Abstract
Knowledge of the physiological endolymphatic space (ELS) is necessary to estimate endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) in patients with vestibulocochlear syndromes. Therefore, the current study investigated age-dependent changes in the ELS of participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing. Sixty-four ears of 32 participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing aged between 21 and 75 years (45.8 ± 17.2 years, 20 females, 30 right-handed, two left-handed) were examined by intravenous delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear (iMRI). Clinical diagnostics included neuro-otological assessment, video-oculography during caloric stimulation, and head-impulse test. iMRI data analysis provided semi-quantitative visual grading and automatic algorithmic quantitative segmentation of ELS volume (3D, mm3) using a deep learning-based segmentation of the inner ear’s total fluid space (TFS) and volumetric local thresholding, as described earlier. As a result, following a 4-point ordinal scale, a mild ELH (grade 1) was found in 21/64 (32.8%) ears uni- or bilaterally in either cochlear, vestibulum, or both. Age and ELS were found to be positively correlated for the inner ear (r(64) = 0.33, p < 0.01), and vestibulum (r(64) = 0.25, p < 0.05). For the cochlea, the values correlated positively without reaching significance (r(64) = 0.21). In conclusion, age-dependent increases of the ELS should be considered when evaluating potential ELH in single subjects and statistical group comparisons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Delayed gadolinium (Gd) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear (iMRI) enables in vivo verification of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH, [1, 2]). Before its technical development, ELH was thought pathognomonic to Menière’s disease (MD). However, up to now, MD diagnosis is based on clinical diagnostic criteria [3] and only definitely verifiable in post-mortem human temporal bone (hTB) histopathologic inquiry [4].
Fittingly, varying degrees of ELH were nearly universally present in subjects with a history of MD, with 97–100% in post-mortem human temporal bones studies [5, 6] and 80% in iMRI studies [7,8,9,10]. ELH was further consistently detected in other pathologies presenting with episodic vertigo, such as in 36–60% in intralabyrinthine schwannoma [11,12,13,14], 60% in bilateral vestibulopathy [15], 59% in otosclerosis [16], 8–30% in vestibular migraine [8, 17, 18], and also in idiopathic intracranial hypertension [19], spontaneous intracranial hypotension [20, 21], or cerebrospinal venous insufficiency [22]. Consequently, ELH's specificity to MD is being revalued, while its pathophysiological relevance within the pathologies mentioned remains unclear to varying degrees.
It is necessary to be aware of asymptomatic ELH prevalence in healthy subjects to assess the relevance of any ELH found. Moreover, possible age-dependent physiological ELS changes should be considered on a single case or group scale. Unfortunately, however, studies on the ELH prevalence within the healthy population have been carried out noticeably less. Due to the more or less invasive nature of the methods able to verify ELH so far, studies on the healthy population to date were frequently replaced by patient groups that were thought not to be associated with ELH. At the same time, studies accompanied by comprehensive vestibulocochlear functional testing are scarce (for an overview cp. Tables 3 and 4). hTB studies often lack information on age and concurrent reference of vestibulocochlear function, while most iMRI studies are satisfied with the participants' statement that they did not perceive any vestibulocochlear malfunction. The comparison of the results of these studies is further complicated using different ELS quantification methods in iMRI [7] and different fixatives or post-mortem hours in hTB [23].
The current study investigated age-dependent changes in the ELS in participants with normal vestibulocochlear function (vcHP) and discussed them given previous studies conducted on ELS in “healthy” participants.
Materials and methods
Setting and institutional review board approval
All data were acquired at the interdisciplinary German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ) and the Munich University Hospital Neurology Department (LMU), Germany, between 2018 and 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained before the initiation of the study (no. 641–15). Furthermore, all participants provided informed oral and written consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki before inclusion in the study.
