Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Bovine Pericardium Matrix in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acellular dermal matrices have been introduced to optimize direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. We selected a bovine pericardium noncross-linked matrix.

Methods

The study consists in the retrospective analysis of 123 patients (141 breasts) who underwent conservative mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with bovine pericardium matrix Veritas® from March 2012 to October 2017.

Results

The overall rates of early and late complications, after a median follow-up of 51.84 months, were, respectively, 37.6% and 24.1%. The most noticeable early complications were flap ischemia [n = 39 (27.7%)], hematoma [n = 5 (3.6%)], marginal skin flap necrosis [n = 5 (3.6%)] and dehiscence of the surgical wound [n = 2 (1.4%)]. The most common late complications were rippling [n = 18 (12.7%)] and seroma [n = 4 (2.8%)]. The rate of clinically relevant capsular contracture was low: 12.1% (n = 17) presented grade II and only 2.1%% (n = 3) grade III. Implant substitution became necessary for five patients (3.6%). Early complications occurred more frequently in patients undergoing therapeutic mastectomy (p = 0.031). Patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy more frequently developed late complications (p = 0.012). A clinically relevant capsular contracture (grade II–III) was found in higher average patients age (p = 0.0019). The left side developed less frequently late complications except for rippling (p = 0.002). Rippling occurred more frequently in patients who sustained a nipple skin-sparing mastectomy (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

Our results further support the safety of Veritas® in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mofid MM, Meininger MS, Lacey MS (2012) Veritas® bovine pericardium for immediate breast reconstruction: a xenograft alternative to acellular dermal matrix products. Eur J Plast Surg 35(10):717–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Annals Surg Oncol 23(2):600–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheflan M, Colwell AS (2014) Tissue reinforcement in implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2(8):e192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheflan M, Brown I (2013) Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using variable lower pole support. In: Urban C, Rietjens M (eds) Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery. Springer, Milano, pp 235–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Berrìos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler D et al (2017) Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. JAMA Surg 152(8):784–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyce JM, Pittet D (2002) Guidelines for hand hygiene in health-care settings. MMWR 51(RR16):1–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Larson EL (1995) APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 23(4):251–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardyck C, Petrinovich LF (1977) Left-handedness. Psychol Bull 84(3):385–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosato RM, Dowden RV (1994) Radiation therapy as a cause of capsular contracture. Ann Plast Surg 32(4):342–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitfield GA, Horan G, Irwin MS, Malata CM, Wishart GC, Wilson CB (2009) Incidence of severe capsular contracture following implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with or without postoperative chest wall radiotherapy using 40 Gray in 15 fractions. Radiother Oncol 90(1):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pu Y, Mao TC, Zhang YM, Wang S, Fan DL (2018) The role of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Medicine 97(6):e9548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J et al (2013) A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:757–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheflan M, Grinberg-Rashi H, Hod K (2018) Bovine acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective, observational study with SurgiMend. Plast Reconstr Surg 141(1):1e–10e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Forsberg CG, Kelly DA, Wood BC, Mastrangelo SL, DeFranzo AJ, Thompson JT et al (2014) Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 72:S116–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Meldford Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr (2011) Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:1170–1178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stump A, Holton LH, Connor J, Harper JR, Slezak S, Silverman RP (2009) The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):82–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Basu CB, Leong M, Hicks MJ (2010) Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the inflammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):1842–1847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu C, Cipriano J, Osgood G, Tepper D, Siddiqui A (2013) Human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm®) dimensional changes and stretching in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(10):1376–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamboto H, Vickery K, Deva AK (2010) Subclinical (biofilm) infection causes capsular contracture in a porcine model following augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:835–842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2011) Revisionary breast surgery with acellular dermal matrices. Aesthet Surg J 31(6):700–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leong M, Bassu B, Hicks J (2015) Further evidence that human acellular dermal matrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule formation in implant-based breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 35(1):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Castagnetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castagnetti, F., Bertani, C., Foroni, M. et al. The Bovine Pericardium Matrix in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 2051–2060 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01651-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01651-z

Keywords

Navigation