Abstract
Background
We aimed to assess the association of atrial fibrillation (AF) on outcomes in a post hoc analysis of the ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study) and how this association is modified by baseline imaging features.
Methods
Inverse probability of treatment weight was used to remove baseline imbalances between those with and without AF. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH), early neurological deterioration or death within 24 h, and death at 90 days. The logistic regression model was used to determine the associations.
Results
Of the 3285 patients included in this analysis, 636 (19%) had AF at baseline. Compared with non-AF, AF was not significantly associated with an unfavourable shift of mRS (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–1.24), but with sICH (2.82; 1.78-4.48; IST-3 criteria), early neurological deterioration or death within 24 h (1.31; 1.01-1.70), and death (1.42; 1.12-1.79). Among patients with acute ischaemic signs (presence, extent, swelling and attenuation of acute lesions), AF was associated with the increased risk of all the poor outcomes (all P < 0.04 for interaction).
Conclusions
We found AF increased risk of sICH, early neurological deterioration or death and death, but not unfavourable functional recovery at day 90 after thrombolysis in patients with AIS. The presence of acute ischaemic brain imaging signs at stroke presentation could be used to improve risk stratification in the presence of AF.
Trial registration
The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01422616).
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cause for cardioembolic stroke, which rises with age [1, 2] and is likely to be the commonest cause of ischaemic stroke in high-income countries [3]. Ischaemic stroke in the presence of AF is associated with poor functional outcomes [4,5,6] and a high risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) [5, 7] after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Thrombolytic treatment with intravenous alteplase, when administered within 4.5 h after the onset of symptoms, is the main medical treatment for AIS [8]. Data from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) of ~ 7000 patients have shown that thrombolysis derives at least equivalent treatment benefit whether in the presence or absence of AF [9]. Observational studies have produced inconsistent results: Some studies indicate that AF is associated with poorer outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis than patients without AF [10,11,12]. While some found no association [13], some even found an opposite association with favourable outcomes [14]. The greater risk for worse outcomes might be attributable to older age, more severe strokes at admission [13, 14], and the duration of AF [11].
Studies have also examined the link between AF and imaging factors beyond a typical vascular risk factor profile to explain the worse outcomes among patients with AF [15,16,17,18,19]. Patients with AF have larger brain infarctions [15], a high burden of white matter hyperintensity lesions [16, 17, 19] and silent cerebral infarctions [18]. A secondary analysis of the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) has shown early ischaemic signs of hyperattenuated artery and pre-existing signs of atrophy and leukoaraiosis on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) were associated with reduced independence and increased risk of sICH after thrombolysis [20]. However, there is scant literature regarding how those imaging signs modified the association between AF and clinical outcomes among AIS after thrombolytic treatment. We aimed to explore those interactions using data from the dose arm of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED). The hypothesis was the association between AF and clinical outcomes was modified by those early ischaemic or pre-existing imaging signs.
Methods
Participants
The ENCHANTED trial was an international, multi-centre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint trial, the details of which are outlined elsewhere [21,22,23]. In brief, 3310 patients with a clinical diagnosis of AIS confirmed on brain image and fulfilling local criteria for thrombolysis treatment, including symptom onset within 4.5 h, and were randomised in the dose arm of the ENCHANTED trial to receive low- (0.6 mg/kg; 15% as bolus, 85% as infusion over 1 h) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg; 10% as bolus, 90% as infusion over 1 h) alteplase. The study protocol was approved by the appropriate ethics committee at each participating centre, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient or an appropriate surrogate. The study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (number NCT01422616).
