Abstract
Load estimation from the momentum balance for a planar control volume is investigated, a configuration which is ubiquitous in experimental fluid mechanics. The classical formulation relies on an assumption of two-dimensional flow which is violated for instantaneous turbulent or transitional flow fields, and to varying degrees in measured mean and second order statistics. A rigorous formulation required for the exact momentum balance over the planar control volume is derived here, involving additional terms related to the three-dimensional momentum fluxes and viscous forces. The formulation is verified using instantaneous and mean control volume load estimations based on synthetic measurements extracted from direct numerical simulations and experimental particle image velocimetry measurements of flow over a cylinder in a turbulent wake regime. The main result is the demonstration of the significance of area integrals involving out-of-plane velocity and velocity gradients, which are shown to be required for accurate estimation of instantaneous sectional loads and cause a sensitivity to experimental conditions for mean sectional load estimates. If volumetric measurements are unavailable to the experimentalist, the divergence-free condition on the velocity field for incompressible flow may be invoked to account for a subset of the three-dimensional terms. This enables higher accuracy, particularly for the mean drag estimates in the statistically three-dimensional flow encountered in experiment. The findings highlight common issues responsible for inconsistent estimates of instantaneous and mean sectional loads for three-dimensional flows using control volume methods, and offer practical recipes for detecting and minimizing errors due to flow three-dimensionality.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonia RA, Rajagopalan S (1990) Determination of drag of a circular cylinder. AIAA J 28:1833–1834
Azijli I, Dwight R (2015) Solenoidal filtering of volumetric velocity measurements using Gaussian process regression. Exp Fluids 56:198
Baur T, Köngeter J (1999) Piv with high temporal resolution for the determination of local pressure reductions from coherent turbulent phenomena. In: 3rd Int. Workshop on Particle Image Velocimetry, Santa Barbara, pp 101–106
Betz A (1925) A method for the direct determination of wing-section drag., Technical Report 337, NACA Tech. Mem
Bohl D, Koochesfahani M (2009) MTV measurements of the vortical field in the wake of an airfoil oscillating at high reduced frequency. J Fluid Mech 620:63–88
Dabiri J (2005) On the estimation of swimming and flying forces from wake measurements. J Exp Biol 208:3519–3532
Dabiri J, Bose S, Gemmell B, Colin S, Costello J (2014) An algorithm to estimate unsteady and quasi-steady pressure fields from velocity field measurements. J Exp Biol 217:331–336
Darwin C (1953) Note on hydrodynamics. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 49:342–354
David L, Jardin T, Farcy A (2009) On the non-intrusive evaluation of fluid forces with the momentum equation approach. Meas Sci Technol 9:095401
de Kat R, van Oudheusden B (2012) Instantaneous planar pressure determination from PIV in turbulent flow. Exp Fluids 52:1089–1106
DeVoria A, Zakery R, Ringuette M (2013) On calculating forces from the flow field with application to experimental volume data. J Fluid Mech 749:297–319
Ghaemi S, Ragni D, Scarano F (2012) PIV-based pressure fluctuations in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp Fluids 53:1823–1840
Gharali K, Johnson D (2014) PIV-based load investigation in dynamic stall for different reduced frequencies. Exp Fluids 55:1803
Graham W, Pitt Ford C, Babinsky H (2017) An impulse-based approach to estimating forces in unsteady flow. J Fluid Mech 815:60–76
Guissart A, Bernal L, Dimitriadis G, Terrapon V (2017) PIV-based estimation of unsteady loads on a flat plate at high angle of attack using momentum equation approaches. Exp Fluids 58:53
Gurka R, Liberzon A, Hefetz D, Rubinstein D, Shavit U (1999) Computation of pressure distribution using PIV velocity data. In: 3rd Int. Workshop on Particle Image Velocimetry, Santa Barbara, pp 671–676
Jones BM (1936) The measurement of profile drag by the pitot-traverse method. Technical Report 1688, Air Ministry—Aeronautical Research Committe Reports and Memoranda
Kotsonis M, Ghaemi S, Veldhuis L, Scarano F (2011) Measurement of the body force field of plasma actuators. J Phys D Appl Phys 44:045204
Kriegseis J, Rival D (2014) Vortex force decomposition in the tip region of impulsively-started flat plates. J Fluid Mech 756:758–770
Kurtulus D, Scarano F, David L (2007) Unsteady aerodynamic forces estimation on a square cylinder by TR-PIV. Exp Fluids 42:185–196
Limacher E, Morton C, Wood D (2018) Generalized derivation of the added-mass and circulatory forces for viscous flows. Phys Rev Fluids 3:014701
Lin J, Rockwell D (1996) Force identification by vorticity fields: techniques based on flow imaging. J Fluids Stuct 10:663–668
