Skip to main content
Log in

Tactile discrimination of gratings

  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Human subjects were required to differentiate grating surfaces of alternating grooves and ridges by moving a finger back and forth across the surface. Their discriminative capacities were measured, as well as the movement and force profiles that they selected. To measure discrimination, a forced choice paradigm was used in which three surfaces were presented on each trial. Two surfaces were the same (standards) and the subject was required to indicate which of the three surfaces (the comparison) differed from the other two. Two series of surfaces were used with standards whose spatial periods were 770 and 1002 μ, respectively. Subjects were able to discriminate, at the 75% correct level, two gratings which differed in spatial period by the order of 5%. When tangential movement between the surface and the finger was eliminated, and only radial contact permitted, discrimination was degraded and the 75% correct levels increased to the order of 10%. Subjects were free to choose their own patterns of finger movement and of contact force between finger and surface. Movement was measured cinematographically. For all subjects movement patterns were close to sinusoidal, with frequencies in the range of 4.0 Hz and with mean velocities of the order of 160 mm/s. Patterns of contact force were measured by a force transducer. For all subjects the force varied rhythmically in synchrony with movement, but the patterns and magnitudes varied with the subject. Gratings were scaled for perceived roughness by a magnitude estimation technique: the relationship between perceived roughness and grating period was monotonic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amerine MA, Pangborn RM, Roessler EB (1965) Principles of sensory evaluation of food. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer HJ (1952) Discrimination of tactual stimuli. J Exp Psychol 44: 455–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Binns H (1937) Visual and tectual ‘judgement’ as illustrated in a practical experiment. Br J Psychol 27: 404–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddick O (1981) Spatial frequency analysis in vision. Nature 291: 9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin V (1977) Active and passive touch at four age levels. Dev Psychol 13: 253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbert SS, Stellwagen WT (1963) Tactual discrimination of textures. Percept Mot Skills 16: 545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith I, Oke LE (1980) Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's fingerpad. J Physiol (Lond) 309: 117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • DeValois RL, Jacobs GH (1968) Primate color vision. Science 62: 533–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman G, Hosman J, Lindström B (1965) Roughness, smoothness, and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. J Exp Psychol 70: 18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellis M, Pool R (1977) Two-point discrimination distances in the normal hand and forearm. Plast Reconstr Surg 59: 57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ (1962) Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev 69: 477–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliner CR (1967) Tactual discrimination thresholds for shape and texture in young children. J Exp Child Psychol 5: 536–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Gridgeman NT (1964) Sensory comparisons: The 2-stage triangle test with sample variability. J Food Sci 29: 112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald AP (1966) A Braille-reading machine. Science 154: 144–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins JW, Gridgeman NT (1955) Comparative sensitivity of pair and triad flavour intensity difference tests. Biometrics 11: 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KO, Darian-Smith I, LaMotte C, Johnson B, Oldfield S (1979) Coding of incremental changes in skin temperature by a population of warm fibers in the monkey: correlation with intensity discrimination in man. J Neurophysiol 42: 1332–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz D (1925) Der Aufbau der Tastwelt. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Ergänzungsband 11

  • Krueger LE (1970) David Katz's Der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch): A synopsis. Percept Psychophys 7: 337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb GD (1982) Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. J Physiol (Lond) (in press)

  • Lederman SJ (1974) Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure. Percept Psychophys 16: 385–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ (1978) “Improving one's touch”... and more. Percept Psychophys 24: 154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Taylor MM (1972) Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophys 12: 401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicol D (1972) A primer of signal detection theory. Alien and Unwin, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Meenes M, Zigler MJ (1923) An experimental study of the perceptions of roughness and smoothness. Am J Psychol 34: 542–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AS, Perey AJ, Azulay A (1975) Further analysis of active and passive touch in pattern discrimination. Bull Psychonomic Soc 6: 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS, Harris JR (1962) The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness. J Exp Psychol 64: 489–494

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morley, J.W., Goodwin, A.W. & Darian-Smith, I. Tactile discrimination of gratings. Exp Brain Res 49, 291–299 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238588

Key words

Navigation