Abstract
Rare recessive variants in the human VRK1 gene are associated with several motor neuron diseases (MND), such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, or distal hereditary motor neuropathies (dHMN). A case with dHMN carrying two novel VRK1 gene variants, expressing Leu200Pro (L200P) and Arg387His (R387H) variant proteins, identified that these protein variants are functionally different. The Leu200Pro variant shares with several variants in the catalytic domain the loss of the kinase activity on different substrates, such as histones, p53, or coilin. However, the distal Arg387His variant and the distal Trp375* (W375X) chinese variant, both located at the end of the low complexity C-terminal region and proximal to the termination codon, retain their catalytic activity on some substrates, and mechanistically their functional impairment is different. The L200P variant, as well as most VRK1 pathogenic variants, impairs the phosphorylation of BAF and histone H4K16 acetylation, which are required for DNA attachment to the nuclear envelope and chromatin accessibility to DNA repair mechanisms, respectively. The R387H variant impairs phosphorylation of H2AX, an early step in different types of DNA damage responses. The functional variability of VRK1 protein variants and their different combinations are a likely contributor to the clinical phenotypic heterogeneity of motor neuron and neurological diseases associated with rare VRK1 pathogenic variants.
Key messages
-
VRK1 variants implicated in motor neuron diseases are functionally different.
-
The L200P variant is kinase inactive, and the R387H variant is partially active.
-
VRK1 variants alter H4K16 acetylation and loss of coilin and BAF phosphorylation.
-
VRK1 variants alter Cajal bodies and DNA damage responses.
-
VRK1 variant combination determines the neurological phenotype heterogeneity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Functional alterations of motor neurons are associated with several neurological diseases. Genetic heterogeneity is present and several genes have been implicated in these diseases [1, 2]. Rare variants of the human VRK1 gene are associated with a heterogeneous group of neurological diseases, affecting motor neurons and the peripheral nerves, sensory and sensory-motor. Among these diseases are spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), distal hereditary motor neuropathies (dHMN), and Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. All VRK1 gene variants associated with these diseases are recessive and their clinical phenotypes are manifested either in homozygous or compound heterozygous individuals [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The evolution of these diseases affecting motor neurons is slowly progressive, often starting early in life, and their clinical manifestations are initially distal. The slowly progressive phenotype in non-dividing cells, such as neurons, indicates that the pathogenic mechanism is a likely consequence of a slow accumulation of axonal alterations in neurons with time, and that may also be associated with the length of the axons, which requires a larger transport along long axons. Furthermore, alterations in histone epigenetic modifications have also been implicated in some motor neuron diseases (MND), such as SMA [10, 11] and ALS [12, 13].
VRK1 is mostly a chromatin/nuclear kinase implicated in the regulation of several processes such as chromatin remodeling [14, 15], cell cycle progression [16, 17], DNA damage responses [18,19,20,21,22], and assembly of Cajal bodies [23]. Alterations in any of these three functions, chromatin remodeling, Cajal bodies, and DNA damage responses are very relevant pathogenic mechanisms in non-dividing neurons. Chromosomes are attached to the nuclear envelope by its binding to BAF, which is regulated by its phosphorylation by VRK1 that permits its detachment from the nuclear envelope [24,25,26]. Furthermore, chromatin remodeling is associated with histone acetylation, such as H4K16 acetylation (H4K16ac), a common mark to many processes, such as transcription, replication, or DNA damage responses. The acetylation of H4K16 is mediated by several lysine acetyl transferases (KAT) such as Tip60 [27,28,29,30] or MOF [31]. VRK1 directly interacts and phosphorylates Tip60 promoting its translocation to chromatin and its transacetylase activity in the DNA damage response [27, 30]. VRK1 depletion also alters several nuclear phosphoproteome pathways in the response to DNA damage [32].
VRK1 pathogenic variants are located within three clusters in the protein sequence [33]. Two clusters, I and II, are located in the kinase N-terminal domain immediately after the ATP binding site or the catalytic site respectively. The third cluster (III) is located near the end of the low-complexity C-terminal regulatory region [33]. The VRK1 C-terminal region is very flexible and can have multiple alternative conformations [34]. This C-terminal region folds and interacts with the N-terminus, inhibiting the kinase activity, and with other proteins determining the complexes in which it participates within the nucleus [15, 33]. Unless the patients are siblings, there is not a single case with the same combination of VRK1 variants [33].
In this report, we have characterized two new VRK1 variants ((c.599 T > C; p.Leu200Pro) [35] and (c.1160G > A; p.Arg387His) [35, 36]), in the context of their pathogenic mechanism that take place in non-proliferating cells. As well as the common effect of several additional pathogenic VRK1 protein variants, representing the three clusters in the VRK1 amino acid sequence. Cluster I is located next to the ATP binding site, cluster 2 next to the catalytic site, both within the kinase domain, and cluster 3 near the end terminus of the protein sequence [33]. We have focused the study on effects regarding the phosphorylation of specific substrates, as well as on histone acetylation and DNA damage response and other nuclear regulatory functions that can have relevant consequences in the neuro-pathogenic mechanism. The two new variants identified in the patient have different roles, one affects the kinase activity, while the other affects regulatory processes such as histone acetylation or alteration of protein complexes in which the VRK1 protein participates. The differences between the two new VRK1 variants, or other variants, which in patients have different variant combinations, can be the determining factor for the heterogeneity of the specific neurological phenotype manifested by individual patients.
Results
Structural prediction of VRK1 L200P and R387H pathogenic protein variants
Initially, we performed a molecular modeling of the new pathogenic protein variants to identify their impact on VRK1 structure, and their functional consequences. The structural localization of the variants studied (Fig. 1A, magenta spheres) is distributed in three locations; none of them is located in the active center of the enzyme. The first of the locations, near the C-terminal tail interaction site (Fig. 1A, red), corresponds to the Pro79Leu (P79L), Leu200Pro (L200P) (this report), and Arg219Ile (R219I) variants. Another group of variants, Trp254Leu, Thr256Ile, and Gly257Ser, localize in the core of the protein, in a hydrophobic cluster. Finally, the remaining three variants, Thr228Met, Arg241Cys, and Asp267Gly, are located closer to the enzyme surface.
