Abstract
The classification of diffuse gliomas into the adult type and the pediatric type is the new basis for the diagnosis and clinical evaluation. The knowledge for the neuroradiologist should not remain limited to radiological aspects but should be based additionally on the current edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). This classification defines the 11 entities of diffuse gliomas, which are included in the 3 large groups of adult-type diffuse gliomas, pediatric-type diffuse low-grade gliomas, and pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas. This article provides a detailed overview of important molecular, morphological, and clinical aspects for all 11 entities, such as typical genetic alterations, age distribution, variability of the tumor localization, variability of histopathological and radiological findings within each entity, as well as currently available statistical information on prognosis and outcome. Important differential diagnoses are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Molecular alterations have become the most important diagnostic criteria for classification of tumor entities over the last 10 years. The current classification of diffuse gliomas is an appropriate example for the fact that the molecular profile is nowadays the most important biomarker to assess the biological behavior of a tumor besides morphological criteria from histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and radiological imaging. This is a fundamental new aspect in routine diagnostics, as many tumors, which do not show morphological features of a higher tumor grade, are classified as high-grade tumors based on molecular analysis. It is important to be aware of currently published interdisciplinary diagnostic experience with the individual tumor entities of diffuse gliomas to assess the diagnostic significance of morphologic findings and of additional diagnostic imaging techniques in individual cases. As an important point, tumor grades are now written in Arabic instead of Roman numerals.
Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas
The three entities within this group of tumors are the following: 1) astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant; 2) oligodendroglioma, IDH mutant and 1p/19q codeleted; 3) glioblastoma, IDH wildtype (Table 1; [1]). For astrocytomas, IDH mutant, a major new aspect since the last WHO classification of CNS tumors from 2016 is the introduction of a WHO tumor grade 4 beside the tumor grades 2 and 3 (Fig. 1). An astrocytoma, IDH mutant with WHO grade 4 is characterized by the presence of homozygous deletions of the tumor suppressor genes for CDKN2A or CDKN2B and/or microvascular proliferation and/or the presence of tumor necrosis [2,3,4,5]. Each of these three findings alone is sufficient for grading an IDH mutant diffuse astrocytoma as WHO tumor grade 4 [5]. CDKN2A/B are cell cycle regulatory proteins, and homozygous deletions of their genes alter their regulatory function leading to uncontrolled tumor cell proliferation [6]. This molecular alteration and even microvascular proliferation and tumor necrosis are absent in astrocytomas with WHO tumor grades 2 and 3. IDH mutant astrocytomas can occur in every region of the CNS but they most commonly are found in a supratentorial location, especially in the frontal lobe [4]. The average age is in the fourth decade and these gliomas only rarely occur in patients older than 55 years [7]. In a large series of 1360 adult-type diffuse astrocytomas with IDH mutation, gliomas with WHO grade 4 had a slightly higher mean age of 42 years compared to the average age of 38 years for tumors with WHO grades 2 and 3 [8]. Imaging reveals diffusely infiltrating tumors with a homogeneous mass in grade 2‑tumors and an increasing frequency of enhancement of contrast agent in tumors with higher tumor grades [4, 9]; however, it is important to know that contrast-enhancement is not a diagnostically reliable criterion to distinguish IDH mutant grades 2 and 3 gliomas from grade 4 gliomas. The IDH mutant gliomas are hypointense on T1-weighted sequences (T1-hypointense) and hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences (T2-hyperintense), whereas fluid attenuation inversion recovery MR sequences (FLAIR) often show a relative T2-hypointensity due to the relative suppression of the T2-signals, which are almost CSF isointense. This sign is called the T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign and is defined as the “presence of a complete or nearly complete hyperintense signal on T2-weighted MRI sequences, in combination with a relative hypointense signal on fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR sequences except for a hyperintense peripheral rim” [10]. The T2/FLAIR-mismatch sign is highly specific for an IDH mutation, but sensitivity is comparably low, as it is present in approximately 50% of IDH mutant astrocytomas only [4, 11,12,13]. In IDH mutant astrocytomas WHO grade 4 with homozygous deletions of CDKN2A/B, histological findings, such as microvascular proliferation and tumor necrosis can be absent with the consequence that they radiologically show no contrast enhancement, no edema, and no necrosis and are therefore easily misinterpreted as low-grade gliomas. In these cases, WHO grade 4 can only be assigned after molecular examination. As additional important clinical information, integrated molecular analysis of 97 tumors showed that most IDH mutant astrocytomas grade 4 occurred de novo (68/97 cases), whereas 29/97 tumors emerged from a prior low-grade tumor [14].
For the diagnosis of an oligodendroglioma, the presence of both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion are required for the diagnosis, which was already addressed in the last edition of the WHO classification from 2016 [2]. Of note, oligodendrogliomas display marked mutational heterogeneity with frequent occurrence of mutations of the genes for capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and even other mutations, but they are not sufficient for diagnosis [15]. Homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A gene have been described in a small subset of oligodendrogliomas grade 3 and this finding has been confirmed to be a significant adverse prognostic factor [6]. Beside this molecular alteration, which can serve as a molecular marker for oligodendrogliomas grade 3 in IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas, pathological grading of oligodendrogliomas as WHO tumor grades 2 or 3 relies on the major histological criteria such as cytomorphology, cellularity and mitosis count [16, 17]. Patients with oligodendrogliomas have a median age in the fifth decade with WHO grade 3 tumors showing a slightly higher age of the patients, occurrence in children is a rare event. Most tumors are located in the frontal lobe and less frequently in the temporal or parietal lobe, only few tumors show a more caudal localization such as the brainstem [16, 17]. Oligodendrogliomas infiltrate the cortex and the cortical-subcortical junction; their outlines can appear as well-circumscribed masses, but also with indistinct tumor margins [16, 18]. Peritumoral edema is rare but can be seen in WHO grade 3 tumors [18,19,20]. Calcifications have been reported in oligodendrogliomas with WHO grades 2 and 3. In a small sample size of 17 cases, calcifications were only found in oligodendrogliomas grade 3 [19], but in another study with a large sample size of 45 cases with available calcification data, calcifications were also found in oligodendrogliomas with WHO grade 2. In this study, there was no significant association between the presence of calcifications and tumor grade [21]. High-grade oligodendrogliomas can also show focal necrosis [18, 19]. Contrast enhancement is present in both oligodendrogliomas with WHO grades 2 or 3, so that the enhancement should not be used as a diagnostic criterion for tumor grade 3. The enhancement of these gliomas is thought to be related to the typical vascular chicken wire-like configuration, which is a histological hallmark of oligodendrogliomas [18]. The average values for the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) have been shown to be significantly lower in high-grade oligodendrogliomas, but different studies reported a distinct overlap of ADC values between the tumor grades 2 and 3 [19, 22].
