Skip to main content
Log in

A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addressed the paradoxical observation that movement is essential for tactile exploration, and yet is accompanied by movement-related gating or suppression of tactile detection. Knowing that tactile gating covaries with the speed of movement (faster movements, more gating), we hypothesized that there would be no tactile gating at slower speeds of movement, corresponding to speeds commonly used during tactile exploration (<200 mm/s). Subjects (n = 21) detected the presence or absence of a weak electrical stimulus applied to the skin of the right middle finger during two conditions: rest and active elbow extension. Movement speed was systematically varied from 50 to ~1,000 mm/s. No subject showed evidence of tactile gating at the slowest speed tested, 50 mm/s (rest versus movement), but all subjects showed decreased detection at one or more higher speeds. For each subject, we calculated the critical speed, corresponding to the speed at which detection fell to 0.5 (chance). The mean critical speed was 472 mm/s and >200 mm/s in almost all subjects (19/21). This result is consistent with our hypothesis that subjects optimize the speed of movement during tactile exploration to avoid speeds associated with tactile gating. This strategy thus maximizes the quality of the tactile feedback generated during tactile search and improves perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angel RW, Malenka RC (1982) Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement. Exp Neurol 77:266–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bays PM, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2005) Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven. Curr Biol 15:1125–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bays PM, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM (2006) Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not post-dictive. PloS Biol 4:281–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE (1994) Active versus passive touch: factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72:558–570

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE (1998) Constancy in the somatosensory system: central neural mechanisms underlying the appreciation of texture during active touch. In: Morley JW (ed) Neural aspects of tactile sensation (advances in psychology). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 275–298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE (2009a) Active touch. In: Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Windhorst U (eds); Iwamura Y (Section editor) Encyclopedic reference of neuroscience. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–41

  • Chapman CE (2009b) Tactile attention. In: Binder MD, Hirokawa N, Windhorst U (eds); Iwamura Y (Section editor) Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3992–3995

  • Chapman CE, Beauchamp E (2006) Differential controls over tactile detection in humans by motor commands and peripheral reafference. J Neurophysiol 96:1664–1675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE, Bushnell MC, Miron D, Duncan GH, Lund JP (1987) Sensory perception during movement in man. Exp Brain Res 68:516–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE, Jiang W, Lamarre Y (1988) Modulation of lemniscal input during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 72:316–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE, Tremblay F, Ageranioti-Belanger SA (1996a) Role of primary somatosensory cortex in active and passive touch. In: Wing A, Flanagan R, Haggard P (eds) Hand and brain: neurophysiology and psychology of hand movement. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, pp 329–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CE, Zompa IC, Williams SR, Shenasa J, Jiang W (1996b) Factors influencing the perception of tactile stimuli during movement. In: Franzén O, Johansson R, Terenius L (eds) Somesthesis and the neurobiology of the somatosensory cortex. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland MM, Shenoy KV (2007) Temporal complexity and heterogeneity of single-neuron activity in premotor and motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 97:4235–4257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coquery JM, Malcuit G, Coulmance M (1971) Altérations de la perception d’un stimulus somesthésique durant un mouvement volontaire. C R Soc Biol (Paris) 165:1946–1951

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter JD (1974) Sensory transmission through lemniscal pathway during voluntary movement in the cat. J Neurophysiol 37:832–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver J, Spence C (1998) Crossmodal links in spatial attention. Phil Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 353:1319–1331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Essick GK, Whitsel BL (1985) Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity: a correlative psychophysical and neurophysiological investigation. Brain Res Rev 10:213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghez C, Lenzi GL (1971) Modulation of sensory transmission in cat lemniscal system during voluntary movement. Pflügers Arch 323:273–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald AP (1966) A Braille-reading machine. Science 154:144–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Chapman CE, Lamarre Y (1990) Modulation of somatosensory evoked responses in the primary somatosensory cortex produced by intracortical microstimulation of the motor cortex in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 80:333–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legge GE, Madison CM, Mansfield JS (1999) Measuring Braille reading speed with the MNREAD test. Vis Impairment Res 1:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1981) Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle. J Physiol (Lond) 320:1–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morley JW, Goodwin AW, Darian-Smith I (1983) Tactile discrimination of gratings. Exp Brain Res 49:291–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Post LJ, Chapman CE (1991) The influence of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans. Somatosens Motor Res 8:149–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Post LJ, Zompa IC, Chapman CE (1994) Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 100:107–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RF, Schady WJ, Torebjörk HE (1990) Gating of tactile input from the hand. I. Effects of finger movement. Exp Brain Res 79:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seki K, Perlmutter SI, Fetz EE (2003) Sensory input to primate spinal cord is presynaptically inhibited during voluntary movement. Nature Neurosci 6:1309–1316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AM, Chapman CE, Deslandes M, Langlais J-S, Thibodeau M-P (2002a) The role of friction and tangential force in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness. Exp Brain Res 144:211–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AM, Gosselin G, Houde B (2002b) Deployment of fingertip forces in tactile exploration. Exp Brain Res 147:209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AM, Chapman CE, Donati F, Fortier-Poisson P, Hayward V (2009) Perception of simulated local shapes using active and passive touch. J Neurophysiol 102:3519–3529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherhill GB, Levitt H (1965) Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol 18:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SR, Chapman CE (2000) Time-course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans II. Effects of stimulus intensity. J Neurophysiol 84:863–875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SR, Chapman CE (2002) Time-course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans III. Effects of motor tasks. J Neurophysiol 88:1968–1979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SR, Shenasa J, Chapman CE (1998) Time-course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans I. Importance of stimulus location. J Neurophysiol 79:947–963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following for providing excellent technical assistance: R. Albert, the late R. Bouchoux, M. Bourdeau, and C. Valiquette. We thank Dr. Trevor Drew for his helpful comments on the manuscript. The research was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (253438) and operating (MOP—14454) and Group grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Université de Montréal, as well as an infrastructure grant from the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec. Dr. Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz was supported by the H. Jasper fellowship from the Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central (GRSNC). Mélissa Raby was supported by a bursary from the Department of Physiology. Marie-Line Lemieux was supported by a bursary from the Faculty of Medicine (COPSE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Elaine Chapman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cybulska-Klosowicz, A., Meftah, EM., Raby, M. et al. A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 210, 291–301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2632-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2632-0

Keywords

Navigation