Abstract
Weeds cause destructive agricultural losses, so weed control is an urgent challenge facing agriculture. The extensive use of synthetic chemical herbicides has detrimental environmental impacts and promotes the emergence of resistant species. Therefore, in this study we tried to find a new natural weed control that can ensure biosafety and eco-sustainability. The phytotoxic potential of culture filtrates of the endophytes Bacillus inaquosorum NL1 and Bacillus safensis NL2 isolated from Nerium oleander leaf against the invasive harmful weed species Cenchrus echinatus was evaluated. Culture filtrates of both bacterial species exhibited potent phytotoxic activity, which resulted in 100% germination inhibition of C. echinatus. The chemical analysis of culture filtrates revealed high contents of total phenolics and n-alkanes that have phytotoxic effects against seed germination. According to the findings of this study the endophytic bacteria associated with N. oleander leaf can be used in the future to develop a sustainable bio-herbicide formulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The invasion of noxious weeds in agricultural lands causes serious problems that have negative impact on ecosystems, native gene pools and commercial crop productivity [1]. Cenchrus echinatus L. is known by the common name southern sandbur or spiny sandbur, is a notorious invasive and noxious weed which belongs to the family Poaceae. It is native distributed in Southern States of North America, Mexico, and South America, and it can easily invade a poorly managed fields in warm temperate, sub-tropical and tropical parts of the world diminishing the quality of crops and grazing lands [2]. The seeds of C. echinatus are easily dispersed by attaching their spines to animals, shoes, clothes, tires, or machinery [3].
Many chemical synthetic herbicides like metsulfuron, imazapic, glyphosate, fluazifop and indaziflam are used to control C. echinatus [4, 5]. The application of chemical herbicides causes environmental consequences such as soil, water, air, and food pollution [6]. Therefore, in the recent decades the herbicide discovery programs interest in alternative natural compounds with phytotoxic properties [7]. Although the use of plant extracts to control weeds is gaining attention in many parts of the world, it has the disadvantage that plants production is influenced by seasonal and environmental conditions [8]. Hence, microorganisms have been considered as a promising alternative source due to easy and fast controllable growth [9].
Nerium oleander (L.) is a worldwide cultivated toxic shrub that belongs to the family Apocynaceae. It was selected for this study due to its allelopathic properties because it produces several phytotoxic metabolic compounds [10]. Since endophytes can produce metabolic compounds in the same way as their host plants [11], we expected that the endophytic bacteria associated with N. oleander may produce phytotoxic compounds like host plant; therefore, the hypothesis of the current study is that endophytic bacteria isolated from leaves of N. oleander would be promising source of phytotoxic agents that could be effectively used for controlling weeds.
In the last years and with the expansion of greenhouses construction in our university, an annoying problem has emerged, which is the infestation of noxious weed Cenchrus echinatus. Its spiny seeds can attach to clothes and shoes of students and penetrate the skin causing painful injuries. This study was aimed to isolate the endophytic bacteria associated with N. oleander leaf and to investigate the phytotoxic effect of their culture filtrates on the seed germination of noxious weed C. echinatus with a future aim to exploit these bacteria for developing a new natural bio-herbicides.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material
Healthy leaves of Oleander (Nerium oleander L.) were collected from Aswan University campus, Egypt (24° 5′ 26.95″ N, 32° 53′ 57.91″ E), and were immediately transferred to laboratory for bacterial isolation.
Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria
The surface sterilization of leaves was performed using sodium hypochlorite (5%) for 1 min and ethanol (70%) for 1 min and then washed three times with sterilized distilled water; one gram of leaf tissue was crushed in 9 mL sterilized saline solution; one milliliter of suspension was spread into tryptic soy agar and nutrient agar plates; one milliliter of the sterilized distilled water resulted from the final rinse during surface sterilization process was also spread on the same media to confirm sterilization success. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 72 h until the appearance of colonies. The obtained isolates were coded as NL1 and NL2.