The major new aspect for the entity glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is the introduction of molecular alterations as a part of its definition (Fig. 2). A diffuse astrocytic tumor without IDH mutation and without histone 3-alteration (H3 alteration) must be diagnosed as a glioblastoma, IDH wildtype with WHO tumor grade 4, if at least one of the following five histological and molecular features are present: microvascular proliferation and/or necrosis and/or EGFR gene amplification and/or TERT promotor mutation and/or +7/−10 chromosome copy number changes [23]. Based on this definition, it is possible that even tumors without typical histological or radiological signs of malignancy are glioblastomas, if at least one of the three molecular alterations mentioned above is present. It has been confirmed that these astrocytic tumors with molecular features of a glioblastoma reveal the same poor outcome as for those patients with glioblastomas showing typical morphological signs of malignancy. Also, a significantly shorter survival time compared to patients with IDH mutant astrocytomas has been confirmed [24, 25]. In a large database of 630 patients with glioblastomas, the age of the patients showed a range between 18 and 89 years, most patients (58%) were in the age group between 50 and 69 years [26]. Glioblastomas can occur throughout the neuroaxis, but most tumors are located within the cerebral hemispheres and can affect all lobes without preference, which is a major difference to IDH-mutant astrocytomas occurring preferentially in the frontal lobe [23, 27]. Another difference is the frequent occurrence of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas in multiple lobes and the frequent infiltration of the contralateral hemisphere through the corpus callosum [23, 27, 28]. Dominant imaging features of glioblastomas are diffuse infiltration of surrounding brain regions, spatial heterogeneity of signal intensities and contrast enhancement, often appearing as a typical ring-like enhancement around necrotic areas. Varying amounts of perifocal edema, necrosis, and even hemorrhages can be observed [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Beside standard sequences, susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) and perfusion techniques (PWI), such as dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) perfusion, as well as diffusion-weighting imaging (DWI) can improve the diagnostic accuracy. The SWI and PWI measure microbleeds and increased cerebral blood volume (rCBV) in the solid part of these tumors, and are thus radiological biomarkers for the neovascularization of glioblastomas. Low ADC values indicate the narrowed extracellular space in the solid part of glioblastomas due to the high density of proliferating tumor cells. Diffusion tensor-weighted imaging (DTI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) potentially enhance the set of available imaging methods, especially with respect to preoperative planning and treatment evaluation [29, 30]. Three important subtypes of the entity glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, are giant cell glioblastomas, gliosarcomas, and epitheloid glioblastomas. A differentiation between these subtypes and a typical diffuse glioblastoma is not possible based on imaging characteristics in the individual case; however, there are several reports about the frequent occurrence of special radiological characteristics in these subtypes, such as a more circumscribed and less infiltrating margin in giant cell glioblastomas [31] and in epithelioid glioblastomas [32, 33]. For gliosarcomas, a frequent dural attachment and a dural tail sign have been reported, as well as infiltration of the adjacent bone and extracranial soft tissue in individual cases [34, 35].
Pediatric-type Diffuse Low-grade Gliomas
Four entities are subsumed under the umbrella term of pediatric-type diffuse low-grade gliomas with each entity showing different histomorphological features in combination with distinct molecular alterations (Table 1). Of note, all these tumors are IDH-wildtype and even H3-wildtype. The first entity is the diffuse astrocytoma, MYB or MYBL1 altered, a low-grade tumor (WHO grade 1) with monomorphic glial cells and absent mitotic activity showing alterations of the genes for V-Myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog (MYB) or V-Myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog-like 1 (MYBL1) [36]. Although this tumor often shows well-defined borders in MRI, it may also show a more diffuse growth pattern [36, 37]. Even histologically, a diffuse growth into adjacent brain tissue is observed at least focally [38]. Therefore, recognition of a clear border between tumor and infiltrated tissue as well as the differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells may be difficult [36,37,38]. In a large series of 26 cases, most patients (24/26) had epileptic seizures since childhood with a median age of 10 years during onset, median age during surgery was 29 years (range: 4–50 years) [38]. Most astrocytomas with MYB or MYBL1 alterations are localized within the temporal lobe, followed by the frontal and occipital lobe [36, 38]. Cerebral cortex is most frequently involved, but tumors can also be located within the cerebral white matter, the deep grey nuclei and, more rarely, within the brainstem and the cerebellum. Nearly all reported cases show no contrast enhancement, and microcystic structures with even larger cysts can be present. For cortical tumors, a lobulated appearance has been frequently reported, while tumors involving more caudal sites appeared more diffuse [37,38,39,40].
Angiocentric gliomas (WHO grade 1) are characterized by bipolar tumor cells cumulating within perivascular spaces, as well as by a typical molecular gene fusion between the gene for Mlu-I cell cycle box (MCB gene) and the gene for quaking homolog, KH domain RNA binding (QKI gene) [37, 41, 42]. Just like diffuse astrocytomas with MYB or MYBL1 alteration, angiocentric gliomas infiltrate adjacent brain structures diffusely, although they can appear as well-demarcated lesions in MRI [43]. As typical low-grade tumors, angiocentric gliomas do not show mitotic activity and a low Ki67 proliferation index [44]. Most patients present clinically with seizures and sometimes with headache and visual impairment [45]. Of note, a broad age range has been described (2–79 years) with an average age of 16 years at the time of initial diagnosis [45]. Tumors usually appear as a cortical or subcortical mass without contrast enhancement, calcifications and cystic structures can also be present. The most frequent localization is the temporal pole, followed by the frontal pole, parietal pole and brainstem [41, 45, 46]. In FLAIR sequences, a stalk-like shape of the tumor outline projecting deeply towards the lateral ventricle has been reported by several authors [45, 47, 48]. In a series of six angiocentric gliomas, histological and immunohistochemical investigations revealed a focal cortical dysplasia adjacent to the tumor in five cases, classified according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) as a dysplasia type IIIb (ILAE type IIIb) [44].
Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY) is also a WHO grade 1 tumor associated with seizures [49, 50]. The PLNTY is characterized by alterations of the mitogen-activated protein kinase-pathway (MAPK pathway) such as a mutation of the gene for the rapid accelerated fibrosarcoma oncogene type B at position 600 (BRAF V600E) or even a gene fusion involving the gene for the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 or 3 (FGFR2 or FGFR3) in combination with typical histological features, such as oligodendroglioma-like areas, a diffuse growth pattern, as well as the expression of cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) and oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2) [50,51,52,53]. Despite the median age of 15.5 years [49], several patients with PLNTY up to the 6th decade of life have been reported [49, 54, 55]. Except for one tumor occurring in the third ventricle [52], all tumors described so far are supratentorial cortical or subcortical tumors with most cases localized within the temporal lobes [49, 54, 55]. A prominent radiological feature of many PLNTYs is a dense calcification appearing in CT and in T1 sequences. Even cystic lesions are often present. The tumor margin is well-delineated in most cases, a scarce contrast enhancement can be observed in a minority of cases [49, 56]. Two study groups reported the frequent occurrence of the so-called salt and pepper sign in T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences with alternating intensity throughout the tumor and it is claimed that this sign together with intense calcifications are specific imaging characteristics of PLNTY [50, 56]. For all tumors in the literature, a good outcome has been reported after total excision with only few cases showing evidence of local recurrence [50, 53, 56, 57]. As an exception, one tumor case of a 15-year-old girl has been reported with the unequivocal diagnosis of a PLNTY in the temporal lobe with FGFR3 gene fusion. A local recurrence appeared 17 months after near-total resection, showing the same molecular alteration after reoperation with additional molecular alterations typically seen in high-grade gliomas [58].
The diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK pathway-altered is an entity with only few clinical and morphological data available up to now. The prognosis is better compared with IDH-mutant gliomas of WHO tumor grade 2, and a WHO tumor grade for this tumor type has yet to be assigned [59]. It is characterized by a mutation of a MAPK pathway protein, mostly FGFR1 or BRAF V600E. Histopathology seems to reveal some differences between these two mutations with frequent oligodendroglioma-like areas in FGFR1 mutated cases and more fibrillary glial tumor cells with OLIG2 positivity in BRAF V600E mutated cases [42, 59, 60]. In contrast to the three other entities of pediatric-type diffuse low-grade gliomas, this tumor type does not show a distinct single cluster within DNA methylation analysis and therefore, its diagnosis requires the exclusion of morphological features or a DNA methylation profile suggestive of an alternative tumor type. Localization of the tumor can be throughout the craniospinal axis with most tumors occurring in the cerebral hemispheres. It may appear as a heterogeneously enhancing mass with cystic changes [59].
