Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fast-track colorectal surgery: protocol adherence influences postoperative outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This single-center prospective cohort study, conducted outside of a clinical trial, tried to identify the importance of each fast-track surgery procedure and protocol adherence level on clinical outcomes after colorectal surgery.

Methods

From a prospectively maintained database, 606 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or open colorectal resection within a well established fast-track surgery (FT) protocol, between 2005 and 2011, were identified. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between each FT procedure with an adherence rate <100 % and the outcome variables (length of stay—LOS, 30-day morbidity and readmission rate). Patients were divided into four adherence level groups to FT procedures—100 %, 85–95 %,70–80 %, and <65 %. Each adherence group was compared with the other groups to evaluate differences in clinical outcome variables.

Results

Group comparisons revealed that higher levels of FT protocol adherence corresponded to significantly improved LOS and morbidity rates. Readmission rates were only significantly different between the full fast-track pathway and the less implemented groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that the fast removal of bladder catheter positively influenced length of stay (p < 0.0001) and 30-day morbidity (p < 0.0001). Laparoscopy surgery, no drain positioning and enforced mobilization improved LOS (p = 0.027, p < 0.0001, p = 0.002, respectively). Early solid feeding improved LOS (p < 0.0001), morbidity (p < 0.0001) and readmission rate (p = 0.011).

Conclusion

Postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery are directly proportional to FT protocol adherence. The early removal of the bladder catheter and early postoperative solid feeding independently influenced the length of hospital stay and 30-day morbidity rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Slim K (2011) Fast-track surgery: the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy. Colorectal Dis 13(5):478–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KC, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CH, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144(10):961–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Muller JM, Schwenk W (2004) ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 18:1463–8.45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram (2005) Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P (2006) The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:506–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, Kehlet H (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47:271–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy BS, Hayward-Sampson P, Tring IC, MacFie J (2005) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 92:1354–1362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245:867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Serclova Z, Dytrych P, Marvan J et al (2009) Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456). Clin Nutr 28:618–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46:851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ (2003) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 90:1497–1504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Feb 16(2):

  14. Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Anderson J (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed J, Khan S, Gatt M, Kallam R, MacFie J (2010) Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 97(5):754–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O, Fearon K, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Hausel J, Nygren J, Andersen J, Revhaug A, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Group (2005) Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five northern European countries. BMJ 330(7505):1420–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H (2005) Enhanced recovery aftersurgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24(3):466–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Feroci F, Kröning KC, Lenzi E, Moraldi L, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2011) Laparoscopy within a fast-track program enhances the short-term results after elective surgery for resectable colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25(9):2919–2925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scatizzi M, Kröning KC, Boddi V, De Prizio M, Feroci F (2010) Fast-track surgery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is it feasible in a general surgery unit? Surgery 147(2):219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vlug MS, Wind J, Wind J, van der Zaag E, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Bemelman WA (2009) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Hofland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Implementation of a fast-track perioperative care program: what are the difficulties? Dig Surg 24:441–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Soop M, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O (2006) Optimizing perioperative management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: what is new? Curr Opin Crit Care 12:166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walter CJ, Smith A, Guillou P (2006) Perceptions of the application of fast-track surgical principles by generalsurgeons. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:191–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Thompson LG, Hill AG (2009) Implementation of ERAS and how to overcome the barriers. Int J Surg 7:16–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96(2):197–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149(6):830–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Engel AF, Gerhards MF, van Wagensveld BA, van der Zaag ES, van Geloven AA, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Bemelman WA, LAFA study group (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical Trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Basse L, Werner M, Kehlet H (2000) Is urinary drainage necessary during continuous epidural analgesia after colonic resection? Reg Anesth Pain Med 25(5):498–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S (2006) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD004080

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Misericordia and Dolce Hospital, Piazza dell’Ospedale 5, 59100, Prato, Po, Italy

    Francesco Feroci, Elisa Lenzi, Maddalena Baraghini, Alessia Garzi, Andrea Vannucchi, Stefano Cantafio & Marco Scatizzi

Authors
  1. Francesco Feroci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisa Lenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maddalena Baraghini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alessia Garzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea Vannucchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stefano Cantafio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marco Scatizzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Feroci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feroci, F., Lenzi, E., Baraghini, M. et al. Fast-track colorectal surgery: protocol adherence influences postoperative outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 103–109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1569-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1569-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation