Abstract
Green urban areas are increasingly affected by water scarcity and climate change. The combination of warmer temperatures and increasing drought poses substantial challenges for water management of urban landscapes in the western U.S. A key component for water management, actual evapotranspiration (ETa) for landscape trees and turfgrass in arid regions is poorly documented as most rigorous evapotranspiration (ET) studies have focused on natural or agricultural areas. ET is a complex and non-linear process, and especially difficult to measure and estimate in urban landscapes due to the large spatial variability in land cover/land use and relatively small areas occupied by turfgrass in urban areas. Therefore, to understand water consumption processes in these landscapes, efforts using standard measurement techniques, such as the eddy covariance (EC) method as well as ET remote sensing-based modeling are necessary. While previous studies have evaluated the performance of the remote sensing-based two-source energy balance (TSEB) in natural and agricultural landscapes, the validation of this model in urban turfgrass remains unknown. In this study, EC flux measurements and hourly flux footprint models were used to validate the energy fluxes from the TSEB model in green urban areas at golf course near Roy, Utah, USA. High-spatial resolution multispectral and thermal imagery data at 5.4 cm were acquired from small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) to model hourly ETa. A protocol to measure and estimate leaf area index (LAI) in turfgrass was developed using an empirical relationship between spectral vegetation indices (SVI) and observed LAI, which was used as an input variable within the TSEB model. In addition, factors such as sUAS flight time, shadows, and thermal band calibration were assessed for the creation of TSEB model inputs. The TSEB model was executed for five datasets collected in 2021 and 2022, and its performance was compared against EC measurements. For ETa to be useful for irrigation scheduling, an extrapolation technique based on incident solar radiation was used to compute daily ETa from the hourly remotely-sensed UAS ET. A daily flux footprint and measured ETa were used to validate the daily extrapolation technique. Results showed that the average of corrected daily ETa values in summer ranged from about 4.6 mm to 5.9 mm in 2021 and 2022. The Near Infrared (NIR) and Red Edge-based SVI derived from sUAS imagery were strongly related to LAI in turfgrass, with the highest coefficient of determination (R2) (0.76–0.84) and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.5–0.6). The TSEB’s latent and sensible heat flux retrievals were accurate with an RMSE 50 W m−2 and 35 W m−2 respectively compared to EC closed energy balance. The expected RMSE of the upscaled TSEB daily ETa estimates across the turfgrass is below 0.6 mm day−1, thus yielding an error of 10% of the daily total. This study highlights the ability of the TSEB model using sUAS imagery to estimate the spatial variation of daily ETa for an urban turfgrass surface, which is useful for landscape irrigation management under drought conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
23 January 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00913-3
References
Aboutalebi M, Torres-Rua AF, Kustas WP et al (2019) Assessment of different methods for shadow detection in high-resolution optical imagery and evaluation of shadow impact on calculation of NDVI, and evapotranspiration. Irrig Sci 37:407–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0613-9
Aboutalebi M, Torres-Rua AF, McKee M et al (2022) Downscaling UAV land surface temperature using a coupled wavelet-machine learning-optimization algorithm and its impact on evapotranspiration. Irrig Sci 40:553–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00801-2
Agam N, Kustas WP, Anderson MC et al (2010) Application of the priestley-taylor approach in a two-source surface energy balance model. J Hydrometeorol 11:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JHM1124.1
Awada H, di Prima S, Sirca C et al (2021) Daily actual evapotranspiration estimation in a mediterranean ecosystem from landsat observations using SEBAL approach. Forests 12:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020189
Badzmierowski MJ, McCall DS, Evanylo G (2019) Using hyperspectral and multispectral indices to detect water stress for an urban turfgrass system. Agronomy. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080439
Braun RC, Bremer DJ, Ebdon JS et al (2022) Review of cool-season turfgrass water use and requirements: II responses to drought stress. Crop Sci 62:1685–1701
Brewer K, Clulow A, Sibanda M et al (2022) Estimation of Maize foliar temperature and stomatal conductance as indicators of water stress based on optical and thermal imagery acquired using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. Drones. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6070169
Burchard-Levine V, Nieto H, Riaño D et al (2020) Seasonal adaptation of the thermal-based two-source energy balance model for estimating evapotranspiration in a semiarid tree-grass ecosystem. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060904
Burchard-Levine V, Nieto H, Riaño D et al (2021) The effect of pixel heterogeneity for remote sensing based retrievals of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid tree-grass ecosystem. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112440
Cammalleri C, Anderson MC, Kustas WP (2014) Upscaling of evapotranspiration fluxes from instantaneous to daytime scales for thermal remote sensing applications. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:1885–1894. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1885-2014
