Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Factors for graft failure after trans-tibial (TT) ACL reconstruction, including anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury and degree of synovialization, remain unclear. This study is to evaluate the risk factors for graft failures after TT ACL reconstruction including ALL injury and synovialization.

Materials and methods

A total 391 patients who underwent primary TT ACL reconstruction were included. Failure was defined as greater than grade 2 laxity on the Lachman or pivot shift tests or 5 mm of anterior translation on stress radiograph. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 31 patients with failure were categorized as group 1 and 89 patients without failure were categorized as group 2. Chi-square test and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.

Results

Preoperatively, 64 patients had ALL injuries (53.3%), 58 had medial meniscal (MM) tears (48.3%), and 62 had lateral meniscal (LM) tears (51.6%). Ninety-three patients (77.5%) had acute injuries and 27 had chronic injuries as per 6-weeks duration. Significant risk factors for failure were LM tear (hazard ratio [HR], 4.018; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.677–9.629; p = 0.002), chronicity (HR, 6.812; 95% CI 2.758–16.824; p = 0.000), presence of ALL injury (HR, 3.655; 95% CI 1.442–9.265; p = 0.006), and poor synovialization (HR, 3.134; 95% CI 1.298–7.566; p = 0.011) in Cox proportional hazard analysis. If combined MM and LM tears were found, an increased risk of failure was also identified (combined tears: HR, 3.951; 95% CI 1.754–8.901; p = 0.001/preoperative high-grade laxity: HR, 4.546; 95% CI 1.875–11.02; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Chronic ACL injuries, meniscus tear, preoperative ALL injuries, preoperative high-grade laxity and poor synovialization are significant risk factors. Therefore, these factors should be carefully assessed and properly treated in TT ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

IV, retrospective cohort study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fu FH, Karlsson J (2010) A long journey to be anatomic. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(9):1151–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chambat P, Guier C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Fayard JM, Thaunat M (2013) The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. Int Orthop 37(2):181–186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SJ, Bae JH, Lim HC (2014) Comparison of Achilles and tibialis anterior tendon allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(1):135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harner CD, Giffin JR, Dunteman RC, Annunziata CC, Friedman MJ (2001) Evaluation and treatment of recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 50:463–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caterine S, Litchfield R, Johnson M, Chronik B, Getgood A (2015) A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: re-introducing the lateral capsular ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(11):3186–3195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehl J, Otto A, Baldino JB, Achtnich A, Akoto R, Imhoff AB, Scheffler S, Petersen W (2019) The ACL-deficient knee and the prevalence of meniscus and cartilage lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017076897). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(6):819–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Riboh JC, Hasselblad V, Godin JA, Mather RC 3rd (2013) Transtibial versus independent drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2693–2702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JK, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC (2014) Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is possible with use of the modified transtibial technique: a comparison with the anteromedial transportal technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(8):664–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ji G, Han A, Hao X, Li N, Xu R, Wang F (2018) Better rotational control but similar outcomes with the outside-in versus the transtibial drilling technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(11):1575–1581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shelbourne KD, Benner RW, Gray T (2017) Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autografts: objective factors associated with the development of osteoarthritis at 20 to 33 years after surgery. Am J Sports Med 45(12):2730–2738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2009) Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 37(3):471–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kato Y, Maeyama A, Lertwanich P, Wang JH, Ingham SJ, Kramer S, Martins CQ, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2013) Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):816–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clatworthy M, Sauer S, Roberts T (2018) Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(1):124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH (2015) Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31(7):1412–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee JK, Lee S, Kim KT, Lee MC (2017) Anatomic tunnel placement can be achieved with a modification to transtibial technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. PLoS ONE 12(7):e0180860

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamien PM, Hydrick JM, Replogle WH, Go LT, Barrett GR (2013) Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med 41(8):1808–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta SP, Barker K, Bowman B, Galloway H, Oliashirazi N, Oliashirazi A (2017) Reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change for iPhone goniometer app in assessing knee range of motion. J Knee Surg 30(6):577–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehl J, Paul J, Feucht MJ, Bode G, Imhoff AB, Sudkamp NP, Hinterwimmer S (2017) ACL deficiency and varus osteoarthritis: high tibial osteotomy alone or combined with ACL reconstruction? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(2):233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaecker V, Drouven S, Naendrup JH, Kanakamedala AC, Pfeiffer T, Shafizadeh S (2018) Increased medial and lateral tibial posterior slopes are independent risk factors for graft failure following ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(10):1423–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosseini A, Lodhia P, Van de Velde SK, Asnis PD, Zarins B, Gill TJ, Li G (2012) Tunnel position and graft orientation in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and imaging analysis. Int Orthop 36(4):845–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JK, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC (2015) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites: comparison of plain radiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging to anatomic dissection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(8):2297–2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kosy JD, Mandalia VI (2018) Anterior cruciate ligament mechanoreceptors and their potential importance in remnant-preserving reconstruction: a review of basic science and clinical findings. J Knee Surg 31(8):736–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chung KS, Ha JK, Ra HJ, Kim SB, Lee GH, Kim JG (2017) Does synovialization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a positive effect on functional performance, outcomes scores, stability and muscle strength? A 2-year follow-up study after reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(12):1725–1733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Blakeney WG, Ouanezar H, Borade A, Daggett M, Thaunat M, Fayard JM, Delaloye JR (2018) Anterolateral ligament reconstruction protects the repaired medial meniscus: a comparative study of 383 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from the SANTI Study Group with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Am J Sports Med 46(8):1819–1826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sonnery-Cottet B, Barbosa NC, Vieira TD, Saithna A (2018) Clinical outcomes of extra-articular tenodesis/anterolateral reconstruction in the ACL injured knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(2):596–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel RM, Brophy RH (2018) Anterolateral ligament of the knee: anatomy, function, imaging, and treatment. Am J Sports Med 46(1):217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rowan FE, Huq SS, Haddad FS (2019) Lateral extra-articular tenodesis with ACL reconstruction demonstrates better patient-reported outcomes compared to ACL reconstruction alone at 2 years minimum follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(10):1425–1433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Monaco E, Sonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Saithna A, Helito CP, Ferretti A (2017) Elimination of the pivot-shift sign after repair of an occult anterolateral ligament injury in an ACL-deficient knee. Orthop J Sports Med 5(9):2325967117728877