Structural modeling of the human VRK1-L200P variant protein. A Structure of the wild-type VRK1 activation loop after 200 ns of free molecular dynamics. B In the simulation of the wild-type (wt) enzyme, the hydrophobic amino acids Pro79 and Leu200 (B, left) interact closely, being located away from the Ile354 residue, which allows some flexibility of the C-terminal tail of the enzyme, facilitating the regulation of auto-inhibition through the cycle of occupancy and release of the active center (ATP site in B). In the case of the Pro79Leu and Leu200Pro variants, the result of molecular dynamics simulation of both mutations is a closer contact of Ile354 with Leu79 and Leu200 (Pro79Leu variant, B, center) or of Ile354 with Pro200 (Leu200Pro variant, B, right). In both cases, this closer interaction would negatively impact the opening of the active center and thus VRK1 activity
In the simulation of the wild-type VRK1 protein, the hydrophobic amino acids Leu200 and Pro79 (Fig. 1B, left) closely interact, being located away from the Ile354 residue, which allows some flexibility of the C-terminal tail of the enzyme, facilitating the regulation of auto-inhibition through the cycle of occupancy and release of the active center (ATP site in Fig. 1B). In the case of the Pro79Leu and Leu200Pro variants, the result of molecular dynamics simulation of both variants is a closer contact of Ile354 with Leu79 and Leu200 variant (Fig. 1B, center) or of Ile354 with Pro200 variant (Fig. 1B, right). In both cases, this closer interaction would negatively influence the opening of the active center and thus can affect VRK1 activity.
The VRK1 R387H mutant could not be modeled because it is located very near the end of the C-terminus, and only lacks the final nine amino acids. This R387H variant was also detected in two unrelated Jewish Moroccan patients in homozygosis [36]. This VRK1 C-terminal region has a very low complexity, containing a very flexible basic arginine-rich motif that has several alternative folding conformations, which can regulate the VRK1 kinase activity [34], its targets [37], and protein interactions [33]. This region is also required for the binding of VRK1 to nucleosomes [38]. This nucleosomal interaction with VRK1 is lost in variants located in cluster III, such as R358X lacking this C-terminal region containing the arginine motif [37].
Protein stability of the L200P and R387H VRK1 variants
Several of the known VRK1 variants have an altered protein stability [39]. Therefore, the protein stability of these two novel variants, L200P and R387H in a compound heterozygous patient, was determined in cells transfected with plasmids expressing each tagged variant, and preincubated with cycloheximide to block de novo translation. The R387H variant was the most stable. The L200P mutant stability was slightly lower than that of the VRK1 wild type (Fig. S1). The kinase-dead VRK1-K179E was used as unstable control (Fig. S1).
Differential phosphorylation of BAF by L200P, R387H, and other VRK1 pathogenic variants
BAF (barrier autointegration factor) is a nuclear protein that facilitates the attachment of chromosomes to the nuclear envelope, and its mutations are associated with progeria [40, 41] and motor neuron diseases [42]. This interaction is regulated by the phosphorylation of BAF by VRK1 [24,25,26, 43], which causes the detachment of chromosomes from the nuclear envelope and facilitates replication and mitosis, an effect that was initially detected in Caenorhabditis elegans [44]. We tested the effect of the two new human L200P and R387H variants, as well as several additional VRK1 pathogenic variants on the phosphorylation of BAF (Fig. 2). L200P and other variants with loss of kinase activity did not phosphorylate BAF, such as P79L, which is close to L200P, H119R, R133C, G135R, Y213H, V236M, W254L, T256I, G257S, D263G, D267G, R321C, and R358X (Fig. 2). However, several VRK1 variants that were kinase active phosphorylated BAF such as R89Q, L195V, R219I, T228M, W375X, and R387H (Fig. 2).
Effect of VRK1 variants on the phosphorylation of BAF. BAF was used as substrate of different VRK1 variants spanning the length of the VRK1 protein and belonging to one of the three clusters of pathogenic VRK1 variants associated with motor neuron diseases. VRK1 autophosphorylation was used as an indicator of its kinase activity. The clusters are indicated by different colors. Red, cluster 1 (next to ATP binding site). Green, cluster 2 (next to kinase catalytic site). Purple, cluster 3 (distal C-terminal low complexity end). The K179E is a kinase-dead protein as negative control
L200P and R387H VRK1 variants differ on the phosphorylation of nuclear substrates
The L200P and R387H variants are located in two different regions of the VRK1 protein. The L200P variant is located within the mutation cluster 2 after the kinase catalytic site, and the R387H variant is located in the low complexity C-terminal region (cluster 3) that interacts with histones and nucleosomes [38]. These different localizations in the protein sequence might have functional consequences regarding its phosphorylation substrates and interacting proteins [33].
Initially, it was determined the effect of the L200P and R358H variants on the phosphorylation of known VRK1 substrates by performing in vitro kinase assays. For these assays, we used as substrates proteins involved in the regulation of different aspects of DNA or RNA biology in nuclei. Therefore, we tested the phosphorylation of histones H3 (Fig. 3A) and H2AX (Fig. 3B), p53 (Fig. 3C), and 53BP1 (Fig. 3D). These proteins are associated with chromatin and DNA damage responses. We also tested the phosphorylation of coilin, a Cajal body protein associated with processes involved in nuclear RNA processing [45]. The L200P variant, located in cluster 2 (next to catalytic site), did not phosphorylate any of these substrates, consequence of the impairment of its kinase activity. In the case of the R387H variant, only H2AX phosphorylation was impaired (Fig. 3B), but the phosphorylation of other substrates, H3, p53, 53BP1, and coilin, was not altered (Fig. 3A–E). This differential effect was also detected in the autophosphorylation of VRK1 that was lost in the L200P variant, but not in the R387H variant. Therefore, these two new VRK1 variants, L200P and R387H, behave differently regarding their kinase activity and substrate specificity (Fig. 3). A similar effect of the variants on the autophosphorylation of VRK1 was detected in radioactive kinase assays (Fig. 3A–E).
Kinase assays of L200P and R387H VRK1 pathogenic variants on known phosphorylation substrates of VRK1. As controls, wild-type VRK1 and kinase-dead VRK1-K179E were used. A Histone H3 phosphorylation. B Histone H2AX phosphorylation. C P53 phosphorylation is Thr18. D 53BP1 phosphorylation. E Coilin phosphorylation. In the radioactive kinase assays, the autophosphorylation kinase activity of the variants was also determined. Green, cluster 2 (next to kinase catalytic site). Purple, cluster 3. The K179E is a kinase-dead protein as negative control
Next, we determined the effect of several additional VRK1 protein variants, which were not previously studied, and includes P79L, Y213H, R219I, T228M, R241C, W254L, T256I, G257S, D263G, D267G, W375X (W375*), and R387H, on these substrates in in vitro kinase assays (Fig. 4). The W375* chinese variant, with a termination codon near its C-terminus, was detected in two unrelated patients, one was compound heterozygous with the R387H variant [46], and the other was homozygous [4]. This W375* variant phosphorylates histone H3, p53, and 53BP1, but not histone H2AX nor coilin (Fig. 4). The R219I, T228M, R241C, W254L, T256I, G257S, D263G, D267G, and W375* were modeled as previously described for other VRK1 variants [9, 39].