Confirmation of Endophytic Association Between N. oleander and the Isolated Strains
The endophytic association between N. oleander and the isolated strains was confirmed by aseptically re-inoculation of the isolated strains in healthy seedlings following the method of Gagne-Bourgue et al. [12]. Three-week-old N. oleander seedlings were obtained from agriculture department, Aswan University. The soil was obtained from Arid Lands Plants Study Unit, Aswan University. Soil texture was clay: sand in a ratio of 2:1. pH, organic matter content and moisture content of the soil were 6.8, 4.2% and 41% respectively. Five seedlings were transplanted in pots filled with autoclaved soil. Pots were assigned to three groups, the first group which received 200 mL water containing 107 CFU/mL of strain NL1, the second group received 200 mL water containing 107 CFU/mL of strain NL2 and the third group that received 200 mL autoclaved distilled water served as control. Inoculum was applied into the soil surrounding plant roots. Pots were kept under normal weather conditions at May 2022 (Temperature, 38 ± 2 °C, humidity, 23%, pressure, 1008 hPa and wind speed, 5 km/h). Five replicate pots were made for each treatment. After 4 weeks of inoculation, the strains were re-isolated from leaves tissue under controlled conditions and compared with the strains isolated from the original samples.
Identification of Endophytic Bacteria
The partial sequencing of 16S rRNA gene was used to identify the isolates at the molecular level. Using the bacterial primers 27F and 1492R, the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR [13]. Products of PCR were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The obtained bands were sequenced in Korea Solgent Company. The percentage of sequence identity was determined using BLAST tool in NCBI. Sequences were recorded in NCBI with accession numbers. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out by MEGA X software [14].
Preparation of Culture Filtrates
One milliliter of bacterial suspension (⁓107 CFU/mL) was inoculated into 200 mL of nutrient broth and incubated for 72 h at 37 °C with shaking (150 rpm). Cultures were centrifuged and the supernatants were filtered twice using 0.22 µm membrane filter. The obtained filtrates were stored at 4 °C for further study.
Collection of Weed Seeds
The seeds of C. echinatus were collected from different localities in Aswan region, Egypt. Seeds were surface sterilized with 5% sodium hypochlorite (1 min), rinsed three times by sterilized distilled water and aseptically dried in the laboratory at room temperature [15].
Seed Germination Bioassay
Seeds of C. echinatus were subjected to three treatments which included culture filtrate of isolate NL1, culture filtrate of isolate NL2 and distilled water as control. For each treatment thirty seeds were placed in 12 cm Petri dishes contained autoclaved filter paper wetted with 10 mL of the tested filtrate or 10 mL distilled water (control). Plates were incubated at 28 °C and daily observed for 10 days. Radicle emergence was considered as germination. The percentage of germination inhibition (GI) was calculated according to Ranal et al. [16] as follows:
where Gc is the average number of seeds germinated in control; and Gt is the average number of seeds germinated in treatment. The assay was repeated three times under the same conditions with five replicates per treatment.
Estimation of Enzymatic Activity in Treated Seeds
Extraction of Enzymes
The method of Elarbi et al. [17] was followed to extract enzymes from treated seeds. One gram (about ten seeds) of 4 days old- germinated seeds from each treatment group were homogenized in 10 mL of 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 6) and then stirred slowly for 1 h at 4 °C. The homogenates were centrifuged for 15 min at 5000 rpm at 4 °C. The obtained supernatants (crude enzymes) were stored at 4 °C in the refrigerator for further assays.
Estimation of Amylase
Amylase activity was estimated using the iodometric method described by Xiao et al. [18]. In this method, 1 mL of crude enzyme was added to 1 mL of 0.2% soluble starch solution dissolved in 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.9. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After that, the reaction was stopped using 1 mL of 0.6 N trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The amylase activity was measured spectrophotometrically at 580 nm. The activity was calculated in IU/g seeds using amylase (Blulux™) standard curve. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that hydrolyses 0.2 g of starch to dextrin per minute under the reaction conditions.