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sonnery-Cottet B, Claes S, Blakeney WG, Cavaignac E, Saithna A, Daggett M, Helito CP, Muramatsu K, de Padua VBC, Vieira TD, Canuto S, Ouanezar H, Thaunat M (2018) Anterolateral ligament: let’s stick to the facts! Arthroscopy 34(8):2259–2262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thaunat M, Clowez G, Saithna A, Cavalier M, Choudja E, Vieira TD, Fayard JM, Sonnery-Cottet B (2017) Reoperation rates after combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a series of 548 patients from the SANTI Study Group with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Am J Sports Med 45(11):2569–2577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ueki H, Nakagawa Y, Ohara T, Watanabe T, Horie M, Katagiri H, Otabe K, Katagiri K, Hiyama K, Katakura M, Hoshino T, Inomata K, Araya N, Sekiya I, Muneta T, Koga H (2018) Risk factors for residual pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MAKS group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(12):3724–3730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Geeslin AG, Chahla J, Moatshe G, Muckenhirn KJ, Kruckeberg BM, Brady AW, Coggins A, Dornan GJ, Getgood AM, Godin JA, LaPrade RF (2018) Anterolateral knee extra-articular stabilizers: a robotic sectioning study of the anterolateral ligament and distal iliotibial band kaplan fibers. Am J Sports Med 46(6):1352–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Noyes FR, Huser LE, Jurgensmeier D, Walsh J, Levy MS (2017) Is an anterolateral ligament reconstruction required in ACL-reconstructed knees with associated injury to the anterolateral structures? A robotic analysis of rotational knee stability. Am J Sports Med 45(5):1018–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Noyes FR, Huser LE, West J, Jurgensmeier D, Walsh J, Levy MS (2018) Two different knee rotational instabilities occur with anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament injuries: a Robotic Study on anterior cruciate ligament and extra-articular reconstructions in restoring rotational stability. Arthroscopy 34(9):2683–2695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang H, Ma G, Li Q, Hu Y, Li J, Tang X (2018) Cortical button versus cross-pin femoral fixation for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 46(9):2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Matava MJ, Arciero RA, Baumgarten KM, Carey JL, DeBerardino TM, Hame SL, Hannafin JA, Miller BS, Nissen CW, Taft TN, Wolf BR, Wright RW (2015) Multirater agreement of the causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a radiographic and video analysis of the MARS cohort. Am J Sports Med 43(2):310–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van Eck CF, Schkrohowsky JG, Working ZM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft. Am J Sports Med 40(4):800–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen J, Gu A, Jiang H, Zhang W, Yu X (2015) A comparison of acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using LARS artificial ligaments: a randomized prospective study with a 5-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(1):95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee YS, Lee OS, Lee SH, Hui TS (2018) Effect of the timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on clinical and stability outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 34(2):592–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Park YB, Lee HJ, Ro DH, Lee GY, Kim S, Kim SH (2019) Anterolateral ligament injury has a synergic impact on the anterolateral rotatory laxity in acute anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(10):3334–3344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Helito CP, Demange MK, Helito PV, Costa HP, Bonadio MB, Pecora JR, Rodrigues MB, Camanho GL (2015) Evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by means of magnetic resonance examination. Rev Bras Ortop 50(2):214–219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Helito CP, Helito PV, Costa HP, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Pecora JR, Camanho GL, Demange MK (2014) MRI evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment in routine 1.5-T scans. Skeletal Radiol 43(10):1421–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M (2017) Assessment of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by magnetic resonance imaging in acute injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 33(1):140–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Beldame J, Mouchel S, Bertiaux S, Adam JM, Mouilhade F, Roussignol X, Dujardin F (2012) Anterior knee laxity measurement: comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos® and “Lerat”, and GNRB® arthrometer. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(7):744–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Beldame J, Bertiaux S, Roussignol X, Lefebvre B, Adam JM, Mouilhade F, Dujardin F (2011) Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(1):34–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jacobsen K (2009) Stress radiographical measurement of the anteroposterior, medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand 47(3):335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim SH, Park YB, Ham DW, Lim JW, Lee HJ (2019) Stress radiography at 30 degrees of knee flexion is a reliable evaluation tool for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29(10):019–05803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05803-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee HJ, Park YB, Kim SH (2019) Diagnostic value of stress radiography and arthrometer measurement for anterior instability in anterior cruciate ligament injured knees at different knee flexion position. Arthroscopy 35(6):1721–1732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hatayama K, Terauchi M, Hashimoto S, Saito K, Higuchi H (2018) Factors associated with posterior cruciate ligament tightness during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1389–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim BH, Kim JI, Lee O, Lee KW, Lee MC, Han HS (2018) Preservation of remnant with poor synovial coverage has no beneficial effect over remnant sacrifice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(8):2345–2352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Parkinson B, Robb C, Thomas M, Thompson P, Spalding T (2017) Factors that predict failure in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 45(7):1529–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Musahl V, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Bedi A, Pearle AD (2010) The effect of medial versus lateral meniscectomy on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 38(8):1591–1597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Trojani C, Sbihi A, Djian P, Potel JF, Hulet C, Jouve F, Bussiere C, Ehkirch FP, Burdin G, Dubrana F, Beaufils P, Franceschi JP, Chassaing V, Colombet P, Neyret P (2011) Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(2):196–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kartus JT, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Magnusson LC, Brandsson S, Pehrsson NG, Pinczewski LA (2002) Concomitant partial meniscectomy worsens outcome after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Orthop Scand 73(2):179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu WH, Hackett T, Richmond JC (2002) Effects of meniscal and articular surface status on knee stability, function, and symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term prospective study. Am J Sports Med 30(6):845–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Seon JK, Gadikota HR, Kozanek M, Oh LS, Gill TJ, Li G (2009) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on kinematics of the knee with combined anterior cruciate ligament injury and subtotal medial meniscectomy: an in vitro robotic investigation. Arthroscopy 25(2):123–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wenning M, Heitner AH, Mauch M, Gehring D, Ramsenthaler C, Paul J (2020) The effect of meniscal repair on strength deficits 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 29(10):020–03347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03347-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. McConkey MO, Amendola A, Ramme AJ, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, Britton CL, Wolf BR, Spindler KP, Carey JL, Cox CL, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Brophy RH, Smith MV, McCarty EC, Vida AF, Wolcott M, Marx RG, Parker RD, Andrish JF, Jones MH (2012) Arthroscopic agreement among surgeons on anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2737–2746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Arno S, Bell CP, Alaia MJ, Singh BC, Jazrawi LM, Walker PS, Bansal A, Garofolo G, Sherman OH (2016) Does anteromedial portal drilling improve footprint placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(7):1679–1689

