Advertisement

Journal of Comparative Physiology A

, Volume 201, Issue 1, pp 133–142 | Cite as

Ecology of acoustic signalling and the problem of masking interference in insects

  • Arne K. D. SchmidtEmail author
  • Rohini Balakrishnan
Review

Abstract

The efficiency of long-distance acoustic signalling of insects in their natural habitat is constrained in several ways. Acoustic signals are not only subjected to changes imposed by the physical structure of the habitat such as attenuation and degradation but also to masking interference from co-occurring signals of other acoustically communicating species. Masking interference is likely to be a ubiquitous problem in multi-species assemblages, but successful communication in natural environments under noisy conditions suggests powerful strategies to deal with the detection and recognition of relevant signals. In this review we present recent work on the role of the habitat as a driving force in shaping insect signal structures. In the context of acoustic masking interference, we discuss the ecological niche concept and examine the role of acoustic resource partitioning in the temporal, spatial and spectral domains as sender strategies to counter masking. We then examine the efficacy of different receiver strategies: physiological mechanisms such as frequency tuning, spatial release from masking and gain control as useful strategies to counteract acoustic masking. We also review recent work on the effects of anthropogenic noise on insect acoustic communication and the importance of insect sounds as indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem health.

Keywords

Acoustic masking interference Acoustic niche partitioning Acoustic adaptation Cricket and katydid assemblage Insect acoustic communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF; P20882-B09) and the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, for supporting research projects conducted in Panama and India, respectively. They thank Jerome Sueur for help with locating interesting publications on paleobioacoustics and Diptarup Nandi for drawing the illustration in Fig. 1.

