering perspective and holistic approach to consider hard and soft variables at urban level, IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, http://idea.unalmzl. edu.co, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales
Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I. and Wisner B. (1996). Vulnerability, the Social Environment of the Disasters (in Spanish). La Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina, La RED/ITDG, Bogota
Cannon T. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of Natural Hazards. In: (eds) Disasters Development and Environment, pp. Wiley, Chichester
Cardona O. D. (1996). Environmental management and disaster prevention: two associated topics (in Spanish). In: Fernández, M. A. (eds) Cities in Risk (in Spanish), pp. La RED, USAID
Cardona, O. D.: 2001, Holistic evaluation of the seismic risk using complex dynamic systems (in Spanish), PhD Thesis, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Cardona O. D. (2004). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In: Frerks, G. and Hilhorst, D. (eds) Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People, pp. Earthscan Publishers, London, UK
Cardona O. D. and Barbat A. H. (2000). The Seismic Risk and its Prevention (in Spanish). Calidad Siderúrgica, Madrid, Spain
Cardona, O. D. and Hurtado J. E.: 2000. Holistic seismic risk estimation of a metropolitan center, in Proceedings of 12th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zeland
Carreño M. L., Cardona O. D. and Barbat A. H.: 2005, In: A. H. Barbat (ed.), System of Indicators for the Risk Evaluation (in Spanish). Monographs of Earthquake Engineering, IS-52, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Barcelona, España
Chambers, R.: 1989, Vulnerability, coping and policy, IDS Bulletin No. 20, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex
Coburn A. and Spence R. (1992). Earthquake Protection. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK
Douglas M. and Wildavsky A. (1982). Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley
Dynes R. R. and Drabek T. E. (1994). The structure of disaster research: its policy and disciplinary implications. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 12: 25–23
(1999). Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, HAZUS. National Institute of Building Science for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
ICC/CIMNE: 2004, An Advanced Approach to Earthquake Risk Scenarios with Applications to Different European Towns, WP08, Application to Barcelona, RISK-UE Project
(2002). State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development. Applied Statistics Group, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
(2003). First Workshop on Composite Indicators of Country Performance. Applied Statistics Group, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
Karlsson J.: 1998, A systematic Approach for Prioritizing Software Requirements, Ph.D. dissertation No.526, Linkoping, Sverige
Kasperson R. E., Renn O., Slovic P., Brown H. S., Emel J., Goble R., Kasperson J. X. and Ratick S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8(2): 177–187
Kates R. W. (1971). Natural hazard in human ecological perspective: hypotheses and models. Economic Geography 47(3): 438–451, Clark University
Lavell A. (1996). Environmental degradation, risk and urban disaster. Problems and concepts: towards the definition of a research schedule (in Spanish). In: Fernández, M. A. (eds) Cities in Risk (in Spanish), pp. La RED, USAID
(1996). Disasters: A Model to Construct. La RED, Lima, Perú
Maskrey A. (1994). Community and disasters in Latin America: Intervention strategies (in Spanish). In: Lavell, A. (eds) Living at Risk: Vulnerable Communities and Disaster Prevention in Latin America (in Spanish), pp. LA RED Tercer Mundo Editores, Bogota Colombia
Masure, P.: 2003, Variables and indicators of vulnerability and disaster risk for land-use and urban or territorial planning, IDB/IDEA Programa de Indicadores para la Gestión de Riesgos, http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales
Palmlund, I.: 1989, The Case of Estrogens: An Inquiry Into Social Risk Evaluation, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Clark University
Quarantelli E. L. (1988). Disaster studies: an analysis of the social historical factor affecting the development of research in the area. International Journal of Mass Emergencies 5(3): 285–310
Rayner S. (1992). Cultural theory and risk analysis. In: Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds) Social Theories of Risk, pp. Praeger, West Port, CT
Saaty T. L. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process: what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modeling 9: 161–176
Saaty T. L. and Vargas L. G. (1991). Prediction, Projection and Forecasting: Applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process in Economics, Finance, Politics, Games, and Sports. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA
Saaty T. L. (2001). Decision Making for Leaders the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburgh RWS, USA
Susman, P., O’Keefe, P. and Wisner, B.: 1984, Global Disasters: A Radical Interpretation, In: K. Hewitt (ed.): 1984, Interpretations of Calamity. Allen & Unwin, Boston, MA
UNDRO: 1980. Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis, Report of Experts Group Meeting, UNDRO, Geneva
Universidad de Los Andes: 2005, Seismic risk and losses scenarios for Bogotá, D.C. (in Spanish), Centro de Estudios sobre Desastres y Riesgos CEDERI, Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá, Dirección de Prevención y Atención de Emergencias, DPAE, Bogotá, Colombia
Wesgate, K. N. and O’Keefe, P.: 1976, Some definitions of disaster, paper No. 4, Disaster Research Unit, University of Bradford
Wijkman A. and Timberlake L. (1984). Natural Disasters: Act of God or Acts of Man. Earthscan, Washington
White, G. F.: 1964, Choice of adjustment of floods, Research Paper 93, Department of Geography, University of Chicago
Whitman R. V. (1973). Damage Probability Matrices for Prototype Buildings. Structures Publication 380. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts
Wilches-Chaux G. (1989). Disasters, Ecologism and Professional Education (in Spanish). SENA, Popayán, Colombia
Wisner B. (1993). Disaster vulnerability: scale, power and daily life. GeoJournal 30(2): 127–140
Zapata, R.: 2004, personal communication in Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carreño, ML., Cardona, O.D. & Barbat, A.H. Urban Seismic Risk Evaluation: A Holistic Approach. Nat Hazards 40, 137–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0008-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0008-8