Abstract
The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to analyze the causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and the influence of meniscectomies after revision. This study was conducted over a 12-year period, from 1994 to 2005 with ten French orthopaedic centers participating. Assessment included the objective International Knee Documenting Committee (IKDC) 2000 scoring system evaluation. Two hundred and ninety-three patients were available for statistics. Untreated laxity, femoral and tibial tunnel malposition, impingement, failure of fixation were assessed, new traumatism and infection were recorded. Meniscus surgery was evaluated before, during or after primary ACL reconstruction, and then during or after revision ACL surgery. The main cause for failure of ACL reconstruction was femoral tunnel malposition in 36% of the cases. Forty-four percent of the patients with an anterior femoral tunnel as a cause for failure of the primary surgery were IKDC A after revision versus 24% if the cause of failure was not the femoral tunnel (P = 0.05). A 70% meniscectomy rate was found in revision ACL reconstruction. Comparison between patients with a total meniscectomy (n = 56) and patients with preserved menisci (n = 65) revealed a better functional result and knee stability in the non-meniscectomized group (P = 0.04). This study shows that the anterior femoral tunnel malposition is the main cause for failure in ACL reconstruction. This reason for failure should be considered as a predictive factor of good result of revision ACL reconstruction. Total meniscectomy jeopardizes functional result and knee stability at follow-up.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aglietti P, Buzzi R, D’Andria S, Zaccherotti G (1992) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate reconstruction with patellar tendon. Arthroscopy 8:510–516
Aglietti P, Zacherotti G, De Biase P (1994) A comparison between medial meniscus repair, partial meniscectomy, and normal meniscus in ACL reconstructed knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 307:165–173
Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD, Harwood FL, Akeson WH (1986) The phenomenon of “ligamentization” anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res 4:162–172
Bach B (2003) Revision anterior cruciate ligament ligament surgery. Arthroscopy 19:14–29
Boileau P, Rémi M, Lemaire M, Rousseau P, Desnuelle C, Argenson C (1999) Plaidoyer pour une rééducation accélérée après ligamentoplastie du genou par un transplant os-tendon rotulien-os. Rev Chir Orthop 85:475–490
Bylski-Austrow DI, Grood ES, Hefzy MS, Holden JP, Butler DL (1993) Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning and initial tension. J Orthop Res 8:522–531
Carson W, Anisko EM, Restrepo C, Panariello RA, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF (2004) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Etiology of failures and clinical results. J Knee Surg 17:127–132
Colombet PH, Neyret PH, Trojani C, Sbihi A, Djian P, Potel JF, Hulet C, Jouve F, Bussière C, Ehkirch P, Burdin G, Dubrana F, Beaufils P, Franceschi JP, Chassaing V (2007) Revision ACL surgery. Rev Chir Orthop 93(suppl 8):5S54–5S67
Colosimo AJ, Heidt RS, Traub JA, Calonas RL (2001) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a reharvested ipsilateral patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 29:746–750
Cross M, Purnell R (1994) Revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthopaedic Trans 17:931
Eberhardt C, Kurth AH, Hailer N, Jäger A (2000) Revision ACL reconstruction using autogenous patellar tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:290–295
Feretti A, Conteduca F, Monaco E, De Carli A, D’arrigo C (2006) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and lateral extra-articular reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2373–2379
Fox J, Pierce M, Bojchuk J, Hayden J, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr (2004) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft. Arthroscopy 20:787–794
Fules PJ, Madhav RT, Goddard RK, Mowbray MA (2003) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts with a polyester fixation device. Knee 10:335–340
Greis PE, Johnson DL, Fu FH (1993) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: causes of graft failures andtechnical considerations of revision surgery. Clin Sports Med 12:839–852
Grossman MG, ElAttrache NS, Shields CL, Glousman RE (2005) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: three to nine year follow-up. Arthroscopy 21:418–423
Harilainen A, Sandelin J (2001) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a review of the literature and resultst of our own revisions. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:163–169
Harner CD, Irrgang JJ, Paul J, Dearwater S, Fu FH (1992) Loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 283:187–195
Harter RA, Osternig LR, Singer KM, James SL, Larson RL, Jones DC (1988) Long term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 16:434–443
Howell SM, Clark JA, Farley TE (1991) A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 19:276–281
Howell SM, Clark JA (1992) Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 283:187–195
Howell SM, Taylor MA (1993) Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1044–1055
Howell SM, Barad SJ (1995) Knee extension an its relationship to the slope of the intercondylar roof. Implications for positioning the tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 23:288–294
Howell SM, Taylor MA (1996) Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis gaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:814–825
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbourne KD, International Knee Documentation Committee (2006) Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 34:1567–1573
Jackson DW, Gasser SI (1994) Tibial tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 10:124–131
Jaureguito J, Paulos L (1996) Why grafts fail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:25–41
Johnson D, Cohen M (1995) Revision ACL surgery: etiology, indications, techniques and results. Am J Knee Surg 8:155–176
Johnson DL, Swenson TM, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD (1996) Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:100–109
Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1998) Ipsi or contra-lateral patellar tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery: a comparison of two methods. Am J Sports Med 26:499–504
Kousa P, Järvinen TL, Vihavainen M, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: tibial site. Am J Sports Med 31:182–188
Kousa P, Järvinen TL, Vihavainen M, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med 31:174–181
Mc Conville OR, Kipnis JM, Richmond JC et al (1993) The effect of meniscal status on knee stability and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 9:431–439
Neyret P, Donnel ST, Dejour D (1993) Partial meniscectomy and ACL rupture in soccer players. A study with a minimum 20 years follow-up. Am J Sports Med 21:455–460
Noyes F, Barber-Westin SD (1996) Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament surgery: experience from Cincinati. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:116–129
Noyes F, Barber-Westin SD (2001) Revision ACL surgery with the use of bone patellar tendon bone autogenous grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1131–1143
O’Neil D (2004) Revision arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament with previously unharvested ipsilateral autografts. Am J Sports Med 32:1833–1841
Pinczewski LA, Clingefeller AJ, Otto DD et al (1997) Integration of hamstring tendon with bone in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 13:641–643
Rollier JC, Besse JL, Lerat JL, Moyen B (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament revision: analysis and results from a series of 74 cases. Rev Chir Orthop 93:344–350
Romano VM, Graf BK, Keene JS, Lange RH (1993) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of tibial tunnel placement on range of motion. Am J Sports Med 21:415–418
Salmon LJ, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Refshauge K (2006) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. 5- to 9- year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:1604–1614
Shelbourne KD, Nitz P (1990) Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 18:292–299
Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown CH Jr, Hayes WC (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Comparison of hamstrings ans patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 22:242–246
Taggart T, Kumar A, Bickerstaff D (2004) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a midterm patient assessment. Knee 11:29–36
Texier A, Hulet C, Acquitter Y (2001) Reconstruction itérative du ligament croisé antérieur sous arthroscopie. A propos de 32 cas. Rev Chir Orthop 87:653–660
Uribe JW, Hetchtman Zvijac JE (1996) Revision ACL surgery: experience from Miami. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:91–99
Woods GW, Fincher AL, O’Connor DP, Bacon SA (2001) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the lateral third of the ipsilateral patellar tendon after failure of the central-third graft: a preliminary report on 10 patients. Am J Knee Surg 14:23–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trojani, C., Sbihi, A., Djian, P. et al. Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 196–201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1201-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1201-6