In vitro kinase assays of P97L, Y213H, R219I, T228M, R241C, W254L, T256I, G257S, D263G, D267G, W375X, and R387H. VRK1 pathogenic variants with different known substrates of the wild-type VRK1. As controls, wild-type VRK1 and kinase-dead VRK1-K179E were used. A Histone H3 phosphorylation. B Histone H2AX phosphorylation. C P53 phosphorylation is Thr18. D 53BP1 phosphorylation. E Coilin phosphorylation. Red, cluster 1. Green, cluster 2. Purple, cluster 3. The K179E is a kinase-dead protein as negative control
VRK1 L200P and R387H variants differently alter H4K16 acetylation in response to DNA damage
The regulation of histone epigenetic modifications is a major role of VRK1 on chromatin [27, 30]. To study the functional consequences of the two new VRK1 variants, these L200P and R387H variants were introduced in the murine VRK1 (mVRK1) to generate stable cell lines expressing them. In these cell lines, the endogenous human VRK1 was depleted, and the role of the two new variants in the response to DNA damage was determined to test if the variants were able to rescue the loss of functions caused by VRK1 depletion. Doxorubicin treatment induces an accumulation of H4K16 acetylation, which is dependent on VRK1 activity [27, 30]. This H4K16 acetylation was impaired in the cell lines expressing the L200P variant, indicating that this variant was not able to rescue the effect caused by the depletion of the endogenous VRK1 (Fig. 5), and behaves as the kinase-dead K179E used as control, in which histone H4 acetylation was impaired (Fig. 5). However, the catalytically active R387H variant was able to rescue the acetylation of H4K16 in response to DNA damage caused by doxorubicin treatment (Fig. 5).
Effect of VRK1 L200P and R387H variants on the acetylation of histone H4 in K16. Immunofluorescence of H4K16 acetylation in stable A549 cell line expressing the indicated murine mutant proteins in which the endogenous human VRK1 was depleted by siRNAs and treated with doxorubicin as indicated. At the bottom, the quantitation of eighty cells is shown. The bar represents 20 µm. WT, wild type; SiCtrl, siControl; siV-02, si-VIK1-02; siV-03, si-VIK1-03; Doxo, doxorubicin
Effect of VRK1 pathogenic variants in different regions of the protein on histone H4K16 acetylation
Because the L200P variant impairs histone H4K16ac induced by DNA damage, we tested whether other known VRK1 variants associated with several motor neuron diseases, and not characterized in this context, have a similar effect. This epigenetic modification is critical for the dynamic remodeling of chromatin, and is required for correct DNA damage responses. Several variants are known to impair DNA damage responses detected by their effect on γH2AX [20, 47] and 53BP1 foci formation [7, 9, 39]. VRK1 specifically phosphorylates Tip60 in The158 and Ser199 facilitating both its acetyltransferase activity and translocation to chromatin [27, 30]. Therefore, we tested several VRK1 pathogenic variants belonging to the three different clusters within the VRK1 protein sequence. The following VRK1 variants P79L, R89Q, H119R, R133C, G135R, L195V, Y213H, R219I, T228M, V236M, R241C, W254L, S256I, D263G, G257S, D267G, and R321C were introduced in the murine VRK1 (mVRK1) and tested whether mVRK1 variant proteins were able to rescue the response to doxorubicin in human VRK1-depleted cells. Most VRK1 variants did not rescue H4K16 acetylation induced by doxorubicin, which were detected in immunoblots (Fig. 6). Only two of them, D267G and R321C, were able to rescue the H4K16ac induced in the response to doxorubicin (Fig. 6, bottom panel).
Effect of the VRK1 mutants located in different regions of the VRK1 protein on histone H4K16 acetylation in the response to doxorubicin treatment. Stable A549 cell lines expressing the indicated murine mutant proteins in which the endogenous human VRK1 depleted by siRNAs were used and treated with doxorubicin as indicated. SiCtrl, Si-control; si-V02, si-VRK1-02; si-V03, si-VRK1-02; Doxo, doxorubicin. Red, cluster 1 (next to ATP binding site). Green, cluster 2 (next to kinase catalytic site). Purple, cluster 3 (distal C-terminal low complexity end). The K179E is a kinase-dead protein used as negative control. Immunofluorescence field images are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2, and quantification is in Supplementary Fig. S3
Effect of VRK1 L200P and R387H on 53BP1 foci in response to doxorubicin
A consequence of alterations of H4K16 acetylation will be the impairment of the DNA damage response (DDR), which can be detected by the formation of 53BP1 foci. This has already been shown to be the case for several of the VRK1 variants studied [9, 39, 48]. The formation of 53BP1 foci in response to doxorubicin is regulated by VRK1, by directly phosphorylating 53BP1 in Ser 25/29 [19]. Therefore, the effect of the L200P and R387H variants on the formation of 53BP1 foci induced in response to doxorubicin treatment was determined. The murine VRK1-L200P variant was not able to rescue 53BP1 foci induced by doxorubicin when the endogenous human VRK1 was depleted (Figs. 7 and S4). However, the R387H variant rescued the formation of 53BP1 foci in response to doxorubicin (Figs. 7 and S4).
Effect of the L200P and R387H VRK1 variants on the formation of 53BP1 foci in response to doxorubicin treatment. Endogenous human wild-type VRK1 was depleted in cell expression of the murine VRK1 containing the indicated variant. The top panel shows the fluorescence image. Field images are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4. At the bottom, the immunoblots to detected levels of depleted human VRK1 and expressed murine VRK1 variant are shown. ***, p < 0.001
Discussion
Bi-allelic VRK1 variants, either homozygous or compound heterozygous, are responsible for a heterogenous group of neurological diseases affecting motor neurons and the peripheral nerves, indicating that the alteration of both alleles is required. This heterogeneity might reflect different, but related functional effects of the variants. In compound heterozygous unrelated patients, all VRK1 variant combinations are unique and different [33, 49].
The P79 and the L200 residues are located very proximal in the VRK1 protein 3D structure, near the ATP binding site, and pathogenic variants in each residue have been individually detected in different patients [50]. The effect of the L200P variant on substrate phosphorylation is similar to that of the P79L variant. These two residues are located very close in the protein structure to the kinase domain, and the variants in either position can impair the kinase VRK1 activity or substrate specificity.