Study population
Thirty-two consecutive inpatients (64 ears; 20 females; aged 21–75 years, mean age 45.8 ± 17.2 years; 31 right-handed, two left-handed) of the Neurology Department without symptoms or underlying pathologies of the peripheral and central vestibulocochlear system underwent MRI with intravenous contrast agent as part of their diagnostic workup and agreed to undergo additional iMRI sequences after 4 h. Ethical considerations did not allow us to include healthy volunteers without a medical indication for an iMRI with contrast agent (see limitations for more information). The reasons for the participant’s admission to the clinic included polyneuropathy (n = 5), movement disorders (n = 5), single small cortical metastases (n = 3), epilepsy (n = 3), optic nerve neuritis (n = 3), spinal inflammatory lesion (n = 3), tension headache (n = 3), viral meningitis (n = 2), subdural hematoma (n = 2), idiopathic facial nerve palsy (n = 2), and decompensated esophoria (n = 1). Cranial MRI findings were age-appropriate or did not interfere with the vestibulocochlear system. The laterality quotient for right-handedness was assessed with the 10-item inventory of the Edinburgh test [24]. The inclusion criterion was age between 18 and 85 years and normal audiovestibular testing to confirm the soundness of their peripheral end-organs and the central vestibular system (see Sect. 2.3). The exclusion criteria were current cochlear or vestibular disorders, a positive history of vertigo, balance, or hearing disorders, any MR- or contrast agent-related contraindications [25], poor image quality, or missing MR sequences.
Measurement of the auditory, semicircular canal and otolith functions
Participants without vestibulocochlear symptoms (vcHP) underwent vestibulocochlear testing to confirm the soundness of their peripheral inner ear end-organs. Diagnostic workup included a thorough neurological examination (e.g., history-taking, clinical examination), neuro-orthoptic assessment [e.g., Frenzel glasses, fundus photography, and adjustments of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) for acute vestibular graviceptive dysfunction], video-oculography (VOG) during caloric and head impulse testing (HIT), and pure tone audiometry (PTA).
A tilt of the SVV is a sensitive sign of an acute graviceptive vestibular tone imbalance. SVV was assessed with the subject sitting upright in front of a half-spherical dome with the head fixed on a chin rest [26]. A mean deviation of > 2.5° from the true vertical was considered a pathological tilt of SVV [26].
The impairment of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in higher frequencies was measured by HIT [24] using high-frame-rate VOG with EyeSeeCam ([27], EyeSeeTech, Munich, Germany). A median gain during head impulses < 0.8 (eye velocity in °/s divided by head velocity in °/s) was considered a pathological VOR [28].
Furthermore, semicircular canal responsiveness in lower frequencies was assessed by caloric stimulation (CS) with VOG, which was performed for both ears with 30° cold and 44° warm water. Vestibular paresis was defined as > 25% asymmetry between the right- and left-sided responses [29] or the sum of the maximal peak velocities of the slow phase caloric-induced nystagmus for stimulation with warm and cold water on each side < 25°/sec [30]. The caloric asymmetry index (AICS) was calculated based on the slow-phase velocity of the caloric nystagmus \({AI}_{CS }[\%] =\frac{({R}_{33^\circ }+{R}_{44^\circ })-({L}_{33^\circ }+{L}_{44^\circ })}{({R}_{33^\circ }+{R}_{44^\circ })+({L}_{33^\circ }+{L}_{44^\circ })}\times 100.\)
Audiological tests consisted of pure-tone audiometry (PTA) by air conduction at 250 Hz to 8 kHz frequencies. PTA was based on both ears’ four-tone average (arithmetic mean) of the thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz. Hearing loss was defined as PTA > 25 dB [31]. In all tests, the contralateral ear was masked by adequate noise. All audiometric equipment is regularly recalibrated (every 6 months) according to the local university equipment standard.
Delayed intravenous gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the inner ear
Data acquisition
Participants received a standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) of gadobutrol (Gadovist®, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) once and were scanned in a whole-body 3 Tesla MRI scanner (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 20-channel head coil twice; first directly after intravenous injection, as part of their diagnostic workup, and a second time after 4 h for the iMRI sequences. A T2-weighted, 3D-FLAIR (three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequence was used to differentiate endolymph from perilymph and bone, and a spin-echo 3D-SPACE (three-dimensional sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolutions) sequence delineated the total inner ear fluid space from the surrounding bone according to the method suggested by Ref. [2].