Estimation of Protease
The activity of protease in seeds was assessed according to the method of Mushtaq et al. [19]. One milliliter of 0.5% (w/v) casein prepared in 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) was incubated with 1 mL of the crude enzyme at 37 °C for 30 min. Then the reaction was stopped using 5 mL of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The reaction mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 5000 rpm and 4 °C. To 1 mL of the collected supernatant, 2.5 mL of 0.4 M Na2CO3 and 0.5 mL of 1 N Folin–Ciocâlteu reagent were added, mixed by swirling, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 660 nm and L-tyrosine was used as standard. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of tyrosine equivalents from casein per minute under standard assay conditions.
Estimation of Lipase
To evaluate the activity of lipase in treated seeds, the reaction mixture containing 1 mL of crude enzyme, 8 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8), and 1 mL of 10 mM p-nitrophenyl-palmitate (pNPP) was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped using 1 mL of 0.6 N TCA. Absorbance was read at 410 nm [20]. Lipase standard curve was used to evaluate enzyme activity as IU/g seeds. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol of p-nitrophenol equivalents from pNPP per minute under standard assay conditions.
Estimation of Phytohormones in Treated Seeds
Extraction of Phytohormones
Upon fourth day of germination, 1 g of seeds from each treatment group was frozen and then homogenized. The homogenates were extracted with 5 mL of cold 80% (v/v) methanol, thoroughly vortexed and left at 4 °C overnight [21]. Solids were removed by centrifugation (5000 rpm, 20 min, 4 °C) and re-extracted with 5 ml of the same solvent. Supernatants were collected and used for phytohormones evaluation.
Estimation of Gibberellic Acid (GA3)
Gibberellic acid was estimated using the method of Berríos et al. [22]. Briefly, in 25 mL- flasks 1 mL of the sample was added to 1 mL of absolute ethanol and the volume was completed to 10 mL with 3.75 M HCl and vigorously mixed for 10 s. The absorbance was measured at 254 nm. The amount of GA3 in the samples was calculated using GA3 standard curve.
Estimation of Indole Acetic Acid (IAA)
IAA was assayed by Salkowsky’s colorimetric method [23]. One milliliter of the sample was mixed with 1 mL Salkowski reagent, vortexed gently and incubated for 30 min in a dark condition. Absorbance was measured at 530 nm. A curve of standard IAA was used to calculate the concentration of IAA in the samples.
Chemical Composition of Culture Filtrates
Estimation of Total Phenolic Content
Folin-Ciocalteu method [24] was used to evaluate the total phenolic content in the culture filtrates of isolate NL1 and NL2. Briefly, 1 mL of the culture filtrate was mixed with 2 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 1 mL of 10% sodium carbonate solution. The mixture was incubated for 1 h with shaking at room temperature until the appearance of blue color. Absorbance was measured at 700 nm. The content of total phenolic was calculated as mg gallic acid equivalent/mL filtrate using gallic acid standard curve.
GC–MS Analysis
The chemical profile of the tested culture filtrates was determined using TRACE™ TR-5MS GC column (Thermo Scientific, ICE3000). Samples were carried by Helium at 1.0 mL per minute flow rate. The starting temperature of the column was 60 °C for 1 min, and then raised up to 240 °C at a rate of 4.0 °C/min. Hexane was used to dilute the samples at the ratio of 1:10 (v/v). One microliter of the diluted samples was injected. The unknown compounds in the samples were identified by matching their mass spectra and retention indices with those of a standard mixture of C7-C40 n-alkanes and NIST standards.
Statistical Analysis
The obtained results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Minitab 18 software. The significant differences between the control and the treatments were considered at P ≤ 0.05. Correlation coefficient (r) between enzymes activities, phytohormones contents and germination inhibition (GI) was calculated using data analysis tool in Excel, and the obtained results were visualized using heat mapper web server [25].
The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the isolate NL1 and NL2 were deposited in the NCBI database with accession numbers ON714987.1 and ON714988.1, respectively.
Results
Identification of Endophytic Bacteria
Based on the NCBI-BLAST analysis, the 16S rRNA sequences of the endophytic bacterial isolates NL1 and NL2 showed close similarity to Bacillus inaquosorum strain BGSC 3A28T (NR_104873.1) and Bacillus safensis FO-36bT (KT989852.1), respectively. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) was inferred using the sequences of Bacillus species derived from NCBI GenBank that were aligned with the sequences of the present isolates.
Effect of Culture Filtrates on Seed Germination of C. echinatus
The effect of culture filtrates of endophytic isolate NL1 and NL2 on seed germination of C. echinatus was assessed. Both culture filtrates showed significant (f = 1849, P < 0.00001) inhibitory effect against seed germination, where germination was completely inhibited (GI = 100%) upon the treatment with the bacterial filtrates (Fig. 2).
Effect of Culture Filtrates on Enzymatic Activities and Phytohormones Content of the Seeds
The activities of amylase, protease, and lipase as well as the contents of IAA and GA3 of the treated seeds and their respective controls were estimated. Interestingly, treatment of seeds with culture filtrates had significant positive effect on enzymes (f = 18.16056, P = 0.000099) as well as phytohormones (f = 360.16108, P < 0.00001), where enzymes activities and phytohormones production were completely suppressed by culture filtrates which resulted in germination inhibition. There was an inverse correlation between enzymes activities, phytohormones content and germination inhibition (Fig. 3). When enzymes activities and phytohormones content are high, the germination inhibition is low and vice versa.
Chemical Composition of Culture Filtrates
High total phenolic contents were estimated in the culture filtrates of isolate NL1 and NL2 as 39.3 ± 0.01 and 36.84 ± 0.04 mg gallic acid equivalent /mL filtrate respectively.
After matching the mass spectra and retention indices of the compounds detected in the culture filtrates against NIST library, it was found that the major compounds identified in culture filtrate of B. inaquosorum NL1 were Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-, Decane, 3-methyl-, Eicosane, Octadecane, Tridecane, 3-methyl-, Octadecane, 2-methyl-, Hexadecane, Heptadecane, Heneicosane, Hentriacontane, Octacosane, 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro (4,5) deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione and 3,5-Dimethyldodecane (Table 1). The main components that were identified in the culture filtrate of B. safensis NL2 being Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-, Decane, 2,4,6-trimethyl-, Sulfurous acid, 2-propyl tetradecyl ester, Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl-, Tetradecane, Eicosane, Decane, 3,8-dimethyl-, Tridecane, 1-iodo-, Octadecane, Pentacosane, Undecane, Benzoic acid, 2,5-bis (trimethylsiloxy)-, trimethylsilyl ester, Heptacosane, Tetratetracontane, Heptadecane, 2-methyl-, 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro (4,5) deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione, Dibutyl phthalate (Table 2).
Discussion
Weed infestation is among the main factors contribute to the severe losses of annual agricultural productivity [26]. Due to the serious negative impacts of conventional weed control using traditional chemical herbicides on the environment, human health, soil, and groundwater, the interest in alternative natural compounds with phytotoxic properties for safer weed management practices has grown in recent decades [27]. The use of bacteria for controlling weeds has been suggested to have several advantages over the use of plant extracts and fungi due to their rapid growth, relatively simple propagation requirements and high suitability for genetic modification [28, 29].
In this study we tried to find new natural promising solution to control the invasive noxious weed species C. echinatus that can ensure biosafety and eco-sustainability. Two endophytic bacterial strains B. inaquosorum NL1 and B. safensis NL2 were isolated from N. oleander leaf. It was observed that N. oleander leaf colonized by a few numbers of endophytic bacteria, this may be due to its antimicrobial activity [30]. This was also observed in other medicinal plants which possess antimicrobial activity [31]. The two isolated strains NL1 and NL2 were related to genus Bacillus. It was previously reported that genus Bacillus is one of the most prevalent genera of endophytic bacteria associated with medicinal plants [32]. This may be attributed to that members of genus Bacillus are characterized by their ability to form heat-resistant endospores, which can survive in the extremely hot climate of Aswan region and can also resist the antimicrobial activity of N. oleander leaf.
