Abstract
During mitotic prophase, chromosomes of the pathogenic unicellular eukaryote Giardia intestinalis condense in each of the cell’s two nuclei. In this study, Giardia chromosomes were investigated using light microscopy, high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscopy, and in situ hybridization. For the first time, we describe the overall morphology, condensation stages, and mitotic segregation of these chromosomes. Despite the absence of several genes involved in the cohesion and condensation pathways in the Giardia genome, we observed chromatin organization similar to those found in eukaryotes, i.e., 10-nm nucleosomal fibrils, 30-nm fibrils coiled to chromomeres or in parallel arrangements, and closely aligned sister chromatids. DNA molecules of Giardia terminate with telomeric repeats that we visualized on each of the four chromatid endings of metaphase chromosomes. Giardia chromosomes lack primary and secondary constrictions, thus preventing their classification based on the position of the centromere. The anaphase poleward segregation of sister chromatids is atypical in orientation and tends to generate lagging chromatids between daughter nuclei. In the Giardia genome database, we identified two putative members of the kleisin family thought to be responsible for condensin ring establishment. Thus far, Giardia chromosomes (300 nm to 1.5 μm) are the smallest chromosomes that were analyzed at the ultrastructural level. This study complements the existing molecular and sequencing data on Giardia chromosomes with cytological and ultrastructural information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam RD (1992) Chromosome-size variation in Giardia lamblia: the role of rDNA repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 20:3057–3061
Adam RD (2000) The Giardia lamblia genome. Int J Parasitol 30:475–484
Adam RD, Nash TE, Wellems TE (1991) Telomeric location of Giardia rDNA genes. Mol Cell Biol 11:3326–3330
Adam RD, Nash TE, Wellems TE (1988) The Giardia lamblia trophozoite contains sets of closely related chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4555–4567
Beadle J, Wright M, McNeely L, Bennett JW (2003) Electrophoretic karyotype analysis in fungi. Adv Appl Microbiol 53:243–270
Bernander R, Palm JE, Svard SG (2001) Genome ploidy in different stages of the Giardia lamblia life cycle. Cell Microbiol 3:55–62
Bian Q, Belmont AS (2012) Revisiting higher-order and large-scale chromatin organization. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24:359–366. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2012.03.003
Burrack LS, Applen SE, Berman J (2011) The requirement for the Dam1 complex is dependent upon the number of kinetochore proteins and microtubules. Curr Biol 21:889–896. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.002
Carpenter ML, Assaf ZJ, Gourguechon S, Cande WZ (2012) Nuclear inheritance and genetic exchange without meiosis in the binucleate parasite Giardia intestinalis. J Cell Sci 125:2523–2532. doi:10.1242/jcs.103879
Cotton JA, Beatty JK, Buret AG (2011) Host parasite interactions and pathophysiology in Giardia infections. Int J Parasitol 41:925–933. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.05.002
Davids BJ, Williams S, Lauwaet T, Palanca T, Gillin FD (2008) Giardia lamblia aurora kinase: a regulator of mitosis in a binucleate parasite. Int J Parasitol 38:353–369. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.08.012
Dawson SC, Sagolla MS, Cande WZ (2007) The cenH3 histone variant defines centromeres in Giardia intestinalis. Chromosoma 116:175–184. doi:10.1007/s00412-006-0091-3
Delany ME, Robinson CM, Goto RM, Miller MM (2009) Architecture and organization of chicken microchromosome 16: order of the NOR, MHC-Y, and MHC-B subregions. J Hered 100:507–514. doi:10.1093/jhered/esp044
Diamont L (1957) The establishment of various trichomonads of animals and man in axenic cultures. J Parasitol 43:488–490
Downs JA, Kosmidou E, Morgan A, Jackson SP (2003) Suppression of homologous recombination by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone. Mol Cell 11:1685–1692
Drmota T, Kral J (1997) Karyotype of Trichomonas vaginalis. Eur J Protistol 33:131–135
Eltsov M, Maclellan KM, Maeshima K, Frangakis AS, Dubochet J (2008) Analysis of cryo-electron microscopy images does not support the existence of 30-nm chromatin fibers in mitotic chromosomes in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:19732–19737. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810057105
Eme L, Trilles A, Moreira D, Brochier-Armanet C (2011) The phylogenomic analysis of the anaphase promoting complex and its targets points to complex and modern-like control of the cell cycle in the last common ancestor of eukaryotes. BMC Evol Biol 11:265. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-265
