Abstract
A unified reproducing kernel gradient smoothing formulation is presented for efficient Galerkin meshfree analysis of strain gradient elasticity problems with particular reference to high order basis functions, such as cubic and quartic basis functions. The integration constraint is elaborated for the Galerkin meshfree formulation of strain gradient elasticity, where the possible inconsistency issue associated with the separate first and second order gradient smoothing formalism is completely resolved. In this approach, the first order smoothed gradients of meshfree shape functions are expressed as a reproduced kernel form and the second order smoothed gradients are deduced from their first order counterparts through direct differentiation. Thereafter, the unknown coefficients in the first and second order smoothed gradients are simultaneously solved from the integration constraint. The resulting smoothed gradients automatically meet the integration consistency by construction. Subsequently, it is proven that the reproducing kernel gradient smoothing quadrature rules for the conventional elasticity problems are well suitable for the strain gradient elasticity problems. Numerical results clearly demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed approach regarding convergence, accuracy, as well as efficiency, in comparison with the Gauss integration-based meshfree formulation for strain gradient elasticity problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mindlin RD (1964) Micro-structure in linear elasticity. Arch Ration Mech Anal 16:51–78
Eringen AC (1983) On differential equations of nonlocal elasticity and solutions of screw dislocation and surface waves. J Appl Phys 54:4703–4710
Aifantis EC (1999) Strain gradient interpretation of size effects. Int J Fract 95:299–314
Bazant ZP (2000) Size effect. Int J Solids Struct 37:69–80
Altan SB, Aifantis EC (1992) On the structure of the mode-III crack-tip in gradient elasticity. Scr Metall 26:319–324
Altan SB, Aifantis EC (1997) On some aspects in the special theory of gradient elasticity. J Mech Behav Mater 8:231–282
Askes H, Morata I, Aifantis EC (2008) Finite element analysis with staggered gradient elasticity. Comput Struct 86:1266–1279
Papanicolopulos SA, Zervos A, Vardoulakis I (2009) A three-dimensional C1 finite element for gradient elasticity. Int J Numer Meth Eng 77:1396–1415
Li S, Ren B, Minaki H (2014) Multiscale crystal defect dynamics: a dual-lattice process zone model. Phil Mag 94:1414–1450
Sze KY, Yuan WC, Zhou YX (2020) Four-node tetrahedral elements for gradient-elasticity analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 121:3660–3679
Hughes TJR (2000) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Dover Publications, New York
Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ (2005) The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Elsevier, Singapore
Belytschko T, Krongauz Y, Organ D, Fleming M, Krysl P (1996) Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:3–47
Atluri SN, Shen S (2002) The Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) Method. Tech Sci.
Li S, Liu WK (2004) Meshfree particle methods. Springer-Verlag
Zhang X, Liu Y (2004) Meshless Methods. Tsinghua University Press & Springer-Verlag, UK
Liu GR (2009) Meshfree methods: moving beyond the finite element method (2nd edition). CRC Press
Chen JS, Hillman M, Chi SW (2017) Meshfree methods: progress made after 20 years. J Eng Mech-Asce 143:04017001
Wang D, Wang J, Wu J (2020) Arbitrary order recursive formulation of meshfree gradients with application to superconvergent collocation analysis of Kirchhoff plates. Comput Mech 65:877–903
Hillman M, Lin KC (2021) Nodally integrated thermo-mechanical RKPM: Part I-Thermoelasticity. Comput Mech 68:795–820
Pasetto M, Baek J, Chen JS, Wei H, Roth MJ (2021) A Lagrangian/Semi-Lagrangian coupling approach for accelerated meshfree modelling of extreme deformation problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 381:113827
Krysl P, Belytschko T (1996) Analysis of thin plates by the element-free Galerkin method. Int J Solids Struct 33:3057–3080
Wang D, Peng H (2013) A Hermite reproducing kernel Galerkin meshfree approach for buckling analysis of thin plates. Comput Mech 51:1013–1029
Amiri F, Millán D, Arroyo M, Silani M, Rabczuk T (2016) Fourth order phase-field model for local max-ent approximants applied to crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 312:254–275
Wu J, Wang D, Lin Z, Qi D (2020) An efficient gradient smoothing meshfree formulation for the fourth-order phase field modeling of brittle fracture. Comput Particle Mech 7:193–207
Yan J, Li S, Kan X, Zhang A, Lai X (2020) Higher-order nonlocal theory of updated Lagrangian particle hydrodynamics (ULPH) and simulations of multiphase flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 368:113176
Yu H, Li S (2021) On approximation theory of nonlocal differential operators. Int J Numer Meth Eng 122:6984–7012
Askes H, Aifantis EC (2002) Numerical modeling of size effect with gradient elasticity-Formulation, meshless discretization and examples. Int J Fract 117:347–358
Tang Z, Shen S, Atluri SN (2003) Analysis of materials with strain-gradient effects: a meshless local Petrov Galerkin (MLPG) approach, with nodal displacements only. Comput Model Eng Sci 4:177–196
Sansour C, Skatulla S (2009) A strain gradient generalized continuum approach for modelling elastic scale effects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:1401–1412
