Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid FE/ANN and LPR approach for the inverse identification of material parameters from cutting tests

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accuracy of numerical models based in finite elements (FE), extensively used for simulation of cutting processes, depends strongly on the identification of proper material parameters. Experimental identification of the constitutive law parameters for simulation of cutting processes involves unsolved problems such as the complex testing techniques or the difficulty to reproduce the stress triaxiality state during cutting. This work proposes a methodology for the inverse identification of the material parameters from cutting test. Two hybrid approaches are compared. One of them based on FE and artificial neural networks (ANN). The other one based on FE and local polynomial regression (LPR). Firstly, a FE model is validated with experimental data. Then, ANN and LPR are trained with FE simulations. Finally, the estimated ANN and LPR models are used for the inverse identification of material parameters. This identification is solved as an optimization problem. The FE/LPR approach shows good performance, outperforming the FE/ANN approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gonzalo O, Jauregi H, Uriarte L, López de Lacalle L (2009) Prediction of specific force coefficients from a FEM cutting model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:348–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davim J, Maranhão C, Jackson M, Cabral G, Grácio J (2009) FEM analysis in high speed machining of aluminium alloy (Al7075-0) using polycrystalline diamond (PCD) and cemented carbide (K10) cutting tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:1093–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tounsi N, Vincenti J, Otho A, Elbestawi MA (2002) From the basics of orthogonal metal cutting toward the identification of the constitutive equation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42/2:1373–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuo C-FJ, Wu Y-S (2005) Application of a Taguchi-based neural network prediction design of the film coating process for polymer blends. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:455–461. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2215-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kohli A, Dixit US (2005) A neural-network-based methodology for the prediction of surface roughness in a turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(1/2):118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanjay C, Jyothi C (2006) A study of surface roughness in drilling using mathematical analysis and neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:846–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Härdle W (1990) Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Umbrello D, Ambrogio G, Filice L, Shivpuri R (2008) A hybrid finite element method–artificial neural network approach for predicting residual stresses and the optimal cutting conditions during hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel. Mater Design 29:873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chamekh A, Bel Hadj Salah H, Hambli R (2009) Inverse technique identification of material parameters using finite element and neural network computation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:173–179. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1809-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández-Fdz D, Zaera R (2008) A new tool based on artificial neural networks for the design of lightweight ceramic–metal armour against high-velocity impact of solids. Int J Solid Struct 45:6369–6383

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Miguélez MH, Zaera R, Molinari A, Cheriguene R, Rusinek A (2009) Residual stresses in orthogonal cutting of metals: the effect of thermomechanical coupling parameters and of friction. J Therm Stresses 32(3):269–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rate and temperature. In: Proc 7th Int Symp on Ballistics. pp. 541–547.

  13. Muñoz-Sánchez A, Miguélez H, Canteli JA, Cantero JL (2009) The influence of tool wear in surface integrity when machining austenitic stainless steel. In: 9th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading (DYMAT 2009), Brussels, Belgium

  14. Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R, Outeiro JC (2007) The influence of Johnson–Cook material constants on finite element simulation of machining of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hibbit Karlson and Sorensen Inc (2003) ABAQUS User’s Manual 6.4–1

  16. Adetoro OB, Wen PH (2010) Prediction of mechanistic cutting force coefficients using ALE formulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(1/4):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miguélez H, Muñoz-Sánchez A, Cantero JL, Loya JA (2009) An efficient implementation of boundary conditions in an ALE model for orthogonal cutting. J Theor Appl Mech 47(3):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miguélez MH, Zaera R, Molinari A, Muñoz-Sánchez A (2009) The influence of cutting speed in the residual stresses induced by HSM in AISI 316L steel, 12th CIRP Conference on Modelling of Machining Operations. San Sebastián, Spain.

  19. Moufki A, Molinari A, Dudzinski D (1998) Modelling of orthogonal cutting with a temperature dependent friction law. J Mech Phys Solids 46/10:2103–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasr MNA, Ng EG, Elbestawi MA (2008) A modified time-efficient FE approach for predicting machining-induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jang DY, Watkins TR, Kozaczek KJ, Hubbard CR, Cavin OB (1996) Surface residual stresses in machined austenitic stainless steel. Wear 194:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Korkut I, Kasap M, Ciftci I, Seke U (2004) Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Design 25:303–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haykin S (2007) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shao J (2003) Linear Model Selection by Cross-Validation. J Amer Stat Assoc 88:486–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen S, Cowan CFN, Grant PM (1991) Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. IIEE Trans Neur Netw 2:302–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA

  27. Zouhar J, Piska M (2008) Modelling the orthogonal machining process using cutting tools with different geometry. MM Sci J 48–51

  28. Borkovec J, Petruska J (2007) Computer simulation of material separation process. In: Proc. Engineering Mechanics, Svratka, Czech Republic. p. 14.

  29. Forejt M (2004) The mechanical properties of selected types of steel in the condition of higher speed deformation. Report of Research plan MSM 262100003, Brno University of Technology, Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Czech Republic

  30. Jaspers SPFC, Dautzenberg JH (2002) Material behaviour in conditions similar to metal cutting: flow stress in the primary shear zone. J Mater Process Technol 122:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Özel T, Zeren E (2005) Finite element modeling of stresses induced by high speed machining with round edge cutting tools. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  32. Outeiro JC, Umbrello D, M’Saoubi R (2006) Experimental and numerical modelling of the residual stresses induced in orthogonal cutting of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tool Manufact 46(14):1786–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandrasekaran H, M’Saoubi R, Chazal H (2005) Modelling of material flow stress in chip formation process from orthogonal milling and split Hopkinson bar tests. Mach Sci Technol 9:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M’Saoubi R (1998) Aspects Thermiques et Microstructuraux de la coupe. Application a la coupe orthogonale des aciers austenitiques. Ph.D. Thesis, ENSAM-Paris

  35. Changeux B, Touratier M, Lebrun JL, Thomas T, Clisson J (2001) High-speed shear tests for the identification of the Johnson–Cook law. Fourth International ESAFORM Conference. pp. 603–606

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Av. de la Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Madrid, Spain

    Ana Muñoz-Sánchez, Isabel M. González-Farias, Xavier Soldani & M. Henar Miguélez

Authors
  1. Ana Muñoz-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Isabel M. González-Farias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xavier Soldani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Henar Miguélez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Henar Miguélez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muñoz-Sánchez, A., González-Farias, I.M., Soldani, X. et al. Hybrid FE/ANN and LPR approach for the inverse identification of material parameters from cutting tests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54, 21–33 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2922-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2922-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation