Abstract
The efficiency of long-distance acoustic signalling of insects in their natural habitat is constrained in several ways. Acoustic signals are not only subjected to changes imposed by the physical structure of the habitat such as attenuation and degradation but also to masking interference from co-occurring signals of other acoustically communicating species. Masking interference is likely to be a ubiquitous problem in multi-species assemblages, but successful communication in natural environments under noisy conditions suggests powerful strategies to deal with the detection and recognition of relevant signals. In this review we present recent work on the role of the habitat as a driving force in shaping insect signal structures. In the context of acoustic masking interference, we discuss the ecological niche concept and examine the role of acoustic resource partitioning in the temporal, spatial and spectral domains as sender strategies to counter masking. We then examine the efficacy of different receiver strategies: physiological mechanisms such as frequency tuning, spatial release from masking and gain control as useful strategies to counteract acoustic masking. We also review recent work on the effects of anthropogenic noise on insect acoustic communication and the importance of insect sounds as indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem health.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aide TM, Corrada-Bravo C, Campos-Cerqueira M, Milan C, Vega G, Alvarez R (2013) Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification. PeerJ 1:e103
Baden T, Hedwig B (2007) Neurite specific Ca2+-dynamics underlying sound processing in an auditory interneurone. J Neurobiol 67:68–80
Bailey WJ, Morris GK (1986) Confusion of phonotaxis by masking sounds in the bushcricket Conocephalus brevipennis (Tettigoniidae: conocephalinae). Ethology 73:19–28
Balakrishnan R, Bahuleyan J, Nandi D, Jain M (2013) Modelling the effects of chorus species composition and caller density on acoustic masking interference in multispecies choruses of crickets and katydids. Ecol Inform. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.006
Bee MA (2008) Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs. Anim Behav 75:1781–1791
Bee MA (2012) Sound source perception in anuran amphibians. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:301–310
Bennet-Clark HC (1998) Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Philos T Roy Soc B 353:407–419
Bermúdez-Cuamatzin E, Ríos-Chelén AA, Gil D, Garcia CM (2011) Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol Lett 7:36–38
Béthoux O, Nel A (2002) Venation pattern and revision of Orthoptera sensu nov. and sister groups. Phylogeny of palaeozoic and Mesozoic Orthoptera sensu nov. Zootaxa 96:1–88
Bormpoudakis D, Sueur J, Pantis JD (2013) Spatial heterogeneity of ambient sound at the habitat type level: ecological implications and applications. Landsc Ecol 28:495–506
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert J, Capranica R, Ingle D (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum, New York, pp 701–730
Connell JH (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–723
Conner WE (2014) Adaptive sounds and silences: acoustic anti-predator strategies in insects. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 65–79
Couldridge VC, van Staaden MJ (2004) Habitat-dependent transmission of male advertisement calls in bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera; Pneumoridae). J Exp Biol 207:2777–2786
Diwakar S, Balakrishnan R (2007a) The assemblage of acoustically communicating crickets of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India: call diversity and diel calling patterns. Bioacoustics 16:113–135
Diwakar S, Balakrishnan R (2007b) Vertical stratification in an acoustically communicating ensiferan assemblage of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India. J Trop Ecol 23:479–486
Diwakar S, Jain M, Balakrishnan R (2007) Psychoacoustic sampling as a reliable, non—invasive method to monitor orthopteran species diversity in tropical forests. Biodiv Conserv 16:4081–4093
Ellinger N, Hödl W (2003) Habitat acoustics of a neotropical lowland rainforest. Bioacoustics 13:297–321
Elliott CJH, Koch UT (1985) The clockwork cricket. Naturwissenschaften 72:150–152
Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Amer Nat 139:125–153
Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 340:215–225
Ey E, Fischer J (2009) The ‘‘Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis’’—a review of the evidence from birds, anurans and mammals. Bioacoustics 19:21–48
Fonseca PJ (2014) Cicada acoustic communication. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 101–121
Gasc A, Sueur J, Pavoine S, Pellens R, Grandcolas P (2013) Biodiversity sampling using a global acoustic approach: contrasting sites with microendemics in New Caledonia. PLoS One 8:e65311