Pediatric-type Diffuse High-grade Gliomas
This group of tumors includes four different entities, the first entity is the diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27-altered. The former term H3K27-mutant has been replaced by the term H3K27-altered, as instead of a mutation leading to an alteration of histone 3 at position 27 (H3K27-mutation), other molecular alterations such as an overexpression of the enhancer of zeste homologs inhibitory protein (EZHIP) can be present. Furthermore, a H3K27 alteration is no more considered specific for a DMG, as it has also been observed in some pilocytic astrocytomas, gangliogliomas and even in gliomas outside the midline [61,62,63,64,65,66]. A wide age range from 2 to 65 years and a median age of 11–14 years has been reported in different series [67, 68]. Prognosis of the patients is generally poor with a median overall survival of 1 year, whereas overall survival was significantly longer (6 years) for patients with H3-wildtype tumors [68]. Other factors significantly associated with a poorer prognosis are TP53 mutation and mutation of the histone H3.3 instead of H3.1 [69, 70]. Of note, longer survival times have been reported for individual patients older than 10 years and even for adult patients [70, 71]. Histopathology of H3K27-altered DMGs shows an astrocytic differentiation with infiltrative growth, but also a considerable range of other histological or cytological phenotypes can be present such as areas resembling primitive neuroectodermal tumors [67, 72]. Except for the above mentioned rare cases occurring outside the midline, a midline appearance of these tumors is almost pathognomonic including brainstem, thalamus unilateral or bilateral, hypothalamus, pineal region, cerebellum, and spinal cord [71, 73,74,75]. Imaging studies revealed a wide spectrum of radiological appearances reflecting the heterogeneity of the histopathology. Some tumors appear sharply demarcated or even without radiological signs of a high-grade tumor, other tumors can show a more diffuse growth pattern without a sharp demarcation of the tumor outline. Contrast enhancement can be distinct or even absent. Signal intensities of T1 and T2-weighted sequences can be considerably heterogeneous, hemorrhages and necrosis can be present [70,71,72, 74,75,76,77]. In pontine gliomas with H3K27M alteration, also termed diffuse intrinsic pons-glioma (DIPG), usually more than 50% of the pons surface is infiltrated in the axial plane [70]. A case series of 47 patients with diffuse midline gliomas with H3K27M alteration showed that patients with DIPGs are younger (median 7 years) compared to patients with gliomas of other locations such as thalamus (median 24 years) or spine (median 25 years) [67]. In DIPGs, the pons is often enlarged due to an exophytic growth with the basilar artery displaced and potentially engulfed (Fig. 3). Just as in the case shown in Fig. 3, a high T2-signal can be observed, also a weak or even absent contrast enhancement in T1-images at the time of diagnosis has been reported for many H3K27M-altered gliomas located in the pons ([76]; Fig. 3). Some DIPGs can show a gliomatosis cerebri-like pattern with diffuse leptomeningeal involvement and a histological pattern resembling a low-grade astrocytic lesion [72]. Of note, all these diffuse midline gliomas with H3K27M alteration behave as high-grade tumors irrespective of histological or imaging features [72, 74]. The need for a biopsy in such pontine tumors and for CNS tumors in children and adolescents in general is discussed according to the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) [72, 76,77,78]. A study by means of diffusion-weighted imaging comparing diffuse midline gliomas with and without H3 mutation revealed no significant differences regarding the ADC histogram parameters; however, significantly lower median ADC values were observed for those patients surviving less than 1 year after initial diagnosis [79].
The second entity within this tumor group is the diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3G34-mutant. Just like diffuse midline gliomas with H3K27 alteration, diffuse hemispheric gliomas with mutation of the histone 3-3A gene at position 34 (H3G34-mutant) are not IDH-mutated. Histopathology is heterogeneous with some tumors showing predominantly features of a high-grade astrocytic tumor or even a glioblastoma, whereas in other cases a pattern resembling a primitive neuroectodermal tumor can be present [80, 81]. Prognosis of these tumors is generally poor. For different series, an overall median survival of 12 months [81] and 36 months [75] has been reported. In a large series of 81 cases, amplification of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) oncogene had a negative statistical effect on survival time, whereas methylation of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT-methylation) had a favorable effect on the overall survival [80]. In contrast to H3K27-altered tumors occurring frequently in children, H3G34-mutated tumors primarily affect young adults with median ages of 18–26 years reported in different studies with an age range between 14 and 66 years [75, 81, 82]. Some tumors are monocentric, whereas others can show a gliomatosis-like multilobar involvement, main localizations are the parietal and the frontal lobe [75, 81,82,83]. Imaging findings can be considerably variable with some tumors showing infiltrative growth with leptomeningeal spread, necrosis, and distinct contrast enhancement. Even significant intratumoral bleeding can be present (Fig. 4). Other tumors show a slight or even absent contrast enhancement without obvious imaging features of a high-grade tumor [75, 81, 82, 84].
The diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype and IDH-wildtype shows typical histological features of high-grade gliomas grade 4 such as brisk mitotic activity, high proliferation index, as well as vascular proliferation and necrosis [85,86,87]. Age range of the tumors described so far is from early childhood to young adulthood, but research has focused very much on pediatric cases up to now and epidemiological data are still limited [85, 87]. These tumors can be differentiated from adult-type high-grade gliomas by DNA methylome analysis and additionally, this analysis reveals three molecularly and prognostically distinct subgroups: one subgroup is characterized by frequent occurrence of amplifications of the gene for V-Myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene neuroblastoma derived homolog (MCYN amplification); another subgroup shows frequent PDGFRA amplifications and the last subgroup is characterized by frequent TERT promotor mutations or even EGFR amplifications. According to a large series of 74 pediatric patients, overall prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of 22 months. The three molecular groups differed significantly with respect to the median survival of the patients: time of survival was short for the group with frequent MYCN amplification (14 months) and longer for the groups with frequent PDGFRA amplification (21 months) and TERT mutation or EGFR amplification (44 months) [85]. The subgroup with frequent PDGFRA amplification reveals nearly the same spectrum of molecular alterations when compared with radiation-induced high-grade gliomas, which is an important finding for further understanding the mechanisms by which these secondary tumors arise [88, 89]. Most diffuse pediatric-type high-grade gliomas with H3 and IDH wildtypes are localized within the cerebral hemispheres, but even thalamic, sellar and infratentorial tumors within the brainstem have been reported [85, 86, 90]. Up to now, no specific differences regarding conventional imaging characteristics have been observed when comparing these tumors with other high-grade gliomas. Irrespective of their localization, most tumors show mass effects with T1 hypointensity, contrast enhancement, T2/FLAIR-hyperintensity of varying degree, indistinct margins and a perifocal edema [76, 91].
The fourth entity of pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas is the infant-type hemispheric glioma (Table 1). Even these tumors show typical histomorphological high-grade features, such as high cellularity, palisading necrosis, and microvascular proliferation. In some tumors, also low-grade areas with less cellularity can be present [92]. Beside different molecular alterations compared with the other entities of pediatric type high-grade gliomas described previously, the prominent difference is the age distribution limited to infancy. One study on a large series reports an age of the patients limited to the first year of life with a median age of 2.8 months [93]. Another study provided evidence that this entity is indeed a tumor of infancy but not necessarily limited to the first year of life [92]. Tumors show a distinct cluster in DNA methylome analysis, typical genetic alterations are receptor tyrosine kinase fusions including the genes for the tyrosine kinases V-Ros avian UR2 sarcoma virus oncogene homolog 1 (ROS1), anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), mesenchymal epithelial transition proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) and the family of neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptors (NTRK family) [92,93,94]. For tumor cases described so far, prognosis of children with infant-type hemispheric glioma seems to be better compared with the other pediatric-type high-grade gliomas with significant differences between the molecular alterations: For a group of 27 patients in total, 5‑year overall survival was 53.8%, 25.0% and 42.9% for patients with ALK, ROS1, and NTRK fusions of the tumors, respectively [93]. The need for further prospective evaluation of clinical information is addressed [92, 93]. An infant-type hemispheric glioma should be considered if an infant presents with a huge supratentorial mass, vasogenic edema and significant mass effect. The tumor is located superficially in the cerebral hemispheres, often involving the meninges. Necrosis can be present, as well as cystic formations, which can be considerably large. If present, these cystic structures sharply alternate with solid tumor areas [92,93,94].