Procedures
Key demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded at the time of enrolment. Stroke severity was measured using the NIHSS at baseline, 24 h, and at day 3 (or earlier on discharge from the hospital). Uncompressed digital images of all baseline and follow-up digital CT, MRI and angiogram images were collected in DICOM format on a CD-ROM identified only with the patient’s unique study number and uploaded by a special purpose-built web-based system for central analysis at The George Institute for Global Health. All brain scans with an intracranial haemorrhage were reviewed by at least two independent assessors, blind to clinical data, treatment, and date and sequence of the scan, using MIStar version 3.2 (Apollo Medical Imaging Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). Assessors graded any haemorrhage as intracerebral, subarachnoid, intraventricular, subdural or other; sICH being graded across all standard definitions [21,22,23]. Our imaging assessment protocol was derived from the IST3 methodology [20], details including the definition of the imaging variables have been described elsewhere (Supplementary file 1) [20, 24].
The primary outcome in these analyses was the ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary efficacy outcomes included early neurologic deterioration (≥ 4 points decline in NIHSS scores) or death within 24 h, mRS scores of 2–6 on the mRS, mRS scores of 3–6 on the mRS, and death at day 90 alone. The safety outcome was sICH defined according to several criteria used in other studies.
Statistical analysis
We used the dose arm of the ENCHANTED trial as an observational cohort study. The characteristics of patients with AF were expected to substantially differ from those of patients without AF. To generate a comparable data set, we calculated a propensity score to estimate the individual probability of a patient having AF. The following variables (significant variables of < 0.05 from univariate analysis) were used to calculate propensity scores (age, sex, ethnic groups [Asian vs non-Asian], premorbid mRS [0 vs 1], a history of the acute coronary syndrome, or other heart diseases, smoking, medication history of antihypertensives, or antiplatelet, or anticoagulant, or lipid-lowering drugs, baseline NIHSS, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, time from onset to randomisation, randomised treatment (low-dose vs standard-dose alteplase), leukoaraiosis, Visible infarct, hypoattenuation, swelling, hyperattenuated artery, atrophy, and leukoaraiosis. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), instead of propensity score matching to maximise sample size, was used as the primary strategy to adjust for baseline imbalances [25]. As the recommended method of propensity score matching is to match either 1 or 2 untreated subjects to each treated subject [26]. Consequently, we would lose a significant proportion of patients. Data balancing was examined using an absolute standardised difference in covariate means [27]. The distributions of baseline covariates were fairly well balanced by applying propensity scores; the absolute standardised differences after IPTW were within an acceptable margin of 0.1 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Stabilized weights [28] were used to reduce the variance of the estimated effect of the presence of AF and were incorporated into logistic regression models to determine associations of the presence of AF and outcomes.
The association of the presence of AF on outcomes was determined using logistic regression models, and the heterogeneity of the association across subgroups by imaging factors was estimated by adding an interaction term to the statistical models. Data were reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two-sided P values are reported, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for analyses [28].
Results
3285 patients (1243 [37.8%] female) of mean age 66.6 (SD 12.8) from the dose arm of the ENCHANTED trial were included in the analysis. Table 1 shows that patients with AF [636(19%)] were significantly more likely to be older, female, of non-Asian ethnicity, disabled before the stroke, and with a history of co-morbidities (coronary artery disease, other cardiac diseases, and hypercholesterolaemia), and concomitant therapies (antihypertensives, anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and statin). As expected, patients with AF were more likely to have a cardioembolic stroke, and thus strokes of greater severity. We observed patients with AF were more likely to have hyperattenuated artery, atrophy, and leukoaraiosis, whereas less likely to have visible infarct, hypoattenuation and swelling. The baseline characteristics are well balanced between patients with AF and without AF after propensity score (Figure SI).
Compared with non-AF, patients with AF were not at increased risk of an unfavourable shift of mRS at day 90 (OR: 95% CI 1.09: 0.96–1.24) (P = 0.192 for proportional odds assumption test) (Fig. 1). However, AF was associated with ~ 1.5-fold increased risk of death (1.42: 1.12–1.79), and ~ fourfold of sICH (3.82: 2.09–6.99) defined by the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) criteria and ~ threefold (2.82: 1.78–4.48) defined by IST-3 criteria. The consistent significant association with sICH was seen across a broad range of criteria (all P < 0.002) (Fig. 1). AF was also associated with a ~ 1.5-fold increased risk of early neurological deterioration or death in the first 24 h (1.31: 1.01–1.70).
