Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Bovine Pericardium: Our Approach Using Tutopatch® and Review of Literature

  • Original Articles
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the usage and advantages of bovine pericardium mesh (Tutopatch®) in breast reconstruction and to compare different mesh materials used in immediate breast reconstruction.

Methods

Our study involved a single-center, retrospective analysis of 103 patients (comprising 114 breasts) who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using bovine pericardium bovine matrix. The procedures were performed by the same surgical team between April 2018 and May 2023.

Results

The rates of early and late complications were examined after a median follow-up period of 30.2 ± 5.5 months. The results revealed that the rates of early complications stood at 9.7%, while late complications were observed in 14.5% of the cases. The most common late complication was seroma formation (7.7%) which six were resolved without any surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Tutopatch® can be used as an extension of the muscle to cover the prosthesis. It forms an extra layer over the silicone implant that helps to decrease the complications as capsular contracture and implant exposure. It also represents a significant 85 % reduction in cost when compared to a similar-sized mesh materials.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boháč M, Danišovič Ľ, Koller J, Dragúňová J, Varga I (2018) What happens to an acellular dermal matrix after implantation in the human body? A histological and electron microscopic study. Eur J Histochem EJH 62(1):2873. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2018.2873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23(2):600–610. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4873-9

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheflan M, Colwell AS (2014) Tissue reinforcement in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2(8):e192. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Castagnetti F, Bertani C, Foroni M, Falco G, Cenini E, De Bonis F, Ferrari G (2020) The bovine pericardium matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(6):2051–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01651-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Billon R, Hersant B, Bosc R, Meningaud JP (2019) Matrices dermiques acellulaires et matrices synthétiques: évolution des pratiques en reconstruction mammaire immédiate par prothèse [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: current concepts]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 47(3):311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S, Connor CM, Jovanovic B, Khan SA, Fine N, Rawlani V (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS (2012) Veritas® bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg 35(10):717–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Quah GS, French JR, Cocco A, Hsu J, Meybodi F, Elder E (2019) Veritas in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher complications compared with TiLOOP. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(12):e2533. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Semprini G, Cattin F, De Biasio F, Cedolini C, Parodi PC (2012) The bovine pericardial patch in breast reconstruction: a case report. G Chir 33(11–12):392–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eichler C, Efremova J, Brunnert K, Kurbacher CM, Gluz O, Puppe J, Warm M (2017) A head to head comparison between SurgiMend®-fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix and Tutomesh®-a bovine pericardium collagen membrane in breast reconstruction in 45 cases. In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 31(4):677–682. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11112

  11. Gubitosi A, Docimo G, Parmeggiani D, Pirozzi R, Vitiello C, Schettino P, Avellino M, Casalino G, Amato M, Ruggiero R, Docimo L (2014) Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 1):S205–S208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paprottka FJ, Krezdorn N, Sorg H, Könneker S, Bontikous S, Robertson I, Schlett CL, Dohse NK, Hebebrand D (2017) Evaluation of complication rates after breast surgery using acellular dermal matrix: median follow-up of three years. Plast Surg Int 2017:1283735. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1283735

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernardini R, Varvaras D, D’Amico F, Bielli A, Scioli MG, Coniglione F, Rossi P, Buonomo OC, Petrella G, Mattei M, Orlandi A (2020) Biological acellular pericardial mesh regulated tissue integration and remodeling in a rat model of breast prosthetic implantation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 108(2):577–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Bruin AF, Gosselink MP, van der Harst E (2012) Local application of gentamicin-containing collagen implant in the prophylaxis of surgical site infection following gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Surg 10(Suppl 1):S21–S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mofid MM (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in cosmetic breast procedures and capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Suppl):77S-84S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11418201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr (2011) Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stump A, Holton LH 3rd, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP (2009) The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab112d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Teo EH, Arriaga AF, Disa JJ (2010) Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb2a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jansen LA, Macadam SA (2011) The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2232–2244. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131c56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW Jr, Guo L (2011) Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Prantl L, Schreml S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Pöppl N, Eisenmann-Klein M, Schwarze H, Füchtmeier B (2007) Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000264398.85652.9a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosato RM, Dowden RV (1994) Radiation therapy as a cause of capsular contracture. Ann Plast Surg 32(4):342–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199404000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Whitfield GA, Horan G, Irwin MS, Malata CM, Wishart GC, Wilson CB (2009) Incidence of severe capsular contracture following implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with or without postoperative chest wall radiotherapy using 40 Gray in 15 fractions. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 90(1):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oray BN, Kelly S, Konobeck T, Lambert A, Mooradian DL (2009) Novel propylene oxide-treated bovine pericardium as soft tissue repair material and potential scaffold for tissue engineering. Surg Technol Int 18:47–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2011) Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212(5):880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Qing-Qing Q, Rasa Z, Rebecca WA, Amanda E (2014) In vitro and ın vivo comparison of Tutopatch™ bovine pericardium and Veritas® collagen matrix for hernia repair. RTI Surg

  28. van Tuil C, Saxena AK, Willital GH (2006) Experience with management of anterior abdominal wall defects using bovine pericard. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 10(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0037-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 11(10):1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0242-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. RTI Surgical (2023) Donor screening & eligibility. Available at: https://www.rtix.com/en_us/operational-excellence/patient-safety/donor-screening-eligibility, Accessed July 27, 2023

  31. Fung L, Wong B, Ravichandiran K, Agur A, Rindlisbacher T, Elmaraghy A (2009) Three-dimensional study of pectoralis major muscle and tendon architecture. Clin Anat 22(4):500–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atilla Adnan Eyuboglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent form is obtained from the patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper was presented in ISAPS 2022 World Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Video 1: Immediate breast reconstruction using parachute sutures (MP4 8445 kb)

Video 2: Tutopatch® was attached to the IMF first to provide support to the lower pole (MP4 12500 kb)

Video 3: Excess bovine pericardium was used to make a double layer over the muscle (MP4 8054 kb)

Video 4: A 14x20 cm bovine pericardium in being meshed and split into two equal halves (MP4 7316 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eyuboglu, A.A., Akdemir, O., Aydogan, F. et al. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Bovine Pericardium: Our Approach Using Tutopatch® and Review of Literature. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 285–296 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03732-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03732-1

Keywords

Navigation