Abstract
Purpose
Restoration of correct alignment is one of the main objectives of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the influence of residual malalignment on clinical and functional outcomes is currently uncertain. This study was therefore undertaken to ascertain its influence in patients undergoing TKA for varus osteoarthritis of the knee.
Methods
A cohort of 132 consecutive patients (143 knees) with pre-operative varus alignment was evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 7.2 years. Based upon the post-operative alignment, patients were stratified into three groups: neutral, mild varus, and severe varus. These groups were compared with respect to clinical and functional outcomes.
Results
All patients had post-operative improvements in Knee Society Score (KSS). Knees that were left in mild varus scored significantly better for the KSS and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, compared with knees that were corrected to neutral and knees that were left in severe varus exceeding 6°. No revisions occurred in any of the groups at midterm follow-up.
Conclusion
The results of this study contradict the conventional assumption that correction to neutral mechanical alignment leads to the best outcome following TKA. Patients with pre-operative varus had better clinical and functional outcome scores if the alignment was left in mild varus, as compared with patients with an alignment correction to neutral.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic study, Level III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53
Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE (2004) Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:26–34
Bonner TJ, Eardley WGP, Patterson P, Gregg PJ (2011) The effect op post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:1217–1222
Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD (2009) Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:560–569
Cooke TD, Sled EA, Scudamore RA (2007) Frontal plan knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement. J Rheumatol 34:1796–1801
D’Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Polyethylene contact stresses, articular congruity, and knee alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:232–238
Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12
Fang DM, Ritter LA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24:39–43
Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML ((2012) Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z
Hungerford DS (1995) Alignment in total knee replacement. AAOS Instr Lect 44:455–468
Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 73:709–714
Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE (2009) Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up? Int Orthop 33:1567–1570
Lee BS, Lee SJ, Kim JM, Lee DH, Cha EJ, Bin SI (2011) No impact of severe varus deformity on clinical outcome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:960–966
Lewallen DG, Bryan RS, Peterson LF (1984) Polycentric total knee arthroplasty: a ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 66:1211–1218
Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24:570–578
Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S (2011) Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3443–3450
Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C (2010) Varus alignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1487–1491
Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter ML (2008) The influence of postoperative alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:639–642
Paley D (2003) Principles of deformity correction. Springer-verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 1–60
Paratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2143–2149
Ma Ritter, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156
Sikorski JM (2008) Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90:1121–1127
Werner FW, Ayers DC, Maletsky LP, Rullkoetter PJ (2005) The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:349–355
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanlommel, L., Vanlommel, J., Claes, S. et al. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2325–2330 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2481-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2481-4