We found that acute ischaemic signs (presence, extent, swelling and attenuation of acute lesions) significantly modified the association between AF and ordinal mRS at day 90 (all P ≤ 0.005 for interaction), death (all P ≤ 0.002 for interaction), and sICH (any adjudicated sICH, all p ≤ 0.004 to 0.037 for interaction) (Table 2). Among patients presenting with any of those acute ischaemic signs, AF was associated with increased risk of poor outcomes for an unfavourable shift of mRS, any adjudicated sICH, and death, respectively).
Discussion
This post hoc analysis of the ENCHANTED trial indicated that the presence of AF was associated with increased risk of sICH, mortality, and early neurological deterioration in thrombolysed patients with AIS, considering the differences explained by traditional vascular risk factors and imaging features. However, no significant differences for functional recovery at day 90 were observed between patients with and without AF. Moreover, we found that acute ischaemic brain imaging signs significant modified the association between AF and poor outcomes. Compared with non-AF, AF increases the risk of all poor outcomes, including poor functional recovery, sICH, and death in the subgroup of patients with acute ischaemic signs.
Our analyses have produced a robust association derived from a large population recruited from a wide range of health care settings, using a broad range of different classifications of ICH, rigorous outcome assessment. We have adjusted for both traditional vascular risk factors and imaging features, including early ischaemic and pre-existing signs. Our results are consistent with most previous observations studies showing a high odds of sICH and mortality in patients with AF after thrombolysis [10,11,12]. Patients with AF were also more likely to develop early neurological deterioration or death within 24 h [10]. Inconsistent results produced by some small studies [13, 14] could be explained by limited sample size, different classifications of sICH and incomplete confounder adjustment.
A secondary analysis of the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) has shown the predictive significance of early ischaemic and pre-existing signs for sICH and functional outcomes after thrombolysis [20]. Given the different AIS mechanisms for patients with and without AF, we hypothesised that the direction/magnitude of those associations was different between patients with and without AF. This analysis found a higher risk of poor outcomes with AF than non-AF among patients with all acute ischaemic signs (presence, extent, swelling and attenuation of acute lesions). The acute ischaemic signs of an early ischaemic lesion, hypoattenuation and swelling reflect the middle cerebral artery’s occlusion with insufficient cerebral collateral circulation supply and are associated with larger infarct volume [29, 30]. Previous studies have shown that patients with AF were more likely to have greater volumes of baseline hypoattenuation, greater infarct growth, greater final infarct volume for sudden main trunk occlusion, and less developed cerebral collateral circulation [31, 32]. Those mechanisms support our results in explaining the more frequent haemorrhagic transformation and poor outcomes among patients with AF after AIS [32, 33]. Our finding in line with recently thrombectomy registry study indicated that AF patients exposed to intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy had increased haemorrhagic complications without improved functional outcomes, in contrast with non-AF patients [34].
Our findings may have relevant implications for clinical practice. First, our data help to explain and understanding the higher risk of haemorrhagic transformation and poor outcomes after thrombolysis in AIS patients with AF by acute ischaemic signs on NCCT. Second, our results suggest direct thrombectomy may suitable treatment strategy for AF patients with acute ischaemic signs on NCCT, which usually reflect large vessel occlusion.
This study’s strength includes the large sample size and recruitment from different healthcare settings, a prospective design with high rates of follow-up, and detailed systematically measured baseline NCCT signs on clinical outcomes in patients with and without AF. Weaknesses include the important point that we have used the ENCHANTED trial as a cohort study, and therefore, despite our efforts to determine the independent significance of associations, we cannot presume causality in such observational analysis, and such multiple post hoc testing raises the potential for chance associations. First, most patients had a mild-to-moderate neurological deficit. Therefore, the present findings may not be generalisable to patients with more severe stroke. Second, magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive and clearer than NCCT in detecting the early ischaemic and pre-existing signs, while only a few patients had a baseline MRI scan. Third, we lack data on cerebral microbleeds, which is the important marker of cerebral small vessel disease. Fourth, the proportion of patients who received mechanical thrombectomy was fairly low in the ENCHANTED study. Therefore, the present findings may not be generalisable to patients with large vessel occlusion and who receive mechanical thrombectomy treatment.
Conclusion
In summary, we confirm that AF was significantly associated with an increased risk of sICH, early neurological deterioration and mortality but not functional recovery at 90 days in thrombolysed patients with AIS. The presence of acute ischaemic signs on NCCT is a significant effect modifier for the association between AF and poor outcomes and could be used to improve risk stratification when the presence of AF.
Data availability
Individual deidentifed participant data used in these analyses will be shared by request from any qualified investigator following approval of a protocol and signed data access agreement via the Research Offce of The George Institute for Global Health, Australia.
References
Alkhouli M, Friedman PA (2019) Ischemic stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol 74(24):3050–3065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.040
Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working G (2008) Comparison of 12 risk stratification schemes to predict stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Stroke 39(6):1901–1910. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.501825
Leyden JM, Kleinig TJ, Newbury J, Castle S, Cranefield J, Anderson CS, Crotty M, Whitford D, Jannes J, Lee A, Greenhill J (2013) Adelaide stroke incidence study: declining stroke rates but many preventable cardioembolic strokes. Stroke 44(5):1226–1231. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.675140
Vinding NE, Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Butt JH, Østergaard L, Olesen JB, Torp-Pedersen C, Gislason GH, Køber L, Kruuse C, Johnsen SP, Fosbøl EL (2022) Ischemic stroke severity and mortality in patients with and without atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 11(4):e022638. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022638
Saposnik G, Gladstone D, Raptis R, Zhou L, Hart RG, Investigators of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN) and the Stroke Outcomes Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group (2013) Atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke: predicting response to thrombolysis and clinical outcomes. Stroke 44(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.676551
Henninger N, Goddeau RP Jr, Karmarkar A, Helenius J, McManus DD (2016) Atrial fibrillation is associated with a worse 90-day outcome than other cardioembolic stroke subtypes. Stroke 47(6):1486–1492. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012865
Lindley RI, Wardlaw JM, Sandercock PA, Rimdusid P, Lewis SC, Signorini DF, Ricci S (2004) Frequency and risk factors for spontaneous hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 13(6):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.03.003
Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, Brott T, Cohen G, Davis S, Donnan G, Grotta J, Howard G, Kaste M, Koga M, von Kummer R, Lansberg M, Lindley RI, Murray G, Olivot JM, Parsons M, Tilley B, Toni D, Toyoda K, Wahlgren N, Wardlaw J, Whiteley W, del Zoppo GJ, Baigent C, Sandercock P, Hacke W, Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2014) Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 384(9958):1929–1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5
Frank B, Fulton R, Weimar C, Shuaib A, Lees KR, Collaborators VISTA (2012) Impact of atrial fibrillation on outcome in thrombolyzed patients with stroke: evidence from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). Stroke 43(7):1872–1877. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.650838
Awadh M, MacDougall N, Santosh C, Shuaib A, Lees KR (2010) Early recurrent ischemic stroke complicating intravenous thrombolysis for stroke: incidence and association with atrial fibrillation. Stroke 41(9):1990–1995. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.569459
Seet RC, Zhang Y, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA (2011) Relationship between chronic atrial fibrillation and worse outcomes in stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis. Arch Neurol 68(11):1454–1458. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2011.248
Hu Y, Ji C (2021) Efficacy and safety of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 21(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02095-x
Padjen V, Bodenant M, Jovanovic DR, Ponchelle-Dequatre N, Novakovic N, Cordonnier C, Beslac-Bumbasirevic L, Leys D (2013) Outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation after intravenous thrombolysis for cerebral ischaemia. J Neurol 260(12):3049–3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7119-4