Campbell GS, Norman JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics. Springer, New York
Carlson MG, Gaussoin RE, Puntel LA (2022) A review of precision management for golf course turfgrass. Crop, Forage Turfgrass Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20183
Chávez JL, Neale CMU, Prueger JH, Kustas WP (2008) Daily evapotranspiration estimates from extrapolating instantaneous airborne remote sensing et values. Irrig Sci 27:67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0122-3
Chen JM (1996) Evaluation of vegetation indices and a modified simple ratio for Boreal applications. Can. J. Remote Sens 22:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.1996.10855178
Chen B, Black TA, Coops NC et al (2009) Assessing tower flux footprint climatology and scaling between remotely sensed and eddy covariance measurements. Boundary Layer Meteorol 130:137–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-008-9339-1
Cheng J, Kustas WP (2019) Using very high resolution thermal infrared imagery for more accurate determination of the impact of land cover differences on evapotranspiration in an irrigated agricultural area. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060613
Colaizzi PD, Evett SR, Howell TA et al (2006) Comparison of five models to scale daily evapotranspiration from one-time-of-day measurements. Trans ASABE 49:1409–1417
Cuxart J, Boone AA (2020) Evapotranspiration over land from a boundary-layer meteorology perspective. Boundary Layer Meteorol 177:427–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00550-9
Dong T, Liu J, Shang J et al (2019) Assessment of red-edge vegetation indices for crop leaf area index estimation. Remote Sens Environ 222:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.032
Du L, Yang H, Song X et al (2022) Estimating leaf area index of maize using UAV-based digital imagery and machine learning methods. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20299-0
Eshonkulov R, Poyda A, Ingwersen J et al (2019) Evaluating multi-year, multi-site data on the energy balance closure of eddy-covariance flux measurements at cropland sites in southwestern Germany. Biogeosciences 16:521–540. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-521-2019
Feng L, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Yang S (2022) A UAV-derived thermal infrared remote sensing three-temperature model and estimation of various vegetation evapotranspiration in urban micro-environments. Urban for Urban Green. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127495
Feng J, Wang W, Che T, Xu F (2023) Performance of the improved two-source energy balance model for estimating evapotranspiration over the heterogeneous surface. Agric Water Manag 278:108159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108159
Finley SL, Basu NB (2020) Curbing the summer surge: permanent outdoor water use restrictions in humid and semiarid cities. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026466
Foken T (2008) The energy balance closure problem: an overview. Ecol Appl 18:1351–1367. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0922.1
French AN, Schmugge TJ, Kustas WP et al (2003) Surface energy fluxes over El Reno, Oklahoma, using high-resolution remotely sensed data. Water Resour Res 39:1164. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001734
Gan G, Gao Y (2015) Estimating time series of land surface energy fluxes using optimized two source energy balance schemes: model formulation, calibration, and validation. Agric for Meteorol 208:62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.04.007
Gao R, Nassar A, Torres-Rua AF (2021) Footprint area generating based on eddy covariance records. In: HydroShare. https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.eb6eeeccdbe546fc941f3c219cb05a34. Accessed 1 Jun 2022
Gao R, Torres-Rua AF, Aboutalebi M et al (2022) LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning. Irrig Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0
Gao R, Torres-Rua AF, Nieto H et al (2023) ET partitioning assessment using the TSEB model and sUAS information across california central valley vineyards. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030756
García-Santos V, Sánchez JM, Cuxart J (2022) Evapotranspiration acquired with remote sensing thermal-based algorithms: a state-of-the-art review. Remote Sens (basel) 14:3440
Gashaw NA, Assefa E, Sachpazis C (2022) Consolidation parameters conceptualization using regression analysisand genetic programming for Addis Ababa’s red clay soils. Model Earth Syst Environ 8:1087–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01127-2
Gelernter WD, Stowell LJ, Johnson ME et al (2015) Documenting trends in water use and conservation practices on U.S. golf courses. Crop, Forage Turfgrass Manag 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2015.0149
Gitelson A, Merzlyak MN (1994) Spectral reflectance changes associated with autumn senescence of Aesculus hippocastanum L. and Acer platanoides L. leaves. Spectral features and relation to chlorophyll estimation. J Plant Physiol 143:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81633-0
Gómez-Navarro C, Pataki DE, Pardyjak ER, Bowling DR (2021) Effects of vegetation on the spatial and temporal variation of microclimate in the urbanized salt lake valley. Agric for Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108211
Gutman G, Ignatov A (1998) The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. Int J Remote Sens 19:1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215333
Hartling S, Sagan V, Maimaitijiang M (2021) Urban tree species classification using UAV-based multi-sensor data fusion and machine learning. Gisci Remote Sens 58:1250–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2021.1974275
Hassler SC, Baysal-Gurel F (2019) Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) technology and applications in agriculture. Agronomy 9:618
Hong M, Bremer DJ, van der Merwe D (2019) Thermal imaging detects early drought stress in turfgrass utilizing small unmanned aircraft systems. Agrosys, Geosci Environ 2:1–9. https://doi.org/10.2134/age2019.04.0028
Jackson RD, Hatfield JL, Reginato R (1983) Estimation of daily evapotranspiration from one time-of-day measurements. Agric Water Manag 7:351–362
Jia X, Dukes MD, Jacobs JM (2009) Bahiagrass crop coefficients from eddy correlation measurements in central Florida. Irrig Sci 28:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0176-x
Katz L, Ben-Gal A, Litaor MI et al (2022) A spatiotemporal decision support protocol based on thermal imagery for variable rate drip irrigation of a peach orchard. Irrig Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00830-x
Kljun N, Calanca P, Rotach MW, Schmid HP (2015) A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for flux footprint prediction (FFP). Geosci Model Dev 8:3695–3713. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015
Kustas WP, Norman JM (1999) Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat ¯ux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover. Agricult for Meteorol 94:13–29
Kustas WP, Alfieri JG, Nieto H et al (2019) Utility of the two-source energy balance (TSEB) model in vine and interrow flux partitioning over the growing season. Irrig Sci 37:375–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0586-8
Lee G, Kim G, Min G et al (2023) Vegetation classification in urban areas by combining UAV-based NDVI and thermal infrared image. Appl Sci (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010515
Litvak E, Pataki DE (2016) Evapotranspiration of urban lawns in a semi-arid environment: an in situ evaluation of microclimatic conditions and watering recommendations. J Arid Environ 134:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.06.016
Lu S, Xuan J, Zhang T et al (2022) Effect of the Shadow pixels on evapotranspiration inversion of vineyard: a high-resolution UAV-based and ground-based remote sensing measurements. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092259
Maas J, van Dillen SME, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP (2009) Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place 15:586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006
Marín J, Yousfi S, Mauri PV et al (2020) RGB vegetation indices, NDVI, and biomass as indicators to evaluate C3 and C4 turfgrass under differentwater conditions. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062160
Massman WJ, Lee X (2002) Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges. Agricult for Meteorol 113:121–144
Mauder M, Foken T, Cuxart J (2020) Surface-Energy-balance closure over land: a review. Boundary Layer Meteorol 177:395–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00529-6
Maupin MA, Kenny JF, Hutson SS et al (2022) Landscape irrigation and water conservation in urban areas: an analysis of information-based strategies. HortTechnology 32:213–225. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05001-21
Mauri PV, Yousfi S, Parra L et al (2022) The usefulness of drone imagery and remote sensing methods for monitoring turfgrass irrigation. In: Kacprzyk J, Balas VE, Ezziyyani M (eds) Advanced intelligent systems for sustainable development (AI2SD’2020). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 913–923
McNaughton KG, Van Den Hurk BJJM (1995) A ‘Lagrangian’ revision of the resistors in the two-layer model for calculating the energy budget of a plant canopy. Boundary Layer Meteorol 74:261–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712121
Meza K, Torres-Rua A, Hipps L, et al (2023) Protocol for measuring leaf area index (LAI) in Urban turfgrass using a destructive method. In: HydroShare. http://www.hydroshare.org/resource/1940e04333584dada3f1d5fed4bee15b. Accessed 20 May 2023
Milas AS, Arend K, Mayer C et al (2017) Different colours of shadows: classification of UAV images. Int J Remote Sens 38:3084–3100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1274449
Miller DL, Alonzo M, Roberts DA et al (2020) Drought response of urban trees and turfgrass using airborne imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111646
Mokhtari A, Ahmadi A, Daccache A, Drechsler K (2021) Actual evapotranspiration from UAV images: a multi-sensor data fusion approach. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122315
Nagler PL, Scott RL, Westenburg C et al (2005) Evapotranspiration on western U.S. rivers estimated using the enhanced vegetation index from MODIS and data from eddy covariance and bowen ratio flux towers. Remote Sens Environ 97:337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.011
Nassar A, Torres-rua A, Kustas W et al (2021) Assessing daily evapotranspiration methodologies from one-time-of-day sUAS and EC information in the GRAPEX project. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152887
Nassar A, Torres-Rua A, Hipps L et al (2022) Using remote sensing to estimate scales of spatial heterogeneity to analyze evapotranspiration modeling in a natural ecosystem. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14020372
Niaghi AR, Jia X, Scherer T, Steele D (2019) Measurement of unirrigated turfgrass evapotranspiration rate in the red river valley. Vadose Zone J 18:1–11. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.11.0202