In the present study the effect of culture filtrates of the endophytic bacteria B. inaquosorum NL1 and B. safensis NL2 on the germination of C. echinatus seeds was investigated. The results revealed that the culture filtrates of both bacterial strains completely inhibited germination of C. echinatus seeds compared to the control (Fig. 2). This agreed with the findings of the other workers who reported that culture filtrates of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain D7 and WH6 that were isolated from winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and downy brome (Bromus tectorum) have been recognized to inhibit germination and growth of several grassy weeds [33, 34]. It was previously reported that the endophytic Xanthomonas campestris pv. poae was used to control the annual bluegrass (Poa annua) in Japan [35]. Furthermore, X. campestris LVA-987 was recognized as a potential control agent against horseweed (Conyza canadensis) [36].
Nutrient mobilization process in the seed that supplies energy and other fundamental food materials to germinating embryo through solubilizing the stored starch, proteins, and lipids is achieved by enzymes such as amylase, protease, and lipase [37]. On the other hand, phytohormones such as gibberellic acid and indole acetic acid can stimulate seed germination through releasing coat dormancy, weakening endosperm, and expanding embryo cell [38]. In the current study, the activities of amylase, protease, and lipase as well as the contents of IAA and GA3 in the treated seeds and their respective controls were estimated as an attempt to find a possible mechanism explaining the reasons of germination inhibition caused by bacterial filtrates. Pearson’s correlation analysis of the obtained results showed that the germination inhibition occurred due to the complete suppression of enzymes and phytohormones upon the treatments with bacterial filtrates (Fig. 3). Suppression of enzymes and phytohormones in the treated seeds may be related to the high contents of total phenolics detected in the seeds, where other researchers reported that phenolic compounds influence the physicochemical properties and consequently the activity of enzymes, as well as cause variations in the hormonal balance [39, 40]. Furthermore, the GC–MS analysis of the culture filtrates of both B. inaquosorum NL1 and B. safensis NL2 revealed that the filtrates are rich in n-alkanes (saturated hydrocarbons) as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Phytotoxicity of alkanes against seed germination and plants development is well known [41,42,43].
Conclusion
Culture filtrates of the endophytes B. inaquosorum NL1 and B. safensis NL2 isolated from N. oleander leaf have distinctive phytotoxic potential against the invasive harmful weed species C. echinatus. The findings obtained from this study suggest the high possibility of developing eco-friendly bio-herbicides from the culture filtrates of these bacteria. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the possible application under field conditions.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Hegazy AK, Diekmann M, Ayyad G (1999) Impact of plant invasions on ecosystems and native gene pools. In: Hegazy AK (ed) Environment 2000 and beyond. Hours for Computing and Printing, Cairo, pp 275–310
Shehata HS (2014) Ecology and allelopathic control of the invasive species Cenchrus echinatus L. in some of newly reclaimed areas in Nile Delta, Egypt. Life Sci J 11(6):246–260
Cope T, Gray A (2009) Grasses of the British Isles. Botanical Society of the British Isles No.13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01132.x
Grichar WJ, Baumann PA, Baughman TA, Nerada JD (2008) Weed control and bermudagrass tolerance to imazapic plus 2,4-D. Weed Technol 22:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-097.1
Nolte SA, Jackson JR, McGinty JA, Howard Z, Grichar WJ (2020) Southern Sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus L.) control in bermudagrass pastures with indaziflam herbicide systems. J Adv Agric 11:89–98. https://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v11i.8738
Santos ACB, Silva MAP (2014) Allelopathic potential of Secondatia floribunda a. DC. (Apocynaceae) on seeds of Lycopersicum esculentum miller. (Solanaceae). Caderno de Cultura e Ciência 13(1):25–30. https://doi.org/10.14295/cad.cult.cienc.v13i1.812
