Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In an era of dwindling hospital resources and increasing medical costs, safe reduction in postoperative stay has become a major focus to optimize utilization of healthcare resources. Although several protocols have been reported to reduce postoperative stay, no Level I evidence exists for their use in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Sixty-four patients undergoing laparotomy and intestinal or rectal resection were randomly assigned to a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet or to traditional postoperative care. Time to discharge from hospital, complication and readmission rates, pain level, quality of life, and patient satisfaction scores were determined at the time of discharge and at 10 and 30 days after surgery. Subgroups were defined to evaluate those who derived the optimal benefit from the protocol. RESULTS: Pathway patients spent less total time in the hospital after surgery (5.4 vs. 7.1 days; P = 0.02) and less time in the hospital during the primary admission than traditional patients. Patients younger than 70 years old had greater benefits than the overall study group (5 vs. 7.1 days; P = 0.01). Patients treated by surgeons with the most experience with the pathway spent significantly less time in the hospital than did those whose surgeons were less experienced with the pathway (P = 0.01). There was no difference between pathway and traditional patients for readmission or complication rates, pain score, quality of life after surgery, or overall satisfaction with the hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients scheduled for a laparotomy and major intestinal or rectal resection are suitable for management by a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet. Pathway patients have a shorter hospital stay, with no adverse effect on patient satisfaction, pain scores, or complication rates. Patients younger than 70 years of age derive the optimal benefit, and increased surgeon experience improves outcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SD Pearson D Goulart-Fisher TH Lee (1995) ArticleTitleCritical pathways as a strategy for improving patient care Ann Intern Med 123 941–948
SB Archer RJ Burnett LV Flesch et al. (1997) ArticleTitleImplementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and hospital charges for patients undergoing total colectomy and ileal pouch/anal anastomosis Surgery 122 699–705
L Bardram P Funch-Jensen P Jensen ME Crawford H Kehlet (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia and early oral nutrition and mobilisation Lancet 345 763–764
SR Binderow SM Cohen SD Wexner JJ Nogueras (1994) ArticleTitleMust early postoperative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy? Dis Colon Rectum 37 584–589
SJ McClane A Senagore P Marcello (2000) ArticleTitleExperience-based postoperative care in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy reduces length of stay Dis Colon Rectum 43 54–589
P Reissman TA Teoh SM Cohen EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1995) ArticleTitleIs early feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 222 73–77
L Basse DH Jakobsen P Billesbolle M Werner H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleA clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection Ann Surg 232 51–57
H Kehlet T Mogensen (1999) ArticleTitleHospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme Br J Surg 86 227–230
KE Behrns AP Kircher JA Galanko MR Brownstein MJ Koruda (2000) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial of early initiation and hospital discharge on a liquid diet following elective intestinal surgery J Gastrointest Surg 4 217–221
BC Bradshaw SS Liu RC Thirlby (1998) ArticleTitleStandardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery J Am Coll Surg 186 501–506
LA Di Fronzo J Cymerman TX O’Connell (1999) ArticleTitleFactors affecting early postoperative feeding following elective open colon resection Arch Surg 134 941–946
TA Pritts NS Nussbaum LV Flesch EJ Fegelamn AA Parikh JE Fischer (1999) ArticleTitleImplementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection Ann Surg 230 728–733
CP Delaney VW Fazio AJ Senagore B Robinson A Halverson FH Remzi (2001) ArticleTitle“Fast track” post-operative management protocol for patients with high comorbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery Br J Surg 88 1533–1538
J Katz R Melzack (1999) ArticleTitleMeasurement of pain Surg Clin North Am 79 231–252
VW Fazio MG O’Riordain IC Lavery et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLong term function and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy Ann Surg 230 575–584
H Kehlet (1999) ArticleTitleSurgical stress response World J Surg 23 801–807
K Holte H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitlePostoperative ileus Br J Surg 87 1480–1493
AJ Senagore D Whalley CP Delaney N Mekhail HJ Duepree VW Fazio (2001) ArticleTitleEpidural anesthesia/analgesia shortens length of stay after laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign pathology Surgery 129 672–676
JH Waldenhausen BD Schirmer (1990) ArticleTitleThe effect of ambulation on recovery from postoperative ileus Ann Surg 212 671–677
CM Harper YM Lyles (1988) ArticleTitlePhysiology and complications of bed rest J Am Geriatr Soc 36 1047–1054
PA Taheri DA Butz LJ Greenfield (2000) ArticleTitleLength of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission J Am Coll Surg 190 123–130
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Delaney, C.P., Zutshi, M., Senagore, A.J. et al. Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Between a Pathway of Controlled Rehabilitation With Early Ambulation and Diet and Traditional Postoperative Care After Laparotomy and Intestinal Resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 851–859 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6672-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6672-4