Summary
Recordings were made from an identified auditory neuron, the omega neuron, in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus. Models of the conspecific calling song and of the song of another species were presented either singly or simultaneously, and the degree to which the temporal pattern of the conspecific model was encoded in the neuron's spike train was determined. When a single stimulus was presented alone, its temporal pattern was faithfully reflected by the cells's spiking activity, no matter what the azimuth of the broadcasting loudspeaker (Fig. 3). When two stimuli were presented simultaneously from opposite sides, encoding of the pattern ipsilateral to the recorded neuron was interfered with only slightly by the contralateral pattern, as long as the two loudspeakers were sufficiently separated (Figs. 2, 3, 4). When the loudspeakers were each 15° from the cricket's midline, however, the encoding of the temporal pattern of the ipsilateral song model was severely disrupted (Figs. 3, 4). Bilateral interactions are important in determining the response level of the neuron, but do not appear to contribute to the direction-selective encoding of the stimulus temporal pattern (Figs. 5, 6).
Phonotactic steering movements of tethered, flying crickets were recorded under stimulus conditions similar to those used in the neurophysiological tests. Under one-stimulus conditions, crickets attempted to turn towards the conspecific model for all tested speaker locations. The heterospecific model elicited reliable steering behavior when it was broadcast from azimuths of 90° and 60°, but often failed to elicit consistent responses when the speaker was positioned closer to the cricket's midline (Figs. 7, 8A and 8B). Responses to the heterospecific pattern were smaller in amplitude than those to the conspecific song model (Figs. 7, 8B). Under two-stimulus conditions, the conspecific model was consistently preferred over the heterospecific song for all tested speaker locations in half the tested crickets. In the remaining animals, preference for the conspecific pattern was only evident for the larger loudspeaker azimuths (Figs. 7, 8C).
These results demonstrate that simultaneouslypresented stimuli can be represented separately in the nervous system as a consequence of auditory directionality. It is postulated that the cricket's ability to choose between these stimuli may result from the interactions between two bilaterallypaired song recognizers, each of which may be driven primarily by sound stimuli from one side.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimental D (ed) Insects, science and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77
Atkins G, Pollack GS (1986) Age dependent occurrence of an ascending axon on the omega neuron of the cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicus. J Comp Neurol 243:527–534
Atkins G, Ligman S, Burghardt F, Stout JF (1984) Changes in phonotaxis by the female cricketAcheta domesticus L. after killing identified acoustic interneurons. J Comp Physiol A 154:795–804
Bentley DR, Hoy RR (1972) Genetic control of the neuronal network generating cricket (Teleogryllus, Gryllus) song patterns. Anim Behav 20:478–492
Boyan GS (1980) Auditory neurones in the brain of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). J Comp Physiol 140:81–93
Boyan GS, Williams JLD (1982) Auditory neurones in the brain of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): ascending interneurones. J Insect Physiol 28:493–501
Boyd P, Lewis B (1983) Peripheral directionality in the cricket (Gryllus campestris L.,Teleogryllus oceanicus Le Guillou). J Comp Physiol 153:523–532
Cade WH (1981) Field cricket spacing, and the phonotaxis of crickets and parasitoid flies to clumped and isolated cricket songs. Z Tierpsychol 55:365–375
Campbell DJ, Clarke DJ (1971) Nearest neighbour tests of significance for non-randomness in the spatial distribution of singing crickets (Teleogryllus commodus (Walker)). Anim Behav 19:750–756
Casaday GB, Hoy RR (1977) Auditory interneurons in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: physiological and anatomical properties. J Comp Physiol 121:1–13
Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am 25:975–979
Doherty JA (1985) Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer: comparisons of sequential and choice paradigms. J Comp Physiol A 157:279–289
Doolan JM, Pollack GS (1985) Phonotactic specificity of the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal parameters of the stimulus. J Comp Physiol A 157:223–233
Fielden A (1960) Transmission through the last abdominal ganglion of the dragonfly nymph,Anax imperator. J Exp Biol 37:832–844
Gerhardt HC (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. Am Zool 22:581–595
Haas H (1949) The influence of a single echo on the audibility of speech. Library communication no. 363, Building Research Station, Watford, Herts, England. Reprinted in Audio Eng Soc J 20:146–159 (1972)
Heiligenberg W (1969) The effect of stimulus chirps on a cricket's chirping (Acheta domesticus). Z Vergl Physiol 65:70–97
Helversen D von (1984) Parallel processing in auditory pattern recognition and directional analysis by the grasshopperChorthippus biguttulus L. (Acrididae). J Comp Physiol A 154:837–846
Hill KG, Boyan GS (1977) Sensitivity to frequency and direction of sound in the auditory system of crickets (Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol 121:79–97
Hill KG, Loftus-Hills JJ, Gartside DF (1972) Pre-mating isolation between the Australian field cricketsTeleogryllus commodus andT. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust J Zool 20:155–163
Hoy RR, Hahn J, Paul RC (1977) Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195:82–84
Kleindienst H-U, Koch UT, Wohlers DW (1981) Analysis of the cricket auditory system by acoustic stimulation using a closed sound field. J Comp Physiol 141:283–296
Koch UT (1980) Analysis of cricket stridulation using miniature angle detectors. J Comp Physiol 136:247–256
Leroy Y (1964) Transmission du paramètre fréquence dans les signaux acoustiques des hybrides F1 et P×F1 de deux grillons:T. commodus Walker etT. oceanicus Le Guillou (Orthopteres, Ensiferes). CR Acad Sci Paris (D) 259:892–895
Moiseff A, Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1978) Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4052–4056
Oldham RS, Gerhardt HC (1975) Behavioral isolating mechanisms of the treefrogsHyla cinerea andH. gratiosa. Copeia 1975:223–231
Pollack GS (1982) Sexual differences in cricket calling song recognition. J Comp Physiol 146:217–221
Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1979) Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204:429–432
Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1981) Phonotaxis to individual rhythmic components of a complex cricket calling song. J Comp Physiol 144:367–373
Pollack GS, Huber F, Weber T (1984) Frequency and temporal pattern-dependent phonotaxis of crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) during tethered flight and compensated walking. J Comp Physiol A 154:13–26
Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J Comp Physiol 119:111–126
Popov AV, Markovich AM, Andjan AS (1978) Auditory interneurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer. J Comp Physiol 126:183–192
Römer H, Seikowski U (1985) Responses to model songs of auditory neurons in the thoracic ganglia and brain of the locust. J Comp Physiol A 156:845–860
Schildberger K (1984) Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol A 155:171–185
Selverston AI, Kleindienst H-U, Huber F (1985) Synaptic connectivity between cricket auditory interneurons as studied by selective photoinactivation. J Neurosci 5:1283–1292
Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition inGryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol 146:361–378
Ulagaraj SM, Walker TJ (1973) Phonotaxis of crickets in flight: attraction of male and female crickets to male calling songs. Science 182:1278–1279
Ulagaraj SM, Walker TJ (1975) Responses of flying mole crickets to three parameters of synthetic songs broadcast outdoors. Nature 253:530–532
Walker TJ (1957) Specificity in the response of female tree crickets (Orthoptera, Gryllidae, Oecanthinae) to calling songs of the males. Ann Entomol Soc Am 50:626–636
Wallach H, Newman EB, Rosenzweig R (1949) The precedence effect in sound localization. Am J Psychol 62:315–336
Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behavior of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141:215–232
Wiese K, Eilts K (1985) Evidence for matched frequency dependence of bilateral inhibition in the auditory pathway ofGryllus bimaculatus. Zool Jb Physiol 89:181–201
Wohlers DW, Huber F (1978) Intracellular recording and staining of cricket auditory interneurons (Gryllus campestris L.,Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer). J Comp Physiol 127:11–28
Wohlers DW, Huber F (1982) Processing of sound by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol 146:161–173
Zhantiev RD, Kalinkina IN, Chukanov VS (1975) Characteristics of the directional sensitivity of the tympanal organs in the cricketGryllus bimaculatus DeG. (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Entomol Rev 54:1–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollack, G.S. Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicus: the influence of sound direction on neural encoding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. 158, 549–561 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603799
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603799