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gogala M, Riede K (1995) Time sharing of song activity by cicadas in Temengor Forest Reserve, Hulu Perak, and Sabah, Malaysia. Malay Nat J 48:297–305
Gorochov AV, Rasnitsyn AP (2002) Superorder Gryllidea Laicharting, 1781. In: Rasnitsyn AP, Quicke DLJ (eds) History of insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 293–303
Gotelli NJ, Graves GR (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
Grant PCB (2014) Acoustic profiling of the landscape. Ph. D thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Greenfield MD (2014) Acoustic communication in the nocturnal Lepidoptera. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 81–100
Gu J-J, Montealegre ZF, Robert D, Engel MS, Xiao G-X, Ren D (2012) Wing stridulation in a Jurassic katydid (Insecta, Orthoptera) produced low-pitched musical calls to attract females. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:3868–3873
Halfwerk W, Holleman LJM, Lessells CM, Slabbekoorn H (2011) Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. J Appl Ecol 48:210–219
Hedwig B (2014) Towards an understanding of the neural basis of acoustic communication in crickets. In Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 123–141
Hedwig B, Robert D (2014) Auditory parasitoid flies exploiting acoustic communication of insects. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 45–63
Heller KG (1995) Acoustic signalling in palaeotropical bushcrickets (Orthoptera: tettigonioidea: Pseudophyllidae): does predation pressure by eavesdropping enemies differ in the Palaeo-and Neotropics? J Zool 237:469–485
Hoskin CJ, Higgie M (2010) Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecol Lett 13:409–420
Jain M, Balakrishnan R (2011) Microhabitat selection in an assemblage of crickets (Orthoptera: ensifera) of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India. Insect Conserv Div 4:152–158
Jain M, Balakrishnan R (2012) Does acoustic adaptation drive vertical stratification? A test in a tropical cricket assemblage. Behav Ecol 23:343–354
Jain M, Kuriakose G, Balakrishnan R (2010) Evaluation of methods to estimate foliage density in the understorey of a tropical evergreen forest. Curr Sci 98:508–515
Jain M, Diwakar S, Bahuleyan J, Deb R, Balakrishnan R (2014) A rain forest dusk chorus: cacophony or sounds of silence? Evol Ecol 28:1–22
Kostarakos K, Hartbauer M, Römer H (2008) Matched filters, mate choice and the evolution of sexually selected traits. PLoS One 3:e3005
Kostarakos K, Hennig MR, Römer H (2009) Two matched filters and the evolution of mating signals in four species of cricket. Front Zool 6:22
Krause BL (1987) Bioacoustics, habitat ambience in ecological balance. Whole Earth Rev 57:14–18
Lampe U, Schmoll T, Franzke A, Reinhold K (2012) Staying tuned: grasshoppers from noisy roadside habitats produce courtship signals with elevated frequency components. Funct Ecol 26:1348–1354
Lampe U, Reinhold K, Schmoll T (2014) How grasshoppers respond to road noise: developmental plasticity and population differentiation in acoustic signaling. Funct Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12215
MacArthur RH (1958) Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39:599–619
Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290
Mendeson TC, Shaw KL (2012) The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 27:421–427
Montealegre-Z F, Morris GK, Mason AC (2006) Generation of extreme ultrasonics in rainforest katydids. J Exp Biol 209:4923–4937
Montealegre-Z F, Jonsson T, Robert D (2011) Sound radiation and wing mechanics in stridulating field crickets (Orthoptera: gryllidae). J Exp Biol 214:2105–2117
Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34
Nischk F, Otte D (2000) Bioacoustics, ecology and systematics of Ecuadorian rainforest crickets (Orthoptera: gryllidae: Phalangopsinae), with a description of four new genera and ten new species. J Orthopt Res 9(229–2):54
Paul RC, Walker TJ (1979) Arboreal singing in a burrowing cricket, Anurogryllusa arboreus. J Comp Physiol A 132:217–223
Penone C, Le Viol I, Pellissier V, Julien J-F, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C (2013) Use of large-scale acoustic monitoring to assess anthropogenic pressures on Orthoptera communities. Conserv Biol 27:979–987
Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74
Pijanowski BC, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL (2011) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol 26:1213–1232
Pollack GS (1986) Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: the influence of sound direction on neural coding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behaviour. J Comp Physiol A 158:549–561
Pollack GS (1988) Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8:2635–2639