The T2-weighted, 3D-FLAIR was characterized by the following parameters: TR 6000 ms; TE 134 ms; TI 2240 ms; FA 180°; FOV 160 × 160 mm2; 36 slices; base resolution 320; averages 1; slice thickness 0.5 mm. The high-resolution, strongly T2-weighted, spin-echo 3D-SPACE sequence of the temporal bone had the following parameters: TR 1000 ms; TE 133 ms; FA 100°; FOV 192 × 192 mm2; 56 slices; base resolution 384; averages 4; slice thickness of 0.5.
Semi-quantitative (visual) grading of the endolymphatic space
ELH was observed as enlarged negative-signal spaces inside the labyrinth and cochlea on the 3D-FLAIR images [2]. Semi-quantitative (SQ) visual grading of the ELS (sqELS) was performed independently by an experienced head and neck radiologist (SSt) and a neurologist (JG, VK) who were blinded to the clinical patient data. The ELS’s characterization in the vestibulum and cochlea was based on a previously described 4-point [7, 32] ordinal scale classification.
3D-(volumetric) quantification of the endolymphatic space.
3D- or volumetric quantification of the ELS (vELS) was achieved in two steps: First, segmentation of the total fluid space (TFS) was based on IE-Vnet [33], a recently proposed and pre-trained volumetric deep learning algorithm with V-net architecture. IE-Vnet was deployed via the TOMAAT module [34] into the 3D–Slicer toolbox (version 4.11, [35]).
Second, ELS and perilymphatic space (PLS) were differentiated within the TFS using volumetric local thresholding (VOLT, [36]) that uses ImageJ Fiji [37], including the “Fuzzy and artificial neural networks image processing toolbox” [38] and the “MorphoLibJ Toolbox” [39]. The resulting 3D volume included ELS and PLS classifications for cochlea and vestibulum (cutoff 6). The ELS ratio, \(ER [\%]=\frac{ELS}{TFS}\times 100\), was calculated analogously to Ref. [40]. ELS symmetry between both inner ears was assessed using the absolute value of the asymmetry index AI [%] = \(\frac{({ELS}_{right}-{ELS}_{left})}{({ELS}_{right}+{ELS}_{left})}\times 100\).
Statistics and validation parameters
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical values are reported as the number of cases that fit the category/number of participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing [%]; ordinal or scalar values are presented as (mean ± standard deviation). Results were reported at a significance level of p < 0.05 and p < 0.01. In addition, the linear agreement between parameter pairs was calculated using two-sided Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results
A detailed clinical and neurophysiological characterization of the group of participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing (vcHP) is provided in Table 1. No participant needed to be excluded due to vestibulocochlear dysfunction.
Following a 4-point ordinal scale [7, 32], a mild ELH (grade 1) was found in 21/64 (32.8%) ears uni- or bilaterally in either cochlear, vestibulum, or both (\(sq{ELS}_{cochlea}^{HC}\): grade 0.2 \(\pm\) 0.4, \(sq{ELS}_{vestibulum}^{HC}\): grade 0.3 \(\pm\) 0.5, \(sq{ELS}_{inner ear}^{HC}\): grade 0.2 \(\pm\) 0.3, range: 0–1). This means that the extent of ELH was low (\(v{ELS}_{cochlea}^{HC}\): 2.8 \(\pm\) 1.1 mm3, \(v{ELS}_{vestibulum}^{HC}\): 6.6 \(\pm\) 2.1 mm3, \(v{ELS}_{inner ear}^{HC}\): 9.4 \(\pm\) 2.3 mm3). A detailed description of the ELS quantification results can be viewed in Table 2.
Age and vELS were found to be significantly positively correlated for the inner ear, r(64) = 0.33, p = 0.008, and vestibulum, r(64) = 0.25, p = 0.045. For the cochlea, values correlated positively without reaching significance, r(64) = 0.21, p = 0.100. The corresponding scatter plots are depicted in Fig. 1.
