## Abstract

Mafic volcanic activity is dominated by effusive to mildly explosive eruptions. Plinian and ignimbrite-forming mafic eruptions, while rare, are also possible; however, the conditions that promote such explosivity are still being explored. Eruption style is determined by the ability of gas to escape as magma ascends, which tends to be easier in low-viscosity, mafic magmas. If magma permeability is sufficiently high to reduce bubble overpressure during ascent, volatiles may escape from the magma, inhibiting violent explosive activity. In contrast, if the permeability is sufficiently low to retain the gas phase within the magma during ascent, bubble overpressure may drive magma fragmentation. Rapid ascent may induce disequilibrium crystallization, increasing viscosity and affecting the bubble network with consequences for permeability, and hence, explosivity. To explore the conditions that promote strongly explosive mafic volcanism, we combine microlite textural analyses with synchrotron x-ray computed microtomography of 10 pyroclasts from the 12.6 ka mafic Curacautín Ignimbrite (Llaima Volcano, Chile). We quantify microlite crystal size distributions (CSD), microlite number densities, porosity, bubble interconnectivity, bubble number density, and geometrical properties of the porous media to investigate the role of magma degassing processes at mafic explosive eruptions. We use an analytical technique to estimate permeability and tortuosity by combing the Kozeny-Carman relationship, tortuosity factor, and pyroclast vesicle textures. The groundmass of our samples is composed of up to 44% plagioclase microlites, > 85% of which are < 10 µm in length. In addition, we identify two populations of vesicles in our samples: (1) a convoluted interconnected vesicle network produced by extensive coalescence of smaller vesicles (> 99% of pore volume), and (2) a population of very small and completely isolated vesicles (< 1% of porosity). Computed permeability ranges from 3.0 × 10^{−13} to 6.3 × 10^{−12} m^{2}, which are lower than the similarly explosive mafic eruptions of Tarawera (1886; New Zealand) and Etna (112 BC; Italy). The combination of our CSDs, microlite number densities, and 3D vesicle textures evidence rapid ascent that induced high disequilibrium conditions, promoting rapid syn-eruptive crystallization of microlites within the shallow conduit. We interpret that microlite crystallization increased viscosity while simultaneously forcing bubbles to deform as they grew together, resulting in the permeable by highly tortuous network of vesicles. Using the bubble number densities for the isolated vesicles (0.1-3^{−3} × 10^{4} bubbles per mm^{3}), we obtain a minimum average decompression rate of 1.4 MPa/s. Despite the textural evidence that the Curacautín magma reached the percolation threshold, we propose that rapid ascent suppressed outgassing and increased bubble overpressures, leading to explosive fragmentation. Further, using the porosity and permeability of our samples, we estimated that a bubble overpressure > 5 MPa could have been sufficient to fragment the Curacautín magma. Other mafic explosive eruptions report similar disequilibrium conditions induced by rapid ascent rate, implying that syn-eruptive disequilibrium conditions may control the explosivity of mafic eruptions more generally.

### Similar content being viewed by others

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

## Introduction

The volume of erupted magma is dominated by products from effusive to mildly explosive mafic eruptions (Parfitt 2004). However, mafic Plinian-style eruptions can occur, generating destructive pyroclastic currents and widespread ash fall (La Spina et al. 2020). The most powerful examples include the basaltic Plinian deposits of ∼60 ka Fontana Lapilli and ∼2 ka Masaya Triple Layer at Masaya Volcano in Nicaragua (Constantini et al. 2009; Constantini et al. 2010; Bamber et al. 2020; Pérez et al. 2020); the 122 BC eruption of Etna, Italy (Coltelli et al. 1998; Houghton et al. 2004; Sable et al. 2006); and the 1886 Tarawera eruption, New Zealand (Houghton et al. 2004; Sable et al. 2006; Shea 2017; Moitra et al. 2018).

In general, explosive eruptions are modulated by the conditions of volatile exsolution that lead to vesiculation. Vesiculation is a process in which volatiles originally dissolved in the magma exsolve into gas bubbles due to a decrease in the pressure-dependent solubility during magma ascent (Yoshimura et al. 2019). The exsolution of volatiles within a magma is controlled by decompression rate, the degree of volatile saturation, availability of nucleation sites, surface tension, and viscosity of magma (Mangan et al. 2004; Cassidy et al. 2018). The resulting bubbles undergo decompression-induced expansion, reducing the bulk mixture density of the magma and enhancing buoyancy (Cassidy et al. 2018). As bubbles expand, they may coalesce to form permeable pathways connecting the dispersed volatile phase (Klug and Cashman 1996). If the resulting permeability is sufficiently high to limit bubble overpressure during ascent, the volatiles may escape from the magma, reducing the chance of violent explosive activity. In contrast, if the permeability is low enough to largely trap the gas phase within the magma during ascent, overpressure in bubbles may drive magma fragmentation, producing an explosive eruption (Mueller et al., 2008; Degruyter et al. 2012; Cashman and Scheu 2015; Cassidy et al. 2018).

Many studies show that there is a link between mafic explosive volcanism, rapid ascent, and syn-eruptive disequilibrium conditions in both the gas and solid phases (La Spina et al., 2016; Polacci et al. 2018; Arzilli et al. 2019; Bamber et al. 2020; Namiki et al. 2021; Colombier et al. 2021). When decompression rate is high, the volatiles may not degas from the magma under equilibrium conditions. Such disequilibrium degassing may lead to volatile supersaturation, late vesiculation, and high bubble overpressures (Mangan and Sisson 2000). Similarly, crystallization kinetics are controlled by water content, degassing, and decompression rates (La Spina et al. 2016; Befus and Andrews 2018; Arzilli et al. 2019). High degrees of disequilibrium due to rapid ascent result in high crystal nucleation and growth rates (Befus and Andrews 2018). The rapid increase of the magma bulk viscosity may further prevent gas loss, promoting the conditions necessary for explosive volcanism (Arzilli et al. 2019; Colombier et al. 2021).

The bubble and crystal textures of magmas are critical in determining their rheology and eruptive behavior (Gonnermann and Manga, 2007; Polacci et al., 2018). Rapid crystallization due to disequilibrium degassing triggers profound rheological changes in ascending magmas (Vona et al. 2011; Arzilli et al. 2019). Indeed, pyroclasts from mafic Plinian eruptions typically display high microlite number densities and high crystallinities (Houghton et al. 2004; Sable et al. 2006; Sable et al. 2009; Murch and Cole 2019; Bamber et al. 2020), suggesting that changes in rheology due to rapid crystallization may be responsible for triggering highly explosive basaltic volcanism (Sable et al. 2006).

Pyroclasts from explosive eruptions record the state of the volatile phase in the conduit prior to fragmentation (Degruyter et al. 2010). Thus, if post-fragmentation vesiculation is negligible, pyroclast vesicle textures can be used to constrain magma permeability at the time of fragmentation, as well as ascent rate and fragmentation conditions (Mueller et al. 2005; Toramaru 2006; Polacci et al. 2010).

The most common approach to investigate vesicle texture is using 2D images from scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging of thin sections. However, this technique cannot image the 3D internal vesicle structures that govern permeability (Saar and Manga 1999; Polacci et al. 2010; Giachetti et al. 2011). Even with 3D analysis, permeability and tortuosity estimates often require lab measurements or numerical models, which may not be an option due to pyroclast size (too small for lab permeameters) and computational challenges to accurately simulate a large enough volume to be representative. For these reasons, this study uses an alternative methodology to calculate pyroclast permeability of lapilli size pyroclasts, which are commonly too small for lab permeameters.