Alireza S, Farhang D, Mehrdad F, Zouheir F (2018) A new meshfree method for modeling strain gradient microbeams. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:384
Thai CH, Ferreira AJM, Nguyen-Xuan H, Phung-Van P (2021) A size dependent meshfree model for functionally graded plates based on the nonlocal strain gradient theory. Compos Struct 272:114169
Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) Numerical integration of the Galerkin weak form in meshfree methods. Comput Mech 23:219–230
Babuška I, Banerjee U, Osborn JE, Li QL (2008) Quadrature for meshless methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 76:1434–1470
Chen JS, Wu CT, Yoon S, You Y (2001) A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin meshfree methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 50:435–466
Chen JS, Yoon S, Wu CT (2002) Nonlinear version of stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin meshfree methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 53:2587–2615
Wang D, Wu J (2016) An efficient nesting sub-domain gradient smoothing integration algorithm with quadratic exactness for Galerkin meshfree methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 298:485–519
Beissel S, Belytschko T (1996) Nodal integration of the element-free Galerkin method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:49–74
Rabczuk T, Belytschko T, Xiao SP (2004) Stable particle methods based on Lagrangian kernels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1035–1063
Wu CT, Chi SW, Koishi M, Wu Y (2016) Strain gradient stabilization with dual stress points for the meshfree nodal integration method in inelastic analyses. Int J Numer Meth Eng 107:3–30
Hillman M, Chen JS (2016) An accelerated, convergent and stable nodal integration in Galerkin meshfree methods for linear and nonlinear mechanics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 107:603–630
Wang D, Chen JS (2004) Locking-free stabilized conforming nodal integration for meshfree Mindlin-Reissner plate formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1065–1083
Wang D, Chen JS (2008) A Hermite reproducing kernel approximation for thin-plate analysis with sub-domain stabilized conforming integration. Int J Numer Meth Eng 74:368–390
Guan PC, Chen JS, Wu Y, Teng H, Gaidos J, Hofstetter K, Alsaleh M (2009) Semi-Lagrangian reproducing kernel formulation and application to modeling earth moving operations. Mech Mater 41:670–683
Wang D, Wang J, Wu J, Deng J, Sun M (2019) A three dimensional two-level gradient smoothing meshfree method for rainfall induced landslide simulations. Front Struct Civ Eng 13:337–352
Duan Q, Li X, Zhang H, Belytschko T (2012) Second-order accurate derivatives and integration schemes for meshfree methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 92:399–424
Duan Q, Gao X, Wang B, Li X, Zhang H, Belytschko T, Shao Y (2014) Consistent element free Galerkin method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 99:79–101
Chen JS, Hillman M, Rüter M (2013) An arbitrary order variationally consistent integration for Galerkin meshfree methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 95:387–418
Wang D, Wu J (2019) An inherently consistent reproducing kernel gradient smoothing framework toward efficient Galerkin meshfree formulation with explicit quadrature. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 349:628–672
Wang J, Wu J, Wang D (2020) A quasi-consistent integration method for efficient meshfree analysis of Helmholtz problems with plane wave basis functions. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 110:42–55
Wu J, Wang D (2021) An accuracy analysis of Galerkin meshfree methods accounting for numerical integration. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 375:113631
Wang B, Lu C, Fan C, Zhao M (2019) Consistent integration schemes for meshfree analysis of strain gradient elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 357:112601
Wang B, Lu C, Fan C, Zhao M (2021) A stable and efficient meshfree Galerkin method with consistent integration schemes for strain gradient thin beams and plates. Thin-Walled Struct 153:106791
Strang G, Fix G (2018) An analysis of the finite element method. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, UK
Liu WK, Jun S, Zhang YF (1995) Reproducing kernel particle methods. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 20:1081–1106
Chen JS, Pan C, Wu CT, Liu WK (1996) Reproducing kernel particle methods for large deformation analysis of nonlinear structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139:195–227
Li S, Liu WK (1999) Reproducing kernel hierarchical partition of unity, Part I-formulation and theory. Int J Numer Meth Eng 45:251–288
Rogers DF (2001) An introduction to NURBS with historical perspective. Academic Press
Lam DCC, Yang F, Chong ACM, Wang J, Tong P (2003) Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 51:1477–1508
Wachspress EL (1975) A rational finite element basis: mathematics in science and engineering. Elsevier, UK
Schrijver A (1998) Theory of linear and integer programming. John Wiley and Sons
Niiranen J, Khakalo S, Balobanov V, Niemi AH (2016) Variational formulation and isogeometric analysis for fourth-order boundary value problems of gradient–elastic bar and plane strain/stress problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 308:182–211
Zervos A, Papanicolopulos SA, Vardoulakis I (2009) Two finite-element discretizations for gradient elasticity. J Eng Mech-Asce 135:203–213
Acknowledgements