McClure J, Yarusevych S (2016) Vortex shedding and structural loading characteristics of finned cylinders. J Fluids Stuct 10:100–101
McClure J, Yarusevych S (2017a) Instantaneous PIV/PTV-based pressure gradient estimation: a framework for error analysis and correction. Exp Fluids 58:92
McClure J, Yarusevych S (2017b) Optimization of planar PIV-based pressure estimates in laminar and turbulent wakes. Exp Fluids 58:62
McPhaden C, Rival D (2018) Unsteady force estimation using a Lagrangian drift-volume approach. Exp Fluids 59:64
Méheut M, Bailly D (2008) Drag-breakdown methods from wake measurements. AIAA J 46:847–862
Mohebbian A, Rival D (2012) Assessment of the derivative-moment transformation method for unsteady-load estimation. Exp Fluids 53:319–330
Moin P, Mahesh K (1998) Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:539–578
Neatby H, Yarusevych S (2012) Towards reliable experimental drag measurements of an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. In: 42nd AIAA fluid dynamics conference and exhibit. ASME, New Orleans, Louisiana
Noca F, Shiels D, Jeon D (1999) A comparison of methods for evaluating time-dependent fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J Fluids Struct 13:551–578
Poelma C, Dickson W, Dickinson M (2006) Time-resolved reconstruction of the full velocity field around a dynamically-scaled flapping wing. Exp Fluids 41:213–225
Ragni D, Ashok A, van Oudheusden B, Scarano F (2009) Surface pressure and aerodynamic loads determination of a transonic airfoil based on particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 20:074005
Ragni D, van Oudheusden BW, Scarano F (2012) 3D pressure imaging of an aircraft propeller blade-tip flow by phase-locked stereoscopic PIV. Exp Fluids 52:463–477
Rival DE, van Oudheusden B (2017) Load-estimation techniques for unsteady incompressible flows. Exp Fluids 58:20
Saffman P (1992) Vortex dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schiavazzi D, Nemes A, Schmitter S, Coletti F (2017) The effect of velocity filtering in pressure estimation. Exp Fluids 58:50
Sciacchitano A, Neal D, Smith B, Warner S, Vlachos P, Wieneke B, Scarano F (2015) Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods. Meas Sci Technol 26:074004
Sciacchitano A, Wieneke B (2016) PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas Sci Technol 27:084006
Spedding G, Hedenström A (2009) PIV-based investigations of animal flight. Exp Fluids 46:749–763
Stansby P (1974) The effect of end plates on the base pressure coefficient of a circular cylinder. Aeronaut J 78:36–37
Takahashi T (1997) On the decomposition of drag components from wake flow measurements. In: 35th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, pp 1–10
Terra W, Sciacchitano A, Scarano F (2017) Aerodynamic drag of a transiting sphere by large-scale tomographic-PIV. Exp Fluids 58:83
Tronchin T, David L, Farcy A (2015) Loads and pressure evaluation of the flow around a flapping wing from instantaneous 3D velocity measurements. Exp Fluids 56:1870
Unal M, Lin J, Rockwell D (1997) Force prediction by PIV imaging: a momentum-based approach. J Fluids Struct 11:965–971
van Dam CP (1999) Recent experience with different methods of drag prediction. Prog Aerosp Sci 35:751–798
van Oudheusden B (2013) PIV-based pressure measurement. Meas Sci Technol 24:032001
van Oudheusden B, Scarano F, Casimiri E (2006) Non-intrusive load characterization of an airfoil using PIV. Exp Fluids 40:988–992
van Oudheusden B, Scarano F, Roosenboom E, Casimiri E, Souverein L (2007) Evaluation of integral forces and pressure fields from planar velocimetry data for incompressible and compressible flows. Exp Fluids 43:153–162
Villegas A, Diez F (2014) Evaluation of unsteady pressure fields and forces in rotating airfoils from time-resolved PIV. Exp Fluids 55:1697
Violato D, Moore P, Scarano F (2011) Lagrangian and Eulerian pressure field evaluation of rod-airfoil flow from time-resolved tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids 50:1057–1070
West G, Fox T (1990) On the use of endplates with circular cylinders. Exp Fluids 9:237–239
Williamson C (1996) Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 28:477–539
Wu J, Ma H, Zhou J (2006) Vorticity and vortex dynamics. Springer, Berlin
Wu J, Pan Z, Lu X (2005) Unsteady fluid-dynamic force solely in terms of control-surface integral. Phys Fluids 17:098102
Zaman K, Culley D (2008) Flow separation control over an airfoil: implication of wake velocity-deficit reduction. In: 4th Flow Control Conference’, Seattle, Washington, pp 1–20
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (Grant no. RGPIN-04222) to the funding of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McClure, J., Yarusevych, S. Planar momentum balance in three-dimensional flows: applications to load estimation. Exp Fluids 60, 41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2683-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2683-8