Sung SF, Chen YW, Tseng MC, Ong CT, Lin HJ (2013) Atrial fibrillation predicts good functional outcome following intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in patients with severe stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(7):892–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.034
de Falco FA, Mastroroberto G, Mazzei G, Montariello A, Zaccaria F, Sepe Visconti O (1991) Atrial fibrillation and infarct area extent in ischemic stroke. A clinical and neuroradiological study in 104 patients. Acta Neurol 13(3):249–254
Henon H, Godefroy O, Lucas C, Pruvo JP, Leys D (1996) Risk factors and leukoaraiosis in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 94(2):137–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1996.tb07044.x
de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Oudkerk M, Kors JA, Hofman A, van Gijn J, Breteler MM (2000) Atrial fibrillation and the risk of cerebral white matter lesions. Neurology 54(9):1795–1801. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.54.9.1795
Kalantarian S, Ay H, Gollub RL, Lee H, Retzepi K, Mansour M, Ruskin JN (2014) Association between atrial fibrillation and silent cerebral infarctions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 161(9):650–658. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-0538
Bernstein RA, Di Lazzaro V, Rymer MM, Passman RS, Brachmann J, Morillo CA, Sanna T, Thijs V, Rogers T, Liu S, Ziegler PD, Diener HC (2015) Infarct topography and detection of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: results from CRYSTAL AF. Cerebrovasc Dis 40(1–2):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437018
IST-3 collaborative group (2015) Association between brain imaging signs, early and late outcomes, and response to intravenous alteplase after acute ischaemic stroke in the third International Stroke Trial (IST-3): secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 14(5):485–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00012-5
Anderson CS, Woodward M, Arima H, Chen X, Lindley RI, Wang X, Chalmers J, ENCHANTED Investigators (2015) Statistical analysis plan for evaluating low- vs. standard-dose alteplase in the ENhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED). Int J Stroke 10(8):1313–1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12602
Huang Y, Sharma VK, Robinson T, Lindley RI, Chen X, Kim JS, Lavados P, Olavarría V, Arima H, Fuentes S, Nguyen HT, Lee TH, Parsons MW, Levi C, Demchuk AM, Bath PM, Broderick JP, Donnan GA, Martins S, Pontes-Neto OM, Silva F, Pandian J, Ricci S, Stapf C, Woodward M, Wang J, Chalmers J, Anderson CS, ENCHANTED investigators (2015) Rationale, design, and progress of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED) trial: An international multicenter 2 x 2 quasi-factorial randomized controlled trial of low- vs. standard-dose rt-PA and early intensive vs. guideline-recommended blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible for thrombolysis treatment. Int J Stroke 10(5):778–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12486
Anderson CS, Robinson T, Lindley RI, Arima H, Lavados PM, Lee TH, Broderick JP, Chen X, Chen G, Sharma VK, Kim JS, Thang NH, Cao Y, Parsons MW, Levi C, Huang Y, Olavarría VV, Demchuk AM, Bath PM, Donnan GA, Martins S, Pontes-Neto OM, Silva F, Ricci S, Roffe C, Pandian J, Billot L, Woodward M, Li Q, Wang X, Wang J, Chalmers J, ENCHANTED Investigators and Coordinators (2016) Low-dose versus standard-dose intravenous Alteplase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 374(24):2313–2323. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1515510
Delcourt C, Wang X, Zhou Z, Wardlaw JM, Mair G, Robinson TG, Chen X, Yoshimura S, Torii-Yoshimura T, Carcel C, Calic Z, Tan WY, Malavera A, Anderson CS, Lindley RI (2020) Brain imaging abnormalities and outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: the ENCHANTED trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 91(12):1290–1296. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-323015
Robins JM, Hernán MÁ, Brumback B (2020) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11(5):550–560. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200009000-00011
Austin PC (2010) Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol 172(9):1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq224
Haviland A, Nagin DS, Rosenbaum PR (2007) Combining propensity score matching and group-based trajectory analysis in an observational study. Psychol Methods 12(3):247–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.247
