Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites: comparison of plain radiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging to anatomic dissection

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to provide quantitative data on insertion sites of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to assess the correlation among measurements of anatomic dissection, plain radiographs, and 3D CT images to determine whether radiologic data can accurately reflect real anatomic measurements.

Methods

Fifteen cadaveric knees were assessed using the three measurement modalities. Lengths of the long and short axis, area, and centre position of each bundle insertion sites by quadrant method were examined on both the femur and tibia. Distances from the insertion centre to distal cortical and posterior cortical margins of condyle on femur, and distance between insertion centres on tibia were also inspected.

Results

The average ACL insertion position in the three measurement modalities was at 33.9 % in deep-shallow position and at 26.5 % in high-low position for anteromedial (AM) bundle and at 39.2 and 54.8 %, respectively, for posterolateral (PL) bundle in femur. For tibia, it was at 36.9 % in anterior–posterior position and 47.1 % in medial–lateral position for AM bundle and at 43.1 and 53.5 %, respectively, for PL bundle. The slight differences in various measurements among the three modalities were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The femoral insertion positions were considerably shallow and low, whereas tibial insertion positions were near the average compared to those in previous studies. Plain radiographic and 3D CT measurements showed a reliable correlation with anatomic dissection measurements. The clinical relevance is that plain radiographs rather than 3D CT can be used as a post-operative evaluation tool after ACL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abreu ESGM, Oliveira MH, Maranhao GS et al (2013) Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2703-9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basdekis G, Christel P, Anne F (2009) Validation of the position of the femoral tunnels in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with 3-D CT scan. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1089–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H et al (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bird JH, Carmont MR, Dhillon M et al (2011) Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 27:1259–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Celentano U, Cardoso MP, Martins CA et al (2012) Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:69–74

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P et al (2006) Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study. Arthroscopy 22:984–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dargel J, Schmidt-Wiethoff R, Fischer S et al (2009) Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: a radiographic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:220–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2008) The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 1: tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1414–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W et al (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK et al (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1418–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo L, Yang L, Wang AM et al (2009) Roentgenographic measurement study for locating femoral insertion site of anterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric study with X-Caliper. Int Orthop 33:133–137

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM et al (1999) Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15:741–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang MD, Piefer JW, Lubowitz JH (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 28:728–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Illingworth KD, Hensler D, Working ZM et al (2011) A simple evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel position: the inclination angle and femoral tunnel angle. Am J Sports Med 39:2611–2618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G et al (2010) Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1226–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenny JY, Ciobanu E, Clavert P et al (2011) Anatomic attachment of the ACL. Comparison between radiological and CT analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:806–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jepsen CF, Lundberg-Jensen AK, Faunoe P (2007) Does the position of the femoral tunnel affect the laxity or clinical outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee? A clinical, prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arthroscopy 23:1326–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawakami Y, Hiranaka T, Matsumoto T et al (2012) The accuracy of bone tunnel position using fluoroscopic-based navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1503–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK et al (2012) Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2200–2207

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S et al (2009) A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JS, Kim TH, Kang SY et al. (2012) How isometric are the anatomic femoral tunnel and the anterior tibial tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Arthroscopy 28:1504–1512, e1501–e1502

  23. Lee YS, Sim JA, Kwak JH et al (2012) Comparative analysis of femoral tunnels between outside-in and transtibial double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography study. Arthroscopy 28:1417–1423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Luites JW, Wymenga AB, Blankevoort L et al (2007) Description of the attachment geometry of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL from arthroscopic perspective for anatomical tunnel placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1422–1431

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mochizuki T, Muneta T, Nagase T et al (2006) Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Musahl V, Burkart A, Debski RE et al (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel placement: comparison of insertion site anatomy with the guidelines of a computer-assisted surgical system. Arthroscopy 19:154–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD et al (2012) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 28:872–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pietrini SD, Ziegler CG, Anderson CJ et al (2011) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel positioning in double-bundle ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:792–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S et al (2008) Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement–a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 24:585–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S et al (2008) Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 24:154–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takahashi M, Doi M, Abe M et al (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34:787–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Taketomi S, Inui H, Nakamura K et al (2013) Clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and 3D CT model-based validation of femoral socket aperture position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2663-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A et al (2010) Tunnel position and relationship to postoperative knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique. Am J Sports Med 38:698–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E et al (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Hoof T, Cromheecke M, Tampere T et al (2013) The posterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1005–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH et al (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A100451).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myung Chul Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.K., Lee, S., Seong, S.C. et al. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites: comparison of plain radiography and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging to anatomic dissection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 2297–2305 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3041-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3041-2

Keywords

Navigation