Skip to main content
Log in

Additive effects of herbivory, nectar robbing and seed predation on male and female fitness estimates of the host plant Ipomopsis aggregata

  • Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many antagonistic species attack plants and consume specific plant parts. Understanding how these antagonists affect plant fitness individually and in combination is an important research focus in ecology and evolution. We examined the individual and combined effects of herbivory, nectar robbing, and pre-dispersal seed predation on male and female estimates of fitness in the host plant Ipomopsis aggregata. By examining the effects of antagonists on plant traits, we were able to tease apart the direct consumptive effects of antagonists versus the indirect effects mediated through changes in traits important to pollination. In a three-way factorial field experiment, we manipulated herbivory, nectar robbing, and seed predation. Herbivory and seed predation reduced some male and female fitness estimates, whereas plants tolerated the effects of robbing. The effects of herbivory, robbing, and seed predation were primarily additive, and we found little evidence for non-additive effects of multiple antagonists on plant reproduction. Herbivory affected plant reproduction through both direct consumptive effects and indirectly through changes in traits important to pollination (i.e., nectar and phenological traits). Conversely, seed predators primarily had direct consumptive effects on plants. Our results suggest that the effects of multiple antagonists on estimates of plant fitness can be additive, and investigating which traits respond to damage can provide insight into how antagonists shape plant performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler LS, Karban R, Strauss SY (2001) Direct and indirect effects of alkaloids on plant fitness via herbivory and pollination. Ecology 82:2032–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman T-L (1998) Is relative pollen production or removal a good predictor of relative male fitness? An experimental exploration with wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana, Rosaceae). Am J Bot 85:1166–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergelson J, Crawley MJ (1992) Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. Am Nat 139:870–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody AK (1991) Pre-dispersal seed predation by Hylemya (Delia) sp. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae): mechanisms and consequences of oviposition choice (Ph.D. thesis). University of California, Davis

  • Brody AK (1992) Oviposition choices by a predispersal seed predator (Hylemya sp.). 1. Correspondence with hummingbird pollinators, and the role of plant size, density and floral morphology. Oecologia 91:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody AK, Mitchell RJ (1997) Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 110:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody AK, Waser NM (1995) Oviposition patterns and larval success of a pre-dispersal seed predator attacking two confamilial host plants. Oikos 74:447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody AK, Irwin RE, McCutcheon ML, Parsons EC (2008) Interactions between nectar robbers and seed predators mediated by a shared host plant, Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 155:75–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkle LA, Irwin RE, Newman DA (2007) Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant life-history traits. Am J Bot 94:1935–1943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR, Halama KJ (1993) Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:1043–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett D (2003) Modelling binary data, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory: the dynamics of animal–plant interactions. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1997) Plant–herbivore dynamics. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 401–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Danckwerts JE (1993) Reserve carbon and photosynthesis: their role in regrowth of Themeda triandra, a widely distributed subtropical graminaceous species. Funct Ecol 7:634–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel EC, Irwin RE (2003) Linking pollinator-visitation rate and pollen receipt. Am J Bot 90:1612–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RS, Brody AK, Neefus CD (2003) Flowering phenology and compensation for herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 136:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM (2003) Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. Am Nat 162:242–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Perfectti F, Bosch J, Camacho JPM (2009) A geographic selection mosaic in a generalized plant–pollinator–herbivore system. Ecol Monogr 79:245–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronemeyer PA, Dilger BJ, Bouzat JL, Paige KN (1997) The effects of herbivory on paternal fitness in scarlet gilia: better moms also make better pops. Am Nat 150:592–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houle G, Simard G (1996) Additive effects of genotype, nutrient availability and type of tissue damage on the compensatory response of Salix planifolia spp. planifolia to stimulated herbivory. Oecologia 107:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer RA, Root RB (2002) Interactive effects of different types of herbivore damage: Trirhabda beetle larva and Philaenus spittlebugs on goldenrod (Solidago altissima). Am Midl Nat 147:204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE (2006) Consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. Am Nat 167:315–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK (1998) Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia 116:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK (1999) Nectar-robbing bumble bees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 80:1703–1712