References

  1. Aide TM, Corrada-Bravo C, Campos-Cerqueira M, Milan C, Vega G, Alvarez R (2013) Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification. PeerJ 1:e103PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baden T, Hedwig B (2007) Neurite specific Ca2+-dynamics underlying sound processing in an auditory interneurone. J Neurobiol 67:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey WJ, Morris GK (1986) Confusion of phonotaxis by masking sounds in the bushcricket Conocephalus brevipennis (Tettigoniidae: conocephalinae). Ethology 73:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan R, Bahuleyan J, Nandi D, Jain M (2013) Modelling the effects of chorus species composition and caller density on acoustic masking interference in multispecies choruses of crickets and katydids. Ecol Inform. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.006
  5. Bee MA (2008) Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs. Anim Behav 75:1781–1791PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bee MA (2012) Sound source perception in anuran amphibians. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:301–310PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennet-Clark HC (1998) Size and scale effects as constraints in insect sound communication. Philos T Roy Soc B 353:407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bermúdez-Cuamatzin E, Ríos-Chelén AA, Gil D, Garcia CM (2011) Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol Lett 7:36–38PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Béthoux O, Nel A (2002) Venation pattern and revision of Orthoptera sensu nov. and sister groups. Phylogeny of palaeozoic and Mesozoic Orthoptera sensu nov. Zootaxa 96:1–88Google Scholar
  10. Bormpoudakis D, Sueur J, Pantis JD (2013) Spatial heterogeneity of ambient sound at the habitat type level: ecological implications and applications. Landsc Ecol 28:495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  12. Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert J, Capranica R, Ingle D (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Plenum, New York, pp 701–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell JH (1961) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology 42:710–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conner WE (2014) Adaptive sounds and silences: acoustic anti-predator strategies in insects. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 65–79Google Scholar
  15. Couldridge VC, van Staaden MJ (2004) Habitat-dependent transmission of male advertisement calls in bladder grasshoppers (Orthoptera; Pneumoridae). J Exp Biol 207:2777–2786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diwakar S, Balakrishnan R (2007a) The assemblage of acoustically communicating crickets of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India: call diversity and diel calling patterns. Bioacoustics 16:113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diwakar S, Balakrishnan R (2007b) Vertical stratification in an acoustically communicating ensiferan assemblage of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India. J Trop Ecol 23:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diwakar S, Jain M, Balakrishnan R (2007) Psychoacoustic sampling as a reliable, non—invasive method to monitor orthopteran species diversity in tropical forests. Biodiv Conserv 16:4081–4093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellinger N, Hödl W (2003) Habitat acoustics of a neotropical lowland rainforest. Bioacoustics 13:297–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott CJH, Koch UT (1985) The clockwork cricket. Naturwissenschaften 72:150–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Amer Nat 139:125–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 340:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ey E, Fischer J (2009) The ‘‘Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis’’—a review of the evidence from birds, anurans and mammals. Bioacoustics 19:21–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fonseca PJ (2014) Cicada acoustic communication. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 101–121Google Scholar
  25. Gasc A, Sueur J, Pavoine S, Pellens R, Grandcolas P (2013) Biodiversity sampling using a global acoustic approach: contrasting sites with microendemics in New Caledonia. PLoS One 8:e65311PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Gogala M, Riede K (1995) Time sharing of song activity by cicadas in Temengor Forest Reserve, Hulu Perak, and Sabah, Malaysia. Malay Nat J 48:297–305Google Scholar
  28. Gorochov AV, Rasnitsyn AP (2002) Superorder Gryllidea Laicharting, 1781. In: Rasnitsyn AP, Quicke DLJ (eds) History of insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 293–303Google Scholar
  29. Gotelli NJ, Graves GR (1996) Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant PCB (2014) Acoustic profiling of the landscape. Ph. D thesis, Stellenbosch University, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenfield MD (2014) Acoustic communication in the nocturnal Lepidoptera. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 81–100Google Scholar
  32. Gu J-J, Montealegre ZF, Robert D, Engel MS, Xiao G-X, Ren D (2012) Wing stridulation in a Jurassic katydid (Insecta, Orthoptera) produced low-pitched musical calls to attract females. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:3868–3873PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Halfwerk W, Holleman LJM, Lessells CM, Slabbekoorn H (2011) Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. J Appl Ecol 48:210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hedwig B (2014) Towards an understanding of the neural basis of acoustic communication in crickets. In Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 123–141Google Scholar
  35. Hedwig B, Robert D (2014) Auditory parasitoid flies exploiting acoustic communication of insects. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 45–63Google Scholar
  36. Heller KG (1995) Acoustic signalling in palaeotropical bushcrickets (Orthoptera: tettigonioidea: Pseudophyllidae): does predation pressure by eavesdropping enemies differ in the Palaeo-and Neotropics? J Zool 237:469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoskin CJ, Higgie M (2010) Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecol Lett 13:409–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jain M, Balakrishnan R (2011) Microhabitat selection in an assemblage of crickets (Orthoptera: ensifera) of a tropical evergreen forest in Southern India. Insect Conserv Div 4:152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jain M, Balakrishnan R (2012) Does acoustic adaptation drive vertical stratification? A test in a tropical cricket assemblage. Behav Ecol 23:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jain M, Kuriakose G, Balakrishnan R (2010) Evaluation of methods to estimate foliage density in the understorey of a tropical evergreen forest. Curr Sci 98:508–515Google Scholar
  41. Jain M, Diwakar S, Bahuleyan J, Deb R, Balakrishnan R (2014) A rain forest dusk chorus: cacophony or sounds of silence? Evol Ecol 28:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kostarakos K, Hartbauer M, Römer H (2008) Matched filters, mate choice and the evolution of sexually selected traits. PLoS One 3:e3005PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kostarakos K, Hennig MR, Römer H (2009) Two matched filters and the evolution of mating signals in four species of cricket. Front Zool 6:22PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krause BL (1987) Bioacoustics, habitat ambience in ecological balance. Whole Earth Rev 57:14–18Google Scholar
