Abstract
We study a model of cell cycle ensemble dynamics with cell–cell feedback in which cells in one fixed phase of the cycle \(S\) (Signaling) produce chemical agents that affect the growth and development rate of cells that are in another phase \(R\) (Responsive). For this type of system there are special periodic solutions that we call \(k\)-cyclic or clustered. Biologically, a \(k\)-cyclic solution represents \(k\) cohorts of synchronized cells spaced nearly evenly around the cell cycle. We show, under very general nonlinear feedback, that for a fixed \(k\) the stability of the \(k\)-cyclic solutions can be characterized completely in parameter space, a 2 dimensional triangle \(T\). We show that \(T\) is naturally partitioned into \(k^2\) sub-triangles on each of which the \(k\)-cyclic solutions all have the same stability type. For negative feedback we observe that while the synchronous solution (\(k=1\)) is unstable, regions of stability of \(k \ge 2\) clustered solutions seem to occupy all of \(T\). We also observe bi-stability or multi-stability for many parameter values in negative feedback systems. Thus in systems with negative feedback we should expect to observe cyclic solutions for some \(k\). This is in contrast to the case of positive feedback, where we observe that the only asymptotically stable periodic orbit is the synchronous solution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bier M, Bakker B, Westerhoff H (2000) How yeast cells synchronize their glycolytic oscillations: a perturbation analytic treatment. Biophys J 78:1087–1093
Boczko E, Cooper T, Gedeon T, Mischaikow K (2005) Structure theorems and the dynamics of nitrogen catabolite repression in yeast. PNAS 102:5647–5652
Boczko E, Stowers C, Gedeon T, Young T (2010) Ode, rde and sde models of cell cycle dynamics and clustering in yeast. J Biol Dyn 4:328–345
Chen Z, Odstrcil E, Tu B, McKnight S (2007) Restriction of DNA replication to the reductive phase of the metabolic cycle protects genome integrity. Science 316:1916–1919
Diekmann O, Gyllenberg M, Verduyn Lunel SM (1993) A cell-cycle model revisited. CWI. Department of Analysis, Algebra and Geometry [AM] Report No. 9305, pp 1–18. http://www.helsinki.fi/~mgyllenb/publications.html
Diekmann O, Heijmans H, Thieme H (1984) On the stability of the cell size distribution. J Math Biol 19:227–248
Finn R, Wilson R (1954) Population dynamic behavior of the chemostat system. Agric Food Chem 2:66–69
Hannsgen K, Tyson J (1985) Stability of the steady-state size distribution in a model of cell growth and division. J Math Biol 22:293–301
Henson M (2005) Cell ensemble modeling of metabolic oscillations in continuous yeast cultures. Comput Chem Eng 29:645–661
Keulers M, Satroutdinov A, Sazuki T, Kuriyama H (1996) Synchronization affector of autonomous short period sustained oscillation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12:673–682
Kilpatrick Z, Ermentrout B (2011) Sparse gamma rhythms arising through clustering in adapting neuronal networks. PLoS Comput Biol 7(11):e1002281.
Kjeldsen T, Ludvigsen S, Diers I, Balshmidt P, Sorensen A, Kaarshold N (2002) Engineering-enhanced protein secretory expression in yeast with applications to insulin. J Biol Chem 277:18245–18248
Klevecz R (1976) Quantized generation time in mammalian cells as an expression of the cellular clock. PNAS 73:4012–4016
Klevecz R, Murray D (2001) Genome wide oscillations in expression. Mol Biol Rep 28:73–82
Kopmann A, Diekmann H, Thoma M (1998) Oxygen, ph value, and carbon source induced changes of the mode of oscillation in synchronous continuous culture of Saccharomyces cervisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:410–417
Kuenzi M, Fiechter A (1969) Changes in carbohydrate composition and trehalose activity during the budding cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol 64:396–407
Mauroy A, Sepulchre R (2008) Clustering behaviors in networks of integrate-and-fire oscillators. Chaos 18(3):037122
Meyenburg HV (1969) Energetics of the budding cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during glucose limited aerobic growth. Arch Microbiol 66:289–303
Monte SD, d’Ovidio F, Danø S, Sørensen P (2007) Dynamical quorum sensing: population density encoded in cellular dynamics. PNAS 104:18377–18381
Pr PP (2003) Oscillatory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an overview of mechanisms and models. Biotechnol Adv 21:183–192
Robertson J, Stowers C, Boczko E, Johnson C (2008) Real-time luminescence monitoring of cell-cycle and respiratory oscillations in yeast. PNAS 105:17988–93
Rotenberg M (1977) Selective synchrony of cells of differing cycle times. J Theor Biol 66:389–398
Slavov N, Botstein D (2011) Coupling among growth rate response, metabolic cycle, and cell division cycle in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 22:1999–2009
Stowers C, Young T, Boczko E (2011) The structure of populations of budding yeast in response to feedback. Hypotheses Life Sci 1:71–84
Tu B, Kudlicki A, Rowicka M, McKnight S (2005) Logic of the yeast metabolic cycle: temporal compartmentation of cellular processes. Science 310:1152–1158
Uchiyama K, Morimoto M, Yokoyama Y, Shioya S (1996) Cell cycle dependency of rice \(\alpha \)-amylase production in a recombinant yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 54:262–271
Von Meyenburg K (1973) Stable synchronous oscillations in continuous cultures of S. cerevisiae under glucose limitation. In: Biological and Biochemical Oscillators. Academic Press, NY
Young T, Fernandez B, Buckalew R, Moses G, Boczko E (2012) Clustering in cell cycle dynamics with general responsive/signaling feedback. J Theor Biol 292:103–115
Zhu G, Zamamiri A, Henson M, Hjortsø M (2000) Model predictive control of continuous yeast bioreactors using cell population balance models. Chem Eng Sci 55:6155–6167
Acknowledgments
Richard Buckalew (Ohio U.) provided essential help with some of the images. We thank Kara Finley (Ohio U.) for helpful comments. E.B., T.Y. and this work were partially supported by the NIH-NIGMS grant R01GM090207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: verification for \(k=3\)
Appendix A: verification for \(k=3\)
Referring to the labeling in Fig. 6, we present calculations verifying rigorously the conclusions of the numerically generated plot in Fig. 9 for the case \(k=3\).
Regions 2, 6, 7:
In Fig. 9 for the case \(k=3\) we see that regions 2 and 7 have neutral stability of the 3 cohort cyclic solution and in region 6 it is stable. These three regions are covered by Theorem 2.4.
Region 1:
We wish to confirm that for all parameter values in this region, the \(3\) cohort cyclic solution is neutrally stable.
For parameter values in region 1 both \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are initially in \(S\). The order of events is that first \(x_2\) reaches \(s\), then it reaches \(r\) and finally it reaches \(1\). The speed of \(x_2\) will be \(1\) until it reaches \(r\). While in \(R\) the cohort \(x_2\) will experience feedback due to \(x_1, x_1 \in S\), and so it’s speed will be \(1+\beta _2\). The time required for \(x_2\) to reach \(1\) is thus:
The positions of \(x_1\) and \(x_1\) at this time will be:
We observe that this map is affine in the variables \(x_1\), \(x_2\). Thus the derivative of the map \(F\) in a neighborhood of the initial condition of the cyclic solution is:
The eigenvalues of this matrix are \(-\frac{1}{2} \pm i \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\) which implies that the solution is linearly neutrally stable. Since the map is affine in a neighborhood of the initial condition, the cyclic solution is neutral.
Region 3:
In this region we wish to confirm that the 3 cyclic solution is stable.