The objective of this study is to understand why mafic magma erupted explosively at Llaima Volcano (38° 41′ 45 S, 71° 43′ 54 W). We focus on pyroclasts produced by the large volume 12.6 ka mafic explosive eruption responsible for the extensive Curacautín Ignimbrite (Fig. 1; Naranjo and Moreno 1991; Lohmar 2008; Schindlbeck et al. 2014; Marshall et al. 2021). The Curacautín Ignimbrite is a massive, poorly sorted, and matrix-supported coarse ash to fine lapilli tuff. The eruption produced four flow units of variable thickness with SiO_{2} content between 50.7 and 57.6 wt.% (Marshall et al. 2021). We collected 10 samples stratigraphically (Units 1–4) from the most complete exposure, which is located southeast of the summit (Fig. 1).

Previous work shows that Curacautín pyroclasts are coarse ash to lapilli size, subrounded, micro-vesicular with low phenocryst contents (2–3%; Marshall et al. 2021). The groundmass is microlite-rich, mostly plagioclase (volume fraction between 0.36 and 0.44), and contains little to no glass (8.0–18.4 × 10^{6} plagioclase microlites per mm^{3}. Fig. 2; Table 2). 2D analyses suggest that vesicles shapes are controlled by an abundance of plagioclase microlites (Fig. 2).

Here we use plagioclase microlite textures and plagioclase crystal size distributions (CSDs) to identify changes in decompression pathways and rates of microlite crystallization. We also report 3D results using x-ray microtomography of porosity, bubble number density, surface areas, tortuosity, and permeability of pyroclasts from the Curacautín Ignimbrite. We then estimate decompression rates, the degree of coupling between the gas phase and the magma, and the evolution of vesiculation during ascent to investigate the role of magma degassing processes during mafic explosive eruptions. Finally, we discuss the consequences of disequilibrium conditions induced by high decompression rates and compare our results with other basaltic explosive eruptions. We recognize that post-fragmentation vesiculation may occur, but for this study makes the simplifying assumption that post-fragmentation vesiculation was negligible, primarily due to our inability to constrain the degree to which it affected final pyroclast textures.

## Methodology

To understand the processes that led to fragmentation, we use several complementary measurements and models.

### Microlite texture analysis

Plagioclase microlite textures were measured using backscattered electron (BSE) images of Curacautín pyroclasts collected on a Teneo FEI Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) at the Boise State University Center for Materials Characterization using a beam current of 6.4 nA and 15 kV accelerating voltage. BSE images were acquired at 1500–2000 × magnifications.

In order to calculate crystal size distributions (CSDs), microlites need to be assigned a crystal habit that describes their shape based on their short, intermediate, and long axes (S:I:L). We obtained crystal habits using the stereological conversion program *CSDslice v.5* (Morgan and Jerram 2006). Because of their acicular nature in two dimensions, we measured > 250 plagioclase microlites per pyroclast to ensure correct determination of crystal habit (Morgan and Jerram 2006). Crystal habits calculated from *CSDslice v.5* were used as inputs for *CSDcorrections v.1.6* (Higgins 2000) to generate CSD plots. The crystal roundness was set to 0.1, and we used a shape measurement of parallelepiped for stereological conversions. Images were corrected for sample vesicularity measured in *ImageJ*.

Crystallization times *τ*_{c} can be calculated from the CSDs using

where “slope” is the slope of the CSD linear regression and *G* is the microlite growth rate (Cashman and Marsh 1988). We calculated *τ*_{c} using growth rates of 10^{−4} mm s^{−1} (Arzilli et al. 2019), 2 × 10^{−5} mm s^{−1} (Arzilli et al. 2015), 10^{−6} mm s^{−1} (Shea and Hammer 2013), and 10^{−7} mm s^{−1} (Arzilli et al. 2015) to investigate the variability of fast versus slow crystallization (Bamber et al. 2020).

The *y*-intercept *n°* of CSD linear regressions is the nucleation density (mm^{−4}). Cashman and Marsh (1988) showed that the nucleation rate *J* can be calculated from

where *G* is the mean linear growth rate.

### Synchrotron x-ray microtomography

Lapilli size pyroclasts were picked, cleaned, and sorted by density (Marshall et al. 2021). We chose the mean and median density pyroclasts from each sample for 3D analysis and drilled 3.4 mm diameter cores for further microtomography imaging. We only imaged intact and visually undamaged cores. Cores were immersed in an ultrasonicator water bath for 25 min to remove powder produced by coring, then dried in an oven at 95 °C. Due to the micro-vesicularity of our samples, no loss of internal structure is expected.

X-ray microtomography was performed on beamline 8.3.2 at the Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. 3D data was acquired over five sessions between September 2017 and October 2018. Owing to differences in beam stability and small changes in setup, scanning parameters varied slightly between sessions to optimize image quality. Images were acquired with 25–30 keV monochromatic x-rays and 200 ms exposure times. One thousand twenty-five to 2625 projections were imaged with a PCO edge camera, a 5× Mitutoyo lens, and a 50 mm LuAG scintillator over a 180° continuous rotation of the sample. Isotropic pixel size was 1.3 microns. A subset of 5 samples were imaged at 0.64 microns/pixel for comparison. Image reconstruction was performed with Xi-cam (Pandolfi et al. 2018), including center of rotation optimization along with ring and outlier removal.

### 3D data processing

Image processing, volume rendering, and geometric computations were generated using the Dragonfly software, Version 2020.1.0.797 for Windows 10 (Object Research Systems (ORS) Inc, Montreal, Canada, 2018; software available at http://www.theobjects.com/dragonfly). We stacked 820 2D images (2560 × 2560 pixels) per sample to reconstruct the 3D microstructures (Supplementary Material B.1A). Due to the size of the resulting volume (22.2 GB; Supplementary Material B.1A) and the computational challenges to process that amount of data, four cubic sub volumes of 820 × 820 × 820 voxels (~ 1.21 mm^{3}) per sample were extracted as Volumes of Interest (VOI; Supplementary Material B.1). These VOIs have linear dimensions that are more than an order of magnitude greater than microlite and vesicle dimensions, and hence are large enough to sample the complexity and heterogeneity of the samples, but small enough to not overwhelm the computing resources available for this project (Baker et al. 2012; Degruyter et al. 2010). We selected four sub volume locations vertically throughout each core sample to reduce ring errors (maximum at the center of the sample) and avoid the cylindrical boundaries of the 2D images (Supplementary Material B.1B). Using four VOIs also provides a sensitivity analysis, enabling uncertainty estimates related to sample heterogeneity.

In order to analyze and visualize the pore network, the VOIs were segmented using Dragonfly’s segmentation toolkit. This process partitions the volume into groups of voxels of each phase of interest. For simplicity, we defined two phases of interest: pores and solid rock. We utilized a global segmentation criterion based on a brightness/grayscale histogram threshold (Histogram segmentation in Dragonfly), where the darker voxels correspond to vesicles or pores and the brighter ones correspond to the solid phase (Supplementary Material B.2). Commonly, this process generates artifacts and errors due to the heterogeneities in voxel brightness (Baker et al. 2012; Degruyter et al. 2010; Ketcham and Carlson 2001; Ketcham 2005; Shanti et al. 2014). Thus, a cleaning procedure was performed using morphological operations, part of Dragonfly’s segmentation toolkit, to “Erode,” “Dilate,” and “Smooth,” effectively removing artifacts such as islands and holes smaller than 9 voxels. This process was repeated as many times as necessary until a clear, bimodal image was produced maintaining the main internal morphologies of the sample (confirmed by a visual inspection, Supplementary Material B.2). Once the segmentation was successful, we separated the vesicle phase (Supplementary Material B.2). Every separated vesicle was counted and identified, followed by the computation of geometrical properties including volume and surface area (Supplementary Material A.1).

Quantification of 2D and 3D vesicle textures in terms of vesicularity (volumetric fraction of vesicles), bubble number densities (number of vesicles per unit volume), vesicle volume, surface areas, and connectivity (volume fraction of the vesicle network) were performed with the same software (Table 1, Supplementary Material A.1). Additionally, we extracted 3D visualizations of the skeletonization (Fig. 3D), segmented phases (Fig. 3B), and separated phases (Fig. 3C). The final 3D segmented data volumes were converted to binary images for tortuosity analysis.

### 3D tortuosity factor

Tortuosity factors (\({\tau }^{*}\)) were calculated using the MatLab application TauFactor (Cooper et al. 2016). TauFactor calculates the changes in diffusive transport produced by contortions and heterogeneities of the interconnected pore space (Eq. 3; Backeberg et al. 2017; Cooper et al. 2016). The effective diffusivity (*D*_{eff}) is related to the tortuosity factor,

where *D*_{0} is the intrinsic diffusivity of the conductive phase and \(\phi\) is the volume fraction of the pore phase. TauFactor calculates the directional tortuosity factor along three mutually perpendicular axes of interconnected “diffusive phases” (or porous phases) through a 3D volume generated by stacking binary or trinary 2D images (Supplementary Material B.3).

It is important to note that tortuosity factor and tortuosity (\(\tau )\) are two different parameters with different definitions in governing equations, although both characterize the relationship between the geometry and length of interconnected phases. In porous media, tortuosity is defined as the ratio between the flow-path length and a straight-line length in the direction of flow, which has been commonly used to quantify flow, or diffusion along porous media (Suman and Ruth 1993; Shanti et al. 2014; Backeberg et al. 2017; Cooper et al. 2016). Tortuosity is measured from skeletonized data using finite element analysis or finite difference calculation on meshed data (Shanti et al. 2014). Unfortunately, the skeletonization of the porous network of our samples is too complex and chaotic for this type of calculation (Fig. 3D). As such, a tortuosity factor calculation is better suited for modelling more complex pore networks such as those in our clasts (Backeberg et al. 2017; Cooper et al. 2016).

In a system where the cross-sectional area of the flow path remains constant, tortuosity factor is equal to the square of tortuosity (Tjaden et al. 2016; Backeberg et al. 2017). Given an average variation of ~ 13% in the cross-sectional area of the flow represented by the 2D porosity changes (Supplementary Material B.4), we use Eq. 4 as an approximation.

The tortuosity factor and tortuosity both increase as pathways become more contorted. Both parameters approach 1 when the cross-sectional area of the flow pathways remains constant and the direction of flow follows the axis that is orthogonal to that cross-sectional area (Backeberg et al. 2017).

TauFactor also computes 2D volume fractions, 3D phase volume fraction (vesicularity), effective diffusivity (\({D}_{\mathrm{eff}}\)), directional percolation, tortuosity factor (\({\tau }^{*}\)), and a provides a visual representation of the flux during steady state (an example is shown in Supplementary Material B.3).

### Permeability calculations

One of the most widely used relationships between permeability and tortuosity is the Kozeny‐Carman relation for the Darcian permeability *k*_{1} (Kozeny 1927; Carman 1937; Yokoyama and Takeuchi 2009; Matyka et al. 2008; Farquharson et al. 2015; Berg 2014; Bernard et al. 2007; Wei et al. 2018),

where \(\phi\) is the porosity, \(\tau\) is the tortuosity, *S* is the surface area per unit volume, and *c* is the Kozeny constant. Bernabe et al. (2010) define two idealized Kozeny constants: a crack-controlled medium where *c* = 12, and a pore-controlled medium where *c* = 8 (Farquharson et al. 2015). We use *c* = 8 due to the nature of the porous network. Given the complexity of the porous media observed in the skeletonized data (Fig. 3D) and the low variation in the cross-sectional area of the flow path, we combined Eq. (4) and Eq. (5) to find a relationship between permeability and tortuosity factor

We compare our estimates of permeability based on the Kozeny-Carman model (5), and the measured vesicularity and estimated tortuosity, with direct numerical simulation of 3D flows in one of the VOIs using the Palabos open-source lattice Boltzmann flow solver (Latt et al. 2021). Lattice Boltzmann methods have often been used to compute the pore-scale flow field in volcanic porous media to estimate permeability from direct numerical simulations (e.g., Wright et al. 2009; Polacci et al. 2009; Degruyter et al. 2010). The flow simulation is conducted with a prescribed pressure gradient on the OSCAR computer cluster at Brown University. The flow field was simulated until it converged (Supplementary Material B.4). For this comparison, and owing to memory limitations, we chose one VOI from sample L4 (closest sample parameters to the average results calculated for Unit 1) reducing the volume by a factor of 2 to a domain of 820 × 820 × 410 voxels for both the TauFactor and lattice Boltzmann calculations. This comparison does not address whether the imaging resolution is sufficient for a meaningful estimate of permeability but does address whether the Kozeny-Carman model is a good model for our samples as imaged.

### Decompression and discharge rates

Given the lack of clear evidence for shear-induced coalescence (no preferential elongation of vesicles or preferential orientation of microlites), we use the bubble number density decompression rate meter proposed by Toramaru (2006) to calculate decompression rates (*dP/dt*) from volumetric bubble number densities (*N*_{v}) for basaltic magmas undergoing heterogeneous nucleation (Shea 2017; Toramaru 2006):

Additionally, if we assume a cylindrical conduit geometry, we can estimate mass discharge rates \((\dot{m)}\) as a function of bulk magma density \(({\rho }_{m})\), decompression rate, pressure gradient in the conduit (*dP/dz*), and conduit radius (*r*) (Shea 2017):

We approximate the pressure gradient in the conduit with the magmastatic gradient. For a mafic magma at 1200 °C, *dP*/*dz* = 0.026 MPa m^{−1} (Cas and Simmons 2018). We used the bulk magma density \(({\rho }_{m})\) (i.e., melt + bubbles + crystals) as the average density of our pyroclasts for Unit 1, \({\rho }_{bulk} \sim 1290 \mathrm{kg }{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}\)(Marshall et al. 2021). For the radius, we considered that Plinian eruptions require larger conduits radius, between 10 and 150 m, to explain the relationship between mass discharge and decompression rates (Shea 2017). To address uncertainty in *r*, we calculated three discharge rates for radii of 25, 50, and 100 m.