Scatter plot for age and 3D quantification of the endolymphatic space. Correlation results for cochlea (top), vestibulum (middle) and inner ear (bottom) of participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing: age and 3D-(volumetric)-quantification (vELS) of the endolymphatic space (ELS) were found to be moderately strong positively correlated for the cochlea, r(64) = 0.21, p = 0.100 (linear slope = 0.043), vestibulum, r(64) = 0.25, p = 0.045 (linear slope = 0.063), and inner ear, r(64) = 0.33, p = 0.008 (linear slope = 0.109). Significant linear agreements are marked (*) for a significance level p < 0.05 and (**) for a significance level p < 0.01
Discussion
The current study investigated age-dependent changes in the endolymphatic space (ELS) in 32 participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing (Table 2). Mild ELH (grade 1) was found in 15.6% in the cochlea (thereof 12.5% unilateral and 9.4% bilateral), 25% in the vestibulum (thereof 12.5% unilateral and 18.8% bilateral), and 32.8% when considering the inner ear (thereof 12.5% unilateral and 28.1% bilateral). None of the participants’ semi-quantitative ELH classification grades (sqELS) exceeded grade 1 (mild ELH) following a 3-point [41] and 4-point [7] ordinal scale. Mean ELS volume (vELS) was 2.8 µl for the cochlea, 6.6 µl for the vestibulum, and 9.4 µl for the inner ear. ELS ratio (ER = \(\frac{ELS}{TFS}\times 100\)) remained below 5% in cochlea (3.1%), vestibulum (3.7%), and inner ear (3.5%). Asymmetry index remained beneath 25% in cochlea (20.2%), vestibulum (15.2%), and inner ear (12.7%). ELS volume showed age-dependent significant changes for the inner ear, r(64) = 0.33, p = 0.008, and vestibulum, r(64) = 0.25, p = 0.045 (cp. Fig. 1). For the cochlea, values correlated positively without reaching significance, r(64) = 0.21, p = 0.100.
In the following, the mentioned results will be discussed given previous studies conducted on ELS in “healthy” participants.
ELH prevalence in “healthy” participants
The results of the current study fit well with the findings in the literature. An overview of ELH prevalence in studies on the “healthy” population to date is shown in Table 3. Notably, even excluding studies using the non-affected ear in unilateral Meniere's disease (uMD) as a healthy control group, a relatively high ELH prevalence was found. In iMRI studies (see Table 3b) using semi-quantitative three-point visual grading [41], mild ELH was reported to lie between 3.3 and 28.6% of participants in the cochlea [10, 42], 6.7–25% in the vestibulum [7, 43], and 7.5–10% in the inner ear [7, 43]. Significant ELH was reported between 9.5 and 13.3% in the cochlea [10] and up to 30% in the vestibulum [42]. In contrast, in hTB studies' adult population (see Table 3a), including participants with MD, ELH prevalence was found to be around 9% [44], and without MD, around 4.5% [6].
In summary, the overlap of the 3-point sqELH grading system of Schuhknecht et al. [45] for the hTB studies and of Nakashima et al. [41] for the iMRI helps to compare their results, a direct transfer of the results should be done with caution. After all, while iMRI can only indirectly verify ELH, it provides in-vivo longitudinal ELS visualization with multi-slice 3D-quantification in addition to contemporary measurement of vestibulocochlear function. hTB studies, on the other hand, provide direct identification of the distension of Reissner's membrane and further histopathologic evidence for MD.
ELS volume in “healthy” participants
The current study's ELS volume was low in the cochlea 2.8 \(\pm\) 1.1 mm3, vestibulum 6.6 \(\pm\) 2.1 mm3, and inner ear 9.4 \(\pm\) 2.3 mm3 compared to volumes in the previous literature, especially across methods in both hTB [23, 46, 47] and high-resolution CT [48,49,50]. A detailed description of the ELS 2D-(area) and 3D-(volumetric) quantification in previous hTB and iMRI studies on the “healthy” population to date can be viewed in Table 4.
It is noticeable that the lower volumetric values or ratios occur in the studies with participants that were controlled for vestibulocochlear testing. In addition, the absolute values of both ELS quantification methods (although 2D- more than the 3D- ELS quantification method) are variable across the different studies, and relative size ELS are less variable (with ELS-Ratio being most constant, also across methods).
ELH laterality and ELS symmetry
In healthy participants, cochlear and vestibular ELH laterality (bi- or unilateral) and ELS symmetry (when using 2D or 3D quantification) were omitted. Investigated hTB and iMRI studies either only have one ear at their disposal [46, 51,52,53], limit information on laterality to the patient cohort [6, 10, 42,43,44, 54, 55], or do not discuss ELH laterality as a category [40, 56,57,58]. The current study showed 12.5% unilateral mild ELH in the cochlea and vestibulum, 9.4% showed a mild bilateral ELH in the cochlea, and 18.8% a mild bilateral ELH in the vestibulum, while the asymmetry index remained < 25% (cochlea: 20.2%, vestibulum 15.2%, inner ear: 12.7%). Laterality and symmetry add to the characteristic pattern in “healthy” participants, alongside volumetric extent and maximally mild ELH in semi-quantitative ELS quantification.
Therefore, ELS studies should include semi-quantitative (SQ) grading and 3D quantification. SQ grading should include the 3-point grading scale by Nakashima et al. [41] as it is the most commonly used grading system and can serve as a calibration point. Reported 3D-quantification values should include symmetry parameters, such as asymmetry indices for un-normalized data and the relative size of the ELS for normalized data.
ELS age-dependency
Age and vELS were found to be significantly positively correlated for the inner ear (r(64) = 0.33, p = 0.008), and vestibulum (r(64) = 0.25, p = 0.045). For the cochlea, values correlated positively without reaching significance (r(64) = 0.21, p = 0.100)(Fig. 1). These results seem plausible because of the increased vestibulocochlear dysfunction with age [59,60,61,62], including the frequent cases without the patient noticing the vestibular dysfunction occurred [63,64,65]. Contrary, two published studies by Inui et al. [40, 58] showed that participants < 60 years had significantly larger TFS and ELS/TFS volume ratios in the inner ear and significantly larger ELS/TFS volume ratios in the vestibulum in comparison to the participant group ≥ 60 years. The differing results between the current study and the latter might be explained by the difference in methods or the selection of participants (Table 4b).
The overall mild degree in ELS increase without symptoms and (in general) normal audiovestibular testing results also further question the current definition of ELH. The word hydrops implies an excessive pathologic accumulation of endolymphatic fluid within the ELS. However, the current results imply that a mild ELH might not necessarily be a pathologic sign but can represent a physiological norm, especially with increasing age and when unaccompanied by audiovestibular symptoms or (diagnostic) signs of audiovestibular dysfunction. An objective description of different ELS distention grades without statement on its pathogenicity (± ELH) would be preferable. An easy solution would be to simply retain all previous suggestions of semi-quantitative ELH grading as ELS grading, and discard the statement referring to no, mild, moderate or severe ELH.
Methodological limitations of the study
Two major limitations of the current study need to be considered: first, the limited number of subjects included, and second, the circumstance that iMRI imaging could only be done in patients with other (neurological) pathologies. A representative ELS study with a higher number of completely healthy subjects, ideally of 20 participants per decade, ranging between 20 and 90 years of age, would be desirable and is still pending. Second, influences of the participants' underlying neurological pathologies on the ELS appear unlikely (view inclusion and exclusion criteria, Sect. 2.2.) but cannot entirely be excluded. In addition, two of our participants showed signs of presbyacusis in our audiometric testing, and we do not know if hearing performance influences the ELS. However, ethical considerations did not allow us to include healthy volunteers without a medical indication for an iMRI with contrast agent. The decision to avoid unnecessary contrast agent application was based on prior findings of signal intensity increases in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on T1-weighted MR images after applying MR contrast agents that are still under investigation [66,67,68]. Third, the study lacks histological confirmation of endolymphatic hydrops since the in-vivo acquisition of histological specimens is currently not possible.
Conclusion
Age-dependent increases of the ELS should be considered when evaluating potential ELH in single subjects and statistical group comparisons.
