Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Resection for colon cancer in the elderly is a major undertaking. However, data on the outcome and survival of elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for colon cancer are limited. This study of patients older than 75 years compared outcome and survival between those who underwent laparoscopic resection and those who had open resection for colorectal cancer.

Methods

From 2000 to 2009, 434 patients ages 75 years and older who underwent elective resection for colon cancer were included in the study. Patients who had rectal cancer or had undergone emergency operations were excluded. Preoperative diagnosis was determined by colonoscopy, and computed tomography scan was performed for preoperative staging. Data on the patients’ demographics, operative details, pathology results, postoperative results, and survival were collected prospectively. The patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were compared with those who had open surgery.

Results

The study included 434 patients (210 men) with a median age of 80 years (range 75–95 years). Of these 434 patients, 189 underwent laparoscopic resection. Nine patients (4.8 %) required conversion to open operation. The patients did not differ in terms of age, gender, incidence of medical comorbidities, or stage of disease. The median operating time was longer in the laparoscopic group, but the blood loss was significantly less. Laparoscopic resection was associated with a lower mortality rate and a shorter hospital stay (p < 0.05). The open resection group had significantly more cardiac complications (p < 0.05). The overall 5-year survival rates were similar between the patients who had laparoscopic resections and those who had open surgery.

Conclusions

For patients older than 75 years, laparoscopic resection of colon is associated with less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, fewer cardiac complication, and a lower mortality rate than open resection. Therefore, the authors recommend laparoscopic resection of colon cancer as the treatment of choice for elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hospital Authority HK (2009) Hong Kong Cancer Registry (report)

  2. Khan MR, Bari H, Zafar SN et al (2011) Impact of age on outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly: a developing country perspective. BMC Surg 11:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Renal-Vera JJ, Tinoco-Carrasco C, del-Villar-Negro A et al (2011) Colorectal cancer in the elderly: characteristics and short-term results. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 103:408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun J, Jiang T, Qiu Z et al (2011) Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol 11:85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhary BN, Shabbir J, Griffith J et al (2012) Short-term outcome following elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Colorectal Dis 14(6):727–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinto RA, Ruiz D, Edden Y et al (2011) How reliable is laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared with laparotomy for octogenarians? Surg Endosc 25:2692–2698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK et al (2007) Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival. Ann Surg 245:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK et al (2009) Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg 33:2177–2182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS et al (2011) Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007) Colorectal cancer statistics (report)

  11. Hong Kong Cancer Stat 2007, Hong Kong Cancer Registry, Hospital Authority 2009

  12. Papamichael D, Audisio R, Horiot JC et al (2009) Treatment of the elderly colorectal cancer patient: SIOG expert recommendations. Ann Oncol 20:5–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Symeonidis D, Christodoulidis G, Koukoulis G et al (2011) Colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly: limitations and drawbacks. Tech Coloproctol 15(Suppl 1):S47–S50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcia Valdecasas JC et al (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14:22–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T et al (2003) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 17:242–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang C, Huang R, Jiang T et al (2010) Laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: an evaluation of cellular immunity. BMC Gastroenterol 10:127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM et al (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:53–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khoury SI (2006) Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth 18:67–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poon JT, Law WL, Chow LC et al (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in patients with high operative risk. Ann Surg Oncol 18:1884–1890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A et al (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, et al (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003145

  24. Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM et al (2007) Meta-analysis of nonrandomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 77:508–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Wong-Hoi She, Jensen Tung-Chung Poon, Joe King-Man Fan, Oswens Siu-Hung Lo, and Wai-Lun Law have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai-Lun Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

She, WH., Poon, J.TC., Fan, J.KM. et al. Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 27, 308–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2466-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2466-2

Keywords

Navigation