BACKGROUND
For patients undergoing colonic surgery, the postoperative hospital stay is usually 6 to 10 days, and the morbidity rate is 15 to 20 percent. Fast-track rehabilitation programs have reduced the hospital stay to 2 to 3 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcome after colonic resection with conventional care compared with fast-track multimodal rehabilitation.
METHODS
One hundred thirty consecutive patients receiving conventional care (group 1) in one hospital were compared with 130 consecutive patients receiving multimodal, fast-track rehabilitation (group 2) in another hospital. Outcomes were time to first defecation after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity during the first postoperative month.
RESULTS
Median age was 74 years (group 1) and 72 years (group 2). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was significantly higher in group 2 (P < 0.05). Defecation occurred on day 4.5 in group 1 and day 2 in group 2 (P < 0.05). Median hospital stay was 8 days in group 1 and 2 days in group 2 (P < 0.05). The use of a nasogastric tube was longer in group 1 (P < 0.05). The overall complication rate (35 patients) was lower in group 2 (P < 0.05), especially cardiopulmonary complications (5 patients; P < 0.01). Readmission was necessary in 12 percent of cases for group 1 and 20 percent in group 2 (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Time to first defecation, hospital stay, and morbidity may be reduced after colonic resection with fast-track multimodal rehabilitation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
EL Bokey PH Chapuis C Fung et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePostoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 38 480–7
SM Retchin L Penberthy C Desch R Brown B Jerome-D’Emilia D Clement (1997) ArticleTitlePerioperative management of colon cancer under Medicare risk programs Arch Intern Med 157 1878–84
InstitutionalAuthorNameColorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) ArticleTitleSurgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review Lancet 356 968–74
JJ Arenal C Benito MP Concejo E Ortega (1999) ArticleTitleColorectal resection and primary anastomosis in patients aged 70 and older: prospective study Eur J Surg 165 593–7
H Kehlet (1997) ArticleTitleMultimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation Br J Anaesth 78 506–17
H Kehlet DW Wilmore (2002) ArticleTitleMultimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome Am J Surg 183 630–41
L Basse DH Jakobsen P Billesbølle M Werner H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleA clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection Ann Surg 232 51–7
L Basse DH Jakobsen P Billesbølle C Lund M Werner H Kehlet (2001) ArticleTitleAccelerated recovery after colonic resection Ugeskr Laeger 163 913–7
L Basse H Raskov DH Jakobsen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAccelerated postoperative recovery program after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition Br J Surg 8 1–10
S Wexner (1998) ArticleTitleStandard perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery Am J Coll Surg 186 589–93
B Bradshaw S Spencer R Thirlby (1998) ArticleTitleStandard perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery J Am Coll Surg 186 501–6
L Fronzo ParticleDi J Cymerman (1999) ArticleTitleO’Connell T. Factors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection Arch Surg 134 941–5
AJ Senagore HJ Duepree CP Delaney S Dissanaike KM Brady VW Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleCost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences Dis Colon Rectum 45 485–90
AE Stephen DL Berger (2003) ArticleTitleShortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection Surgery 133 277–82
CP Delaney VW Fazio AJ Senagore B Robinson AL Halverson FH Remzi (2001) ArticleTitleFast track postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery Br J Surg 88 1533–8
K Holte H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitlePostoperative ileus: a preventable event Br J Surg 87 1480–93
K Holte N Sharrock H Kehlet (2002) ArticleTitleClinical implications of perioperative fluid excess Br J Anaesth 89 622–32
DN Lobo KA Bostock KR Neal et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEffect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomized controlled trial Lancet 359 1812–8
K Azimuddin L Rosen JF Reed SuffixIII JJ Stasik RD Riether IT Khubchandani (2001) ArticleTitleReadmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted Dis Colon Rectum 44 942–6
AE Chapman MD Levitt P Hewett et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies. A systematic review Ann Surg 234 590–606
H Kehlet (2002) ArticleTitleClinical trials on laparoscopic surgery – the second round will require a change in tactics Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech 12 137–8
AJ Senagore D Whalley CP Delaney N Mekhail HJ Duepree VW Fazio (2001) ArticleTitleEpidural analgesia-analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology Surgery 129 672–6
AJ Senagore HJ Duepree CP Delaney KM Brady VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleResults of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience Dis Colon Rectum 46 503–9
AJ Senagore KM Madbouly VW Fazio HJ Duepree KM Brady CP Delaney (2003) ArticleTitleAdvantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients Arch Surg 138 252–6
Acknowledgments.
This study was supported by grants from Apotekerfonden 1991, the Center of Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, and The Danish Research Council (22-01-0160).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprints are not available.
About this article
Cite this article
Basse, L., Thorbøl, J., Løssl, K. et al. Colonic Surgery With Accelerated Rehabilitation or Conventional Care. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 271–278 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0055-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-003-0055-0