### Forchheimer and Stokes numbers

We calculated the Stokes and Forchheimer numbers for Unit 1 following Degruyter et al. (2012) to compare our results with other explosive eruptions. The Stokes number (St) is a non-dimensional number that represents the ratio of the magma response time scale and the gas phase characteristic flow time, in this case, the flow of gas through the permeable magma,

where *μ*_{g} is the viscosity of the gas phase, *r* is the conduit radius, and *U*_{0} is the velocity. Velocity is calculated as the ratio between the mean decompression rate and the magmastatic gradient in the conduit. When St is small, magma and gas are coupled and ascend at similar velocities, limiting gas loss from the magma. For larger St, the degree of coupling decreases permitting gas loss (Degruyter et al. 2012; La Spina et al. 2017). The Forchheimer number (Fo) is the ratio of the inertial and viscous term in Forchheimer’s law (Eq. 10; Degruyter et al. 2012; La Spina et al. 2017)

where the density of the gas *ρ*_{g0} is calculated from the ideal gas law

and *k*_{2} is the inertial permeability, *P*_{0} is the pressure in the conduit at a certain depth, and *R* is the specific gas constant. The inertial permeability is calculated using the Gonnermann et al. (2017) relationship between Darcian and Inertial permeabilities (in SI units)

For small Fo, outgassing is controlled by the viscous permeability (Darcian). For larger Fo, the inertial permeability dominates (Degruyter et al. 2012; La Spina et al. 2017).

In order to obtain values of Fo and St, we assumed that the temperature in the conduit is constant. We used a temperature of 1100 °C (1375 K), which represents the mean temperature for the Curacautín Ignimbrite pre-eruptive magma (Lohmar 2008). Gas viscosity and velocity throughout the conduit are assumed constant as well, while conduit radius and reference depth are variable between 25 and 100 m, and between 100 and 1000 m, respectively.

## Results

Each measurement and analysis provide distinct results. The joint analysis and interpretation of the complementary measurements are provided in the discussion.

### Plagioclase microlite number densities and crystal size distributions

Plagioclase microlite CSD results are summarized in Table 1. We analyzed three pyroclasts for Unit 1, and one pyroclast each for Units 2, 3, and 4. Unit 1 plagioclase have tabular to rectangular prism habits and S:I:L axes between 1:6:10 and 1:8:10 (*R*^{2} = 0.68–0.83). Units 2 and 3 microlites have rectangular prism habits and S:I:L axes of 1:6:10 (*R*^{2} = 0.80 and 0.85, respectively). Unit 4 plagioclase have a tabular habit and S:I:L axes of 1:6:10 (*R*^{2} = 0.86). Plagioclase microlite number densities are available in Table 2.

All CSD curves are concave up (Fig. 4). We identified two size populations of microlites based on linear regression. The first regression (segment A, Fig. 4) is fit to the smallest crystal size population and produces the steepest slopes. The second regression (segment B, Fig. 4) is fit to the largest crystal size population and has shallower slopes. The *y*-intercept *n°* is the nucleation density (mm^{−4}). All CSDs exhibit a downturn at the smallest size bins (i.e., abrupt decrease in microlite CSD; Fig. 4). Because our data were collected at 1500–2000× magnifications, these downturns likely reflect the reduced probability of intercepting small crystals and not inadequate image resolution (Cashman 1998; Marsh 1998). Data from downturns are not included in segment A regressions (Fig. 4).

### Reconstruction and measurements of vesicle textures in 3D

We analyzed 40 VOIs from 10 representative pyroclasts, 4 VOIs per sample. The reconstructed volumes obtained using synchrotron x-ray microtomography allow us to visualize and quantify the vesicle network of Llaima pyroclasts in 3D (Fig. 5). All samples show high vesicle interconnectivity (99%) and no clear signs of preferential vesicle elongation. From a gas transport perspective, there are two main populations of vesicles: (1) a contorted connected vesicle network produced by coalescence of smaller vesicles (> 99% of porosity network, yellow color in Fig. 5A), and (2) a population of very small and completely isolated vesicles (< 1% of total porosity; Fig. 5B). The contorted vesicle network has irregular shapes and rough surfaces. In contrast, some of the smallest isolated vesicles are moderately spherical, whereas the larger isolated vesicles have irregular to polylobate shapes (Supplementary Material B.6).

Quantitative textural parameters including 2D and 3D vesicularities, bubble number densities (BND), and specific surface area are summarized in Table 2. Individual 3D measurements of vesicularities are shown in Supplementary Materials B.5. Average 3D vesicularities, correlated stratigraphically in Fig. 6A, and BND are presented in Table 2. The BND results are based on the number of small, isolated vesicles, and do not include the (uncountable) number of vesicles that are part of the interconnected network. The reported BND is thus a lower bound. No correlation between BND and vesicularity is observed.

Average specific surface area calculations, a key measurement for the Kozeny-Carman model Eq. (5) and defined as the ratio between surface area and volume (Maroof et al. 2020), are also presented in Table 2. These values were calculated for the contorted connected phase through which gas flowed and represent 99% of the vesicle phase (Fig. 5A, yellow interconnected vesicle).

### Tortuosity factor

We compute tortuosity factors in three orthogonal directions following the axis of our VOIs. Results are presented in Table 2 and correlated stratigraphically in Fig. 6B. We observe low directional variability, implying that there is no preferred flow direction for the gas flux. We also observe an inverse relationship between vesicularity and tortuosity, and a strong direct correlation with specific surface area (Supplementary Material A.1).

### Permeability calculations

Darcian permeabilities were calculated using Eq. (6) assuming a pore-controlled medium with *c* = 8 (Bernabe et al. 2010; Farquharson et al. 2015). Similar to the tortuosity factor calculations, we computed permeability values in three orthogonal directions following the axes of our VOIs. Computations of average Darcian permeability are presented in Table 3 and correlated stratigraphically in Fig. 6C. Calculated permeabilities have an inverse correlation with tortuosity, a direct correlation with vesicularity, and a strong inverse correlation with the specific surface area. We calculated inertial permeabilities using the Darcian permeability results and Eq. (12) (Gonnermann et al. 2017). Average values of inertial permeabilities are also presented in Table 3, and show similar correlations to Darcian permeabilities. The computed permeabilities are the result of many stages of analysis, from image reconstruction to segmentation to the use of the Kozeny-Carman model. Error in our calculated permeabilities can be introduced at all stages.

The permeability estimates from the tortuosity calculations (6.26 × 10^{−13} m^{2}) and the lattice Boltzmann numerical simulation (5.1 × 10^{−13} m^{2}) are in good agreement (Supplementary Material B.4). The 19% difference between the estimates is encouraging given limitations in spatial resolution in both numerical simulations and the assumption that tortuosity and specific surface area can be used as a proxy for permeability in the Kozeny-Carman model.

### Decompression and discharge rates

Due to the large amount of microlites and the absence of glass in our samples (Marshall et al. 2021; Fig. 2), we propose a heterogeneous nucleation regime for the formation of the small isolated bubbles (Fig. 5B). Therefore, we calculated decompression rates using Eq. (7) proposed by Toramaru (2006) for basaltic magmas undergoing heterogeneous nucleation (Shea 2017). Using the BND based on isolated vesicles, the minimum decompression rates for all samples range from 0.36 to 2.6 MPa s^{−1} (Table 3; Fig. 6D). Figure 7, which compares our results with other basaltic eruptions (Toramaru 2006; Shea 2017), shows that the minimum estimated decompression rates for the Curacautín magma are close to decompression rates calculated for Tarawera 1886AD and Etna 122BC. Finally, in order to calculate and contrast the minimum discharge rates with other basaltic eruptions, we use Eq. (8) for three different conduit radius (Table 3 and Fig. 6E). Minimum average discharge rates are between 1.6 × 10^{8} and 2.2 × 10^{9} kg s^{−1} (Fig. 6E; Eq. 8).

