Evaluation of angiographic computed tomography in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms—a comparative study with DSA and TOF-MRA

Abstract

Following coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms, many centers perform at least one digital subtraction angiography (DSA) continuing with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA). Angiographic computed tomography (ACT) provides high-resolution data from a rotational acquisition of a c-arm-mounted flat panel detector. This study evaluates possible advantages of applying ACT in aneurysm follow-up. In 22 patients DSA examinations with a rotational acquisition were performed. Rotational data were processed into an isotropic high-resolution volume. TOF-MRA was performed the day before DSA. Three experienced neuroradiologists performed a rating of the occlusion rate and a subjective method comparison. Weighted κ statistics were calculated to assess the level of interobserver agreement. Compared to DSA, the diagnostic value of ACT as well as of TOF-MRA was rated to be inferior, although the sensitivity of detecting residual necks was higher with both techniques. Compared to TOF-MRA, ACT achieves favorable ratings only in aneurysms after stent-remodeling. Interobserver agreement was high for all techniques. Ratings of the occlusion rate correlated highly between all observers (r > 0.85, p < 0.001, respectively). In selected patients ACT can add valuable diagnostic information to DSA. TOF-MRA remains a highly sensitive method for aneurysm follow-up.

Introduction

Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms currently is a widely accepted therapeutic option in patients with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or unruptured aneurysms [1, 2]. A long-term follow-up is mandatory because there is a relevant rate of aneurysm recurrence of up to 30%, which does not always need retreatment, but, however, can be associated with a risk of rebleeding [3–6]. Many neurovascular centers perform a follow-up digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and a time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) at 3 to 6 months after treatment in order to continue with TOF-MRA alone, which has been shown to be sufficient in detecting recurrent aneurysms in the majority of the patients [7–9].

Three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) is an angiographic tool that has primarily been used to visualize cerebral aneurysms in a 3D surface-shaded or volume-rendered reconstruction in order to find the best therapeutic approach. Possible advantages of 3D-RA in follow-up examinations after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms have not yet been described. The possibility of processing multiplanar reformatted slice images in high quality derived from a rotational dataset has been improved simultaneously to the development of the latest flat-panel detector-equipped angiographic devices. These systems provide a much higher acquisition speed and image information density combined with a large rectangular field of view. Rotational acquisitions by such detectors provide an almost CT-like contrast resolution allowing imaging of brain parenchyma, which can be of importance during neuro-interventional procedures [10, 11]. In addition, the spatial resolution is higher than in current helical CT: Angiographic CT (ACT)— generated by rotational acquisition—provides an isotropic resolution of about 0.1 mm in comparison to about 0.5-mm maximum CT resolution [12]. The value of ACT in peri-interventional imaging of intracranial stents has been shown, especially the combination of 3D volume-rendered (VRT) and thin- and thick-sliced maximum intensity projected (MIP) reconstructions provides additional information to conventional DSA [13, 14].

The purpose of the representative cross-sectional study presented here is to systematically elucidate possible diagnostic advantages of ACT compared to DSA and TOF-MRA in follow-up examinations of patients after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Methods

Patients

Twenty-two patients treated by endovascular coil embolization of a cerebral aneurysm in our department (14 men, median age 48 years, range 29–78 years) participated in the prospective study. All patients were admitted for standard 6-month follow-up DSA, which included a rotational acquisition. TOF-MRA was performed the day before the DSA examination. Aneurysm locations were the following: anterior communicating artery (Acom): n = 8; internal carotid artery (ICA): n = 5; posterior communicating artery (Pcom): n = 4; basilar artery (BA): n = 4; posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA): n = 1. Stent-remodeling was performed in seven patients (6 x Neuroform™, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA; 1 x Driver™, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Approval of the local ethics committee and informed patient consent were obtained.

Image acquisition

Rotational acquisitions and conventional DSA examinations were performed on an AxiomArtis dBA biplane angiography system equipped with flat panel detectors (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). The rotational acquisitions were performed with the following parameters, complying with the standard 3D-RA protocol: dual 10-s rotation (mask images first, then images during intra-arterial contrast media injection), 273 projections each, 30 cm × 40 cm detector size, radiation dose: 0.36 μGy per image, CTDI_weighted ≈ 22 mGy (manufacturer information).

Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and TOF-MRA scans were performed at 3 T (Magnetom Trio, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Parameters of the TOF-MRA were the following: repetition time: 28 ms, echo time: 4.6 ms, matrix size: 448 × 448, 0.6 mm slice thickness, acquisition time: 5:12 min.