Abbreviations
- 3D:
-
Three-dimensional
- AI:
-
Asymmetry index
- ELH:
-
Endolymphatic hydrops
- ELS:
-
Endolymphatic space
- FLAIR:
-
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- HIT:
-
Head-impulse test
- vcHP:
-
Participants with normal vestibulocochlear testing
- hTB:
-
Human temporal bone
- IE-Vnet:
-
Inner ear Vnet
- iMRI:
-
Delayed intravenous gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the inner ear
- MD:
-
Ménière’s disease
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PLS:
-
Perilymphatic space
- PTA:
-
Pure tone audiometry
- SPN:
-
Spontaneous nystagmus
- SVV:
-
Subjective visual vertical
- TFS:
-
Total fluid space
- uMD:
-
Unilateral MD
- VOG:
-
Video-oculography
References
Touska P, Connor SEJ (2020) Imaging of the temporal bone. Clin Radiol 75:658–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.06.013
Naganawa S, Yamazaki M, Kawai H et al (2010) Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s Disease with single-dose intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media using heavily T2-weighted 3D-FLAIR. Magn Reson Med Sci 9:6
Lopez-Escamez JA, Carey J, Chung W-H et al (2015) Diagnostic criteria for Menière’s disease. J Vestib Res 25:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-150549
Nakashima T, Pyykkö I, Arroll MA et al (2016) Meniere’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16028. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.28
Foster CA, Breeze RE (2013) Endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s disease: cause, consequence, or epiphenomenon? Otol Neurotol 34:1210–1214. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829e83df
Merchant SN, Adams JC, Nadol JB (2005) Pathophysiology of Meniere’s syndrome: are symptoms caused by endolymphatic hydrops? Otol Neurotol 26:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200501000-00013
Boegle R, Gerb J, Kierig E et al (2021) Intravenous delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the endolymphatic space: a methodological comparative study. Front Neurol 12:647296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.647296
Oh S-Y, Dieterich M, Lee BN et al (2021) Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with vestibular migraine and concurrent Meniere’s disease. Front Neurol 12:594481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.594481
Conte G, Caschera L, Calloni S et al (2018) MR imaging in Menière disease: is the contact between the vestibular endolymphatic space and the oval window a reliable biomarker? Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5841
Yoshida T, Sugimoto S, Teranishi M et al (2018) Imaging of the endolymphatic space in patients with Ménière’s disease. Auris Nasus Larynx 45:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2017.02.002
Eliezer M, Poillon G, Maquet C et al (2019) Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma correlates with the presence of utricular hydrops as diagnosed on heavily T2-weighted MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 100:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.01.006
Naganawa S, Kawai H, Sone M et al (2011) Endolympathic hydrops in patients with vestibular schwannoma: visualization by non-contrast-enhanced 3D FLAIR. Neuroradiology 53:1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0834-y
Mahmud MR, Khan AM, Nadol JB (2003) Histopathology of the inner ear in unoperated acoustic neuroma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:979–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311201111
Hızlı Ö, Cureoglu S, Kaya S et al (2016) Quantitative vestibular labyrinthine otopathology in temporal bones with vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815601070
Eliezer M, Hautefort C, Van Nechel C et al (2020) Electrophysiological and inner ear MRI findings in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05829-8
Wang F, Yoshida T, Sugimoto S et al (2019) Clinical features of ears with otosclerosis and endolymphatic hydrops. Otol Neurotol 40:441–445. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002175
Nakada T, Yoshida T, Suga K et al (2014) Endolymphatic space size in patients with vestibular migraine and Ménière’s disease. J Neurol 261:2079–2084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7458-9
Gürkov R, Kantner C, Strupp M et al (2014) Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with vestibular migraine and auditory symptoms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2661–2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2751-2
Ranieri A, Cavaliere M, Sicignano S et al (2017) Endolymphatic hydrops in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: prevalence and clinical outcome after lumbar puncture. Preliminary data Neurol Sci 38:193–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2895-8
Fukushima M, Matsukawa N, Akahani S, Inohara H (2019) Secondary endolymphatic hydrops associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:191–193. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3073
Poillon G, Hautefort C, Levy D, Eliezer M (2020) Endolymphatic hydrops secondary to spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Headache 60:1812–1813. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13866
Bruno A, Napolitano M, Califano L et al (2017) The prevalence of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in Meniere disease: 24-month follow-up after angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28:388–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.10.019