### Forchheimer and Stokes numbers

We calculated Fo and St for Unit 1 following Eqs. (9–12) using the reference parameters in Table 4 (Degruyter et al. 2012; La Spina et al. 2017). The (St, Fo) results for Unit 1 overlap with the (St, Fo) values for the 1980 Mount St. Helens (MSH) Plinian eruption reported by Degruyter et al. (2012) (Fig. 8). Both areas are in the low St and high Fo regions, indicating that the magma and gas were well coupled, ascending at similar (but not equal) velocities, and the outgassing was turbulent (Degruyter et al. 2012). Higher permeabilities lead to higher and lower values of St and Fo, respectively, increasing the outgassing efficiency but not enough to decouple the gas phase from the magma. Conversely, lower permeabilities lead to lower and higher values of St and Fo, respectively, enhancing the coupling between magma and the gas phase. Figure 8 also shows how increasing certain parameters influence the St and Fo numbers. The threshold (dashed line in Fig. 8) separating conditions that lead to explosive and effusive eruptions was determined in Degruyter et al. (2012) using numerical simulations of magma ascent. These simulations depend on details of magma composition, how rheology evolves during ascent, and the fragmentation mechanism. Performing equivalent simulations is hindered by a lack of constraints on how rheology of Llaima magma evolves as it ascends and how crystallinity and vesicularity change. However, based on the results in Degruyter et al. (2012), the threshold is unlikely to change by more than an order of magnitude. Furthermore, the key parameters that determine St and Fo are those we can measure from the pyroclasts and the ascent velocity which is constrained by the mass eruption rate. We thus added question marks to the dashed line to highlight the uncertainty, but note that Llaima magma erupted with conditions that most likely lie well within conditions that promote fragmentation.

## Discussion

### Microlite texture analysis

CSDs are useful for identifying changing decompression pathways in the subsurface (Fig. 4). For example, CSDs that form a straight line reflect continuous decompression while concave up CSDs reflect differing depths and rates of crystallization (Marsh 1998). In the shallow subsurface, nucleation-dominated crystallization is driven by high decompression rates and high undercooling (*ΔT*). Conversely, larger microlites and phenocrysts form deeper in the conduit and magma chamber where they have time to grow before their final ascent to the surface.

The two segments in our CSDs (Fig. 4) identified from separate linear regressions are most simply explained by a change in decompression histories during ascent of the Curacautín magma (Murch and Cole 2019; Bamber et al. 2020). Bamber et al. (2020) determined that *G* values of 10^{−4} mm s^{−1} (Arzilli et al. 2019) and 2 × 10^{−5} mm s^{−1} (Arzilli et al. 2015) are most appropriate for crystallization in the conduit, while 10^{−6} mm s^{−1} (Shea and Hammer 2013) and 10^{−7} mm s^{−1} (Arzilli et al. 2015) are appropriate for phenocrysts or larger microlites crystallizing within the magma reservoir. Thus, segment A (Fig. 4) documents the shallow, rapid decompression or syn-eruptive crystallization where nucleation-dominated crystallization prevailed (Geschwind and Rutherford 1995; Hammer et al. 1999; Blundy and Cashman 2008). Segment B (Fig. 4) records the larger sizes of crystals that nucleated deeper in the conduit. Note that 85–93% of plagioclase microlites in our samples are < 10 μm, suggesting that even though a subpopulation of microlites crystallized deeper, most plagioclase crystals had little time to grow. We therefore interpret our CSDs as primarily reflecting disequilibrium crystallization conditions produced by rapid ascent and rapid crystallization of microlites at shallow depths.

Calculations of *τ*_{c} from segment A linear regression in Fig. 4D indicate that the Curacautín magma reached high microlite crystallinities in seconds to minutes (Table 1). We interpret that such rapid crystallization could only result from high degrees of undercooling (*ΔT*, Arzilli et al. 2019). High degrees of undercooling are further reflected in the dominantly acicular to hopper microlite textures, which form under disequilibrium crystallization conditions (Shea and Hammer 2013).

Our microlite textures and CSDs indicate varying degrees of microlite nucleation, decompression rate, and ascent dynamics between the four units. There is a general increase in *n°* and *J* of segment A from Unit 1 into Units 2, 3, and 4 suggesting that the ascent rates of later eruptive episodes increased along with nucleation rates. Therefore, we suggest that our CSDs reflect mid- to shallow conduit conditions and syn-eruptive crystallization, likely accompanying and following the onset of bubble nucleation, rather than conditions and processes in the magma reservoir. A more quantitative assessment would require a set of laboratory decompression experiments using Curacautín magma, which is beyond the scope of this paper.

### Vesicle network analysis

The 3D reconstructions allow us to investigate the pyroclast vesicle textures in detail and extract vesicularity, surface areas, interconnectivity, and number of vesicles, all of which are more challenging to interpret in 2D slices. For example, we observe an average variation of ~ 13% for the 2D vesicularities considering all our VOIs (Supplementary Material B.4). That variation decreases to less than ~ 3% if we compare the 3D vesicularity between the four VOIs per sample (Table 2). This increment of accuracy suggests that the selected VOI is sufficient to account for the major textural heterogeneity of our samples. In addition, vesicles have more than 99% interconnectivity in all our samples, a feature that would be impossible to conclude with 2D section analyses.

Similar to the microlite texture interpretations, BND results suggest that the magma rose at fast decompression rates, similar to other basaltic explosive eruptions reported in the literature (Shea 2017). Specifically, Unit 1 has a minimum average decompression rate of 1.4 MPa s^{−1} (Eq. 7), similar to the 1.5 and 2.0 MPa s^{−1} reported for Tarawera 1886AD and Etna 122BC, respectively (Fig. 7; Shea 2017). Although the lack of more samples for Units 2, 3, and 4 adds additional uncertainty to the results, their calculated minimum decompression rates show a similarly rapid ascent. We estimate minimum average discharge rates between 1.6 × 10^{8} and 2.2 × 10^{9} kg s^{−1} (Fig. 6E; Eq. 8), close to the 1.4 × 10^{8} kg s^{−1} and 5–8.5 × 10^{8} kg s^{−1} reported for Fontana Lapilli Masaya 60 ka and Etna 122BC, respectively (Shea 2017).

Decompression experiments show that rapid ascent rates lead to high degrees of disequilibrium, promoting rapid nucleation of plagioclase microlites at shallow depths (Brugger and Hammer 2010; Befus and Andrews 2018). As discussed in the previous section, our samples are rich in microlites, with plagioclase microlite number densities of 7.95–18.4 × 10^{8} per mm^{3} (Table 2), evidencing high degrees of disequilibrium crystallization. Microlite nucleation may have shifted the solubility conditions of the remaining melt (Gonnermann et al. 2012), causing exsolution and vesiculation. Such vesiculation would have enhanced the buoyancy of the bulk magma, driving magma acceleration (Cassidy et al. 2018). Simultaneously, rapid crystallization of microlites increased the viscosity of the magma and may have restricted the expansion of the first population of bubbles forcing them to deform as they grew toward each other and resulting in a tortuous but still well-connected (99% connectivity) bubble network structure (Fig. 2; Arzilli et al. 2019; deGraffenried et al. 2019).