Fan JB, Korman SH, Cantor CR, Smith CL (1991) Giardia lamblia: haploid genome size determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis is less than 12 Mb. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1905–1908
Fennell-Fezzie R, Gradia SD, Akey D, Berger JM (2005) The MukF subunit of Escherichia coli condensin: architecture and functional relationship to kleisins. EMBO J 24:1921–1930. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600680
Flegel TW, Pasharawipas T (1995) A proposal for typical eukaryotic meiosis in microsporidians. Can J Microbiol 41:1–11
Fulneckova J et al (2013) A broad phylogenetic survey unveils the diversity and evolution of telomeres in eukaryotes. Genome Biol Evol 5:468–483. doi:10.1093/gbe/evt019
Gan L, Ladinsky MS, Jensen GJ (2013) Chromatin in a marine picoeukaryote is a disordered assemblage of nucleosomes. Chromosoma 122:377–386. doi:10.1007/s00412-013-0423-z
Gourguechon S, Holt LJ, Cande WZ (2013) The Giardia cell cycle progresses independently of the anaphase-promoting complex. J Cell Sci 126:2246–2255. doi:10.1242/jcs.121632
Grigoryev SA, Woodcock CL (2012) Chromatin organization—the 30 nm fiber. Exp Cell Res 318:1448–1455. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.02.014
Hirano T (2012) Condensins: universal organizers of chromosomes with diverse functions. Genes Dev 26:1659–1678. doi:10.1101/gad.194746.112
Hou G, Le Blancq SM, E Y, Zhu H, Lee MG (1995) Structure of a frequently rearranged rRNA-encoding chromosome in Giardia lamblia. Nucleic Acids Res 23:3310–3317
Ijdo JW, Wells RA, Baldini A, Reeders ST (1991) Improved telomere detection using a telomere repeat probe (TTAGGG)n generated by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 19:4780
Jirakova K, Kulda J, Nohynkova E (2012) How nuclei of Giardia pass through cell differentiation: semi-open mitosis followed by nuclear interconnection. Protist 163:465–479. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2011.11.008
Kabnick KS, Peattie DA (1990) In situ analyses reveal that the two nuclei of Giardia lamblia are equivalent. J Cell Sci 95(Pt 3):353–360
Keister DB (1983) Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 77:487–488
Khrustaleva LI, Kik C (2001) Localization of single-copy T-DNA insertion in transgenic shallots (Allium cepa) by using ultra-sensitive FISH with tyramide signal amplification. Plant J 25:699–707
Lauwaet T et al (2011) Mining the Giardia genome and proteome for conserved and unique basal body proteins. Int J Parasitol 41:1079–1092. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.06.001
Le Blancq SM, Adam RD (1998) Structural basis of karyotype heterogeneity in Giardia lamblia. Mol Biochem Parasitol 97:199–208
Malik SB, Pightling AW, Stefaniak LM, Schurko AM, Logsdon JM Jr (2008) An expanded inventory of conserved meiotic genes provides evidence for sex in Trichomonas vaginalis. PLoS One 3:e2879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002879
Martin R, Busch W, Herrmann RG, Wanner G (1994) Efficient preparation of plant chromosomes for high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Chromosome Res 2:411–415
Matsuura S et al (2006) Monoallelic BUB1B mutations and defective mitotic-spindle checkpoint in seven families with premature chromatid separation (PCS) syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 140:358–367. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31069
Mehta GD, Kumar R, Srivastava S, Ghosh SK (2013) Cohesin: functions beyond sister chromatid cohesion. FEBS Lett 587:2299–2312. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.06.035
Misumi O et al (2008) Genome analysis and its significance in four unicellular algae, Cyanidioschyzon [corrected] merolae, Ostreococcus tauri, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and Thalassiosira pseudonana. J Plant Res 121:3–17. doi:10.1007/s10265-007-0133-9
Morrison HG et al (2007) Genomic minimalism in the early diverging intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia. Science 317:1921–1926. doi:10.1126/science.1143837
Nelson AD, Forsythe ES, Gan X, Tsiantis M, Beilstein MA (2014) Extending the model of Arabidopsis telomere length and composition across Brassicaceae. Chromosome Res. doi:10.1007/s10577-014-9423-y
Nishino Y et al (2012) Human mitotic chromosomes consist predominantly of irregularly folded nucleosome fibres without a 30-nm chromatin structure. EMBO J 31:1644–1653. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.35
Parfrey LW, Barbero E, Lasser E, Dunthorn M, Bhattacharya D, Patterson DJ, Katz LA (2006) Evaluating support for the current classification of eukaryotic diversity. PLoS Genet 2:e220. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220
Perry DA, Morrison HG, Adam RD (2011) Optical map of the genotype A1 WB C6 Giardia lamblia genome isolate. Mol Biochem Parasitol 180:112–114. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2011.07.008
Pokorna M et al (2011) Strong conservation of the bird Z chromosome in reptilian genomes is revealed by comparative painting despite 275 million years divergence. Chromosoma 120:455–468. doi:10.1007/s00412-011-0322-0