The support of this work by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12072302, 12102138) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2021J02003) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
For the reproducing kernel gradient smoothing integration using quartic meshfree approximation, the properties of different type 1D, 2D and 3D sample points as shown in Fig. 2 are described in Tables
6,
7,
8.
The three sets of independent equations arising from Eqs. (68) and (69) for 1D, 2D and 3D cases are attained as follows:
-
(1) 1D case
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{2} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \hat{\delta }_{2} \rangle } = 1} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1 - 3} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle 1} \rangle = 1} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} } \rangle = \frac{1}{6}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} } \rangle = \frac{1}{30}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{3} \xi_{2}^{3} } \rangle = \frac{1}{140}} \hfill & {} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$(82) -
(2) 2D case
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{2,3,5} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \hat{\delta }_{3} \rangle = 1} } \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,5} }}^{{}} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} \hat{\delta }_{3} \rangle = \frac{1}{6}} } \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,5} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \hat{\delta }_{3} } \rangle = \frac{1}{30}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,5} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{3} \xi_{2}^{3} \hat{\delta }_{3} \rangle } = \frac{1}{140}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1 - 6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle 1} \rangle = 1} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3 - 6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} } \rangle = \frac{1}{12}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,4,6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} \xi_{3} } \rangle = \frac{1}{60}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} } \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3 - 6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} } \rangle = \frac{1}{90}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,4,6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{{}} } \rangle = \frac{1}{630}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,4,6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{2} } \rangle = \frac{1}{2520}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3 - 6} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{3} \xi_{2}^{3} } \rangle = \frac{1}{560}} \hfill & {} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$(83) -
(3) 3D case
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{2,3,5,7,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = 1} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,5,7,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{12}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{{}} \xi_{2}^{{}} \xi_{3}^{{}} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{60}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,5,7,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{90}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{{}} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{630}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,5,7,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{3} \xi_{2}^{3} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{560}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{2} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{2520}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{3,8,10} }} {\omega_{S}^{b} \langle \xi_{1}^{{}} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{4} \hat{\delta }_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{3780}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle 1\rangle } = 1} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} \rangle } = \frac{1}{20}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3,4,6,8 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} \xi_{3} \rangle } = \frac{1}{120}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \rangle } = \frac{1}{210}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,4,6,9,11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1} \xi_{2} \xi_{3} \xi_{4} \rangle } = \frac{1}{840}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3,4,6,8 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{{}} \rangle } = \frac{1}{1680}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3,4,6,8 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{2} \rangle } = \frac{1}{7560}} \hfill \\ {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,3 - 11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{3} \xi_{2}^{3} \rangle } = \frac{1}{1680}} \hfill & {\sum\limits_{{S = {\mathcal{S}}_{1,4,6,9,11} }} {\omega_{S}^{i} \langle \xi_{1}^{2} \xi_{2}^{2} \xi_{3}^{{}} \xi_{4}^{{}} \rangle } = \frac{1}{15120}} \hfill & {} \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right. $$(84)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, H., Wu, J., Wang, D. et al. A unified reproducing kernel gradient smoothing Galerkin meshfree approach to strain gradient elasticity. Comput Mech 70, 73–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02156-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02156-z