Riede K (1993) Monitoring biodiversity: analysis of Amazonian rainforest sounds. Ambio 22:546–548
Riede K (1997) Bioacoustic diversity and resource partitioning in tropical calling communities. In: Tropical Biodiversity and Systematics, pp 275–280. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems, Bonn
Römer H (1993) Environmental and biological constraints for the evolution of long-range signalling and hearing in acoustic insects. Philos T Roy Soc B 340:179–185
Römer H (1998) The sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects. In: Hoy R, Popper A, Fay R (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Handbook of auditory research. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–96
Römer H (2013) Masking by noise in acoustic insects: problems and solutions. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 33–63
Römer H, Krusch M (2000) A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 186:181–191
Römer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:437–444
Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf Surv Evolut Biol 5:157–195
Samways MJ, Sergeev MG (1997) Orthoptera and landscape change. In: Gangwere SK, Muralirangan MC, Muralirangan M (eds) The bionomics of grasshoppers, katydids and their kin. CAB International, Oxon
Schmidt AKD, Römer H (2011) Solutions to the cocktail party problem in insects: selective filters, spatial release from masking and gain control in tropical crickets. PLoS One 6:e28593
Schmidt AKD, Riede K, Römer H (2011) High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket. J Exp Biol 214:1754–1762
Schmidt AKD, Römer H, Riede K (2013) Spectral niche segregation and community organization in a tropical cricket assemblage. Behav Ecol 24:470–480
Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726
Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39
Schul J, Sheridan RA (2006) Auditory stream segregation in an insect. J Neurosci 138:1–4
Schul J, Mayo AM, Triblehorn JD (2012) Auditory change detection by a single neuron in an insect. J Comp Physiol A 198:695–704
Senter P (2008) Voices of the past: a review of Paleozoic and Mesozoic animal sounds. Hist Biol 20:255–287
Shieh BS, Liang SH, Chen CC, Loa HH, Liao CY (2012) Acoustic adaptations to anthropogenic noise in the cicada Cryptotympana takasagona Kato (Hemiptera: cicadidae). Acta Ethol 15:33–38
Siegert ME, Römer H, Hartbauer M (2013) Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation. J Exp Biol 216:4655–4665
Siemers BM, Schaub A (2011) Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:1646–1652
Simmons AM (2013) “To ear is human, to forgive is divine”: bob Capranica`s legacy to auditory neuroethlogy. J Comp Physiol A 199:169–182
Slabbekoorn H, den Boer-Visser A (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Curr Biol 16:2326–2331
Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise—great tits hit the high notes to ensure that their mating calls are heard above the city’s din. Nature 424:267
Sobel EC, Tank DW (1994) In vivo Ca2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: an example of chemical computation. Science 263:823–826
Stumpner A, Nowotny M (2014) Neural processing in the bush-cricket auditory pathway. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 143–166
Sueur J (2002) Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Biol J Linn Soc 75:379–394
Sueur J, Aubin T (2003) Is microhabitat segregation between two cicada species (Tibicina haematodes and Cicada orni) due to calling song propagation constraints? Naturwissenschaften 90:322–326
Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS One 3:e4065
van Staaden MJ, Römer H (1997) Sexual signaling in bladder grasshoppers: tactical design for maximizing calling range. J Exp Biol 200:2597–2608
von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1997) Recognition of sex in the acoustic communication of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 180:373–386
Wehner R (1987) “Matched filters”-neural models of the external world. J Comp Physiol A 161:511–531
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptation for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Quellet H (eds) acoustic communication in birds. Academic, New York, pp 131–181
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF; P20882-B09) and the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, for supporting research projects conducted in Panama and India, respectively. They thank Jerome Sueur for help with locating interesting publications on paleobioacoustics and Diptarup Nandi for drawing the illustration in Fig. 1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, A.K.D., Balakrishnan, R. Ecology of acoustic signalling and the problem of masking interference in insects. J Comp Physiol A 201, 133–142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0955-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0955-6