Patient cohort, clinical and laboratory data
Among 367 patients classified as SSc according to the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria, we identified 18 patients who underwent muscle biopsy due to presence of muscle symptoms. Clinical data were collected in routine clinical practice following standardized European Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) procedures and are summarized in Supplementary Table 1, online resource. All patients were assessed for muscle symptoms (myalgia/muscle weakness) as part of the physical exam, which includes standard neurological examination. Medical research council (MRC) scale-based data were unfortunately not available for all patients. Antibody profiles were determined using EUROLINE ANA profile 3 by Euroimmun for ANA characterization, an ELISA directed against RNA polymerase III by MBL Life Science Corporation and EUROLINE myositis blot by Euroimmun until 2018. For patients assessed afterwards, we used EUROLINE systemic sclerosis profile and EUROLINE autoimmune inflammatory myopathies both by Euroimmun. We performed histopathological analysis according to a standardized protocol in line with the current standard used for the assessment of inflammatory muscle diseases [41] that was slightly adapted. For large-scale digitization, we also included 10 disease controls (8 DM patients’ biopsies and 2 anti-synthetase syndrome patients’ biopsies) who fulfilled the respective ENMC diagnostic criteria [15, 20] and a non-diseased control. Additionally, one non-diseased control was examined by conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved. All procedures were approved by the official ethical standards committee (EA2/163/17) at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Histologic, enzyme histochemical and immunohistochemical procedures
Routine stains were performed on 7 µm cryostat sections according to standard procedures. Immunohistochemical stains were obtained as described previously [28]. The following antibodies were used for staining procedures: C5b-9 (Dako, aE11, 1:200), CD8 (Dako, C8/144B, 1:100), CD20 (Dako, L26, 1:200), CD45 (Dako, 2B11, 1:400), CD56 (Serotec/MCA591 ERIC-1, 1:400), CD68 (Dako, EBM11, 1:100), CD138 (Dako, MI15, 1:30), CD206 (Acris, 7–450, 1:500), ISG15 (abcam, ab14374, 1:100), MHC class I (Dako, w6/32, 1:1000), MHC class II (Dako, CR3/43, 1:100), neonatal MyHC (Novocastra, NB-MHCn, 1:20), MxA (Santa Cruz, sc-50509 polyclonal, 1:100), PDGFR-β (Santa Cruz, sc-339, P-20, 1:30), Siglec1 (Millipore, MABT328 5F1.1, 1:50), SQSTM1/p62 (Abcam, rabbit polyclonal 91526, 1:100). Appropriate positive and negative controls (tissue reactions) were used where necessary. Additionally, normal muscle or physiological control (e.g., staining of arterioles by C5b-9, MHC class I positivity of capillaries) was used as negative control for all reactions as described in Ref. [28]. The above-mentioned comprehensive antibody panel was also used to ensure negative staining results by studying so-called “irrelevant antibodies” for validation.
Transmission electron microscopy
Muscle specimens were fixed and embedded according to standard protocols. Briefly, muscle specimens were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for a minimum of 24 h at 4 °C, osmicated in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer, dehydrated using graded acetone series including combined en bloc staining with 1% uranyl acetate and 0.1% phosphotungstic acid in 70% acetone, infiltrated in RenLam resin and then polymerized for 48–72 h at 60 °C. Semithin sections (500 nm) were stained with Richardson solution for microanatomical examination, and ultrathin sections (60–70 nm) were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Conventional ultrastructural analysis using TEM 902 and TEM 906 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) was performed only in one non-diseased control case.
Large-scale digitization (“nanotomy”)
Routinely fixed and embedded muscle samples were used to prepare ultrathin sections on support film-coated slot grids similar as previously described [9, 17, 35]. We digitized one entire ultrathin section per SSc case and disease/pathological control cases and a non-diseased control (n = 29). Briefly, a Gemini 300 field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), equipped with a scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) detector, was used to digitize entire ultrathin sections with Atlas 5 Software (Fibics) at 7.3 nm pixel size and 1 µs dwell time. Using Atlas 5, overlapping image tiles were stitched and exported into an internet browser-compatible format for upload and open-access pan-and-zoom analysis on http://www.nanotomy.org. In addition, image tiles were stitched and exported to bigtif files using Fiji with TrakEM2 plugin [5] (open source software; last accessed 16.09.2020) and nip2 (open source software; https://www.github.com/libvips/nip2/releases, last accessed 16.09.2020) to allow for analysis via QuPath [1] (open source software; https://www.qupath.github.io/, last accessed 16.09.2020).
Semi-quantitative scoring systems and data analysis
We applied semi-quantitative scores for light microscopic analysis of muscle biopsies using conventional and immunohistochemical stains (see Supplementary Table 3, online resource). Following pseudonymization, whole tissue sections were evaluated by three blinded readers (WS, ES, AU) in a consensus approach. A visual analogue scale (VAS) score for general pathological alteration (severity score) was established with 0 cm = no alterations to 10 cm = most severe alterations [45]. In addition, capillaries, muscle fibers and endomysium/perimysium were evaluated with a score ranging from 0 to 3 that we based on a previously published scoring system [45].
A semi-quantitative score for ultrastructural evaluation of capillary pathology was applied for BM thickening, BM reduplication, endothelial activation, capillary ensheathment by endothelial and/or pericyte processes and presence of tubuloreticular inclusions (TRI) in endothelial cells or pericytes. For this semi-quantitative score, 100 capillaries in each dataset (per patient sample) were manually annotated, except for eight samples containing less than 100 in a section, and afterwards scored by two researchers in a consensus approach (AU, CD) and subsequently discussed with two further authors (WS, HHG). In total, we applied this scoring system to 2618 capillaries (18 SSc cases, 10 disease controls, 1 non-diseased control). 0 = 50–100 nm BM thickness, no reduplication, no endothelial activation, no prominent ensheathment (1–4 processes), no TRI; 1 = 100–200 nm BM thickness, mild reduplication (2–3 layers), mild endothelial activation (increased area and/or organelles), prominent ensheathment (5–6 processes, not only focal and small), 2 small- or 1 medium-sized TRI; 2 = 200 + nm BM thickness, marked reduplication (4 + layers), marked endothelial activation, very prominent ensheathment (7 + processes, also depending on size), 2 + medium- or 1 + large-sized TRI.
Data analysis was performed with Excel. An average sum (AS) score was generated to assess general capillary pathology per case by adding individual capillary scores of the categories: BM thickening, BM reduplication, endothelial activation and capillary ensheathment and dividing by the analyzed capillaries. In addition, an average category sum (ACS) score was generated to assess the portion of each of these four categories per case. Beside scoring of capillaries, all datasets of SSc cases were also examined in detail via QuPath to evaluate ultrastructural findings in addition to the described capillary pathology.
The cases were sorted by the VAS-score and the AS-score for visualization of the EM scoring data, together with age and creatinine kinase (CK) levels, light microscopic findings and additional EM findings. Micrographs were edited using Adobe Photoshop CC, and figures were prepared with CorelDRAW 2020. Graphs of scoring data were prepared with Prism GraphPad 9.0.0.