The presence of a well-connected, albeit convoluted, vesicle network and a population of small vesicles suggest that there was a change in the coalescence efficiency prior fragmentation. The larger vesicles that are part of the connected network have irregular shapes and rough surfaces suggesting that they had more time to evolve. In contrast, some of the smallest isolated vesicles are moderately spherical. The contorted vesicle network shape and the abundance of microlites between vesicles could hinder diffusion of the remaining dissolved volatiles to existing bubbles, enabling heterogeneous nucleation on microlites and leading to the formation of the disconnected group of bubbles (Hajimirza et al. 2021). We interpret that the population of small, isolated vesicles (~ 1% of vesicularity; Fig. 5B) was the last to form and might be the result of a syn-eruptive crystallization of microlites induced by high decompression rates (La Spina et al. 2016). Given the high vesicle connectivity (⁓99%), it is likely that this final stage of vesiculation occurred after the main vesicle network reached the percolation threshold (Lindoo et al. 2017).

Fo and St calculations for Unit 1 (Eqs. 10 and 11; Fig. 8) suggest that the gas phase was well coupled with the magma during ascent (Degruyter et al. 2012). We propose that, despite the well-connected network of bubbles promoted by crystallization (Lindoo et al. 2017) and evidence for the Curacautín magma reaching the percolation threshold, the permeability of the convoluted bubble network remained low enough for gas to remain well coupled with the magma during its ascent. That is, the minimum decompression rate inferred from the population of small, isolated vesicles is high enough that gas loss through the interconnected network of bubbles was suppressed, leading to the overpressure needed to promote fragmentation (Fig. 8). Furthermore, rapid crystallization of microlites induced by high decompression rates increased viscosity of the magma and limited gas loss through the permeable network. We interpret that this promoted gas overpressure and brittle fragmentation, similar to the conditions reported for other mafic explosive eruptions (Moitra et al. 2018; Arzilli et al. 2019; Colombier et al. 2021). Given the evidence for rapid ascent rates, shear-induced fragmentation may also have played a role. However, we see no evidence of preferential elongation or orientation of the interconnected vesicle network or the isolated vesicles which we might expect from high strain rates and large strains. Nor do we see any obvious microlite preferred orientation that would result from shear.

As a preliminary validation for our permeability model, the calculations presented herein indicate that pyroclast permeability of our samples is similar to, but slightly lower than, those of other basaltic explosive eruptions (Colombier et al. 2021; Fig. 9) and similar to basaltic scoria (Saar and Manga 1999). Additionally, our results fall within the wide empirical bounds provided by Mueller et al. (2005) for explosive volcanic rocks. Furthermore, our values are similar to those measured on samples generated experimentally in crystallizing and vesiculating basaltic andesites (Lindoo et al. 2017).

Following the methods of Mueller et al. (2008), we calculate the minimum bubble overpressure needed to lead fragmentation (Δ*P*_{fr})

where *a* and σ_{m} are constants equal to 8.21 × 10^{5} MPa m^{−1} and 1.54 MPa, respectively. Our results show that a bubble overpressure greater than ~ 5 MPa could have been sufficient to fragment the Curacautín magma (Fig. 10; Table 3).

Lastly, low variations of microstructural properties (CSDs, BND, vesicularity, permeability) in the stratigraphic sequence (Fig. 6) support the assertion of Marshall et al. (2021) that the Curacautín Ignimbrite is the result of one eruptive event with perhaps several discrete explosive pulses, resulting in the four flow units.

## Conclusions

We investigated the 12.6 ka explosive mafic eruption at Llaima Volcano, Chile, that produced the extensive Curacautín ignimbrite. The objective of this study was to use microlite and vesicle textural analysis to explore the conditions that promoted the strong explosivity of the Curacautín magma. We use microlite number densities and CSDs to constrain ascent rates and crystallization rate paths, and vesicle textures to constrain vesicle tortuosity, permeabilities, decompression rates, the degree of coupling between the gas phase and the magma, and the evolution of vesiculation during ascent. We validate permeability estimates using a full three-dimensional lattice Boltzmann simulation. The analytical calculations provide an approach for quantifying the permeability and tortuosity of pyroclast vesicle networks in samples too small to use laboratory techniques like traditional permeameters.

The CSD analyses combined with our 3D vesicle texture results suggest rapid ascent rates that induced disequilibrium crystallization of microlites during ascent at shallow depths. Simultaneously, microlite crystallization increased magma bulk viscosity and confined bubbles during expansion. This rapid crystallization forced bubbles to deform as they grew toward each other, resulting in the convoluted interconnected vesicle network. Despite reaching the percolation threshold, it appears the decompression rate was too high for the Curacautín magma permeability to promote outgassing; instead, the volatile phase remained well coupled with the magma, which inhibited outgassing and promoted an increase in bubble overpressure. Our permeability and vesicularity results suggest that a minimum bubble overpressure of ⁓5 MPa was required to induce fragmentation of the magma.

The conditions that led to explosive mafic volcanism at Llaima Volcano are similar to other basaltic explosive eruptions (Tarawera 1886AD, Etna 122BC, and Fontana Lapilli Masaya 60 ka). Our results provide further evidence that mafic explosive volcanism at Llaima Volcano, as well as other mafic centers, is driven by rapid magma ascent. Rapid ascent induces disequilibrium crystallization conditions and rapid crystallization of microlites at shallow depths. Crystallization increases viscosity of the magma, inhibiting gas escape and driving bubble overpressure, promoting explosive behavior. The question that remains is – why was the decompression rate so high? A combination of decompression experiments to quantitatively assess decompression rates, rheology experiments to constrain the physical parameters of the magma as it crystallized, fragmentation experiments on Curacautín pyroclasts, and conduit modelling to explore different geometries may yield more insight into this fundamental question.

## References

Arzilli F, Agostini C, Landi P, Fortunati A, Mancini L, Carroll M (2015) Plagioclase nucleation and growth kineticis in a hydrous basaltic melt by decompression experiments. Contrib Mineral Petrol 170:55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-015-1205-9

Arzilli F, La Spina G, Burton M, Polacci M, Le Gall N, Hartley M, Di Genova D, Cai B, Vo N, Bamber E, Nonni S, Atwood R, Llewellin E, Brooker R, Mader H, Lee P (2019) Magma fragmentation in highly explosive basaltic eruptions induced by rapid crystallisation. Nat Geosci 12:1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0468-6

Backeberg NR, Iacoviello F, Rittner M, Mitchell TM, Jones AP, Day R, … Striolo A (2017) Quantifying the anisotropy and tortuosity of permeable pathways in clay-rich mudstones using models based on X-ray tomography. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14810-1

Baker DR, Mancini L, Polacci M, Higgins MD, Gualda GAR, Hill RJ, Rivers ML (2012) An introduction to the application of X-ray microtomography to the three-dimensional study of igneous rocks. Lithos 148:262–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.008

Bamber EC, Arzilli F, Polacci M, Hartley ME, Fellowes J, Di Genova D, … Burton MR (2020) Pre- and syn-eruptive conditions of a basaltic Plinian eruption at Masaya Volcano, Nicaragua: the Masaya Triple Layer (2.1 ka).

*Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research*,*392*, 106761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106761Befus KS, & Andrews BJ (2018) Crystal nucleation and growth produced by continuous decompression of Pinatubo magma. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 173(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-018-1519-5

Berg CF (2014) Permeability description by characteristic length, tortuosity, constriction and porosity. Transp Porous Media 103(3):381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0307-6

Bernabé Y, Li M, Maineult A (2010) Permeability and pore connectivity: a new model based on network simulations. J Geophys Res 155:B10203. https://doi.org/10.1023/2010JB007444

Bernard ML, Zamora M, Géraud Y, Boudon G (2007) Transport properties of pyroclastic rocks from Montagne Pelée volcano (Martinique, Lesser Antilles). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 112(5):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004385

Blundy J, Cashman KV (2008) Petrologic reconstruction of magmatic system variables and processes in: Minerals, Inclusions and Volcanic Processes. Rev Mineral Geochem 69:179–239

Brugger CR, Hammer JE (2010) Crystallization kinetics in continuous decompression experiments: implications for interpreting natural magma ascent processes. J Petrol 51(9):1941–1965. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egq044

Carman PC (1937) Fluid flow through granular beds. Transactions, Institution of Chemical Engineers, London 15:150–166

Cas RAF, Simmons JM (2018) Why deep-water eruptions are so different from subaerial eruptions. Front Earth Sci 6(November):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00198

Cashman KV (1992) Groundmass crystallization of Mount St. Helens dacite 1980–1986: a tool for interpreting shallow magmatic processes. Contrib Mineral Petrol 109:431–449

Cashman KV (1998) Crystallization of Mount St. Helens 1980–1986 dacite: a quantitative textural approach. Bull Volcanol 50:194–209

Cashman KV, Marsh BD (1988) Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization II. Makaopuhi Lava Lake Contrib Mineral Petrol 99:292–305

Cashman KV, Scheu B (2015) Magmatic fragmentation. In the Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (second Edi). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-385938-9.00025-0

Cassidy M, Manga M, Cashman K, & Bachmann O (2018) Controls on explosive-effusive volcanic eruption styles. Nature Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05293-3

Colombier M, Vasseur J, Houghton BF, Cáceres F, Scheu B, Kueppers U, Dingwell DB (2021) Degassing and gas percolation in basaltic magmas. Earth Science Planetary Letters 573:117134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117134

Coltelli M, Del Carlo P, Vezzoli L (1998) Discovery of a Plinian basaltic eruption of Roman age at Etna volcano, Italy. Geology 26:1095–1098

Costantini L, Bonadonna C, Houghton BF, Wehrmann H (2009) New physical characterization of the Fontana Lapilli basaltic Plinian eruption, Nicaragua. Bull Volcanol 71:337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-008-0227-9

Costantini L, Houghton BF, Bonadonna C (2010) Constraints on eruption dynamics of basaltic explosive activity derived from chemical and microtextural study: the example of the Fontana Lapilli Plinian eruption, Nicaragua. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 189:207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.11.008

Cooper SJ, Bertei A, Shearing PR, Kilner JA, Brandon NP (2016) TauFactor: an open-source application for calculating tortuosity factors from tomographic data. SoftwareX 5:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2016.09.002

DeGraffenried RL, Larsen JF, Graham NA, Cashman KV (2019) The influence of phenocrysts on degassing in crystal-bearing magmas with rhyolitic groundmass melts. Geophys Res Lett 46(10):5127–5136. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081822

Degruyter W, Burgisser A, Bachmann O, Malaspinas O (2010) Synchrotron X-ray microtomography and lattice Boltzmann simulations of gas flow through volcanic pumices. Geosphere 6(5):470–481. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00555.1

Degruyter W, Bachmann O, Burgisser A, Manga M (2012) The effects of outgassing on the transition between effusive and explosive silicic eruptions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 349–350:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2012.06.056

Farquharson J, Heap MJ, Varley NR, Baud P, Reuschlé T (2015) Permeability and porosity relationships of edifice-forming andesites: a combined field and laboratory study. J Volcanol Geoth Res 297:52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.03.016

Fontijn K, Rawson H, Van Daele M, Moernaut J, Abarzúa AM, Heirman K, Bertrand S, Pyle DM, Mather TA, De Batist M, Naranjo JA, Moreno H (2016) Synchronisation of sedimentary records using tephra: a postglacial tephrochronological model for the Chilean Lake District. Quat Sci Rev 137:234–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.02.015

Geschwind C-H, Rutherford MJ (1995) Crystallization of microlites during magma ascent: the fluid mechanics of 1980–1986 eruptions at Mount St. Helens Bull Volcanol 57:356–370

Giachetti T, Burgisser A, Arbaret L, Druitt TH, Kelfoun K (2011) Quantitative textural analysis of Vulcanian pyroclasts (Montserrat) using multi-scale X-ray computed microtomography: comparison with results from 2D image analysis. Bull Volcanol 73(9):1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0472-1

Gonnermann HM, Manga M (2007) The fluid mechanics inside a volcano. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 39:321–356. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110207

Gonnermann HM, Houghton BF (2012) Magma degassing during the Plinian eruption of Novarupta, Alaska, 1912. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13(10):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004273

Gonnermann HM, Giachetti T, Fliedner C, Nguyen CT, Houghton BF, Crozier JA, Carey RJ (2017) Permeability during magma expansion and compaction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 122(12):9825–9848. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014783

Hajimirza S, Gonnermann HM, Gardner JE (2021) Reconciling bubble nucleation in explosive eruptions with geospeedometers. Nat Commun 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20541-1

Hammer JE, Cashman KV, Hoblitt RP, Newman S (1999) Degassing and microlite crystallization during pre-climatic events of the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. Philippines Bull Volcanol 60:355–380

Higgins MD (2000) Measurement of crystal size distributions. Am Mineral 85:1105–1116

Houghton BF, Wilson CJN, Del Carlo P, Coltelli M, Sable JE, Carey R (2004) The influence of conduit processes on changes in styles of basaltic Plinian eruptions: Tarawera 1886 and Etna 122 BC. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 137:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.05.009

Kozeny J (1927) Ober kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Akad Wiss Wien 136:271–306

Ketcham RA, Carlson WD (2001) Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of x-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences. Comput Geosci 27(4):381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00116-3

Ketcham RA (2005) Computational methods for quantitative analysis of three-dimensional features in geological specimens. Geosphere 1(1):32–41. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00001.1

Klug C, Cashman K (1996) Permeability development in vesiculating magmas: implications for fragmentation. Bull Volcanol. 58, 87–100. https://doi-org.libproxy.boisestate.edu/https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050128

La Spina G, Burton M, De’Michieli Vitturi M, & Arzilli F (2016) Role of syn-eruptive plagioclase disequilibrium crystallization in basaltic magma ascent dynamics. Nature Communications, 7(November 2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13402

La Spina G, Polacci M, Burton M, de’ Michieli Vitturi M (2017) Numerical investigation of permeability models for low viscosity magmas: application to the 2007 Stromboli effusive eruption. Earth Planet Sci Lett 473:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.013

La Spina G, Arzilli F, Llewellin EW, Burton MR, Clarke AB, de’ Michieli Vitturi M, … Mader HM (2020) Explosivity of basaltic lava fountains is controlled by magma rheology, ascent rate and outgassing. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 553, 116658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116658

Latt J et al (2021) Palabos: parallel lattice Boltzmann solver. Comput Math Appl 81:334–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.03.022

Lindoo A, Larsen JF, Cashman KV, Oppenheimer J (2017) Crystal controls on permeability development and degassing in basaltic andesite magma. Geology 45(9):831–834