  45. Lampe U, Schmoll T, Franzke A, Reinhold K (2012) Staying tuned: grasshoppers from noisy roadside habitats produce courtship signals with elevated frequency components. Funct Ecol 26:1348–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lampe U, Reinhold K, Schmoll T (2014) How grasshoppers respond to road noise: developmental plasticity and population differentiation in acoustic signaling. Funct Ecol. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12215
  47. MacArthur RH (1958) Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology 39:599–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mendeson TC, Shaw KL (2012) The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 27:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Montealegre-Z F, Morris GK, Mason AC (2006) Generation of extreme ultrasonics in rainforest katydids. J Exp Biol 209:4923–4937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Montealegre-Z F, Jonsson T, Robert D (2011) Sound radiation and wing mechanics in stridulating field crickets (Orthoptera: gryllidae). J Exp Biol 214:2105–2117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nischk F, Otte D (2000) Bioacoustics, ecology and systematics of Ecuadorian rainforest crickets (Orthoptera: gryllidae: Phalangopsinae), with a description of four new genera and ten new species. J Orthopt Res 9(229–2):54Google Scholar
  54. Paul RC, Walker TJ (1979) Arboreal singing in a burrowing cricket, Anurogryllusa arboreus. J Comp Physiol A 132:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Penone C, Le Viol I, Pellissier V, Julien J-F, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C (2013) Use of large-scale acoustic monitoring to assess anthropogenic pressures on Orthoptera communities. Conserv Biol 27:979–987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pianka ER (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pijanowski BC, Gage SH, Dumyahn SL, Krause BL (2011) What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landsc Ecol 26:1213–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pollack GS (1986) Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: the influence of sound direction on neural coding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behaviour. J Comp Physiol A 158:549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pollack GS (1988) Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8:2635–2639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Riede K (1993) Monitoring biodiversity: analysis of Amazonian rainforest sounds. Ambio 22:546–548Google Scholar
  61. Riede K (1997) Bioacoustic diversity and resource partitioning in tropical calling communities. In: Tropical Biodiversity and Systematics, pp 275–280. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems, BonnGoogle Scholar
  62. Römer H (1993) Environmental and biological constraints for the evolution of long-range signalling and hearing in acoustic insects. Philos T Roy Soc B 340:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Römer H (1998) The sensory ecology of acoustic communication in insects. In: Hoy R, Popper A, Fay R (eds) Comparative hearing: insects. Handbook of auditory research. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Römer H (2013) Masking by noise in acoustic insects: problems and solutions. In: Brumm H (ed) Animal communication and noise, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 33–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Römer H, Krusch M (2000) A gain-control mechanism for processing of chorus sounds in the afferent auditory pathway of the bushcricket Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). J Comp Physiol A 186:181–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Römer H, Lewald J (1992) High-frequency sound transmission in natural habitats: implications for the evolution of insect acoustic communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryan MJ (1990) Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf Surv Evolut Biol 5:157–195Google Scholar
  68. Samways MJ, Sergeev MG (1997) Orthoptera and landscape change. In: Gangwere SK, Muralirangan MC, Muralirangan M (eds) The bionomics of grasshoppers, katydids and their kin. CAB International, OxonGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmidt AKD, Römer H (2011) Solutions to the cocktail party problem in insects: selective filters, spatial release from masking and gain control in tropical crickets. PLoS One 6:e28593PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schmidt AKD, Riede K, Römer H (2011) High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket. J Exp Biol 214:1754–1762PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmidt AKD, Römer H, Riede K (2013) Spectral niche segregation and community organization in a tropical cricket assemblage. Behav Ecol 24:470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schul J, Sheridan RA (2006) Auditory stream segregation in an insect. J Neurosci 138:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schul J, Mayo AM, Triblehorn JD (2012) Auditory change detection by a single neuron in an insect. J Comp Physiol A 198:695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Senter P (2008) Voices of the past: a review of Paleozoic and Mesozoic animal sounds. Hist Biol 20:255–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shieh BS, Liang SH, Chen CC, Loa HH, Liao CY (2012) Acoustic adaptations to anthropogenic noise in the cicada Cryptotympana takasagona Kato (Hemiptera: cicadidae). Acta Ethol 15:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Siegert ME, Römer H, Hartbauer M (2013) Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation. J Exp Biol 216:4655–4665PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Siemers BM, Schaub A (2011) Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:1646–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Simmons AM (2013) “To ear is human, to forgive is divine”: bob Capranica`s legacy to auditory neuroethlogy. J Comp Physiol A 199:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Slabbekoorn H, den Boer-Visser A (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Curr Biol 16:2326–2331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise—great tits hit the high notes to ensure that their mating calls are heard above the city’s din. Nature 424:267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sobel EC, Tank DW (1994) In vivo Ca2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: an example of chemical computation. Science 263:823–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stumpner A, Nowotny M (2014) Neural processing in the bush-cricket auditory pathway. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 143–166Google Scholar
  85. Sueur J (2002) Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Biol J Linn Soc 75:379–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sueur J, Aubin T (2003) Is microhabitat segregation between two cicada species (Tibicina haematodes and Cicada orni) due to calling song propagation constraints? Naturwissenschaften 90:322–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS One 3:e4065PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Staaden MJ, Römer H (1997) Sexual signaling in bladder grasshoppers: tactical design for maximizing calling range. J Exp Biol 200:2597–2608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. von Helversen D, von Helversen O (1997) Recognition of sex in the acoustic communication of the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 180:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wehner R (1987) “Matched filters”-neural models of the external world. J Comp Physiol A 161:511–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptation for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, Quellet H (eds) acoustic communication in birds. Academic, New York, pp 131–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyKarl-Franzens-UniversityGrazAustria
  2. 2.Centre for Ecological SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations