Abstract
Objectives
To describe the usage and advantages of bovine pericardium mesh (Tutopatch®) in breast reconstruction and to compare different mesh materials used in immediate breast reconstruction.
Methods
Our study involved a single-center, retrospective analysis of 103 patients (comprising 114 breasts) who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using bovine pericardium bovine matrix. The procedures were performed by the same surgical team between April 2018 and May 2023.
Results
The rates of early and late complications were examined after a median follow-up period of 30.2 ± 5.5 months. The results revealed that the rates of early complications stood at 9.7%, while late complications were observed in 14.5% of the cases. The most common late complication was seroma formation (7.7%) which six were resolved without any surgical intervention.
Conclusion
Tutopatch® can be used as an extension of the muscle to cover the prosthesis. It forms an extra layer over the silicone implant that helps to decrease the complications as capsular contracture and implant exposure. It also represents a significant 85 % reduction in cost when compared to a similar-sized mesh materials.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boháč M, Danišovič Ľ, Koller J, Dragúňová J, Varga I (2018) What happens to an acellular dermal matrix after implantation in the human body? A histological and electron microscopic study. Eur J Histochem EJH 62(1):2873. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2018.2873
Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 23(2):600–610. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4873-9
Scheflan M, Colwell AS (2014) Tissue reinforcement in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2(8):e192. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000140
Castagnetti F, Bertani C, Foroni M, Falco G, Cenini E, De Bonis F, Ferrari G (2020) The bovine pericardium matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Aesthet Plast Surg 44(6):2051–2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01651-z
Billon R, Hersant B, Bosc R, Meningaud JP (2019) Matrices dermiques acellulaires et matrices synthétiques: évolution des pratiques en reconstruction mammaire immédiate par prothèse [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: current concepts]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 47(3):311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.010
Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S, Connor CM, Jovanovic B, Khan SA, Fine N, Rawlani V (2012) A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(1):28–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6
Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS (2012) Veritas® bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg 35(10):717–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0736-9
Quah GS, French JR, Cocco A, Hsu J, Meybodi F, Elder E (2019) Veritas in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher complications compared with TiLOOP. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(12):e2533. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002533
Semprini G, Cattin F, De Biasio F, Cedolini C, Parodi PC (2012) The bovine pericardial patch in breast reconstruction: a case report. G Chir 33(11–12):392–394
Eichler C, Efremova J, Brunnert K, Kurbacher CM, Gluz O, Puppe J, Warm M (2017) A head to head comparison between SurgiMend®-fetal bovine acellular dermal matrix and Tutomesh®-a bovine pericardium collagen membrane in breast reconstruction in 45 cases. In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 31(4):677–682. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11112
Gubitosi A, Docimo G, Parmeggiani D, Pirozzi R, Vitiello C, Schettino P, Avellino M, Casalino G, Amato M, Ruggiero R, Docimo L (2014) Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy. Int J Surg 12(Suppl 1):S205–S208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.007
Paprottka FJ, Krezdorn N, Sorg H, Könneker S, Bontikous S, Robertson I, Schlett CL, Dohse NK, Hebebrand D (2017) Evaluation of complication rates after breast surgery using acellular dermal matrix: median follow-up of three years. Plast Surg Int 2017:1283735. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1283735
Bernardini R, Varvaras D, D’Amico F, Bielli A, Scioli MG, Coniglione F, Rossi P, Buonomo OC, Petrella G, Mattei M, Orlandi A (2020) Biological acellular pericardial mesh regulated tissue integration and remodeling in a rat model of breast prosthetic implantation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 108(2):577–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34413
de Bruin AF, Gosselink MP, van der Harst E (2012) Local application of gentamicin-containing collagen implant in the prophylaxis of surgical site infection following gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Surg 10(Suppl 1):S21–S27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.014
Mofid MM (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in cosmetic breast procedures and capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J 31(7 Suppl):77S-84S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11418201
Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr (2011) Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):1170–1178. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6
Stump A, Holton LH 3rd, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP (2009) The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):82–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab112d
Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E (2010) Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90
Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Teo EH, Arriaga AF, Disa JJ (2010) Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb2a
Jansen LA, Macadam SA (2011) The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(6):2232–2244. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131c56
Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW Jr, Guo L (2011) Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233
Prantl L, Schreml S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Pöppl N, Eisenmann-Klein M, Schwarze H, Füchtmeier B (2007) Clinical and morphological conditions in capsular contracture formed around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000264398.85652.9a
Rosato RM, Dowden RV (1994) Radiation therapy as a cause of capsular contracture. Ann Plast Surg 32(4):342–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199404000-00002
Whitfield GA, Horan G, Irwin MS, Malata CM, Wishart GC, Wilson CB (2009) Incidence of severe capsular contracture following implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with or without postoperative chest wall radiotherapy using 40 Gray in 15 fractions. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 90(1):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.023
Oray BN, Kelly S, Konobeck T, Lambert A, Mooradian DL (2009) Novel propylene oxide-treated bovine pericardium as soft tissue repair material and potential scaffold for tissue engineering. Surg Technol Int 18:47–54
Deeken CR, Melman L, Jenkins ED, Greco SC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2011) Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 212(5):880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.006
Qing-Qing Q, Rasa Z, Rebecca WA, Amanda E (2014) In vitro and ın vivo comparison of Tutopatch™ bovine pericardium and Veritas® collagen matrix for hernia repair. RTI Surg
van Tuil C, Saxena AK, Willital GH (2006) Experience with management of anterior abdominal wall defects using bovine pericard. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 10(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-005-0037-3
Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 11(10):1275–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0242-8
RTI Surgical (2023) Donor screening & eligibility. Available at: https://www.rtix.com/en_us/operational-excellence/patient-safety/donor-screening-eligibility, Accessed July 27, 2023
Fung L, Wong B, Ravichandiran K, Agur A, Rindlisbacher T, Elmaraghy A (2009) Three-dimensional study of pectoralis major muscle and tendon architecture. Clin Anat 22(4):500–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20784
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Written informed consent form is obtained from the patients.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This paper was presented in ISAPS 2022 World Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Video 1: Immediate breast reconstruction using parachute sutures (MP4 8445 kb)
Video 2: Tutopatch® was attached to the IMF first to provide support to the lower pole (MP4 12500 kb)
Video 3: Excess bovine pericardium was used to make a double layer over the muscle (MP4 8054 kb)
Video 4: A 14x20 cm bovine pericardium in being meshed and split into two equal halves (MP4 7316 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Eyuboglu, A.A., Akdemir, O., Aydogan, F. et al. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Bovine Pericardium: Our Approach Using Tutopatch® and Review of Literature. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 285–296 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03732-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03732-1