Prabhu A, Morrison HG, Martinez CR 3rd, Adam RD (2007) Characterisation of the subtelomeric regions of Giardia lamblia genome isolate WBC6. Int J Parasitol 37:503–513. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.12.011
Punta M et al (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D290–301. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065
Ramesh MA, Malik SB, Logsdon JM Jr (2005) A phylogenomic inventory of meiotic genes; evidence for sex in Giardia and an early eukaryotic origin of meiosis. Curr Biol 15:185–191. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.003
Robinson PJ, An W, Routh A, Martino F, Chapman L, Roeder RG, Rhodes D (2008) 30 nm chromatin fibre decompaction requires both H4-K16 acetylation and linker histone eviction. J Mol Biol 381:816–825. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.04.050
Sagolla MS, Dawson SC, Mancuso JJ, Cande WZ (2006) Three-dimensional analysis of mitosis and cytokinesis in the binucleate parasite Giardia intestinalis. J Cell Sci 119:4889–4900. doi:10.1242/jcs.03276
Shampay J, Blackburn EH (1988) Generation of telomere-length heterogeneity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:534–538
Shemilt LA, Estandarte AK, Yusuf M, Robinson IK (2014) Scanning electron microscope studies of human metaphase chromosomes. Philos A Math Phys Eng Sci 372:20130144. doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0144
Shen HE et al (2011) Visualization of chromosomes in the binucleate intestinal parasite Giardia lamblia. Parasitol Res 109:1439–1445. doi:10.1007/s00436-011-2392-6
Schaper A, Rossle M, Formanek H, Jovin TM, Wanner G (2000) Complementary visualization of mitotic barley chromatin by field-emission scanning electron microscopy and scanning force microscopy. J Struct Biol 129:17–29. doi:10.1006/jsbi.1999.4203
Schleiffer A, Kaitna S, Maurer-Stroh S, Glotzer M, Nasmyth K, Eisenhaber F (2003) Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol Cell 11:571–575
Schroeder-Reiter E, Wanner G (2009) Chromosome centromeres: structural and analytical investigations with high resolution scanning electron microscopy in combination with focused ion beam milling. Cytogenet Genome Res 124:239–250. doi:10.1159/000218129
Schubert V (2009) SMC proteins and their multiple functions in higher plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 124:202–214. doi:10.1159/000218126
Simpson AG (2003) Cytoskeletal organization, phylogenetic affinities and systematics in the contentious taxon Excavata (Eukaryota). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1759–1777
Simpson AG, Roger AJ (2004) The real ‘kingdoms’ of eukaryotes. Curr Biol 14:R693–696. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.038
Slijepcevic P (1998) Telomere length regulation–a view from the individual chromosome perspective. Exp Cell Res 244:268–274. doi:10.1006/excr.1998.4185
Spano F, Crisanti A (2000) Cryptosporidium parvum: the many secrets of a small genome. Int J Parasitol 30:553–565
Sumner AT (2003) Chromosomes: organization and function. Willey-Blackwell, Malden, MA
Tumova P, Hofstetrova K, Nohynkova E, Hovorka O, Kral J (2007) Cytogenetic evidence for diversity of two nuclei within a single diplomonad cell of Giardia. Chromosoma 116:65–78. doi:10.1007/s00412-006-0082-4
Upcroft JA, Abedinia M, Upcroft P (2005) Rearranged subtelomeric rRNA genes in Giardia duodenalis. Eukaryot Cell 4:484–486. doi:10.1128/EC.4.2.484-486.2005
Upcroft JA, Krauer KG, Upcroft P (2010) Chromosome sequence maps of the Giardia lamblia assemblage A isolate WB. Trends Parasitol 26:484–491. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2010.07.002
Vagnarelli P (2012) Mitotic chromosome condensation in vertebrates. Exp Cell Res 318:1435–1441. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.017
Vas AC, Andrews CA, Kirkland Matesky K, Clarke DJ (2007) In vivo analysis of chromosome condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 18:557–568. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0454
Vleugel M, Hoogendoorn E, Snel B, Kops GJ (2012) Evolution and function of the mitotic checkpoint. Dev Cell 23:239–250. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.06.013
Wanner G, Formanek H (1995) Imaging of DNA in human and plant chromosomes by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Chromosome Res 3:368–374
Wanner G, Formanek H (2000) A new chromosome model. J Struct Biol 132:147–161. doi:10.1006/jsbi.2000.4310
Wanner G, Schroeder-Reiter E (2008) Scanning electron microscopy of chromosomes. Methods Cell Biol 88:451–474. doi:10.1016/S0091-679X(08)00423-8
Wilkins BJ et al (2014) A cascade of histone modifications induces chromatin condensation in mitosis. Science 343:77–80. doi:10.1126/science.1244508
Wu G, McArthur AG, Fiser A, Sali A, Sogin ML, Mllerm M (2000) Core histones of the amitochondriate protist, Giardia lamblia. Mol Biol Evol 17:1156–1163