Igarashi M, O-Uchi T, Isago H, Wright WK (1983) Utricular and saccular volumetry in human temporal bones. Acta Otolaryngol 95:75–80. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488309130918
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Dill T (2008) Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 94:943–948. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.125039
Dieterich M, Brandt T (1993) Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs. Ann Neurol 33:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330311
Schneider E, Villgrattner T, Vockeroth J et al (2009) EyeSeeCam: an eye movement-driven head camera for the examination of natural visual exploration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1164:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03858.x
Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (1988) A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol 45:737–739. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1988.00520310043015
Jongkees LB, Maas JP, Philipszoon AJ (1962) Clinical nystagmography. A detailed study of electro-nystagmography in 341 patients with vertigo. Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel) 24:65–93
Agrawal Y, Van de Berg R, Wuyts F et al (2019) Presbyvestibulopathy: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the classification committee of the Bárány Society. VES 29:161–170. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-190672
(1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Menière's disease. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:181–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70102-8
Kirsch V, Becker-Bense S, Berman A et al (2018) Transient endolymphatic hydrops after an attack of vestibular migraine: a longitudinal single case study. J Neurol 265:51–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8870-3
Ahmadi S-A, Frei J, Vivar G et al (2022) IE-Vnet: deep learning-based segmentation of the inner ear’s total fluid space. Front Neurol 13:663200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.663200
Milletari F, Frei J, Aboulatta M et al (2019) Cloud deployment of high-resolution medical image analysis with TOMAAT. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 23:969–977. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2885214
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
Gerb J, Ahmadi SA, Kierig E et al (2020) VOLT: a novel open-source pipeline for automatic segmentation of endolymphatic space in inner ear MRI. J Neurol 267:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10062-8
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
Nizamutdinov V (2015) Neural network and fuzzy logic based plugins for imagej. GitHub repository. https://github.com/astartes91/imagej-neural-fuzzy-plugins
Legland D, Arganda-Carreras I, Andrey P (2016) MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics 32:3532–3534. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw413
Inui H, Kitahara T, Ito T, Sakamoto T (2021) Magnetic resonance 3D measurement of the endolymphatic space in 100 control human subjects. Int Adv Otol 17:536–540. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.21317
Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Pyykko I et al (2009) Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480902729827
Attyé A, Eliezer M, Boudiaf N et al (2017) MRI of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease: a case-controlled study with a simplified classification based on saccular morphology. Eur Radiol 27:3138–3146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4701-z
Ito T, Kitahara T, Inui H et al (2016) Endolymphatic space size in patients with Meniere’s disease and healthy controls. Acta Otolaryngol 136:879–882. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2016.1169556
Belal A, Antunez JC (1980) Pathology of endolymphatic hydrops. J Laryngol Otol 94:1231–1240. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100090058
Schuhknecht H (1993) Pathology of the ear, 2nd edn. Lea and Febinger Press, Philadelphia
Teranishi M, Yoshida T, Katayama N et al (2009) 3D computerized model of endolymphatic hydrops from specimens of temporal bone. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480902729868
Igarashi M, Ohashi K, Ishii M (1986) Morphometric comparison of endolymphatic and perilymphatic spaces in human temporal bones. Acta Otolaryngol 101:161–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488609132823
Teixido MT, Kirkilas G, Seymour P et al (2015) Normative inner ear volumetric measurements. J Craniofac Surg 26:251–254. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001204
Heutink F, Koch V, Verbist B et al (2020) Multi-Scale deep learning framework for cochlea localization, segmentation and analysis on clinical ultra-high-resolution CT images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 191:105387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105387
Hiller J, Nour-Eldin N-EA, Gruber-Rouh T et al (2020) Assessing inner ear volumetric measurements by using three-dimensional reconstruction imaging of high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography. SN Compr Clin Med 2:2178–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00513-8