Rheta E. Lanehart PRdG, Eun Sook Kim, Aarti P. Bellara, Jeffrey D, Kromrey aRSL Propensity score analysis and assessment of propensity score approaches using SAS procedures [online]. http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings12/314-2012.pdf. Accessed 17 Mar 2023
von Kummer R, Bourquain H, Bastianello S, Bozzao L, Manelfe C, Meier D, Hacke W (2001) Early prediction of irreversible brain damage after ischemic stroke at CT. Radiology 219(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap0695
Roberts HC, Dillon WP, Furlan AJ, Wechsler LR, Rowley HA, Fischbein NJ, Higashida RT, Kase C, Schulz GA, Lu Y, Firszt CM (2002) Computed tomographic findings in patients undergoing intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion: results from the PROACT II trial. Stroke 33(6):1557–1565. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000018011.66817.41
Sakamoto Y, Koga M, Toyoda K, Osaki M, Okata T, Nagatsuka K, Minematsu K (2012) Low DWI-ASPECTS is associated with atrial fibrillation in acute stroke with the middle cerebral artery trunk occlusion. J Neurol Sci 323(1–2):99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.08.021
Tu HT, Campbell BC, Christensen S, Desmond PM, De Silva DA, Parsons MW, Churilov L, Lansberg MG, Mlynash M, Olivot JM, Straka M, Bammer R, Albers GW, Donnan GA, Davis SM, Investigators EPITHET-DEFUSE (2015) Worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation is explained by more severe hypoperfusion, infarct growth, and hemorrhagic transformation. Int J Stroke 10(4):534–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12007
Tu HT, Campbell BC, Christensen S, Collins M, De Silva DA, Butcher KS, Parsons MW, Desmond PM, Barber PA, Levi CR, Bladin CF, Donnan GA, Davis SM, Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) Investigators (2010) Pathophysiological determinants of worse stroke outcome in atrial fibrillation. Cerebrovasc Dis 30(4):389–395. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316886
Akbik F, Alawieh A, Dimisko L, Howard BM, Cawley CM, Tong FC, Nahab F, Samuels OB, Maier I, Feng W, Goyal N, Starke RM, Rai A, Fargen KM, Psychogios MN, Jabbour P, De Leacy R, Keyrouz SG, Dumont TM, Kan P, Liman J, Arthur AS, Wolfe SQ, Mocco J, Crosa RJ, Fox WC, Gory B, Spiotta AM, Grossberg JA, Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) Collaborators (2022) Bridging thrombolysis in atrial fibrillation stroke is associated with increased hemorrhagic complications without improved outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 14(10):979–984. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017954
Acknowledgements
TGR, CSA, and RIL conceived the trial. CSA was the chief investigator. RIL led the adjudication of neuroimaging and serious adverse events. XW did the statistical analysis. XW and SY wrote the first draft of the manuscript; all authors revised this draft. All authors read and approved the final version.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. The study is supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (Project Grant numbers 1020462 and 1101113, and Program Grant 1149987), the Stroke Association of the United Kingdom (TSA 2012/01 and 2015/01), the Ministry of Health and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPQ: 467322/2014–7, 402388/2013–5), the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs of the Republic of Korea (HI14C1985) (for the alteplase-dose arm), and a research grant from Takeda to support the conduct of the study in China. The research team acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) for the conduct of the trial in England, UK. XW holds National Heart Foundation of Australia post-doctoral fellowship, investigator development grant from New South Wales Health commission, Australia, and investigator grant from NHMRC; CSA is a Senior Principal Research Fellow for the NHMRC; TGR is a NIHR Senior Investigator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
CA has received grants from NHMRC of Australia, the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Australia and Takeda China and speaker fees from Takeda. Others have no disclosures.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., You, S., Zhou, Z. et al. Baseline brain imaging signs in patients with ischaemic stroke by the presence of atrial fibrillation: the ENCHANTED trial. J Neurol 270, 2567–2575 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11580-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11580-x