Yee J et al (2007) Core histone genes of Giardia intestinalis: genomic organization, promoter structure, and expression. BMC Mol Biol 8:26. doi:10.1186/1471-2199-8-26
Zolan ME (1995) Chromosome-length polymorphism in fungi. Microbiol Rev 59:686–698
Zubacova Z, Cimburek Z, Tachezy J (2008) Comparative analysis of trichomonad genome sizes and karyotypes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 161:49–54. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.06.004
Zubacova Z, Krylov V, Tachezy J (2011) Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of single copy genes on Trichomonas vaginalis chromosomes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 176:135–137. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.12.011
Acknowledgments
We thank Jennifer Grünert (LMU, Munich, Germany), Zuzana Zubáčová, Miroslav Hyliš, Ondřej Šebesta (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic), and Veronika Marešová (Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic) for technical assistance; Alexander Schleiffer (CSF Vienna Biocenter, Austria) for bioinformatics assistance; and Elizabeth Schroeder-Reiter (LMU, Munich, Germany) and Jiří Král (Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic) for comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by Grant No. P305/12/1248 and partly funded by student Grant No. SVV-260 026 (MU), which were both from the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplemental Fig. 1
Scanning electron micrograph of a Giardia intestinalis trophozoite cell fixed with methanol/acetic acid fixative (3:1) following “drop/cryo“ preparation and glutaraldehyde fixation. Two interphase nuclei remined attached to flagellar axonemes. (GIF 209 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 2
Controls for discriminating chromosomes/chromatin from contamination on chromosome preparations. (a) SEM micrograph of DNA–richand DNA–free material following PtBlue staining (a, left = SE image; a, right = BSE image). Arrows indicate a DNA-free object (contamination) that is not visible following PtBlue staining. The other object with a faint PtBlue staining in a BSE image contains DNA and represents a loosened interphase nucleus. (b) Correlative light- and scanning electron microscopy: SEM micrograph of a chromosome complement (b, left) and fluorescence LM micrograph of the same chromosome complement with DAPI staining (b, right). Circles indicate a non-chromosomal structure (contamination) present but not visible under DAPI staining. (GIF 348 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 3
The alignment of Giardia intestinalis histone H4 and a human H4 indicating the conserved position of H4 lysine 16 (arrow). (PDF 201 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 4
Putative condensin subunits (kleisins) found in Giardia intestinalis (GL 50803_15239, GL 50803_102874). (A) Sequential steps followed to search for Giardia kleisins with the final conserved-domain identification of retrieved hits. A putative function of the found hypothetical proteins is proposed. (B) Alignments of putative Giardia kleisins and of other eukaryotic kleisins that were selected according to information provided by Schleiffer et al. (2003). Giardia hypothetical proteins (GL 50803_15239, GL 50803_102874) were aligned with β- and γ-kleisins. The conserved parts of N- and C-termini of kleisin protein families are indicated in boxes and represent their binding domains to “head“ domains of SMC proteins (Fennell-Fezzie et al. 2005). In the alignment, the kleisin family of other eukaryotic kleisins is indicated by a capital letter added to the sequence name (B or G for β- or γ-kleisins, respectively). (PDF 430 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 5
Putative condensin non-SMC subunits (HEAT proteins) found in Giardia intestinalis. The table displays the sequential search for Giardia HEAT proteins with the conserved domain identification of retrieved hits. A resulting putative function of the found hypothetical proteins is proposed. (PDF 418 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 6
Stereomicrographs of Giardia metaphase chromosomes allowing visualization of chromosomes in three dimensions (a, b). Seven chromosomes out of the nine of Giardia strain HP-1 nucleus are imaged. The asterix indicates a contaminating non-chromosomal material, which was DAPI-negative in light microscope, as indicated by correlative light- and electron microscopy (a). The dotted line indicates a slight groove between two sister chromatids (b). (GIF 201 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tůmová, P., Uzlíková, M., Wanner, G. et al. Structural organization of very small chromosomes: study on a single-celled evolutionary distant eukaryote Giardia intestinalis . Chromosoma 124, 81–94 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0486-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0486-5