Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Versorgungsrealität in der laparoskopischen Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms in Deutschland

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256:915–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20:947–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottino V, Esposito MG, Mottola A et al (2012) Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger. BMC Surg 12(Suppl 1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparision of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet 6:477–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobbins TA, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2014) Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 57:415–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A et al (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujii S, Ishibe A, Ota M et al (2014) Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Surg Endosc 28:466–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASSIC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhry E, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E et al (2005) Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc 19:687–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lorenzon L, LaTorre M, Ziparo V et al (2014) Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection. World J Gastroenterol 20:3680–3692

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Millo P, Rispoli C, Rocco N et al (2013) Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 26:198–203

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nedrebø BS, Søreide K, Nesbakken A et al (2013) Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort. Colorectal Dis 15:e301–e308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ptok H, Gastinger I, Meyer F et al (2013) Colorectal tumor surgery in the elderly: results of quality assurance. Chirurg 84:296–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U et al (2009) Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection – associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol 35:1273–1279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reichenbach DJ, Tackett AD, Harris J (2006) Laparoscopic colon resection early in the learning curve: what is the appropriate setting? Ann Surg 243:730–735

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch H (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13:151–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J et al (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. She WH, Poon JT, Fan JK et al (2013) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 27:308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. H. Ptok, I. Gastinger, C. Bruns und H. Lippert geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. An-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin gGmbH, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, ZENIT II – Gebäude, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland

    H. Ptok, I. Gastinger & H. Lippert

  2. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Deutschland

    H. Ptok & C. Bruns

Authors
  1. H. Ptok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Gastinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Bruns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Lippert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Ptok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ptok, H., Gastinger, I., Bruns, C. et al. Versorgungsrealität in der laparoskopischen Chirurgie des Kolonkarzinoms in Deutschland. coloproctology 37, 177–186 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-015-0020-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-015-0020-0

Search

Navigation