This R387H variant has been detected in patients from three countries, China [46], Israel [36], and Spain [35]. The structural effect of the R387H variant, located in the distal C-terminus of VRK1, is the disruption of the arginine-rich motif and its folding, in a positively charged region that is required for its interaction with both DNA and nucleosomes [38] as well as other nuclear proteins [33]. The R387H variant is able to phosphorylate some proteins such as histone H3, 53BP1, and p53, but H2AX phosphorylation was impaired, which is an early participant in DNA damage responses [51,52,53].
Patients with variants located in the kinase domain, either near the ATP binding site or catalytic site, do not have neurological pathology in heterozygosis, but have a very severe neurological disease when they are either homozygous, or compound heterozygous. In homozygosis, the neurological diseases start earlier in childhood and in some is prenatal. Both the R387H and W375X (W375*) variants are located in the low complexity C-terminal region, near the end of the protein, and are associated with neurological manifestations of dHMN in middle age patients. In these variants, the VRK1 C-terminal region, required for its interaction with nucleosomes [38], is likely to alter the histone posttranslational epigenetic patterns [14], as well as interactions with other nuclear proteins [33], which are likely to be affected, but have not been studied.
A consequence of VRK1 pathogenic variants in motor neurons is the impairment of their action potential that are smaller in amplitude, larger in duration, and show a more depolarized threshold [54]. These defects in motor neurons, clinically manifested by neurological symptoms, eventually, are the results of the pathogenic roles of the different variant combinations, among them, the effects that VRK1 variants have on the altered assembly and stability of Cajal bodies, which can play a major pathogenic role [3, 7, 9, 23, 37, 39]. Cajal bodies are involved in the correct assembly of ribonucleoprotein complexes, which are exported to cytoplasm, and migrate along neuronal axons to reach synapses [55,56,57]. If these RNP complexes are defective in an unknown way, it is likely that they may fail during their axonal transport; the longer the axon, the more likely their failure [58]. This is consistent with the initial manifestation of the neurological syndromes in distal parts of the body in patients with pathogenic VRK1 variants. Chromatin alterations can also be a consequence of modifications in the pattern of its epigenetic modifications [32]. The alteration of chromatin relaxation as a consequence of pathogenic VRK1 variants, which impairs histone H4K16 acetylation, can alter not only DNA damage responses, but also the differentiation of neurons during development. These two processes are independent of cell proliferation and can have a pathogenic role in motor neuron diseases. In this context, VRK1 depletion or VRK1 pathogenic variants alter the modification of histone H3 in K9 and K27, by reducing acetylation and increasing methylation. H3K27 methylation is associated with differentiation of spinal motor neurons [59]. The Tudor domain of SMN interacts with methylated histone H3K79 [57]. H3K79 methylation requires the previous acetylation of H4K16 [60], which is also impaired by VRK1 depletion [27, 30].
A subgroup of related and heterogeneous motor neuron diseases is associated with rare homozygous or compound heterozygous VRK1 variants. Patients with the two VRK1 pathogenic variants located in clusters I and II have an early presentation in infancy. Patients with at least one of the variants located in cluster III present a slower disease progression and reach middle age, as is the case in this report and in the W375X (W375*) variant identified in the Chinese population [4, 6]. The R358X (R358*) variant is the only exception; this variant is frequently detected in homozygosis, and generates a truncated protein that is unstable [61], and located in the cytoplasm due to the loss of the nuclear localization signal [39].
The characterization of two new rare VRK1 variants shows that they can also present functional differences regarding their biological effects. Thus, it is likely that different VRK1 protein variant combinations in individual patients will lead to the heterogeneity observed in neurological phenotypes, which are associated with different MND diseases, and other distal neuropathies with neurological manifestations due to different rare VRK1 variant combinations, which individually have differences in substrate phosphorylation and protein interactions.
Materials and methods
Clinical case of new VRK1 heterozygous variants
Two novel variants in the human VRK1 gene were detected in a juvenile-onset motor neuropathy with pyramidal tract signs in a 49-year-old woman [35]. The patient is compound heterozygous for the two following missense variants in the VRK1 gene (NM_003384.2: c.599 T > C (p.Leu200Pro) (L200P), and c.1160G > A (p.Arg387His/R387H)) [35]. The NM_003384.2:c.1160G > A (p.Arg387His) variant was also reported in dHMN patients from Israel [36] and China [46].
Structure modeling of human VRK1 missense variants
The three-dimensional (3D) structure of the human VRK1 wild-type protein (Uniprot id: Q99986) was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB id: 2LAV) [34]. Conformer no. 16 (of the 20 NMR conformers included in the PDB file) was selected for further processing. Models for VRK1 variants P79L, L200P were generated using the wild-type structure as template. The initial positions of the side chain of the mutated residues were located using the Pymol Molecular Graphics System (https://pymol.org/; Schrödinger, LLC, Portland, OR) as previously reported [7, 9].
Molecular dynamics simulation
Structures for wild-type and variant proteins were subjected to 100 ns of unrestrained molecular dynamics (MD) simulation using the AMBER18 molecular dynamics package (http://ambermd.org/; University of California-San Francisco, CA), essentially as previously described [62]. In brief, 3D models were first solvated with a periodic octahedral pre-equilibrated solvent box using the LEaP module of AMBER, with 12 Å as the shortest distance between any atom in the protein subdomain and the periodic box boundaries. Free MD simulation was performed using the PMEMD program of AMBER18 and the ff14SB force field (http://ambermd.org/), applying the SHAKE algorithm, a time step of 2 femtoseconds (fs), and a non-bonded cut-off of 12 Å. Systems were initially relaxed over 10,000 steps of energy minimization, using 1000 steps of steepest descent minimization followed by 9000 steps of conjugate-gradient minimization. Simulations were then started with a 20 picoseconds (ps) heating phase, raising the temperature from 0 to 300 K in 10 temperature change steps, after each of which velocities were reassigned. During minimization and heating, the Cα trace dihedrals were restrained with a force constant of 500 kcal mol−1 rad−2 and gradually released in an equilibration phase in which the force constant was progressively reduced to 0 over 200 ps. After the equilibration phase, 100 ns of unrestricted MD simulation was obtained for the structures. MD trajectories were analyzed using VMD (Visual Molecular Dynamics) software [63]. Figures were generated using the Pymol Molecular Graphics System (https://pymol.org/. Schrödinger, LLC, Portland, OR).