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK (2000) Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Ecology 81:2637–2643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK, Waser NM (2001) The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia 129:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Galen C, Rabenold JJ, Kaczorowski R, McCutcheon ML (2008) Mechanisms of tolerance to floral larceny in two animal-pollinated wildflowers, Polemonium viscosum and Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 89:3093–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juenger T, Bergelson J (1997) Pollen and resource limitation of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 78:1684–1695

    Google Scholar 

  • Juenger T, Bergelson J (1998) Pairwise versus diffuse natural selection and the multiple herbivores of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 52:1583–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juenger T, Bergelson J (2000) The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764–777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot

  • Kolb A, Ehrlén J, Eriksson O (2007) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of spatial and temporal variation in pre-dispersal seed predation. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL (1998) Insect herbivory above- and belowground: individual and joint effects on plant fitness. Ecology 79:1281–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis RJ (1992) The selective impact of herbivores. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 301–325

  • Mitchell RJ (1993) Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production—observation and experiment in the field. Evolution 47:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RJ, Waser NM (1992) Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 73:633–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris WF et al (2007) Direct and indirect interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88:1021–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mothershead K, Marquis RJ (2000) Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant-pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology 81:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige KN (1992) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: from mutualistic to antagonistic interactions. Ecology 73:2076–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987) Overcompensation in response to herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am Nat 129:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petraitis PS, Dunham AE, Niewiarowski PH (1996) Inferring multiple causality: the limitations of path analysis. Funct Ecol 10:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants JM (1983) Nectar production in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Am J Bot 70:1468–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM (1993) MANOVA: multiple response variables and multispecies interactions. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharaf KE, Price MV (2004) Does pollination limit tolerance to browsing in Ipomopsis aggregata? Oecologia 138:396–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Ashman TL, Galloway LF, Young HJ (1992) Estimating male fitness of plants in natural populations. In: Wyatt R (ed) Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction: new approaches. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 62–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Irwin RE (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant–animal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:435–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Conner JK, Rush SL (1996) Foliar herbivory affects floral characters and plant attractiveness to pollinators: implications for male and female plant fitness. Am Nat 147:1098–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Sahli H, Conner JK (2005) Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution. New Phytol 165:81–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez LH, Gonzalez WL, Gianoli E (2009) Foliar damage modifies floral attractiveness to pollinators in Alstroemeria exerens. Evol Ecol 23:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres I, Salinas L, Lara C, Castillo-Guevara C (2008) Antagonists and their effects in a hummingbird–plant interaction: field experiments. Ecoscience 15:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1989) Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1991) Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata: are ovules usurped? Am J Bot 78:1036–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf PG, Campbell DR (1995) Hierarchical analysis of allozymic and morphometric variation in a montane herb, Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). J Hered 86:386–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton JT (1993) Indirect effects and habitat use in an intertidal community: interaction chains and interaction modifications. Am Nat 141:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-W, Zhao QYJ-M, Guo Y-H (2009) Differential effects of nectar robbing by the same bumble-bee species on three sympatric Corydalis species with varied mating systems. Ann Bot 104:33–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1980) Reproduction in Polemonium: pre-dispersal seed predation. Ecology 61:502–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank L. Burkle, B. Degasparis, E. Deliso, K. Fitzgerald, E. Henry, A. Rastogi, K. Ritter, and A. Schuett for help in the field and lab. R. Rosetti from the Dartmouth Women in Science Program helped count pollen for the male function estimates. A. Carper, G. Clarke, J. Evans, Z. Gezon, N. Gotelli, E. Hart, J. Manson, C. Orians, R. Petipas, R. Schaeffer, and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the manuscript. Field and lab work were funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-9806501, and supplies and lab assistance for pollen counting were provided by NSF DEB-0455348 and the Dartmouth Women in Science Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca E. Irwin.

Additional information

Communicated by Colin Orians.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Irwin, R.E., Brody, A.K. Additive effects of herbivory, nectar robbing and seed predation on male and female fitness estimates of the host plant Ipomopsis aggregata . Oecologia 166, 681–692 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1898-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1898-4

Keywords

Navigation