Discussion
The differentiation between diffuse gliomas of the adult type and the pediatric type is primarily based on a completely different spectrum of molecular alterations characterizing the three large groups of diffuse gliomas within the 5th edition of the WHO classification of CNS tumors (Table 1). Additionally, pediatric-type diffuse gliomas show clear cut molecular biological differences when comparing low-grade and high-grade tumors. Despite the designation pediatric type and adult type, however, it is clinically important to realize the overlapping age distribution of all diffuse gliomas, as pediatric-type diffuse gliomas can occur in adults, as well as adult-type diffuse gliomas can occur in children [95]. A second new major aspect in clinical diagnostics is the possibility that four entities with molecular features of diffuse high-grade gliomas may lack MR imaging features of a high-grade tumor. This applies to diffuse astrocytomas with IDH mutation showing a homozygous deletion of the CDKN2A or CDKN2B gene, and for glioblastomas with IDH wildtype showing at least one of three typical molecular alterations: EGFR gene amplification, TERT promotor mutation, +7/−10 chromosome copy number changes. Diffuse midline gliomas with H3K27 alteration and diffuse hemispheric gliomas with H3G34 mutation might also lack morphological signs of a higher tumor grade, but even these tumors will show typical alterations after molecular analysis. Of note, even a preoperative confirmation of malignancy in several diffuse hemispheric gliomas with H3G34 mutation but without imaging features of a high-grade tumor could be achieved by means of 18F‑FET-PET [84]. Especially for those diffuse gliomas without or with questionable features of a higher tumor grade, there is considerable motivation and discussion concerning the general need for a biopsy assessment [78, 96]. Several important differential diagnoses for diffuse high-grade gliomas must be addressed, especially from the group of circumscribed astrocytic gliomas. This applies to pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas with individual cases showing contrast enhancement, indistinct margins and perifocal edema [97, 98]. Histological and molecular examination, however, will show a different immunophenotype and molecular profile when compared with diffuse astrocytic gliomas. Another important differential diagnosis is the high-grade astrocytoma with piloid features. This new entity can show a glioblastoma-like morphology, whereas other cases may show no obvious imaging features of a high-grade tumor [99, 100]. Final diagnosis of this tumor type will depend on DNA methylation profiling, as neither histopathology nor imaging or genetic analysis alone will provide a clear differentiation from other tumor types [100].
The four entities of pediatric-type diffuse low-grade gliomas show a considerable overlap of imaging characteristics. Most tumors occur within the hemispheres and cystic structures can be present. Even a focal or nodular contrast enhancement can be present in individual cases. Of major importance for routine diagnostic purposes is to be aware of the fact that these tumors have been observed in older patients within the 6th up to the 8th decade of life. An exception is the diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK pathway-altered, as reports on this entity have focused on tumors in children up to now [59]. For differential diagnosis of diffuse low-grade gliomas, glioneuronal tumors must be considered. Imaging appearance of gangliogliomas may overlap with low-grade gliomas, but they usually show a higher rCBV without restriction on DWI. Cystic changes and calcification are often present [101]. Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT) is in general an important differential diagnosis for low-grade gliomas, but individual DNT cases have been described showing not the typical sharply defined margin but a more diffuse extension into the deeper brain structures with contrast enhancement. Therefore, DNT may also show overlapping imaging features when compared with diffuse high-grade gliomas [102]. Differentiation between pediatric-type diffuse low-grade and high-grade tumors can be challenging in the case of H3K27-altered or H3G34-mutated tumors showing no imaging signs of malignancy; however, the clear-cut differences between low-grade and high-grade gliomas concerning mutation analysis and methylation profiling provides a clear recognition of the individual tumor entity.
In summary, the article provided a detailed presentation of all important morphological, molecular, and clinical characteristics of adult-type and pediatric-type gliomas as a basis for routine neuroradiological diagnostics. The fact that not every high-grade glioma will show imaging features of a higher tumor grade should be considered as a progress in molecular and clinical research: Many tumors diagnosed as low-grade tumors in former times can be recognized as high-grade tumors by means of their molecular profile with all consequences for further treatment. This opens the door for prospective studies on therapeutic approaches with small molecule inhibitors. There is the need for a further clinical and diagnostic assessment of the 11 tumor entities described in this review, and the neuroradiologist is called upon to contribute to the morphological characterization of larger tumor collectives.
References
Brat DJ, Ellison DW, Figarella-Branger D, Hawkins CE, Louis DN, Ng HK, Perry A, Pfister SM, Reifenberger G, Soffietti R, Von Deimling A, Wesseling P. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2016.
Marker DF, Pearce TM. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A by fluorescence in situ hybridization is prognostic in grade 4, but not grade 2 or 3, IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8:169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-01044-y.
Brat DJ, Cahill DP, Cimino PJ, Huse JT, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Komori T, Reuss DE, Suva ML, von Deimling A, Weller M. Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Huang LE. Impact of CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion on the prognosis and biology of IDH-mutant glioma. Biomedicines. 2022;10:246. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020246.
Appay R, Dehais C, Maurage CA, Alentorn A, Carpentier C, Colin C, Ducray F, Escande F, Idbaih A, Kamoun A, Marie Y, Mokhtari K, Tabouret E, Trabelsi N, Uro-Coste E, Delattre JY, Figarella-Branger D, Network POLA. CDKN2A homozygous deletion is a strong adverse prognosis factor in diffuse malignant IDH-mutant gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21:1519–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz124.
Barresi V, Eccher A, Simbolo M, Cappellini R, Ricciardi GK, Calabria F, Cancedda M, Mazzarotto R, Bonetti B, Pinna G, Sala F, Ghimenton C, Scarpa A. Diffuse gliomas in patients aged 55 years or over: A suggestion for IDH mutation testing. Neuropathology. 2020;40:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12608.
Reuss DE, Mamatjan Y, Schrimpf D, Capper D, Hovestadt V, Kratz A, Sahm F, Koelsche C, Korshunov A, Olar A, Hartmann C, Reijneveld JC, Wesseling P, Unterberg A, Platten M, Wick W, Herold-Mende C, Aldape K, von Deimling A. IDH mutant diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas have similar age at presentation and little difference in survival: a grading problem for WHO. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:867–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1438-8.
Juratli TA, Tummala SS, Riedl A, Daubner D, Hennig S, Penson T, Zolal A, Thiede C, Schackert G, Krex D, Miller JJ, Cahil DP. Radiographic assessment of contrast enhancement and T2/FLAIR mismatch sign in lower grade gliomas: correlation with molecular groups. J Neurooncol. 2019;141:327–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03034-6.
Broen MPG, Smits M, Wijnenga MMJ, Dubbink HJ, Anten MHME, Schijns OEMG, Beckervordersandforth J, Postma AA, van den Bent MJ. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as an imaging marker for non-enhancing IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-intact lower-grade glioma: a validation study. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:1393–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy048.
Dono A, Ballester LY, Primdahl D, Esquenazi Y, Bhatia A. IDH-mutant low-grade glioma: advances in molecular diagnosis, management, and future directions. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23:20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-020-01006-6.
Park SI, Suh CH, Guenette JP, Huang RY, Kim HS. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as a predictor of IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-noncodeleted lower-grade gliomas: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31:5289–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07467-4.
Yeniceri IÖ, Yildiz ME, Özduman K, Danyeli AE, Pamir MN, Dincer A. The reliability and interobserver reproducibility of T2/FLAIR mismatch in the diagnosis of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021;27:796–801. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2021.20624.
Korshunov A, Casalini B, Chavez L, Hielscher T, Sill M, Ryzhovak M, Sharma T, Schrimpf D, Stichel D, Capper D, Reuss DE, Sturm D, Absalyamova O, Golanov A, Lambo S, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Lichter P, Herold-Mende C, Wick W, Pfister SM, Kool M, Jones DTW, von Deimling A, Sahm F. Integrated molecular characterization of IDH-mutant glioblastomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2019;45:108–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12523.