Mutagenesis to generate the L200P and R387H VRK1 variants
The amino acid substitutions were introduced in both the human and murine VRK1 cDNA clones using as substrates the following plasmids: pGEX-4 T-VRK1 for bacterial expression and protein purification plasmid [39, 64,65,66]; plasmid pCEFL-HA-VRK1 [7, 39] and murine plasmid pLenti-C-HA-IRES-BSD-mVRK1 [9]for expression in human cells and rescue experiments. Reaction conditions were previously published [7, 9]. The following primers were used for introducing the amino acid changes: human and murine L200P variant (forward: 5′-TATGGCCCTGCTTATCGGTAC-3′; reverse: 5′-GTACCGATAAGCAGGGCCATA-3′); human R387H variant (forward: 5′-GGAGGCCATACAGACCCACTCAAGAACCAG-3′; reverse: 5′-CTTTCTGGTTCTTGAGTGGGTCTGTATGGC-3′); murine R387H variant (forward: 5′-GGCCGCACAGACCCATTCACGAAC-5′; reverse: 5′-CTGGTTCGTGAATGGGTCTGTGCG-3′); human W375X variant (forward: 5′-GGAACCTGGTGTTGAAGATACGGAATGATCAAACACACAGACAGAGG-3′; reverse: 5′-CCTCTGTCTGTGTGTTTGATCATTCCGTATCTTCAACACCAGGTTCC-3′).
VRK1 kinase assays
The in vitro kinase assays were performed with [32- P]-γATP as previously described [65, 67] or alternatively with the use of specific antibodies to detect the phosphorylation of the substrates as previously reported. For these assays, either GST-VRK1 wild-type and mutants were used [23, 65, 68]. In vitro kinase assays with [32- P]-γATP were performed with GST-VRK1 wild-type and variants [23, 65, 68]. Assays with the following substrates were previously published: p53 [69, 70], histone H3 [20, 66], 53BP1 [19], γH2AX [20], and GST-coilin [23] in the kinase reaction buffer for radioactive assays that was composed of (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT, and 150 mM KCl), 5 µM ATP and 5 µCi (0.1 µM) radiolabelled [ɣ-32P]ATP, and the indicated substrates in a final volume of 40 µl [7, 9].
Cell lines, culture, and lentiviral infection
The following validated cell lines were used in this work: A549 (CCL-185) and HEK-293 T (CRL-3216) from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Cells were grown in DMEM (Gibco-Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM de l-glutamine (Gibco-Life Technologies), penicillin (50 u/ml), and streptomycin (50 μg/ml) (Pen/Strep; Gibco-Life Technologies). In the indicated experiments, serum starvation (DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 1% Pen/Strep) was performed for 48 h.
For the stability assays, HEK-293 T cells were transfected with the corresponding plasmid (pCELF-VRK1-HA wild type or mutated or empty vector) diluted in polyethylenimine (PEI; Polysciences; Warrington, PA, USA) reagent. Forty-eight hours later, 50 ug/ml cycloheximide was added to inhibit protein synthesis. Cells were harvested at the indicated times from cycloheximide addition. Cell extracts were prepared by using a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with protease inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, and 10 μg/ml leupeptin) and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM NaF).
For the study of DNA Damage Response, A549 cell lines expressing murine VRK1 wild type or mutated (kinase-dead K179E, L200P, and R387H) were generated by lentiviral infection. Cells were infected with lentiviral particles containing the vector pLentiC-HA-IRES-BSD (OriGene Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA) expressing murine VRK1 wild type or mutated. Cells were selected with blasticidine (InvivoGen) and cloned by single-cell isolation.
Immunoprecipitations and immunoblots
Immunoprecipitations were performed using 0.5 to 2 mg of cell lysates in a final volume of 1 ml. Lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibody according to manufacturer recommendations (1:50–1:500). As negative control, a non-specific antibody was used. Lysates were next incubated with Gammabind plus Sepharose (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with lysis buffer overnight at 4 °C with rotation. The beads were washed by centrifugation at 400 g for 2 min in lysis buffer, and finally the beads were resuspended in loading buffer and fractionated in SDS-PAGE gels.
Proteins were separated in SDS-PAGE gels in running buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM glycine, 1.7 mM SDS), and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-FL, Millipore) in buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 19.2 mM glycine, 15% methanol) as previously described [21, 23, 68, 71]. The primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The secondary antibodies were incubated for an hour, and the fluorescence was detected with LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were grown in dishes containing coverslips and fixed with 1–3% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at room temperature followed by treatment with 20 mM glycine for 15 min to remove the excess of aldehyde groups. Cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS 1 × for 30 min, and finally blocked with 1% BSA, and sodium azide in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, or overnight at 4 °C. Next, cells were incubated with the primary antibody at the indicated dilution overnight at 4 °C with 1% BSA and sodium azide in PBS, followed by three washes in PBS. Next coverslips were incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Cells were incubated with antibodies in darkness to protect the fluorophores. Cells were washed three times in PBS and nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-fenilindol) in PBS for 15 min. Coverslips were mounted with MOWIOL-4–88 (Calbiochem). Immunofluorescence was detected with a Leica TCS SP5 or SP8 (Leica Microsystems) microscope and images captured with a Leica DC100 (Leica Microsystems) digital camera. Image analysis was performed using software from LAS AF Lite (Leica Microsystems) and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health).
Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, two software packages were used, the IBM SPSS Statistics 23 and GraphPad Prism 8. The following tests were used to compare two groups: ANOVA when the sample has a normal distribution according to the two-tailed Kolmogorov test; and the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test when the sample is not a normal distribution. Dates are presented as dot plots. In all cases, the level of significance was 0.05 (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.002; and ***, p < 0.001) [72].
Reagents
Recombinant human histones H3 and H2AX (Millipore, Merck), cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich). All other chemicals were from Sigma-Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Tissue culture media and reagents were from Gibco-Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).
Data availability
All data are presented in the manuscript. All material is freely available. No datasets were generated in this report.
Abbreviations
- VRK1:
-
Vaccinia-Related Kinase 1
- BAF:
-
Barrier to Autointegration Factor 1
- 53BP1:
-
TP53-Binding Protein 1.