Duke SO, Dayan FE, Rimando AM, Schrader KK, Aliotta G, Oliva A, Romagni JG (2002) Invited paper: chemicals from nature for weed management. Weed Sci 50(2):138–151. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0138:IPCFNF]2.0.CO;2
Shanmugalingam S, Umarukatha JB (2019) Review on use of plant extracts in weed control. Curr Trends Biomed Eng Biosci 18(4):555993. https://doi.org/10.19080/CTBEB.2019.18.555993
Cabello LO (2020) Microorganisms as alternative sources of new natural products. In: Sharma K et al (eds) Bioactive compounds in nutraceutical and functional food for good human health. IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92697
Shareif ISM, Al-saadi SAAM, Al-Kaaby HK (2022) Allelopathic effect of Nerium oleander L. alcohol extract on growth and development of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Casp. J Environ Sci 20(1):155–163. https://doi.org/10.22124/CJES.2022.5411
Ludwig-Müller J (2015) Plants and endophytes: equal partners in secondary metabolite production? Biotechnol Lett 37(7):1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1814-4
Gagne-Bourgue F, Aliferis KA, Seguin P, Rani M, Samson R, Jabaji S (2013) Isolation and characterization of indigenous endophytic bacteria associated with leaves of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars. J Appl Microbiol 114(3):836–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12088
Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ (2008) Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2461–2470. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02272-07
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Uremis I, Arslan M, Uludag A (2005) Allelopathic activity of some Brassica species on germination and growth of cut leaf ground-cherry (Physlis angulata L.). J Biol Sci 5:661–665. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2005.661.665
Ranal MA, Santana DG, Ferreira WR, Rodrigues CM (2009) Calculating germination measurements and organizing spread sheets. Braz J Bot 32(4):849–855. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042009000400022
Elarbi MB, Khemiri H, Jridi T, Hamida JB (2009) Purification and characterization of α-amylase from safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germinating seeds. C R Biol 332(5):426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.01.002
Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A (2006) A quantitative starch-iodine method for measuring alpha-amylase and glucoamylase activities. Anal Biochem 351(1):146–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.036
Mushtaq H, Jehangir A, Ganai SA, Farooq S, Ganai BA, Nazir R (2021) Biochemical characterization and functional analysis of heat stable high potential protease of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain HM48 from soils of Dachigam National Park in Kashmir Himalaya. Biomolecules 11(1):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010117
Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC (2001) Production, purification, characterization, and applications of lipases. Biotechnol Adv 19(8):627–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-9750(01)00086-6
Großkinsky DK, Albacete A, Jammer A, Krbez P, van der Graaff E, Pfeifhofer H, Roitsch T (2014) A rapid phytohormone and phytoalexin screening method for physiological phenotyping. Mol Plant 7(6):1053–1056. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu015
Berríos J, Illanes A, Aroca G (2004) Spectrophotometric method for determining gibberellic acid in fermentation broths. Biotechnol Lett 26(1):67–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:bile.0000009463.98203.8b
Glickmann E, Dessaux Y (1995) A critical examination of the specificity of the salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61(2):793–796. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.2.793-796.1995
Ainsworth EA, Gillespie KM (2007) Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin- Ciocalteu reagent. Nat Protoc 2(4):875–877. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.102
Babicki S, Arndt D, Marcu A, Liang Y, Grant JR, Maciejewski A, Wishart DS (2016) Heat mapper: web-enabled heat mapping for all. Nucleic Acids Res 44(W1):W147-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw419
Paini DR, Sheppard AW, Cook DC, De Barro PJ, Worner SP et al (2016) Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. PNAS 113(27):7575–7579. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160220511
Soltys D, Krasuska U, Bogatek R, Gniazdowsk A (2013) Allelochemicals as bioherbicides—present and perspectives. In: Price AJ, Kelton JA (eds) Herbicides—current research and case studies in use. InTech, Rijeka, pp 517–542
Johnson DR, Wyse DL, Jones KJ (1996) Controlling weeds with phytopathogenic bacteria. Weed Technol 10:621–624
Li YQ, Sun ZL, Zhuang XF, Xu L, Chen SF, Li MZ (2003) Research progress on microbial herbicides. Crop Protect 22:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-2194(02)00189-8
Hussain MA, Gorsi MS (2004) Antimicrobial activity of Nerium oleander Linn. Asian J Plant Sci 3(2):177–180. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2004.177.180
Abdel Baset FM, Hagagg NSA, Hezayen FF, Abdul-Raouf UM (2020) Endophytic bacterial communities colonizing the medicinal plant Calotropis procera: as resources of hydrolases. Nov Res Microbiol J 4(6):1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.21608/nrmj.2020.130852
Jalgaonwala RE, Mohite BV, Mahajan RT (2010) Evaluation of endophytes for their antimicrobial activity from indigenous medicinal plants belonging to North Maharashtra region India. Int J Phar Biomed Res 1:136–141
Gealy DR, Gurusiddaiah S, Ogg AG, Kennedy AC (1996) Metabolites from Pseudomonas fluorescens strain D7 inhibit downy brome (Bromus tectorum) seedling growth. Weed Technol 10(2):282–287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00039968
Kimbrel JA, Givan SA, Halgren AB, Creason AL, Mills DI, Banowetz GM (2010) An improved, high-quality draft genome sequence of the germination-arrest factor-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens WH6. BMC Genomics 11:522. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-522
Imaizumi S, Nishino T, Miyabe K, Fujimori T, Yamada M (1997) Biological control of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) with a Japanese isolate of Xanthomonas campestris pv. poae (JT-P482). Biol Control 8:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1996.0475
Boyette CD, Hoagland RE (2015) Bioherbicidal potential of Xanthomonas campestris for controlling Conyza canadensis. Biocontrol Sci Technol 25:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2014.966650
Joshi R (2018) Role of enzymes in seed germination. Int J Creat Res Dhaka Div Bangladesh 6:1481–1485
Miransari M, Smith DL (2014) Plant hormones and seed germination. Environ Exp Bot 99:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.11.005
Rohn S, Rawel HM, Kroll J (2002) Inhibitory effects of plant phenols on the activity of selected enzymes. J Agric Food Chem 50(12):3566–3571. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011714b
Marchiosi R, dos Santos WD, Constantin RP, de Lima RB, Soares AR, Finger-Teixeira A, Mota TR, de Oliveira DM, Foletto-Felipe MP, Abrahao J (2020) Biosynthesis and metabolic actions of simple phenolic acids in plants. Phytochem Rev 19:865–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-020-09689-2
Adam G, Duncan H (2002) Influence of diesel fuel on seed germination. Environ Pollut 120(2):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00119-7
Çakır A, Özer H, Aydın T, Kordali S, Çavuşoglu AT, Akçin T, Eand M, Akçin A (2016) Phytotoxic and insecticidal properties of essential oils and extracts of four Achillea species. Rec Nat Prod 10(2):154–167
Wei C, Zhou S, Shi K, Zhang C, Shao H (2020) Chemical profile and phytotoxic action of Onopordum acanthium essential oil. Sci Rep 10(1):13568. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70463-7
Acknowledgements
We introduce our sincere thanks and gratitude to the Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Aswan University for supporting and providing the requirements of scientific research.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors conceived, designed, and performed the experiments. Both authors wrote and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hagaggi, N.S.A., Abdul-Raouf, U.M. Phytotoxic Interference of Culture Filtrates of Endophytic Bacteria Associated with Nerium oleander Leaf Against Seed Germination of the Invasive Noxious Weed Cenchrus echinatus. Curr Microbiol 80, 67 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03166-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03166-z