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Bowers AL, Bedi A, Lipman JD, Potter HG, Rodeo SA, Pearle AD, Warren RF, Altchek DW (2011) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 27(11):1511–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Piasecki DP, Bach BR Jr, Espinoza Orias AA, Verma NN (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with a transtibial technique? Am J Sports Med 39(6):1306–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pujol N, Colombet P, Potel JF, Cucurulo T, Graveleau N, Hulet C, Panisset JC, Servien E, Sonnery-Cottet B, Trojani C, Djian P (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in partial tear: selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction conserving the posterolateral remnant versus single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(8 Suppl):S171–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sonnery-Cottet B, Bazille C, Hulet C, Colombet P, Cucurulo T, Panisset JC, Potel JF, Servien E, Trojani C, Djian P, Graveleau N, Pujol N (2014) Histological features of the ACL remnant in partial tears. Knee 21(6):1009–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mehta A, Lin CC, Campbell RA, Chin G, McGarry MH, Lee TQ, Adamson GJ (2019) Effects of anteromedial portal versus transtibial ACL tunnel preparation on contact characteristics of the graft and the tibial tunnel aperture. Clin Orthop Surg 11(1):52–59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ahn GY, Nam IH, Lee YH, Lee YS, Choi YD, Lee HH, Hwang SH (2018) Factors affecting the extent of graft tendon synovialization after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: based on second-look arthroscopic findings. Clin Orthop Surg 10(4):413–419

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Lee JH, Lee D-H, Park J-H, Suh DW, Kim E, Jang K-M (2020) Poorer dynamic postural stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture combined with lateral meniscus tear than in those with medial meniscus tear. Knee Surg Relat Res 32(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0027-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Won SH, Lee B-I, Park SY, Min K-D, Kim J-B, Kwon S-W, Kim Y-B, Seo G-W, Kim J-H, Choi H-S (2020) Outcome differences of remnant- preserving versus non-preserving methods in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis with subgroup analysis. Knee Surgery & Related Research 32(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0017-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han-Jun Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.H., Park, YB., Kim, DH. et al. Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140, 1445–1457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03483-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03483-7

Keywords

Navigation