References
Achsel T, Barabino S, Cozzolino M, Carri MT (2013) The intriguing case of motor neuron disease: ALS and SMA come closer. Biochem Soc Trans 41:1593–1597. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20130142
Rossor AM, Polke JM, Houlden H, Reilly MM (2013) Clinical implications of genetic advances in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Nat Rev Neurol 9:562–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2013.179
El-Bazzal L, Rihan K, Bernard-Marissal N, Castro C, Chouery-Khoury E, Desvignes JP, Atkinson A, Bertaux K, Koussa S, Levy N et al (2019) Loss of Cajal bodies in motor neurons from patients with novel mutations in VRK1. Hum Mol Genet 28:2378–2394. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz060
Feng SY, Li LY, Feng SM, Zou ZY (2019) A novel VRK1 mutation associated with recessive distal hereditary motor neuropathy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 6:401–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.701
Gonzaga-Jauregui C, Lotze T, Jamal L, Penney S, Campbell IM, Pehlivan D, Hunter JV, Woodbury SL, Raymond G, Adesina AM et al (2013) Mutations in VRK1 associated with complex motor and sensory axonal neuropathy plus microcephaly. JAMA Neurol 70:1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4598
Li N, Wang L, Sun X, Lu Z, Suo X, Li J, Peng J, Peng R (2019) A novel mutation in VRK1 associated with distal spinal muscular atrophy. J Hum Genet 64:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-018-0553-5
Marcos AT, Martin-Doncel E, Morejon-Garcia P, Marcos-Alcalde I, Gomez-Puertas P, Segura-Puimedon M, Armengol L, Navarro-Pando JM, Lazo PA (2020) VRK1 (Y213H) homozygous mutant impairs Cajal bodies in a hereditary case of distal motor neuropathy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 7:808–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51050
Sung A, Moretti P, Shaibani A (2021) Adult-onset spinal muscular atrophy due to mutations in the VRK1 gene. Neurol Genet 7:e599. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000000599
Morejon-Garcia P, Keren B, Marcos-Alcalde I, Gomez-Puertas P, Mochel F, Lazo PA (2021) Dysfunctional homozygous VRK1-D263G variant impairs the assembly of Cajal bodies and DNA damage response in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neurol Genet 7:e624. https://doi.org/10.1212/nxg.0000000000000624
Kernochan LE, Russo ML, Woodling NS, Huynh TN, Avila AM, Fischbeck KH, Sumner CJ (2005) The role of histone acetylation in SMN gene expression. Hum Mol Genet 14:1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi130
Lunke S, El-Osta A (2009) The emerging role of epigenetic modifications and chromatin remodeling in spinal muscular atrophy. J Neurochem 109:1557–1569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06084.x
Bennett SA, Tanaz R, Cobos SN, Torrente MP (2019) Epigenetics in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a role for histone post-translational modifications in neurodegenerative disease. Transl Res 204:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2018.10.002
Jimenez-Pacheco A, Franco JM, Lopez S, Gomez-Zumaquero JM, Magdalena Leal-Lasarte M, Caballero-Hernandez DE, Cejudo-Guillén M, Pozo D (2017) Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 978:255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53889-1_14
Monte-Serrano E, Lazo PA (2023) VRK1 kinase activity modulating histone H4K16 acetylation inhibited by SIRT2 and VRK-IN-1. Int J Mol Sci 24:4912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054912
Monte-Serrano E, Morejón-García P, Campillo-Marcos I, Campos-Díaz A, Navarro-Carrasco E, Lazo PA (2023) The pattern of histone H3 epigenetic posttranslational modifications is regulated by the VRK1 chromatin kinase. Epigenetics Chromatin 16:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-023-00494-7
Valbuena A, López-Sánchez I, Lazo PA (2008) Human VRK1 is an early response gene and its loss causes a block in cell cycle progression. PLoS ONE 3:e1642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001642
Kang TH, Park DY, Kim W, Kim KT (2008) VRK1 phosphorylates CREB and mediates CCND1 expression. J Cell Sci 121:3035–3041. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.026757
Valbuena A, Castro-Obregon S, Lazo PA (2011) Downregulation of VRK1 by p53 in response to DNA damage is mediated by the autophagic pathway. PLoS ONE 6:e17320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017320
Sanz-Garcia M, Monsalve DM, Sevilla A, Lazo PA (2012) Vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) is an upstream nucleosomal kinase required for the assembly of 53BP1 foci in response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. J Biol Chem 287:23757–23768. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.353102
Salzano M, Sanz-Garcia M, Monsalve DM, Moura DS, Lazo PA (2015) VRK1 chromatin kinase phosphorylates H2AX and is required for foci formation induced by DNA damage. Epigenetics 10:373–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2015.1028708
Monsalve DM, Campillo-Marcos I, Salzano M, Sanz-Garcia M, Cantarero L, Lazo PA (2016) VRK1 phosphorylates and protects NBS1 from ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation in response to DNA damage. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1863:760–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.02.005
Campillo-Marcos I, Lazo PA (2018) Implication of the VRK1 chromatin kinase in the signaling responses to DNA damage: a therapeutic target? Cell Mol Life Sci 75:2375–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2811-2
Cantarero L, Sanz-Garcia M, Vinograd-Byk H, Renbaum P, Levy-Lahad E, Lazo PA (2015) VRK1 regulates Cajal body dynamics and protects coilin from proteasomal degradation in cell cycle. Sci Rep 5:10543. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10543
Unnikannan CP, Reuveny A, Grunberg D, Volk T (2020) Recruitment of BAF to the nuclear envelope couples the LINC complex to endoreplication. Development 147. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.191304
Marcelot A, Petitalot A, Ropars V, Le Du MH, Samson C, Dubois S, Hoffmann G, Miron S, Cuniasse P, Marquez JA et al (2021) Di-phosphorylated BAF shows altered structural dynamics and binding to DNA, but interacts with its nuclear envelope partners. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab184
Marcelot A, Zinn-Justin S, Cuniasse P (2023) The conformation of the intrinsically disordered N-terminal region of barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) is regulated by pH and phosphorylation. J Mol Biol 435:167888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167888
Garcia-Gonzalez R, Morejon-Garcia P, Campillo-Marcos I, Salzano M, Lazo PA (2020) VRK1 phosphorylates Tip60/KAT5 and is required for H4K16 acetylation in response to DNA damage. Cancers (Basel) 12:2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102986
Peng L, Ling H, Yuan Z, Fang B, Bloom G, Fukasawa K, Koomen J, Chen J, Lane WS, Seto E (2012) SIRT1 negatively regulates the activities, functions, and protein levels of hMOF and TIP60. Mol Cell Biol 32:2823–2836. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00496-12
