Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial estimation of actual evapotranspiration over irrigated turfgrass using sUAS thermal and multispectral imagery and TSEB model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 January 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Green urban areas are increasingly affected by water scarcity and climate change. The combination of warmer temperatures and increasing drought poses substantial challenges for water management of urban landscapes in the western U.S. A key component for water management, actual evapotranspiration (ETa) for landscape trees and turfgrass in arid regions is poorly documented as most rigorous evapotranspiration (ET) studies have focused on natural or agricultural areas. ET is a complex and non-linear process, and especially difficult to measure and estimate in urban landscapes due to the large spatial variability in land cover/land use and relatively small areas occupied by turfgrass in urban areas. Therefore, to understand water consumption processes in these landscapes, efforts using standard measurement techniques, such as the eddy covariance (EC) method as well as ET remote sensing-based modeling are necessary. While previous studies have evaluated the performance of the remote sensing-based two-source energy balance (TSEB) in natural and agricultural landscapes, the validation of this model in urban turfgrass remains unknown. In this study, EC flux measurements and hourly flux footprint models were used to validate the energy fluxes from the TSEB model in green urban areas at golf course near Roy, Utah, USA. High-spatial resolution multispectral and thermal imagery data at 5.4 cm were acquired from small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) to model hourly ETa. A protocol to measure and estimate leaf area index (LAI) in turfgrass was developed using an empirical relationship between spectral vegetation indices (SVI) and observed LAI, which was used as an input variable within the TSEB model. In addition, factors such as sUAS flight time, shadows, and thermal band calibration were assessed for the creation of TSEB model inputs. The TSEB model was executed for five datasets collected in 2021 and 2022, and its performance was compared against EC measurements. For ETa to be useful for irrigation scheduling, an extrapolation technique based on incident solar radiation was used to compute daily ETa from the hourly remotely-sensed UAS ET. A daily flux footprint and measured ETa were used to validate the daily extrapolation technique. Results showed that the average of corrected daily ETa values in summer ranged from about 4.6 mm to 5.9 mm in 2021 and 2022. The Near Infrared (NIR) and Red Edge-based SVI derived from sUAS imagery were strongly related to LAI in turfgrass, with the highest coefficient of determination (R2) (0.76–0.84) and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.5–0.6). The TSEB’s latent and sensible heat flux retrievals were accurate with an RMSE 50 W m−2 and 35 W m−2 respectively compared to EC closed energy balance. The expected RMSE of the upscaled TSEB daily ETa estimates across the turfgrass is below 0.6 mm day−1, thus yielding an error of 10% of the daily total. This study highlights the ability of the TSEB model using sUAS imagery to estimate the spatial variation of daily ETa for an urban turfgrass surface, which is useful for landscape irrigation management under drought conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was possible thanks to support from Utah Water Research Laboratory Student Fellowship and the United States Golf Association. The authors are also grateful for the extraordinary support from the Utah State University AggieAir sUAS program staff and Agricola Research team for data collection support and analysis. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.M, A.T.R and L.H authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, experimental setup, data acquisition, and processing, and wrote the main manuscript text. Data acquisition was handled by L.C, R.G, C.C, I.G. W.K, H.N, K.K, V.B.L and M.P.M authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karem Meza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was revised due to update in placement of Table 6.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19.

Table 6 Inputs required for deriving an hourly flux footprint model
Fig. 15
figure 15

a High, b intermediate, and c low turfgrass quality for sampling leaves

Fig. 16
figure 16

a A sampling location with four replications and b sampling turfgrass with a turfgrass cup cutter

Fig. 17
figure 17

Crow profile from a 3D reconstruction using sUAS point cloud data

Fig. 18
figure 18

Linear regression of thermal band calibration using infrared thermometer sensors (IRTs)

Fig. 19
figure 19

Time series of net radiation (Rn), sensible heat flux (H), latent heat flux (LE), and ground heat flux (G) from closed energy balance in 2022

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meza, K., Torres-Rua, A.F., Hipps, L. et al. Spatial estimation of actual evapotranspiration over irrigated turfgrass using sUAS thermal and multispectral imagery and TSEB model. Irrig Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00899-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00899-y

Navigation