Aihara K, Mukasa A, Nagae G, Nomura M, Yamamoto S, Ueda H, Tatsuno K, Shibahara J, Takahashi M, Momose T, Tanaka S, Takayanagi S, Yanagisawa S, Nejo T, Takahashi S, Omata M, Otani R, Saito K, Narita Y, Nagane M, Nishikawa R, Ueki K, Aburatani H, Saito N. Genetic and epigenetic stability of oligodendrogliomas at recurrence. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017;5:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0422-z.
Reifenberger G, Cairncross JG, Figarella-Branger D, Hartmann C, Kros JM, Louis DN, Snuderl M, Suva ML, Van den Bent MJ, Yip S, Yokoo H. Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Tork CA, Atkinson C. Oligodendroglioma. Treasure Island: StatPearls; 2022.
Smits M. Imaging of oligodendroglioma. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150857. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150857.
Aboud O, Shah R, Vera E, Burton E, Theeler B, Wu J, Boris L, Quezado M, Reyes J, Wall K, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS, Penas-Prado M. Challenges of imaging interpretation to predict oligodendroglioma grade: a report from the Neuro-Oncology Branch. CNS Oncol. 2022;11:CNS83. https://doi.org/10.2217/cns-2021-0005.
Van Lent DI, Van Baarsen KM, Snijders TJ, Robe PAJT. Radiological differences between subtypes of WHO 2016 grade II-III gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurooncol Adv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaa044.
Khalid L, Carone M, Dumrongpisutikol N, Intrapiromkul J, Bonekamp D, Barker PB, Yousem DM. Imaging characteristics of oligodendrogliomas that predict grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:852–75. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2895.
Joyner DA, Garret J, Batchala PP, Rama B, Ravicz JR, Patrie JT, Lopez MB, Fadul CE, Schiff D, Jain R, Patel SH. MRI features predict tumor grade in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. Neuroradiology. 2022;65:121–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03038-0.
Louis DN, Aldape KD, Capper D, Giannini C, Horbinski CM, Ng HK, Perry A, Reifenberger G, Sarkar C, Soffietti R, Suva ML, Wick W. Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Tesileanu CMS, Dirven L, Wijnenga MMJ, Koekkoek JAF, Vincent AJPE, Dubbink HJD, Atmodimedjo PN, Kros JM, van Duinen SG, Smits M, Taphoorn MJB, French PJ, van den Bent MJ. Survival of diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH1/2 wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV: A confirmation of the cIMPACT-NOW criteria. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22:515–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz200.
Lee D, Riestenberg RA, Haskell-Mendoza A, Bloch O. Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-Wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV: A single-institution case series and review. J Neurooncol. 2021;152:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03677-4.
Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, Bilello M, Sotiras A, Shukla G, Rudie JD, Santamaría NF, Kazerooni AF, Pati S, Rathore S, Mamourian E, Ha SM, Parker W, Doshi J, Baid U, Bergman M, Binder ZA, Verma R, Lustig RA, Desai AS, Bagley SJ, Mourelatos Z, Morrissette J, Watt CD, Brem S, Wolf RL, Melhem ER, Nasrallah MLP, Mohan S, O’Rourke DM, Davatzikos C. The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: Advanced MRI, clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Sci Data. 2022;9:453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01560-7.
Bai J, Varghese J, Jain R. Adult glioma WHO classification update, genomics, and imaging—What the radiologists need to Know. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;29:71–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000234.
Qi S, Yu L, Li H, Ou Y, Qiu X, Ding Y, Han H, Zhang X. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation is associated with tumor location and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics in astrocytic neoplasms. Oncol Lett. 2014;7:1895–902. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2013.
Van Dijken BRJ, van Laar PJ, Smits M, Dankbaar JW, Enting RH, van der Hoorn A. Perfusion MRI in treatment evaluation of glioblastomas: Clinical relevance of current and future techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26306.
Heynold E, Zimmermann M, Hore N, Buchfelder M, Doerfler A, Stadlbauer A, Kremenevski N. Physiological MRI biomarkers in the differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases. Mol Imaging Biol. 2021;23:787–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-021-01604-1.
Ogawa K, Kurose A, Kamataki A, Asano K, Katayama K, Kurotaki H. Giant cell glioblastoma is a distinctive subtype of glioma characterized by vulnerability to DNA damage. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2020;37:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-019-00355-w.
Zeng Y, Zhu X, Wang Y, Liu B, Yang X, Wang Q, Du J, Ma Y, Lin L, Fu P, Xiao H, Guo QN. Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study on epithelioid glioblastoma: A series of fifteen cases with literature review. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:3943–52. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S249317.
Huang QL, Cao X, Chai X, Wang X, Xiao C, Wang J. The radiological imaging features of easily misdiagnosed epithelioid glioblastoma in seven patients. World Neurosurg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.128.
Frandsen S, Broholm H, Larsen VA, Grunnet K, Møller S, Poulsen HS, Michaelsen SR. Clinical Characteristics of Gliosarcoma and Outcomes From Standardized Treatment Relative to Conventional Glioblastoma. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01425.
Schuss P, Ulrich CT, Harter PN, Tews DS, Seifert V, Franz K. Gliosarcoma with bone infiltration and extracranial growth: case report and review of literature. J Neurooncol. 2011;103:765–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0437-9.
Hawkins CE, Blümcke I, Capper D, Ellison DW, Jones DTW, Najm I, Rosenblum MK. Diffuse astrocytoma, MYB- or MYBL1-altered. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Chiang J, Harreld JH, Tinkle CL, Moreira DC, Li X, Acharya S, Qaddoumi I, Ellison DW. A single-centre study of the clinicopathologic correlates of gliomas with a MYB or MYBL1 alteration. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138:1091–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-019-02081-1.
Wefers AK, Stichel D, Schrimpf D, Coras R, Pages M, Tauziède-Espariat A, Varlet P, Schwarz D, Söylemezoglu F, Pohl U, Pimentel J, Meyer J, Hewer E, Japp A, Joshi A, Reuss DE, Reinhardt AK, Sievers P, Casalini MB, Ebrahimi A, Huang H, Koelsche C, Low HL, Rebelo O, Marnoto D, Becker AJ, Staszewski O, Mittelbronn M, Hasselblatt M, Schittenhelm J, Cheesman E, Santos de Oliveira R, Queiroz RG, Valera ET, Hans VH, Korshunov A, Olar A, Ligon KL, Pfister SM, Jaunmuktane Z, Brandner S, Tatevossian RG, Ellison DW, Jacques TS, Honavar M, Aronica E, Thom M, Sahm F, von Deimling A, Jones DTW, Blumcke I, Capper D. Isomorphic diffuse glioma is a morphologically and molecularly distinct tumour entity with recurrent gene fusions of MYBL1 or MYB and a benign disease course. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;139:193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-019-02078-w.
Ryall S, Zapotocky M, Fukuoka K, Nobre L, Guerreiro-Stucklin A, Bennett J, Siddaway R, Li C, Pajovic S, Arnoldo A, Kowalski PE, Johnson M, Sheth J, Lassaletta A, Tatevossian RG, Orisme W, Qaddoumi I, Surrey LF, Li MM, Waanders AJ, Gilheeney S, Rosenblum M, Bale T, Tsang DE, Laperriere N, Kulkarni A, Ibrahim GM, Drake J, Dirks P, Taylor MD, Rutka JT, Laughlin S, Shroff M, Shago M, Hazrati LN, D’Arcy C, Ramaswamy V, Bartels U, Huang A, Bouffet E, Karajannis MA, Santi M, Ellison DW, Tabori U, Hawkins C. Integrated molecular and clinical analysis of 1000 pediatric low-grade gliomas. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:569–583.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.011.
Nikolaus M, Koch A, Stenzel W, Elezkurtaj S, Sahm F, Tietze A, Stöffler L, Kreye J, Driever HP, Thomale UW, Kaindl AM, Schuelke M, Knierim E. Atypical NMDA receptor expression in a diffuse astrocytoma, MYB- or MYBL1-altered as a trigger for autoimmune encephalitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2022;144:385–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-022-02447-y.