Liu F, Huang W, Wang Z et al (2011) Noninvasive evaluation of endolymphatic space in healthy volunteers using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol 131:247–257. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2010.524938
Liu F, Huang W, Meng X et al (2012) Comparison of noninvasive evaluation of endolymphatic hydrops in Meniere’s disease and endolymphatic space in healthy volunteers using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol 132:234–240. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2011.637232
Liu F, Huang W, Chen Q, Gao Z (2015) Comparison of noninvasive evaluation of endolymphatic space in healthy volunteers in different age groups using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol 135:416–421. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2014.986760
Cho YS, Kim JS, Kim MB et al (2021) Validation of inner ear MRI in patients with Ménière’s disease by comparing endolymphatic hydrops from histopathologic specimens. Sci Rep 11:17738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97213-7
Ito T, Inui H, Miyasaka T et al (2019) Endolymphatic volume in patients with meniere’s disease and healthy controls: three-dimensional analysis with magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 4:653–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.313
Buch NH (1966) Endolymphatic hydrops in the cochlea of a newborn. J Laryngol Otol 80:1006–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100066329
Bachor E, Karmody CS (1995) Endolymphatic hydrops in children. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 57:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276725
Inui H, Sakamoto T, Ito T, Kitahara T (2016) Magnetic resonance volumetric measurement of endolymphatic space in patients without vertiginous or cochlear symptoms. Acta Otolaryngol 136:1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2016.1204663
Neuhauser HK (2016) The epidemiology of dizziness and vertigo. In: Handbook of clinical neurology. Elsevier, pp 67–82
Grill E, Müller M, Brandt T, Jahn K (2013) Vertigo and dizziness: challenges for epidemiological research. OA Epidemiology 1:12. https://doi.org/10.13172/2053-079X-1-2-757
Prell T, Finn S, Axer H (2022) How healthcare utilization due to dizziness and vertigo differs between older and younger adults. Front Med (Lausanne) 9:852187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.852187
Agrawal Y, Ward BK, Minor LB (2013) Vestibular dysfunctionrüße: prevalence, impact and need for targeted treatment. J Vestib Res 23:113–117. https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-130498
Evans TH, Schiller LR (2012) Chronic vestibular dysfunction as an unappreciated cause of chronic nausea and vomiting. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 25:214–217
Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC et al (2009) Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2004. Arch Intern Med 169:938–944. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66
Yardley L, Owen N, Nazareth I, Luxon L (1998) Prevalence and presentation of dizziness in a general practice community sample of working age people. Br J Gen Pract 48:1131–1135
Adin ME, Kleinberg L, Vaidya D et al (2015) Hyperintense dentate nuclei on T1-weighted MRI: relation to repeat gadolinium administration. Am J Neuroradiol 36:1859–1865. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4378
Barbieri S, Schroeder C, Froehlich JM et al (2016) High signal intensity in dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images in three patients with impaired renal function and vascular calcification. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 11:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmmi.1683
Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA et al (2014) Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patients with normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Invest Radiol 49:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000072
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Göttlinger for copyediting the manuscript. This is part of the dissertation of Tatjana Hergenröder.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was partially funded by the German Foundation of Neurology (Deutsche Stiftung Neurologie, DSN), Verein zur Förderung von Wissenschaft und Forschung an der Medizinischen Fakultät der LMU (Association for the Promotion of Science and Research at the LMU Medical Faculty), and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) via the German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ, grant number 01 EO 0901).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MD: conception, and design of the study, drafting the manuscript, providing funding; TH: acquisition, and analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript, analysis of the data; RB, JG, EK: acquisition, and analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript; SS: conception, and design of the study, analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript; VK: conception, and design of the study, acquisition, and analysis of the data, drafting the manuscript, providing funding,
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dieterich, M., Hergenroeder, T., Boegle, R. et al. Endolymphatic space is age-dependent. J Neurol 270, 71–81 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11400-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11400-8