Renaud E, Barascu A, Rosselli F (2016) Impaired TIP60-mediated H4K16 acetylation accounts for the aberrant chromatin accumulation of 53BP1 and RAP80 in Fanconi anemia pathway-deficient cells. Nucleic Acids Res 44:648–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1019
García-González R, Monte-Serrano E, Morejón-García P, Navarro-Carrasco E, Lazo PA (2022) The VRK1 chromatin kinase regulates the acetyltransferase activity of Tip60/KAT5 by sequential phosphorylations in response to DNA damage. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1865:194887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2022.194887
Sharma GG, So S, Gupta A, Kumar R, Cayrou C, Avvakumov N, Bhadra U, Pandita RK, Porteus MH, Chen DJ et al (2010) MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 30:3582–3595. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01476-09
Navarro-Carrasco E, Campos-Díaz A, Monte-Serrano E, Rolfs F, de Goeij-de HR, Pham TV, Piersma SR, Jiménez CR, Lazo PA (2024) Loss of VRK1 alters the nuclear phosphoproteome in the DNA damage response to doxorubicin. Chem Biol Interact 391:110908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2024.110908
Lazo PA, Morejón-García P (2023) VRK1 variants at the cross road of Cajal body neuropathogenic mechanisms in distal neuropathies and motor neuron diseases. Neurobiol Dis 183:106172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106172
Shin J, Chakraborty G, Bharatham N, Kang C, Tochio N, Koshiba S, Kigawa T, Kim W, Kim KT, Yoon HS (2011) NMR solution structure of human vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) reveals the C-terminal tail essential for its structural stability and autocatalytic activity. J Biol Chem 286:22131–22138. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.200162
Frasquet M, Rojas-García R, Argente-Escrig H, Vázquez-Costa JF, Muelas N, Vílchez JJ, Sivera R, Millet E, Barreiro M, Díaz-Manera J et al (2021) Distal hereditary motor neuropathies: mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation. Eur J Neurol 28:1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14700
Greenbaum L, Barel O, Nikitin V, Hersalis-Eldar A, Kol N, Reznik-Wolf H, Dominissini D, Pras E, Dori A (2020) Identification of a homozygous VRK1 mutation in two patients with adult-onset distal hereditary motor neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 61:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26779
Sanz-Garcia M, Vazquez-Cedeira M, Kellerman E, Renbaum P, Levy-Lahad E, Lazo PA (2011) Substrate profiling of human vaccinia-related kinases identifies coilin, a Cajal body nuclear protein, as a phosphorylation target with neurological implications. J Proteomics 75:548–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.08.019
Budziszewski GR, Zhao Y, Spangler CJ, Kedziora KM, Williams MR, Azzam DN, Skrajna A, Koyama Y, Cesmat AP, Simmons HC et al (2022) Multivalent DNA and nucleosome acidic patch interactions specify VRK1 mitotic localization and activity. Nucleic Acids Res 50:4355–4371. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac198
Martin-Doncel E, Rojas AM, Cantarero L, Lazo PA (2019) VRK1 functional insufficiency due to alterations in protein stability or kinase activity of human VRK1 pathogenic variants implicated in neuromotor syndromes. Sci Rep 9:13381. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49821-7
Puente XS, Quesada V, Osorio FG, Cabanillas R, Cadinanos J, Fraile JM, Ordonez GR, Puente DA, Gutierrez-Fernandez A, Fanjul-Fernandez M et al (2011) Exome sequencing and functional analysis identifies BANF1 mutation as the cause of a hereditary progeroid syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 88:650–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.010
Janssen A, Marcelot A, Breusegem S, Legrand P, Zinn-Justin S, Larrieu D (2022) The BAF A12T mutation disrupts lamin A/C interaction, impairing robust repair of nuclear envelope ruptures in Nestor-Guillermo progeria syndrome cells. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac726
Marcelot A, Rodriguez-Tirado F, Cuniasse P, Joiner ML, Miron S, Soshnev AA, Fang M, Pufall MA, Mathews KD, Moore SA et al (2023) A de novo sequence variant in barrier-to-autointegration factor is associated with dominant motor neuronopathy. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12060847
Suzuki Y, Ogawa K, Koyanagi Y (2010) Functional disruption of the moloney murine leukemia virus preintegration complex by vaccinia-related kinases. J Biol Chem 285:24032–24043. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.116640
Gorjanacz M, Klerkx EP, Galy V, Santarella R, Lopez-Iglesias C, Askjaer P, Mattaj IW (2008) Caenorhabditis elegans BAF-1 and its kinase VRK-1 participate directly in post-mitotic nuclear envelope assembly. Embo J 26:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601470
Broome HJ, Carrero ZI, Douglas HE, Hebert MD (2013) Phosphorylation regulates coilin activity and RNA association. Biol Open 2:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20133863
Liu X, Duan X, Zhang Y, Sun A, Fan D (2020) Molecular analysis and clinical diversity of distal hereditary motor neuropathy. Eur J Neurol 27:1319–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14260
Navarro-Carrasco E, Lazo PA (2021) VRK1 depletion facilitates the synthetic lethality of temozolomide and olaparib in glioblastoma cells. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:683038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.683038
Vinograd-Byk H, Sapir T, Cantarero L, Lazo PA, Zeligson S, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T, Renbaum P, Reiner O, Levy-Lahad E (2015) The spinal muscular atrophy with pontocerebellar hypoplasia gene VRK1 regulates neuronal migration through an amyloid-beta precursor protein-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci 35:936–942. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1998-14.2015
Demaegd K, Brilstra EH, Hoogendijk JE, de Bie CI, de Pagter MS, van Hecke W, Mühlebner A, van Es MA, Milone M, van Rheenen W (2022) Distal spinal muscular atrophy featured by predominant calf muscle involvement in VRK1 associated disease - case series and review. Neuromuscul Disord 32:527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2022.04.007
Shaheen R, Maddirevula S, Ewida N, Alsahli S, Abdel-Salam GMH, Zaki MS, Tala SA, Alhashem A, Softah A, Al-Owain M et al (2019) Genomic and phenotypic delineation of congenital microcephaly. Genet Med 21:545–552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0140-3
Fernandez-Capetillo O, Lee A, Nussenzweig M, Nussenzweig A (2004) H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. DNA Repair (Amst) 3:959–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.024
Thiriet C, Hayes JJ (2005) Chromatin in need of a fix: phosphorylation of H2AX connects chromatin to DNA repair. Mol Cell 18:617–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.008
Srivastava N, Gochhait S, de Boer P, Bamezai RN (2009) Role of H2AX in DNA damage response and human cancers. Mutat Res 681:180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.08.003
Bos R, Rihan K, Quintana P, El-Bazzal L, Bernard-Marissal N, Da Silva N, Jabbour R, Mégarbané A, Bartoli M, Brocard F, Delague V (2022) Altered action potential waveform and shorter axonal initial segment in hiPSC-derived motor neurons with mutations in VRK1. Neurobiol Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105609