Buccoliero AM, Caporalini C, Scagnet M, Mussa F, Giordano F, Sardi I, Migliastro I, Moscardi S, Conti V, Barba C, Antonelli M, Gianno F, Rossi S, Diomedi-Camassei F, Gessi M, Donofrio V, Bertero L, Giangaspero F, Santi M, Aronica E, Genitori L, Guerrini R. Angiocentric glioma-associated seizures: The possible role of EATT2, pyruvate carboxylase and glutamine synthetase. Seizure. 2021;86:152–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.014.
Qaddoumi I, Orisme W, Wen J, Santiago T, Gupta K, Dalton JD, Tang B, Haupfear K, Punchihewa C, Easton J, Mulder H, Boggs K, Shao Y, Rusch M, Becksfort J, Gupta P, Wang S, Lee RP, Brat D, Collins VP, Dahiya S, George D, Konomos W, Kurian KM, McFadden K, Serafini LN, Nickols H, Perry A, Shurtleff S, Gajjar A, Boop FA, Klimo PD, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Baker SJ, Zhang J, Wu G, Downing JR, Tatevossian RG, Ellison DW. Genetic alterations in uncommon low-grade neuroepithelial tumors: BRAF, FGFR1, and MYB mutations occur at high frequency and align with morphology. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:833–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1539-z.
Taschner CA, Sankowski R, Scheiwe C, Urbach H, Storz C, Prinz M. Freiburg neuropathology case conference—Hypersalivatory seizures in a 6-year-old child. Clin Neuroradiol. 2019;29:581–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00820-1.
Fuller LD, Prayson RA. Molecular immunohistochemical profile of angiocentric glioma. J Epilepsy Res. 2020;10:79–83. https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.20013.
Ampie L, Choy W, Di Domenico JD, Lamano JB, Williams CK, Kesavabhotla K, Mao Q, Bloch O. Clinical attributes and surgical outcomes of angiocentric gliomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;28:117–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.015.
Almubarak AO, Alahmari A, Al Hindi H, Al Shail E. Angiocentric glioma of brain stem. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2020;25:416–20. https://doi.org/10.17712/nsj.2020.5.20200026.
Cheng S, Lü Y, Xu S, Liu Q, Lee P. Cystoid angiocentric glioma: A case report and literature review. J Radiol Case Rep. 2015;9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v9i7.2413.
Wang H, Zhu J, Zhu P, Luo C. Angiocentric glioma: A case report and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;94:179–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.10.016.
Kurokawa M, Kurokawa R, Capizzano AA, Baba A, Ota Y, Pinarbasi E, Johnson T, Srinivasan A, Moritani T. Neuroradiological features of the polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young: Five new cases with a systematic review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2022;64:1255–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02879-5.
Chen Y, Tian T, Guo X, Zhang F, Fan M, Jin H, Liu D. Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young: case report and review focus on the radiological features and genetic alterations. BMC Neurol. 2020;20:123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01679-3.
Gupta R, Lucas CHG, Wu J, Barreto J, Shah K, Simon IB, Casavilca-Zambrano S, Brathwaite C, Zhou H, Caccamo D, Gilani A, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Lee JC, Perry A, Clarke JL, Chang SM, Berger MS, Solomon DA. Low-grade glioneuronal tumors with FGFR2 fusion resolve into a single epigenetic group corresponding to ‘Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;142:595–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-021-02352-w.
Ida CM, Johnson DR, Nair AA, Davila J, Kollmeyer TM, Minn K, Fadra NM, Balcom JR, Fung KMA, Kim DK, Kaufmann TJ, Kipp BR, Halling KC, Jenkins RB, Giannini C. Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY): Molecular profiling confirms frequent MAPK pathway activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2021;80:821–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlab075.
Palejwala AH, O’Neal CM, Quinton MR, Battiste JD, Peterson JEG, Dunn IF. Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young: Rare tumor and review of the literature. Rare Tumors. 2022;14:20363613221083360. https://doi.org/10.1177/20363613221083360.
Broggi G, Certo F, Altieri R, Caltabiano R, Gessi M, Barbagallo GMV. A “polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY)” diagnosed in an adult. Report of a case and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2021;12:470. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_500_2021.
Riva G, Cima L, Villanova M, Ghimenton C, Sina S, Riccioni L, Munari G, Fassan M, Giangaspero F, Eccher A. Low-grade neuroepithelial tumor: Unusual presentation in an adult without history of seizures. Neuropathology. 2018;38:557–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12504.
Fei X, Zhao J, Wei W, Wang W, Kong X, Qian R, Niu C, Yao Y. Clinical, radiological, pathological features and seizure outcome with surgical management of polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young associated with epilepsy. Front Oncol. 2022;12:863373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.863373.
Benson JC, Summerfield D, Carr C, Cogswell P, Messina S, Gompel JV, Welker K. Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young as a partially calcified intra-axial mass in an adult. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:573–8. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6500.
Bale TA, Sait SF, Benhamidi J, Ptashkin R, Haque S, Villafania L, Sill M, Sadowska J, Akhtar RB, Liechty B, Juthani R, Ladanyi M, Fowkes M, Karajannis MA, Rosenblum MK. Malignant transformation of a polymorphous low grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY). Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:123–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02245-4.
Jacques TS, Capper D, Giannini C, Orr BA, Tabori U. Diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK pathway-altered. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Engelhardt S, Behling F, Beschorner R, Eckert F, Kohlhof P, Tatagiba M, Tabatabai G, Schuhmann MU, Ebinger M, Schittenhelm J. Frequent FGFR1 hotspot alterations in driver-unknown low-grade glioma and mixed neuronal-glial tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022;148:857–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03906-x.
Fujii Y, Hatae R, Hata N, Suzuki SO, Sangatsuda Y, Takigawa K, Funakoshi Y, Fujioka Y, Kuga D, Mizoguchi M, Iwaki T, Yoshimoto K. A case of ganglioglioma grade 3 with H3 K27M mutation arising in the medial temporal lobe in an elderly patient. Neuropathology. 2022;42:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/neup.12793.
Lopez G, Oberheim-Bush NA, Berger MS, Perry A, Solomon DA. Diffuse non-midline glioma with H3F3A K27M mutation: a prognostic and treatment dilemma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017;5:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-017-0440-x.
Morita S, Nitta M, Muragaki Y, Komori T, Masui K, Maruyama T, Ichimura K, Nakano Y, Sawada T, Koriyama S, Tsuzuki S, Yasuda T, Hashimoto K, Niwa A, Kawamata T. Brainstem pilocytic astrocytoma with H3 K27M mutation: case report. J Neurosurg. 2018;129:593–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.4.JNS162443.
Rodriguez FJ, Brosnan-Cashman JA, Allen SJ, Vizcaino A, Giannini C, Camelo-Piragua S, Webb M, Matsushita M, Wadhwani N, Tabbarah A, Hamideh D, Jiang L, Chen L, Arvanitis LD, Alnajar HH, Barber JR, Rodríguez-Velasco A, Orr B, Heaphy CM. Alternative lengthening of telomeres, ATRX loss and H3-K27M mutations in histologically defined pilocytic astrocytoma with anaplasia. Brain Pathol. 2019;29:126–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12646.
Castel D, Kergrohen T, Tauziède-Espariat A, Mackay A, Ghermaoui S, Lechapt E, Pfister SM, Kramm CM, Boddaert N, Blauwblomme T, Puget S, Beccaria K, Jones C, Jones DTW, Varlet P, Grill J, Debily MA. Histone H3 wild-type DIPG/DMG overexpressing EZHIP extend the spectrum diffuse midline gliomas with PRC2 inhibition beyond H3-K27M mutation. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;139:1109–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02142-w.
