Skip to main content

Limits of vector calibration in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti

Insectes Sociaux volume 65, pages 141–152 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Desert ants that forage solitarily continually update their position relative to the nest through path integration. This is accomplished by combining information from their celestial compass and pedometer. The path integration system can adapt when memories of previous inbound routes do not coincide with the outbound route, through vector calibration. Here, we test the speed and limit of vector calibration in the desert ant Melophorus bagoti by creating directional conflicts between the inbound and outbound routes (45°, 90°, 135°, 180°). The homeward vector appears to calibrate rapidly after training with shifts occurring after three foraging trips, yet the limit of the vector’s plasticity appears to be a maximum of 45°. At 45° conflicts, the vector calibrates the full 45°, suggesting dominance of the previous inbound memories over the outbound cues of the current trip. Yet at larger directional conflicts, vector shifts after training diminish, with foragers in the 90° and 135° conditions showing smaller intermediate shifts between the inbound memories and the current outbound vector. When the conflict is at its maximum (180°), foragers show no calibration, suggesting the outbound vector is dominant. Panorama exposure during training appears to aid foragers orienting to the true nest, but this also appears limited to about a 45° shift and does not improve with training.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2 
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Batschelet E (1981) Circular Statistics in Biology. New York: Academic Press

  • Bregy P, Sommer S, Wehner R (2008) Nest-mark orientation versus vector navigation in desert ants. J Exp Biol 211:1868–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann C, Cheng K, Wehner R (2011) Vector-based and landmark-guided navigation in desert ants inhabiting landmark-free and landmark-rich environments. J Exp Biol 214:2845–2853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehlmann C, Graham P, Hansson BS, Knaden M (2015) Desert ants use olfactory scenes for navigation. Anim Behav 106:99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Freas CA (2015) Path integration, views, search, and matched filters: the contributions of Rüdiger Wehner to the study of orientation and navigation. J Comp Physiol A 201(6):517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Narendra A, Sommer S, Wehner R (2009) Traveling in clutter: navigation in the central Australian ant Melophorus bagoti. Behav Process 80:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Schultheiss P, Schwarz S, Wystrach A, Wehner R (2014) Beginnings of a synthetic approach to desert ant navigation. Behav Processes 102:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian KA, Morton SR (1992) Extreme thermophilia in a Central Australian ant, Melophorus bagoti. Physiol Zool 65:885–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS (1992) Landmark learning and guidance in insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 337:295–303. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1992.0107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett M, Collett TS (2000a) How do insects use path integration for their navigation? Biol Cyber 83(3):245–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Collett M (2000b) Path integration in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:757–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collett M, Collett TS, Wehner R (1999) Calibration of vector navigation in desert ants. Curr Biol 9:1031–1034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne AS, Teroni V, Hurni C, Portenier V (1990) The effect of a single light cue on homing behaviour of the golden hamster. Anim Behav 39:17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etienne AS, Maurer R, Seguinot V (1996) Path intergration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks. J Exp Biol 199:201–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fent K (1986) Polarised skylight orientation in the desert ant Cataglyphis. J Comp Physiol A 158:145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freas CA, Cheng K (2017) Learning and time-dependent cue choice in the desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Ethology 123:503–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freas CA, Whyte C, Cheng K (2017a) Skyline retention and retroactive interference in the navigating Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. J Comp Physiol A 203:353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-017-1174-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freas CA, Narendra A, Cheng K (2017b) Compass cues used by a nocturnal bull ant, Myrmecia midas. J Exp Biol 220:1578–1585. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.152967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freas CA, Narendra A, Lemesle C, Cheng K (2017c) Polarized light use in the nocturnal bull ant, Myrmecia midas. R Soc Open Sci 4(8):170598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Cheng K (2009) Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant? J Comp Physiol A 195:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (1979) A simple sequential rejective method procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler M, Wehner R (2005) Idiosyncratic route memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: How do they interact with path-integration vectors? Neurobiol Learn Mem 83:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labhart T, Meyer EP (1999) Detectors for polarized skylight in insects: a survey of ommatidial specializations in the dorsal rim area of the compound eye. Microsc Res Tech 47:368–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legge ELG, Wystrach A, Spetch ML, Cheng K (2014) Combining sky and Earth: desert ants (Melophorus bagoti) show weighted integration of celestial and terrestrial cues. J Exp Biol 217:4159–4166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan M, Webb B (2012) Spontaneous formation of multiple routes in individual desert ants (Cataglyphis velox). Behav Ecol 23:944–954. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H (1983) The role of multimodal convergence in homing by path integration. Fortschr Zool 28:197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller M, Wehner R (1994) The hidden spiral: systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Phys A 175:525–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muser B, Sommer S, Wolf H, Wehner R (2005) Foraging ecology of the thermophilic Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Aust J Zool 53:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A (2007) Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information. J Exp Biol 210:1804–1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A, Cheng K, Wehner R (2007a) Acquiring, retaining and integrating memories of the outbound distance in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Exp Biol 210:570–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A, Si A, Sulikowski D, Cheng K (2007b) Learning, retention and coding of nest-associated visual cues by the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1543–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A, Gourmaud S, Zeil J (2013a) Mapping the navigational knowledge of individually foraging ants, Myrmecia croslandi. Proc R Soc B 280:20130683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A, Reid SF, Raderschall CA (2013b) Navigational efficiency of nocturnal Myrmecia ants suffers at low light levels. PLoS One 8:e58801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A, Ramirez-Esquivel F, Ribi WA (2016) Compound eye and ocellar structure for walking and flying modes of locomotion in the Australian ant, Camponotus consobrinus. Sci Rep 6:22331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto F (1959) Die Bedeutung des Rückfluges für die Richtings – und Entfernungsangabe der Bienen. Z Vergl Physiol 42:303–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss P, Cheng K (2011) Finding the nest: inbound searching behaviour in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Anim Behav 81:1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss P, Wystrach A, Scwarz S, Tack A, Delor J, Nooten SS, Bibost AL, Freas CA, Cheng K (2016) Crucial role of ultraviolet light for desert ants in determining direction from the terrestrial panorama. Anim Behav 115:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz S, Cheng K (2010) Visual associative learning in two desert ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:2033–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1987) Spatial organization of the foraging behavior in individually searching desert ants, Cataglyphis (Sahara desert) and Ocymyrmex (Namib desert). In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JM (eds) From individual to collective behavior in insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 15–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1994) The polarization-vision project: championing organismic biology. In: Schildberger K, Elsner N (eds) Neural basis of behavioural adaptation. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 103–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (2008) The architecture of the desert ant’s navigational toolkit (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 12:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Müller M (2006) The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant’s celestial system of navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12575–12579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Räber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35:1569–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Comp Physiol A 142:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Wehner S (1986) Path integration in desert ants. Approaching a long-standing puzzle in insect navigation. Monit Zool Ital 20:309–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199:129–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Gallizzi K, Frei C, Vesely M (2002) Calibration processes in desert ant navigation: vector courses and systematic search. J Comp Physiol A 188:683–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Boyer M, Loertscher F, Sommer S, Menzi U (2006) Ant navigation: one-way routes rather than maps. Curr Biol 16:75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wittlinger M, Wehner R, Wolf H (2007) The desert ant odometer: a stride integrator that accounts for stride length and walking speed. J Exp Biol 210:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wystrach A, Schwarz S, Schultheiss P, Baniel A, Cheng K (2014) Multiple sources of celestial compass information in the central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Comp Physiol A 200:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1998) Biostatisical analysis, 4th edn. Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Ribi WA, Narendra A (2014) Polarization vision in ants, bees and wasps. In: Horváth G (ed) Polarized light and polarization vision in animal sciences, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Grant from the Australian Research Council (DP150101172) and many thanks to the Centre of Appropriate Technology for access to the field site and nests. The authors declare no conflict of interests in association with this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Cody A. Freas & Ken Cheng

Authors
  1. Cody A. Freas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ken Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Experiments conceived and designed: CAF. Data collection and analysis: CAF. Manuscript production and revision: CAF and KC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cody A. Freas.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 373 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freas, C.A., Cheng, K. Limits of vector calibration in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti . Insect. Soc. 65, 141–152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0595-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0595-2

Keywords

  • Ants
  • Path integration
  • Vector navigation
  • Vector calibration
  • Memory