Abstract
Breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants have become increasingly popular over the past six decades. This article addresses the concerns of patients regarding implant strength by providing clinicians with valuable information in addition to video and pictorial evidence to share, fostering reassurance. The article focuses on the structural integrity and stability of breast implants, which play a critical role in their long-term performance and patient satisfaction. Specifically, it examines the industry standards outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), with a particular emphasis on ISO14607-2018, which encompasses a range of mechanical and physio-mechanical tests, including the assessment of silicone gel-fill firmness, evaluation of shell integrity, and examination of the impact of environmental conditions on implant performance. Breast implants are not static devices and are subject to aging and fatigue-based degradation. This emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure the long-term safety and satisfaction of patients. By providing a comprehensive examination of breast implant structure and industry standards, this article equips clinicians with the necessary knowledge to address patient concerns and foster confidence in the safety and longevity of breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants.
Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Perry D, Frame JD (2020) The history and development of breast implants. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 102(7):478–482. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.0003
International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO14607-2018-04, 3rd Edition: Non-active surgical implants- mammary implants- particular requirements standard.
American Standards of Testing Materials (2022) ASTM F703-18 R22. Standard specification for implantable breast protheses.
McGhee DE, Steele JR (2020) Breast biomechanics: What do We really know? Physiol (Bethesda) 35(2):144–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00024.2019. (PMID: 32027563)
American Standards of Testing Materials (2011) ASTM 1980-07-2011. Standard guide for accelerated aging of sterile barrier systems for medical devices.
Le-Petross HT, Scoggins ME, Clemens MW (2023) Assessment, complications, and surveillance of breast implants: making sense of 2022 FDA breast implant guidance. J Breast Imag. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbad029
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care (2023) Breast implant associated cancer: health professionals information. https://www.tga.gov.au/resources/resource/guidance/bia-alcl-information-health-professionals#routine Accessed 2 July 2023
Mîra A, Carton AK, Muller S, Payan Y (2018) A biomechanical breast model evaluated with respect to MRI data collected in three different positions. Clin Biomech 1(60):191–199
Serwan E, Matthews D, Davies J, Chau M (2020) Mammographic compression practices of force-and pressure-standardisation protocol: a scoping review. J Med Radiat Sci 67(3):233–242
Dijkman HB, Slaats I, Bult P (2021) Assessment of silicone particle migration among women undergoing removal or revision of silicone breast implants in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open 4(9):e2125381
Brody GS, Deapen D, Taylor CR, Pinter-Brown L, House-Lightner SR, Andersen JS, Carlson G, Lechner MG, Epstein AL (2015) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma occurring in women with breast implants: analysis of 173 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(3):695–705. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001033.Erratum.In:PlastReconstrSurg.2015Aug;136(2):426. (PMID: 25490535)
Janzekovic J, Hunt J, Peltz T, Wagels M, Brown T, Hutmacher DW (2022) Biomechanical principles of breast implants and current state of research in soft tissue engineering for cosmetic breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02559-y. (Epub 2021 Sep 7 PMID: 34494126)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Daniel Kluess is owner and CEO of INNOPROOF, an independent, impartial, and accredited implant testing laboratory. INNOPROOF offers, amongst others, breast implant testing services.
Human or Animal Participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 8903 kb)
Supplementary file2 (MP4 3136 kb)
Supplementary file3 (MP4 7471 kb)
Supplementary file4 (MP4 9033 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, T., Harvie, F. & Kluess, D. Testing Mechanical Properties of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants and Their Degradation. Aesth Plast Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03886-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03886-6