Mondal G, Lee JC, Ravindranathan A, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Tran QT, Allen SJ, Barreto J, Gupta R, Doo P, Van Ziffle J, Onodera C, Devine P, Grenert JP, Samuel D, Li R, Metrock LK, Jin LW, Antony R, Alashari M, Cheshier S, Whipple NS, Bruggers C, Raffel C, Gupta N, Kline CN, Reddy A, Banerjee A, Hall MD, Mehta MP, Khatib Z, Maher OM, Brathwaite C, Pekmezci M, Phillips JJ, Bollen AW, Tihan T, Lucas JT, Broniscer A, Berger MS, Perry A, Orr BA, Solomon DA. Pediatric bithalamic gliomas have a distinct epigenetic signature and frequent EGFR exon 20 insertions resulting in potential sensitivity to targeted kinase inhibition. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;139:1071–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02155-5.
Solomon DA, Wood MD, Tihan T, Bollen AW, Gupta N, Phillips JJJ, Perry A. Diffuse Midline gliomas with histone H3-K27M mutation: A series of 47 cases assessing the spectrum of morphologic variation and associated genetic alterations. Brain Pathol. 2016;26:569–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12336.
Karremann M, Gielen GH, Hoffmann M, Wiese M, Colditz N, Warmuth-Metz M, Bison B, Claviez A, van Vuurden DG, von Bueren AO, Gessi M, Kühnle I, Hans VH, Benesch M, Sturm D, Kortmann RD, Waha A, Pietsch T, Kramm CM. Diffuse high-grade gliomas with H3 K27M mutations carry a dismal prognosis independent of tumor location. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:123–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox149.
Kline C, Jain P, Kilburn L, Bonner ER, Gupta N, Crawford JR, Banerjee A, Packer RJ, Villanueva-Meyer J, Luks T, Zhang Y, Kambhampati M, Zhang J, Yadavilli S, Zhang B, Gaonkar KS, Rokita JL, Kraya A, Kuhn J, Liang W, Byron S, Berens M, Molinaro A, Prados M, Resnick A, Waszak SM, Nazarian J, Mueller S. Upfront biology-guided therapy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: Therapeutic, molecular, and biomarker outcomes from PNOC003. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:3965–78. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0803.
Hoffman LM, Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Colditz N, Baugh J, Chaney B, Hoffmann M, Lane A, Fuller C, Miles L, Hawkins C, Bartels U, Bouffet E, Goldman S, Leary S, Foreman NK, Packer R, Warren KE, Broniscer A, Kieran MW, Minturn J, Comito M, Broxson E, Shih CS, Khatua S, Chintagumpala M, Carret AS, Escorza NY, Hassall T, Ziegler DS, Gottardo N, Dholaria H, Doughman R, Benesch M, Drissi R, Nazarian J, Jabado N, Boddaert N, Varlet P, Giraud G, Castel D, Puget S, Jones C, Hulleman E, Modena P, Giagnacovo M, Antonelli M, Pietsch T, Gielen GH, Jones DTW, Sturm D, Pfister SM, Gerber NU, Grotzer MA, Pfaff E, von Bueren AO, Hargrave D, Solanki GA, Cvrlje FJ, Kaspers GJL, Vandertop WP, Grill J, Bailey S, Biassoni V, Massimino M, Calmon R, Sanchez E, Bison B, Warmuth-Metz M, Leach J, Jones B, van Vuurden DG, Kramm CM, Fouladi M. Clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and molecular characteristics of long-term survivors of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG): A collaborative report from the International and European Society for Pediatric Oncology DIPG Registries. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1963–72. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9308.
Gu Q, Huang Y, Zhang H, Jiang B. Case report: Five adult cases of H3K27-altered diffuse midline glioma in the spinal cord. Front Oncol. 2021;11:701113. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.701113.
Yekula A, Gupta M, Coley N, Sang H. Adult H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma with gliomatosis cerebri growth pattern: Case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;68:124–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.02.046.
Ryall S, Krishnatry R, Arnoldo A, Buczkowicz P, Mistry M, Siddaway R, Ling C, Pajovic S, Yu M, Rubin JB, Hukin J, Steinbok P, Bartels U, Bouffet E, Tabori U, Hawkins C. Targeted detection of genetic alterations reveals the prognostic impact of H3K27M and MAPK pathway aberrations in paediatric thalamic glioma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0353-0.
Meyronet D, Esteban-Mader M, Bonnet C, Joly MO, Uro-Coste E, Amiel-Benouaich A, Forest F, Rousselot-Denis C, Burel-Vandenbos F, Bourg V, Guyotat J, Fenouil T, Jouvet A, Honnorat J, Ducray F. Characteristics of H3 K27M-mutant gliomas in adults. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:1127–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now274.
Roux A, Pallud J, Saffroy R, Edjlali-Goujon M, Debily MA, Boddaert N, Sanson M, Puget S, Knafo S, Adam C, Faillot T, Cazals-Hatem D, Mandonnet E, Polivka M, Dorfmüller G, Dauta A, Desplanques M, Gareton A, Pages M, Tauziede-Espariat A, Grill J, Bourdeaut F, Doz F, Dhermain F, Mokhtari K, Chretien F, Figarella-Branger D, Varlet P. High-grade gliomas in adolescents and young adults highlight histomolecular differences from their adult and pediatric counterparts. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22:1190–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa024.
Goncalves FG, Alves CAPF, Vossough A. Updates in pediatric malignant gliomas. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;29:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000235.
Tam LT, Yeom KW, Wright JN, Jaju A, Radmanesh A, Han M, Toescu S, Maleki M, Chen E, Campion A, Lai HA, Eghbal AA, Oztekin O, Mankad K, Hargrave D, Jacques TS, Goetti R, Lober RM, Cheshier SH, Napel S, Said M, Aquilina K, Ho CY, Monje M, Vitanza NA, Mattonen SA. MRI-based radiomics for prognosis of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: an international study. Neurooncol Adv. 2021;3:vdab42. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab042.
Otth M, Pizer B, Rutkowski S, Scheinemann K. Standard clinical practice recommendations—Brain Tumour Group overview and discipline groups. Version 1.0, date 14.03.2022. 2022. https://siope.eu/media/documents/standard-clinical-practice-recommendations-brain-tumour-group-overview-and-discipline-groups.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2022.
Aboian MS, Tong E, Solomon DA, Kline C, Gautam A, Vardapetyan A, Tamrazi B, Li Y, Jordan CD, Felton E, Weinberg B, Braunstein S, Mueller S, Cha S. Diffusion characteristics of pediatric diffuse midline gliomas with histone H3-K27M mutation using apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1804–10. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6302.
Korshunov A, Capper D, Reuss D, Schrimpf D, Ryzhova M, Hovestadt V, Sturm D, Meyer J, Jones C, Zheludkova O, Kumirova E, Golanov A, Kool M, Schüller U, Mittelbronn M, Hasselblatt M, Schittenhelm J, Reifenberger G, Herold-Mende C, Lichter P, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Jones DTW. Histologically distinct neuroepithelial tumors with histone 3 G34 mutation are molecularly similar and comprise a single nosologic entity. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:137–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1493-1.
Picart T, Barritault M, Poncet D, Berner LP, Izquierdo C, Tabouret E, Figarella-Branger D, Idbaïh A, Bielle F, Bourg V, Vandenbos FB, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E, Uro-Coste E, Guyotat J, Honnorat J, Gabut M, Meyronet D, Ducray F. Characteristics of diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3G34-mutant in adults. Neurooncol Adv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab061.
Lim KY, Won JK, Park CK, Kim SK, Choi SH, Kim T, Yun H, Park SH. H3 G34-mutant high-grade glioma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2021;38:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00378-8.
Mohammad F, Helin K. Oncohistones: drivers of pediatric cancers. Genes Dev. 2017;31:2313–24. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.309013.117.