Tapia O, Bengoechea R, Palanca A, Arteaga R, Val-Bernal JF, Tizzano EF, Berciano MT, Lafarga M (2012) Reorganization of Cajal bodies and nucleolar targeting of coilin in motor neurons of type I spinal muscular atrophy. Histochem Cell Biol 137:657–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-012-0921-8
Tapia O, Narcís JO, Riancho J, Tarabal O, Piedrafita L, Calderó J, Berciano MT, Lafarga M (2017) Cellular bases of the RNA metabolism dysfunction in motor neurons of a murine model of spinal muscular atrophy: role of Cajal bodies and the nucleolus. Neurobiol Dis 108:83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2017.08.004
Sabra M, Texier P, El Maalouf J, Lomonte P (2013) The Tudor protein survival motor neuron (SMN) is a chromatin-binding protein that interacts with methylated lysine 79 of histone H3. J Cell Sci 126:3664–3677. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.126003
Tucker KE, Berciano MT, Jacobs EY, LePage DF, Shpargel KB, Rossire JJ, Chan EK, Lafarga M, Conlon RA, Matera AG (2001) Residual Cajal bodies in coilin knockout mice fail to recruit Sm snRNPs and SMN, the spinal muscular atrophy gene product. J Cell Biol 154:293–307. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200104083
Thornton SR, Butty VL, Levine SS, Boyer LA (2014) Polycomb repressive complex 2 regulates lineage fidelity during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS ONE 9:e110498. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110498
Valencia-Sánchez MI, De Ioannes P, Wang M, Truong DM, Lee R, Armache JP, Boeke JD, Armache KJ (2021) Regulation of the Dot1 histone H3K79 methyltransferase by histone H4K16 acetylation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc6663
Renbaum P, Kellerman E, Jaron R, Geiger D, Segel R, Lee M, King MC, Levy-Lahad E (2009) Spinal muscular atrophy with pontocerebellar hypoplasia is caused by a mutation in the VRK1 gene. Am J Hum Genet 85:281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.07.006
Marcos-Alcalde I, Mendieta-Moreno JI, Puisac B, Gil-Rodriguez MC, Hernandez-Marcos M, Soler-Polo D, Ramos FJ, Ortega J, Pie J, Mendieta J, Gomez-Puertas P (2017) Two-step ATP-driven opening of cohesin head. Sci Rep 7:3266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03118-9
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(33–38):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Lopez-Borges S, Lazo PA (2000) The human vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) phosphorylates threonine-18 within the mdm-2 binding site of the p53 tumour suppressor protein. Oncogene 19:3656–3664. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203709
Vazquez-Cedeira M, Barcia-Sanjurjo I, Sanz-Garcia M, Barcia R, Lazo PA (2011) Differential inhibitor sensitivity between human kinases VRK1 and VRK2. PLoS ONE 6:e23235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023235
Moura DS, Campillo-Marcos I, Vazquez-Cedeira M, Lazo PA (2018) VRK1 and AURKB form a complex that cross inhibit their kinase activity and the phosphorylation of histone H3 in the progression of mitosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 76:2591–2611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2746-7
Barcia-Sanjurjo I, Vazquez-Cedeira M, Barcia R, Lazo PA (2013) Sensitivity of the kinase activity of human vaccinia-related kinase proteins to toxic metals. J Biol Inorg Chem 18:473–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-013-0992-6
Moura DS, Fernandez IF, Marin-Royo G, Lopez-Sanchez I, Martin-Doncel E, Vega FM, Lazo PA (2016) Oncogenic Sox2 regulates and cooperates with VRK1 in cell cycle progression and differentiation. Sci Rep 6:28532. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28532
Lopez-Sanchez I, Valbuena A, Vazquez-Cedeira M, Khadake J, Sanz-Garcia M, Carrillo-Jimenez A, Lazo PA (2014) VRK1 interacts with p53 forming a basal complex that is activated by UV-induced DNA damage. FEBS Lett 588:692–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.040
Santos CR, Vega FM, Blanco S, Barcia R, Lazo PA (2004) The vaccinia virus B1R kinase induces p53 downregulation by an Mdm2-dependent mechanism. Virology 328:254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.013
Salzano M, Vazquez-Cedeira M, Sanz-Garcia M, Valbuena A, Blanco S, Fernandez IF, Lazo PA (2014) Vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) confers resistance to DNA-damaging agents in human breast cancer by affecting DNA damage response. Oncotarget 5:1770–1778. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1678
Bremer M, Doerge RM (2009) Statistics at the bench: a step-by step handbook for biologists. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
Valbuena A, Lopez-Sanchez I, Vega FM, Sevilla A, Sanz-Garcia M, Blanco S, Lazo PA (2007) Identification of a dominant epitope in human vaccinia-related kinase 1 (VRK1) and detection of different intracellular subpopulations. Arch Biochem Biophys 465:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2007.06.005
Acknowledgements
A. C-D., E. M.-S., P. G.-P., and P.A.L. are members of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)’s Cancer Hub. The computational support of the “Centro de Computación Científica CCC-UAM” is gratefully recognized.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Agencia Estatal de Investigación, PID2019-105610RB-I00, Pedro A. Lazo, PID2022-139598OB-I00, Pedro A. Lazo, RED2018-102801-T, Pedro A. Lazo, RTC-2017-6494-1, Paulino Gómez-Puertas, RTI2018-094434-B-I00, Paulino Gómez-Puertas, Consejería de Educación, Junta de Castilla y León, CSI264P20, Pedro A. Lazo,CLC-2017-01, Pedro A. Lazo, CSI004-18, Eva Monte-Serrano, European JPIAMR network “EPIC-Alliance, Ministerio de Universidades, FPU20/02978, Aurora Campos-Díaz, FPU16/01883, Patricia Morejón-García.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Aurora Campos-Díaz: investigation, methodology, formal analysis. Patricia Morejón-García: investigation, methodology, formal analysis. Eva Monte-Serrano: investigation, methodology, formal analysis. David Ros-Pardo: investigation, structural modeling analysis, formal analysis. Iñigo Marcos-Alcalde: investigation, structural modeling analysis, formal analysis. Paulino Gómez-Puertas: formal analysis, writing original draft, funding acquisition. Pedro A. Lazo: conceptualization, supervision and coordination, formal analysis, writing original draft, review and editing final manuscript, funding acquisition. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Does not require ethical approval. Experimental work with established commercial cell lines used to molecularly and functionally characterize pathogenic gene variants.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Campos-Díaz, A., Morejón-García, P., Monte-Serrano, E. et al. Pathogenic effects of Leu200Pro and Arg387His VRK1 protein variants on phosphorylation targets and H4K16 acetylation in distal hereditary motor neuropathy. J Mol Med 102, 801–817 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-024-02442-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-024-02442-8