Nieto H, Kustas WP, Torres-Rúa A et al (2019) Evaluation of TSEB turbulent fluxes using different methods for the retrieval of soil and canopy component temperatures from UAV thermal and multispectral imagery. Irrig Sci 37:389–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0585-9
Niu H, Hollenbeck D, Zhao T et al (2020) Evapotranspiration estimation with small uavs in precision agriculture. Sensors (switzerland) 20:1–28
Norman JM, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1995) Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature. Agric for Meteorol 77:263–293
Nouri H, Beecham S, Anderson S, Nagler P (2013) High spatial resolution WorldView-2 imagery for mapping NDVI and its relationship to temporal urban landscape evapotranspiration factors. Remote Sens (basel) 6:580–602. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6010580
Nouri H, Nagler P, Chavoshi Borujeni S et al (2020) Effect of spatial resolution of satellite images on estimating the greenness and evapotranspiration of urban green spaces. Hydrol Process 34:3183–3199. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13790
Pahari R, Leclerc MY, Zhang G et al (2018) Carbon dynamics of a warm season turfgrass using the eddy-covariance technique. Agric Ecosyst Environ 251:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.015
Park S, Ryu D, Fuentes S et al (2021) Mapping very-high-resolution evapotranspiration from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. ISPRS Int J Geoinf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040211
Park G, Park K, Song B, Lee H (2022) Analyzing impact of types of UAV-derived images on the object-based classification of land cover in an urban area. Drones. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6030071
Parker GG (2020) Tamm review: leaf area index (LAI) is both a determinant and a consequence of important processes in vegetation canopies. For Ecol Manage 477:118496
Pastorello G, Trotta C, Canfora E et al (2020) The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci Data 7:225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0534-3
Qi H, Zhu B, Wu Z et al (2020) Estimation of peanut leaf area index from unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral images. Sensors (switzerland) 20:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236732
Qin L, Yan C, Yu L et al (2022) High-resolution spatio-temporal characteristics of urban evapotranspiration measured by unmanned aerial vehicle and infrared remote sensing. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109389
Rondeaux G, Steven M, Baret F (1996) Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 55:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257
Rouse J, Haas R, Schell J et al (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: NASA SP-351: Proceedings of the third symposium on significant results obtained with ERTS-1. Washington, DC, pp 309–317
Saher R, Stephen H, Ahmad S (2021) Urban evapotranspiration of green spaces in arid regions through two established approaches: a review of key drivers, advancements, limitations, and potential opportunities. Urban Water J 18:115–127
Saher R, Stephen H, Ahmad S (2022) Role of urban landscapes in changing the irrigation water requirements in arid climate. Geosciences (basel) 13:14. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13010014
Sarkar S, Cazenave AB, Oakes J et al (2021) Aerial high-throughput phenotyping of peanut leaf area index and lateral growth. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00936-w
Semmens KA, Anderson MC, Kustas WP et al (2016) Monitoring daily evapotranspiration over two California vineyards using Landsat 8 in a multi-sensor data fusion approach. Remote Sens Environ 185:155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.025
Simpson JE, Holman F, Nieto H et al (2021) High spatial and temporal resolution energy flux mapping of different land covers using an off-the-shelf unmanned aerial system. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071286
Simpson JE, Holman FH, Nieto H et al (2022) UAS-based high resolution mapping of evapotranspiration in a mediterranean tree-grass ecosystem. Agric for Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108981
Stoy PC, Mauder M, Foken T et al (2013) A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: the role of landscape scale heterogeneity. Agric for Meteorol 171–172:137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.004
Tang Z, Jin Y, Alsina MM et al (2022) Vine water status mapping with multispectral UAV imagery and machine learning. Irrig Sci 40:715–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00788-w
Torres-Rua A (2017) Vicarious calibration of sUAS microbolometer temperature imagery for estimation of radiometric land surface temperature. Sensors (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071499
Verma B, Prasad R, Srivastava PK et al (2022) Investigation of optimal vegetation indices for retrieval of leaf chlorophyll and leaf area index using enhanced learning algorithms. Comput Electron Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106581
Volk JM, Huntington J, Melton FS et al (2023) Development of a benchmark Eddy flux evapotranspiration dataset for evaluation of satellite-driven evapotranspiration models over the CONUS. Agric for Meteorol 331:109307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109307
Vulova S, Kuhlemann L, Tetzlaff D et al (2019) Assessment of evapotranspiration from urban vegetation across space and time: a case study in Berlin. In: 10th International workshop on the analysis of multitemporal remote sensing images (MultiTemp). Shanghai, China, pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/Multi-Temp.2019.8866903