Vettermann FJ, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Hasselblatt M, Forbrig R, Berding G, La Fougère C, Galldiks N, Schittenhelm J, Weis J, Albert NL, Schüller U. Characterization of diffuse gliomas with histone H3-G34 mutation by MRI and dynamic 18F-FET PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:895–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002300.
Korshunov A, Schrimpf D, Ryzhova M, Sturm D, Chavez L, Hovestadt V, Sharma T, Habel A, Burford A, Jones C, Zheludkova O, Kumirova E, Kramm CM, Golanov A, Capper D, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Jones DTW. H3-/IDH-wild type pediatric glioblastoma is comprised of molecularly and prognostically distinct subtypes with associated oncogenic drivers. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;134:507–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-017-1710-1.
Tauziède-Espariat A, Debily MA, Castel D, Grill J, Puget S, Roux A, Saffroy R, Pagès M, Gareton A, Chrétien F, Lechapt E, Dangouloff-Ros V, Boddaert N, Varlet P. The pediatric supratentorial MYCN-amplified high-grade gliomas methylation class presents the same radiological, histopathological and molecular features as their pontine counterparts. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-00974-x.
Capper D, Jones DTW, Tabori U, Varlet P. Diffuse paediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype and IDH-wildtype. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Deng MY, Sturm D, Pfaff E, Sill M, Stichel D, Balasubramanian GP, Tippelt S, Kramm C, Donson AM, Green AL, Jones C, Schittenhelm J, Ebinger M, Schuhmann MU, Jones BC, van Tilburg CM, Wittmann A, Golanov A, Ryzhova M, Ecker J, Milde T, Witt O, Sahm F, Reuss D, Sumerauer D, Zamecnik J, Korshunov A, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Jones DTW. Radiation-induced gliomas represent H3-/IDH-wildtype pediatric gliomas with recurrent PDGFRA amplification and loss of CDKN2A/B. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25708-y.
Whitehouse JP, Howlett M, Federico A, Kool M, Endersby R, Gottardo NG. Defining the molecular features of radiation-induced glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurooncol Adv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab109.
Tauziède-Espariat A, Debily MA, Castel D, Grill J, Puget S, Sabel M, Blomgren K, Gareton A, Dangouloff-Ros V, Lechapt E, Boddaert N, Varlet P. An integrative radiological, histopathological and molecular analysis of pediatric pontine histone-wildtype glioma with MYCN amplification (HGG-MYCN). Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0738-y.
Goncalves FG, Viaene AN, Vossough A. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric glioblastomas. Front Neurol. 2021;12:733323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.733323.
Clarke M, Mackay A, Ismer B, Pickles JC, Tatevossian RG, Newman S, Bale TA, Stoler I, Izquierdo E, Temelso S, Carvalho DM, Molinari V, Burford A, Howell L, Virasami A, Fairchild AR, Avery A, Chalker J, Kristiansen M, Haupfear K, Dalton JD, Orisme W, Wen J, Hubank M, Kurian KM, Rowe C, Maybury M, Crosier S, Knipstein J, Schüller U, Kordes U, Kram DE, Snuderl M, Bridges L, Martin AJ, Doey LJ, Al-Sarraj S, Chandler C, Zebian B, Cairns C, Natrajan R, Boult JKR, Robinson SP, Sill M, Dunkel IJ, Gilheeney SW, Rosenblum MC, Hughes D, Proszek PZ, Macdonald TJ, Preusser M, Haberler C, Slavc I, Packer R, Ng HK, Caspi S, Popović M, Kotnik BF, Wood MD, Baird L, Davare MA, Solomon DA, Olsen TK, Brandal P, Farrell M, Cryan JB, Capra M, Karremann M, Schittenhelm J, Schuhmann MU, Ebinger M, Dinjens WNM, Kerl K, Hettmer S, Pietsch T, Andreiuolo F, Hernáiz Driever P, Korshunov A, Hiddingh L, Worst BC, Sturm D, Zuckermann M, Witt O, Bloom T, Mitchell C, Miele E, Colafati GS, Diomedi-Camassei F, Bailey S, Moore AS, Hassall TEG, Lowis SP, Tsoli M, Cowley MJ, Ziegler DS, Karajannis MA, Aquilina K, Hargrave DR, Carceller F, Marshall LV, von Deimling A, Kramm CM, Pfister SM, Sahm F, Baker SJ, Mastronuzzi A, Carai A, Vinci M, Capper D, Popov S, Ellison DW, Jacques TS, Jones DTW, Jones C. Infant high-grade gliomas comprise multiple subgroups characterized by novel targetable gene fusions and favorable outcomes. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:942–63. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1030.
Guerreiro Stucklin AS, Ryall S, Fukuoka K, Zapotocky M, Lassaletta A, Li C, Bridge T, Kim B, Arnoldo A, Kowalski PE, Zhong Y, Johnson M, Li C, Ramani AK, Siddaway R, Nobre LF, De Antonellis P, Dunham C, Cheng S, Boué DR, Finlay JL, Coven SL, De Prada I, Somarriba MP, Faria CC, Grotzer MA, Rushing E, Sumerauer D, Zamecnik J, Krskova L, Ariza MG, Cruz O, La Madrid AM, Solano P, Terashima K, Nakano Y, Ichimura K, Nagane M, Sakamoto H, Gil-da-Costa MJ, Silva R, Johnston DL, Michaud J, Wilson B, van Landeghem FKH, Oviedo A, McNeely PD, Crooks B, Fried I, Zhukova N, Hansford JR, Nageswararao A, Garzia L, Shago M, Brudno M, Irwin MS, Bartels U, Ramaswamy V, Bouffet E, Taylor MD, Tabori U, Hawkins C. Alterations in ALK/ROS1/NTRK/MET drive a group of infantile hemispheric gliomas. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4343. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12187-5.
Mançano BM, Dos Reis MB, Moreno DA, De Paula FE, De Almeida CR Junior, Cavalcante CEB, Zanon MF, Santana IVV, De Medeiros Matsushita M, Reis RM. A unique case report of infant-type hemispheric glioma (gliosarcoma subtype) with TPR-NTRK1-fusion treated with Larotrectinib. Pathobiology. 2022;89:178–85. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521253.
Komori T. The molecular framework of pediatric-type diffuse gliomas: shifting toward the revision of the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2021;38:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00392-w.
Di Ruscio V, Del Baldo G, Fabozzi F, Vinci M, Cacchione A, De Billy E, Megaro G, Carai A, Mastronuzzi A. Pediatric diffuse midline gliomas: An unfinished puzzle. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092064.
Moore W, Mathis D, Gargan L, Bowers DC, Klesse LJ, Margraf L, Koral K. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma of childhood: MR imaging and diffusion MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:2192–6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4011.
Yu S, He L, Zhuang X, Luo B. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: MR imaging findings in 19 patients. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:223–8. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2010.100221.
Bender K, Perez E, Chirica M, Onken J, Kahn J, Brenner W, Ehret F, Euskirchen P, Koch A, Capper D, Kaul D. High-grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP): the Charité experience with a new central nervous system tumor entity. J Neurooncol. 2021;153:109–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03749-z.
Capper D, Jones DTW, Rodriguez FJ, Varlet P. High-grade astrocytoma with piloid features. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central nervous system tumours. 5th ed. WHO classification of tumours series, Vol. 6. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
Borja MJ, Plaza MJ, Altman N, Saigal G. Conventional and advanced MRI features of pediatric intracranial tumors: supratentorial tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:W483–W503. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9724.
Daghistani R, Miller E, Kulkarni AV, Widjaja E. Atypical characteristics and behaviour of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors. Neuroradiology. 2013;55:217–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1135-z.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
R. Nafe, L. Porto, P.-F. Samp, S.-J. You and E. Hattingen declare that they have no competing interests. The authors hereby declare that they did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this review. No grants or other support were received. The authors have no financial interests to disclose.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nafe, R., Porto, L., Samp, PF. et al. Adult-type and Pediatric-type Diffuse Gliomas. Clin Neuroradiol 33, 611–624 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01277-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01277-z