For these parameter values first \(x_2\) reaches \(r\), then \(x_1\) reaches \(s\) and finally \(x_2\) reaches \(1\). Thus \(x_2\) will experience feedback of \(\beta _2\) for the times \(r-x_2 < t < s - x_1\). For \(t > s-x_1\) it will be subject to feedback \(\beta _1\). The trajectory of \(x_2\) is thus:
It follows that \(t^*\) satisfies:
and so
The local affine map is given by:
which gives us:
The characteristic polynomial for this matrix simplifies to:
One can check that the roots of this polynomial are less than 1 in modulus if and only if \(\beta _2 < \beta _1\). This is the case for monotone negative feedback and so the cyclic solution is stable.
Region 4:
We confirm that the 3-cyclic solution is neutrally stable in this region. We first compute the time it takes \(x_2\) to reach 1; \(x_2\) travels with speed \((1+\beta _1)\) until time \(t=s-x_1\), then travels at speed \((1+\beta _1)\), allowing us to set up the equation:
Solving, we find \(t^* = \displaystyle \frac{1+(\beta _1 - \beta _2)s}{1+\beta _1} - \displaystyle \frac{1}{1+\beta _1}x_2 + \displaystyle \frac{\beta _2 - \beta _1}{1+\beta _1}x_1\).
cohort \(x_1\) travels at speed 1; \(x_1\) travels at speed 1 until \(t=r-x_1\), then at speed \((1+\beta _1)\):
Gathering for convenience the constant terms as a single \(C\), \(x_1(t^*) = (1+\beta _1)x_1 + (\beta _2 - \beta _1)x_1 - x_2 + C= (1+\beta _2)x_1 - x_2 + C\); thus
The characteristic polynomial of DF is given by \(\lambda ^2 + \lambda (\frac{\beta _1 - \beta _2}{1+\beta _1} + 1) + 1\). To simplify the following expressions, we denote \(w = \frac{\beta _2 - \beta _1}{1+\beta _1}\). The roots of the polynomial are then \(\lambda _{\pm }=\frac{-w-1 \pm \sqrt{(w+1)^2 - 4}}{2}\). Observing that \(w<1\) iff \(-1<\beta _2\), which is true, we see that the roots are complex. We compute the norm of \(\lambda _{+}\) as \(\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}w^2 + \frac{1}{4}(4-w^2)} = 1\)
Region 5:
We wish to confirm that the 3 cyclic solution is neutrally stable in this region.
For this region \(x_1\) reaches \(s\) before \(x_1\) or \(x_2\) reach \(r\). This implies that no cell actually experiences any feedback. The map \(F\) in a neighborhood of the cyclic solution is thus given by the trivial affine expression:
The derivative \(DF\) is then the same as (6.1) and the solution is thus neutrally stable.
Region 8:
For parameter values in this region \(x_2\) travels with speed \(1+\beta _1\) until time \(t=s\), then at speed 1. The time it takes to reach 1 can thus be calculated:
Clearly \(x_1(t^*) = t^*\); bearing in mind that \(x_1\) enters \(R\) before \(x_1\) leaves \(S\), we calculate:
This gives rise to the matrix
yielding a characteristic polynomial of \(\lambda ^2 + \lambda + (1+\beta _ 1)\) and roots of \(\lambda _{\pm } = \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{-3 - 4\beta _1}}{2}\). If the roots are real, the maximum root (in absolute value), \(\lambda _{-}\), is clearly contained in the interval \((-1,-\frac{1}{2})\); if the roots are complex, their norm can be explicitly calculated as \(\sqrt{1+\beta _1}\).
Region 9:
cohort \(x_2\) travels at rate \((1+\beta _1)\) until time \(t=s\), whereafter it travels with speed 1. We can then calculate the time it takes \(x_2\) to reach 1:
yielding \(t^* = 1 - x_2 - \beta _1 s\).
cohort \(x_1\) experiences feedback exactly when \(x_2\) does, and thus travels the same distance. The local affine map is given by:
The resultant map DF is exactly that in (A.1), so the solution is neutrally stable.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Breitsch, N., Moses, G., Boczko, E. et al. Cell cycle dynamics: clustering is universal in negative feedback systems. J. Math. Biol. 70, 1151–1175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-014-0786-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-014-0786-7