Lohmar S (2008) Petrologia de las ignimbritas Lican y Pucon (Volcan Villarrica) y Curacautín (Volcan Llaima) en los Andes del sur de Chile. Universidad de Chile

Mangan M, Sisson T (2000) Delayed, disequilibrium degassing in rhyolite magma: decompression experiments and implications for explosive volcanism. Earth Planet Sci Lett 183:441–455

Mangan M, Mastin L, Sisson T (2004) Gas evolution in eruptive conduits: combining insights from high temperature and pressure decompression experiments with steady-state flow modelling. J Volcanol Geoth Res 129:23–36

Marsh BD (1998) On the interpretation of crystal size distributions in magmatic systems. J Petrol 39:553–599

Marshall AA, Brand BD, Martínez V, Bowers JM, Walker M, Wanless VD, Andrews BJ, Manga M, Valdivia P, Giordano G (2021) The mafic Curacautín ignimbrite of Llaima volcano, Chile. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 420:107418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107418

Maroof MA, Mahboubi A, Noorzad A (2020) A new method to determine specific surface area and shape coefficient of a cohesionless granular medium. Adv Powder Technol 31(7):3038–3049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.05.028

Martel C, Iacono-marziano G (2015) Timescales of bubble coalescence, outgassing, and foam collapse in decompressed rhyolitic melts. Earth Planet Sci Lett 412:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.010

Matyka M, Khalili A, Koza Z (2008) Tortuosity-porosity relation in porous media flow. Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 78(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.026306

Moitra P, Gonnermann HM, Houghton BF, Tiwary CS (2018) Fragmentation and Plinian eruption of crystallizing basaltic magma. Earth Planet Sci Lett 500:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.003

Morgan DJ, Jerram DA (2006) On estimating crystal shape for crystal size distribution analysis. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 154:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.09.016

Mueller S, Melnik O, & Spieler O (2005) Permeability and degassing of dome lavas undergoing rapid decompression : an experimental determination. 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-004-0392-4

Mueller S, Scheu B, Spieler O, Dingwell DB (2008) Permeability control on magma fragmentation. Geology 36(5):399–402. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24605A.1

Murch AP, Cole PD (2019) Using microlites to gain insights into ascent conditions of differing styles of volcanism at Soufrière Hills Volcano. J Volcanol Geoth Res 384:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.07.022

Namiki A, Patrick MR, Manga M, Houghton BF (2021) Brittle fragmentation by rapid gas separation in a Hawaiian fountain. Nat Geosci 14(4):242–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00709-0

Naranjo J, Moreno M (1991) Actividad explosiva postglacial en el volcan Llaima, Andes del Sur, 38° 45S. Rev Geol Chile 18(1):69–80. https://doi.org/10.5027/andgeoV18n1-a06

Pandolfi RJ et al (2018) Xi-cam: a versatile interface for data visualization and analysis. J Synchrotron Radiation 25:1261–1270

Parfitt EA (2004) A discussion of the mechanisms of explosive basaltic eruptions. J Volcanol Geoth Res 134(1–2):77–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.01.002

Pérez W, Freundt A, Kutterolf S (2020) The basaltic plininan eruption of the ~6 ka San Antonio Tephra and formation of the Masaya caldera, Nicaragua. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 401:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106975

Polacci M, Baker DR, Mancini L, Favretto S, Hill RJ (2009) Vesiculation in magmas from Stromboli and implications for normal Strombolian activity and paroxysmal explosions in basaltic systems. J Geophys Res 114:B01206. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005672

Polacci M, Mancini L, Baker DR (2010) The contribution of synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography to understanding volcanic processes. J Synchrotron Radiat 17(2):215–221. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049509048225

Polacci M, Arzilli F, La Spina G, Le Gall N, Cai B, Hartley ME, … Burton MR (2018) Crystallisation in basaltic magmas revealed via in situ 4D synchrotron X-ray microtomography.

*Scientific Reports*,*8*(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26644-6Saar MO, Manga M (1999) Permeability-porosity relationship in vesicular basalts. Geophys Res Lett 26:111–114

Sable JE, Houghton BF, Del Carlo P, Coltelli M (2006) Changing conditions of magma ascent and fragmentation during the Etna 122 BC basaltic Plinian eruption: Evidence from clast microtextures. J Volcanol Geoth Res 158(3–4):333–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2006.07.006

Sable JE, Houghton BF, Wilson CJN, Carey RJ (2009) Eruption mechanisms during the climax of the Tarawera 1886 basaltic Plinian eruption inferred from microtextural characteristics of the deposits

*in*Thordarson T, Self S, Larsen G, Rowland SK, Hoskuldsson A (eds) Studies in volcanology: the legacy of George Walker. Special Publications of IAVCEI 2:229–154. The Geological Society of London, LondonShanti NO, Chan VWL, Stock SR, De Carlo F, Thornton K, Faber KT (2014) X-ray micro-computed tomography and tortuosity calculations of percolating pore networks. Acta Mater 71:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.003

Schindlbeck JC, Freundt A, Kutterolf S (2014) Major changes in the post-glacial evolution of magmatic compositions and pre-eruptive conditions at Llaima volcano, Andean Southern Volcanic Zone. Chile Bull Volcanol 76:830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-014-0830-x

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675

Shea T, Hammer JE (2013) Kinetics of cooling- and decompression-induced crystallization in hydrous mafic-intermediate magmas. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 260:127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.04.018

Shea T (2017) Bubble nucleation in magmas : a dominantly heterogeneous process ? J Volcanol Geoth Res 343:155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.06.025

Suman R, Ruth D (1993) Formation factor and tortuosity of homogeneous porous media. Transp Porous Media 12(2):185–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00616979

Tjaden B, Cooper SJ, Brett DJ, Kramer D, Shearing PR (2016) On the origin and application of the Bruggeman correlation for analysing transport phenomena in electrochemical systems. Curr Opin Chem Eng 12:44–51

Toramaru A (2006) BND ( bubble number density ) decompression rate meter for explosive volcanic eruptions. 154, 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2006.03.027

Vona A, Romano C, Dingwell DB, Giordano D (2011) The rheology of crystal-bearing basaltic magmas from Stromboli and Etna. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75(11):3214–3236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.03.031

Yokoyama T, & Takeuchi S (2009) Porosimetry of vesicular volcanic products by a water-expulsion method and the relationship of pore characteristics to permeability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005758

Yoshimura S, Kuritani T, Matsumoto A, Nakagawa M (2019) Fingerprint of silicic magma degassing visualised through chlorine microscopy. Sci Rep 9(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37374-0

Wei W, Cai J, Xiao J, Meng Q, Xiao B, Han Q (2018) Kozeny-Carman constant of porous media: insights from fractal-capillary imbibition theory. Fuel 234(June):1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.012

Wright HMN, Cashman KV, Gottesfeld EH, Roberts JJ (2009) Pore structure of volcanic clasts: measurements of permeability and electrical conductivity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 280(1–4):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.01.023

## Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation Division of Earth Sciences grant 1831143. The x-ray microtomography was supported through the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Advanced Light Source grant ALS-09197.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

Editorial responsibility: U. Kueppers

This paper constitutes part of a topical collection:

What pyroclasts can tell us

## Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Valdivia, P., Marshall, A.A., Brand, B.D. *et al.* Mafic explosive volcanism at Llaima Volcano: 3D x-ray microtomography reconstruction of pyroclasts to constrain shallow conduit processes.
*Bull Volcanol* **84**, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01514-8

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01514-8