Image postprocessing

DSA series were processed by standard optimization of the mask images and pixel shifting. Postprocessing of the rotational image data into a volume data set (ACT) was performed using dedicated commercial software on a medical workstation (“Leonardo,” DynaCT™, InSpace 3D™, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). The software includes the application of system-specific filter algorithms in order to correct for beam hardening, scattered radiation, truncated projections and ring artifacts. Postprocessing resulted in isotropic volume data sets defined by a batch of 300–400 slices in a 512 × 512 matrix. Isotropic resolution was in the order of 0.1 mm. For diagnostic evaluation the ACT data were viewed as multiplanar MIP slices in free orientations as well as 3D MIP and 3D VRT images. TOF-MRA data were processed according to the ACT data. DSA data only included two-dimensional series. All image viewing was performed on a Macintosh workstation (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) with OsiriX™ installed [15].

Statistical analysis

Three experienced neuroradiologists (K.K., A.M., M.K.) independently performed the image viewing and rating. Firstly, the state of aneurysm occlusion was rated following a three-step ordinal scale (“complete occlusion” vs. “residual neck” vs. “residual aneurysm”) [6]. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for each pair of methods in the diagnostic rating. Weighted κ-statistics were calculated in order to assess interobserver variabilities; a value above κ = 0.6 was assumed to represent substantial agreement [16, 17]. Secondly, a direct method-comparison questionnaire in order to achieve a statement of diagnostic superiority vs. equality vs. inferiority was completed by each observer. A second questionnaire regarding TOF-MRA vs. ACT was completed concerning the artifact load of the technique.

Results

Occlusion rate

The cumulative results of the ratings of occlusion rate are shown in Table 1. All residual aneurysms were consistently detected with every technique except in one patient, where TOF-MRA was impaired due to clip-related signal extinction (Fig. 1a–d). That patient was excluded from the TOF-MRA rating.

Fig. 1

Follow-up examination of a 51-year-old female patient with history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and neurosurgical as well as interventional therapy of a recurrent ICA aneurysm. The DSA series in optimized projection with selective injection into right ICA (a: unsubtracted, b: subtracted) reveals an aneurysm recurrence beyond the coil package. On the opposite of the recurrent aneurysm there is an infundibular origin of the posterior communicating artery (Pcom). TOF-MRA is not diagnostic in this case due to clip-related artifacts (c). A thin-sliced coronal reconstructed ACT (d: 5 mm MIP) demonstrates the refilling inside the coil package (d, arrows). Endovascular re-treatment was performed a few days later

Table 1 Cumulative results of the aneurysm occlusion rate by three observers

Correlation analysis (Pearson) of occlusion rate revealed the following results: DSA vs. TOF-MRA: r = 0.889 (P < 0.001); DSA vs. ACT: r = 0.893 (P < 0.001); ACT vs. TOF-MRA: r = 0.913 (P < 0.001). TOF-MRA achieved the highest score by depicting 16 residual necks, followed by ACT (14) and DSA (12).

The case presented in Fig. 2 illustrates a residual neck of an Acom aneurysm, which is equally well detectable in ACT as well as in TOF-MRA (Fig. 2c,d), but not in DSA due to the unfavorable orientation (Fig. 2a,b). The residual aneurysm presented in Fig. 3 is reliably detected in all three techniques (Fig. 3a,b: DSA; c: TOF-MRA; d: ACT). The stretched and partially endothelialized coil remnant in the right ICA and A1 is well visualized by ACT (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 2

Follow-up examination of a 59-year-old male patient with history of SAH and interventional therapy of an anterior communicating artery (Acom) aneurysm. The DSA series in anterior projection (a: unsubtracted, b: subtracted) seems to show a complete occlusion and was rated like that by all observers. Both thin-sliced ACT (c: 2-mm MIP, transversal) and TOF-MRA (d: 10-mm MIP, coronal) revealed a small neck remnant (c, d, arrows)

Fig. 3

Follow-up examination of 61-year-old male patient with history of SAH and interventional therapy of an Acom aneurysm complicated by coil stretching. The DSA series in anterior orientation (a: unsubtracted, b: subtracted) shows a large basal refilling. TOF-MRA reveals a corresponding finding (c: 10-mm MIP, arrow). Thin-sliced reconstructions of ACT data show the basal refilling (d, closed arrow) as well as a slim rim of attenuation close to the stretched coil in the A1 segment that can be interpreted as neointima (d, open arrow)

Table 2 presents the results of the κ statistics. Interobserver agreement was very good for all groups (κ_w > 0.8) [16, 17].

Table 2 Interobserver agreement regarding the occlusion rate, measured as κw, achieves substantially high agreement for all techniques

Direct comparison

All data are presented cumulatively. Firstly, a subjective assessment of the diagnostic performance of each technique compared to the other was made. Both ACT and TOF-MRA received inferior ratings when compared to DSA, being the gold standard (MRA vs. DSA: favors MRA: n = 14, no preference: n = 16, favors DSA: n = 33; ACT vs. DSA: favors ACT: n = 14, no preference: n = 15; favors DSA: n = 37).

Comparing MRA to ACT presents a slight trend in favor of TOF-MRA (favors MRA: n = 29; no prevalence: n = 14; favors ACT: n = 20). Dividing these data into two subgroups (aneurysms that have been treated with stent remodeling, n = 21 vs. those that have been treated without stent remodeling, n = 42) reveals a trend towards TOF-MRA being rated superior to ACT when no stent had been implanted, while the methods seem to be equivalent in the group of patients with stent remodeling.