Vulova S, Meier F, Rocha AD et al (2021) Modeling urban evapotranspiration using remote sensing, flux footprints, and artificial intelligence. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147293
Wandera L, Mallick K, Kiely G et al (2017) Upscaling instantaneous to daily evapotranspiration using modelled daily shortwave radiation for remote sensing applications: an artificial neural network approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21:197–215. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-197-2017
Wang X, Cheng H, Xi J et al (2018) Relationship between park composition, vegetation characteristics and cool island effect. Sustainability (switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030587
Wang T, Chandra A, Jung J, Chang A (2022) UAV remote sensing based estimation of green cover during turfgrass establishment. Comput Electron Agric. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.106721
Webb BEK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Meteor Soc 106:85–100
Wei Z, Yoshimura K, Wang L et al (2017) Revisiting the contribution of transpiration to global terrestrial evapotranspiration. Geophys Res Lett 44:2792–2801. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072235
Wei S, Yin T, Dissegna MA et al (2020) An assessment study of three indirect methods for estimating leaf area density and leaf area index of individual trees. Agric for Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108101
Weiss M, Baret F, Smith GJ et al (2004) Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling. Agric for Meteorol 121:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.001
Wenjuan L, Yang H, Ibrahim KS et al (2010) Actual evapotranspiration estimation for different land use and land cover in urban regions using Landsat 5 data. J Appl Remote Sens 4:041873. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3525566
Wilber AL, Czarnecki JMP, McCurdy JD (2022) An ArcGIS Pro workflow to extract vegetation indices from aerial imagery of small-plot turfgrass research. Crop Sci 62:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20669
Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E et al (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agricult for Meteorol 113:223–243
Wu S, Deng L, Guo L, Wu Y (2022) Wheat leaf area index prediction using data fusion based on high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Plant Methods. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-022-00899-7
Wutzler T, Lucas-Moffat A, Migliavacca M et al (2018) Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc. Biogeosciences 15:5015–5030. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018
Wynne T, Devitt D (2020) Evapotranspiration of urban landscape trees and turfgrass in an arid environment: potential tradeoffs in the landscape. HortScience 55:1558–1566. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI15027-20
Xia T, Kustas WP, Anderson MC et al (2016) Mapping evapotranspiration with high-resolution aircraft imagery over vineyards using one-and two-source modeling schemes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:1523–1545. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1523-2016
Xing Y, Brimblecombe P, Wang S, Zhang H (2019) Tree distribution, morphology and modelled air pollution in urban parks of Hong Kong. J Environ Manage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109304
Xu T, Liu S, Xu L et al (2015) Temporal upscaling and reconstruction of thermal remotely sensed instantaneous evapotranspiration. Remote Sens (basel) 7:3400–3425. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70303400
Yadav PK, Thomasson AJ, Hardin R et al (2023) Detecting volunteer cotton plants in a corn field with deep learning on UAV remote-sensing imagery. Comput Electron Agric 204:107551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107551
Yan G, Hu R, Luo J et al (2019) Review of indirect optical measurements of leaf area index: recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Agric for Meteorol 265:390–411
Zhang J, Virk S, Porter W et al (2019) Applications of unmanned aerial vehicle based imagery in turfgrass field trials. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00279
Zhu W, Huang Y, Sun Z (2018) Mapping crop leaf area index from multi-spectral imagery onboard an unmanned aerial vehicle. In: 2018 7th international conference on agro-geoinformatics, agro-geoinformatics 2018. Institute of electrical and electronics engineers Inc
Acknowledgements
This study was possible thanks to support from Utah Water Research Laboratory Student Fellowship and the United States Golf Association. The authors are also grateful for the extraordinary support from the Utah State University AggieAir sUAS program staff and Agricola Research team for data collection support and analysis. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.M, A.T.R and L.H authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, experimental setup, data acquisition, and processing, and wrote the main manuscript text. Data acquisition was handled by L.C, R.G, C.C, I.G. W.K, H.N, K.K, V.B.L and M.P.M authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article was revised due to update in placement of Table 6.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Meza, K., Torres-Rua, A.F., Hipps, L. et al. Spatial estimation of actual evapotranspiration over irrigated turfgrass using sUAS thermal and multispectral imagery and TSEB model. Irrig Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00899-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00899-y