Secondly, a subjective assessment of the impairments due to artifact load was asked in comparison between TOF-MRA and ACT. We were aware of not defining the character of artifacts we asked for because many ACT artifacts have not been described yet and are therefore hard to anticipate. Comparable to the ratings of the diagnostic value, TOF-MRA is superior to ACT when no stent was implanted (favors MRA: n = 23, no prevalence: n = 7, favors ACT: n = 12). A slight superiority of ACT is observed for patients with stent remodeling (favors MRA: n = 7, no prevalence: n = 3, favors ACT: n = 11). A second subgroup analysis was performed regarding the aneurysm size. A small aneurysm was defined as having a maximal diameter below 10 mm (n = 13 patients), a large aneurysm having a maximal diameter of 10 mm or more (n = 8 patients). Here equivalence results when comparing the artifact load in TOF-MRA and ACT regarding small aneurysms (favors MRA: n = 14, no prevalence: n = 8, favors ACT: n = 17), but a clear superiority of TOF-MRA over ACT regarding large aneurysms (favors MRA: n = 16, no prevalence: n = 2, favors ACT: n = 6).

One crucial artifact of ACT is demonstrated in Fig. 4. A large ophthalmoplegic ICA aneurysm was treated by stent-protected coil embolization. The follow-up DSA showed a slight central residual filling. ACT provides good visualization of the large coil package using 3D MIP. Concerning the interior of the coil package, ACT suffers from hardening artifacts presenting as an amorphous attenuation comparable to the contrast media filling of the parent vessel. Performing a subtraction only shows some movement artifacts on the edge of the coil package, but no residual filling. The residual filling is confirmed by TOF-MRA.

Fig. 4

Follow-up examination of a 63-year-old female after endovascular therapy of an ophthalmoplegic left ICA aneurysm. The subtracted DSA series in optimized projection (a) show hints for a minimal central residual filling (arrow). A thick-sliced MIP of the ACT data (b) is helpful in displaying the configuration of the coil package and the relation to the ophthalmic artery, but does not reveal the central filling. A thin-sliced section in the same orientation (c, 2-mm MIP) shows an amorphous structure of the core of the coil package (arrow) not delineating any residual filling. The impression of this artifact is similar to an eggshell; therefore, we chose the denomination “eggshell artifact.” TOF-MRA succeeds in delineating the central filling when a thin-sliced MIP section is processed (d, arrow)

Discussion

We are aware that many neuroendovascular centers perform rotational acquisitions as a component of a follow-up angiographic examination. For the purpose of this study we separated the one examination into the two independent techniques.

In our study DSA alone achieved good results in direct comparison to ACT as well as to TOF-MRA. The striking advantage is of course the dynamic information that is missing in both ACT and conventional TOF-MRA. Therefore, we believe that currently no less invasive angiographic technique can completely replace DSA for follow-up after endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate whether there is a group of patients that should additionally be examined with advanced techniques like ACT.

The scoring of the occlusion rate yielded highly consistent results for all techniques and for all three observers. Therefore, ACT can, in principle, be assumed to be a reliable technique in diagnostic imaging of cerebral aneurysms after coil embolization. The results of our study also underline the high value of TOF-MRA in aneurysm follow-up. Our study confirms earlier results of the very high sensitivity for residual flow in cerebral aneurysms treated with coil embolization [8, 9, 18–20].

We experienced some TOF-MRA artifacts mainly related to the susceptibility artifacts caused by coils and stents. Especially stent-related artifacts impair the assessment of the lumen of the parent vessel. The possibility of almost artifact-free imaging of intracranial stents by ACT has been described before [13, 21]. Although our data do not show a convincing superiority, ACT may have some advantages in patients after stent remodeling. However, these are often patients with large aneurysms. The algorithms for reconstructing rotational radiographic data have been found to be insufficient for the assessment of large coil packages resulting in an amorphous signal in the interior of the coil packages (“eggshell” artifact). Similar results in applying ACT to monitor stent and coil apposition during neurointerventional procedures have been published recently [14]. Both conventional 3D-RA and ACT did not consistently detect residual fillings in larger aneurysms. An angiographic follow-up examination can therefore be done without a rotational acquisition, as proposed before [9].

In patients after treatment of complex aneurysms, there seem to be advantages of the 3D techniques over plain DSA (see Figs. 1, 2). Neurosurgical clips disqualify TOF-MRA as a follow-up technique (see Fig. 1); in such patients ACT can provide valuable information.

Conclusion

ACT is a diagnostic tool that has useful added value to conventional DSA in treated aneurysms with a complex anatomy. It may have advantages over TOF-MRA in aneurysms treated with stent remodeling. Larger coil packages (approximately over 10-mm diameter) produce substantial artifacts in ACT data; therefore, we would advise not to use ACT, but rather MRA in such patients.