Abstract
The TLQP-21 neuropeptide has been implicated in functions as diverse as lipolysis, neurodegeneration and metabolism, thus suggesting an important role in several human diseases. Three binding targets have been proposed for TLQP-21: C3aR1, gC1qR and HSPA8. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the molecular identity of the TLQP-21 receptor and the proposed multi-receptor mechanism of action. Several studies confirm a critical role for C3aR1 in TLQP-21 biological activity and a largely conserved mode of binding, receptor activation and signaling with C3a, its first-identified endogenous ligand. Conversely, data supporting a role of gC1qR and HSPA8 in TLQP-21 activity remain limited, with no signal transduction pathways being described. Overall, C3aR1 is the only receptor for which a necessary and sufficient role in TLQP-21 activity has been confirmed thus far. This conclusion calls into question the validity of a multi-receptor mechanism of action for TLQP-21 and should inform future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction and scope of the review
The murine Vgf gene (non-acronymic) encodes for a 617-amino acid (615 in human)-long pro-protein and peptide precursor, classified as a member of the extended granin family [1]. VGF is cleaved by prohormone convertases such as PC1/3 and PC2 to generate low-molecular weight peptides which are secreted through the regulated pathway [1, 2]. The 21-amino acid-long TLQP-21 is arguably the most studied and best characterized among the VGF-encoded peptides [3, 4]. After its identification in the rodent brain [3], sympathetic nerves [5] and sensory neurons [6], it emerged as a pleiotropic neuropeptide involved in various physiological processes such as lipolysis, microglial activation, pain, sexual and depression-like behavior and energy balance [1, 7,8,9,10]. However, most of our knowledge on the pharmacological and physiological role of TLQP-21 derives from pharmacological gain of function experiments pre-dating the identification of its cognate receptor. To date, three binding targets, have been proposed for TLQP-21, namely Complement 3a Receptor 1 (C3aR1) [11], the receptor for the globular head of the complement protein C1q (gC1qR) [12], and the Heat Shock Protein Family A member 8 (HSPA8) [13].
Here, we aim to provide a critical review of the molecular identity of the TLQP-21 receptor as well as to evaluate the hypothesis that multiple receptors are responsible for TLQP-21 biological activity.
Upon critical evaluation of experimental evidence available to date, sequence alignment of pharmacophores and analysis of mode(s) of binding of receptor ligands, we conclude that C3aR1 is the only cognate receptor of TLQP-21 for which a necessary and sufficient role has been confirmed, and a molecular mechanism has been proposed for its activation upon ligand binding. Additionally, a multi-receptor mechanism of action is not supported by experimental results. This conclusion should be taken into account when designing future mechanistic studies as well as in drug discovery and development experiments focused on this promising therapeutic target for human diseases.
The TLQP-21 neuropeptide
Identification, biochemistry and evolution. TLQP-21 was originally identified in the rodent brain using mass spectrometry [3]. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of immunoprecipitates of VGF peptides from rat brain allowed the identification of a pseudomolecular ion at a mass to charge (m/z) of 2433.53 designated as TLQP-21 corresponding to positions 556–576 of the rat VGF sequence. The consequent analysis identified the sequence as TLQPPASSRRRHFHHALPPAR. Its name derives from the first four N-terminal amino acid sequence (Thr-Leu-Gln-Pro) combined with the specification of its length, following standard convention in VGF biology [2]. TLQP-21 derives from the cleavage of the precursor TLQP-62 [3, 14], although the exact biochemical steps for this proteolytic cleavage have not been clarified yet. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis, molecular modeling and NMR studies corroborated the identification of the pharmacophore of TLQP-21 as the three C-terminal residues PAR [4, 15].
A recent evolutionary protein sequence analysis of TLQP-21 for the mammalian peptide showed that 96% of mammals had a positively charged C-terminal residue [4] with the human sequence being the ancestral and evolutionarily conserved sequence, while a unique gain of function mutation emerged in two subfamilies of rodents (see below for details on the pharmacology). All primates express a C-terminal PSR motif which is also the most dominant motif representing 56% of the sequences analyzed [4]. On the other hand, Muridae and Cricetidae (subfamilies of rodents including mice, rats, and hamsters) express the PAR motif at the C-terminus. As will be discussed below, pharmacological evidences suggest that this S to A mutation may represent a gain of function enabling small-sized rodents to have a selective advantage to mobilize energy [4].
Tissue distribution and regulation of expression
Due to intrinsic biological constraints (a peptide encoded by a pro-peptide precursor) and limitations in current bioassay development/validation, there is limited knowledge on the tissue distribution and regulation of TLQP-21. The expression of the Vgf gene has been used as a proxy of TLQP-21 expression. Studies of VGF mRNA described prominent expression in the central and peripheral nervous system and in several neuroendocrine glands including the pancreas, adrenal medulla and pituitary [1]. However, since VGF encodes for at least 8 biologically active peptides generated through cell and organ-dependent proteolytic cleavage in the secretory granules [1, 2], VGF gene expression should not be used as a unambiguous measure of TLQP-21 regulation/expression and investigators should use proteomics to confirm the presence of the peptide cleavage products. Similarly, the presence of “TLQP- motif containing peptides” has been described in enterochromaffin-like cells, somatostatin cells, pancreas and the hypothalamus [8, 16,17,18]. It must be noted that the antibodies used against the N-terminus of TLQP-21 do not discriminate among TLQP-21 and other peptides containing the “TLQP” sequence. Recently, a selective rabbit anti-mouse TLQP-21 has been generated [5], allowing the identification of expression in sympathetic nerves innervating the adipose tissue [5] and sensory neurons [6]. However, its use has been limited thus far, and no comprehensive organ mapping has been conducted. Finally, a few experimental [16, 17] or commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for TLQP-21 are available. While, they provide valuable insights, unfortunately they are limited in scope due to partial validation or significant cross-reactivity with overlapping VGF fragments including the TLQP-62 precursor, a peptide for which a cognate receptor has not been identified yet and which shows a pharmacology often inconsistent with TLQP-21. Indeed, while TLQP-21 and TLQP-62 treatment resulted in overlapping, but not identical, reduction in neuropathology in 5xFAD model of Alzheimer`s disease [19] and thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity [20], several studies showed non-overlapping and potentially opposing effects of either the two peptides or non-cross reactive antibodies directed specifically to TLQP-21 or TLQP-62, including in: contextual fear conditioning memory [21], behavior in depression-related tests like the forced swim test and social interaction test [22] and the firing rate of hypothalamic neuronal networks [23]. Studies in insulinoma [14] and CHO cells [24], revealed different potencies of the two peptides, and moreover, stimulation of insulin secretion by TLQP-62 in insulinoma cells was not blocked by the C3aR1 antagonist SB290157 [14]. Overall, the preponderance of non-overlapping biological functions of TLQP-21 and TLQP-62 suggests that assays which detect significant overlap between these two (and potentially other) VGF-derived peptides containing the TLQP motif can have limited validity to discriminate TLQP-21 expression. Technological innovation and systematic studies are desperately needed to address these gaps of knowledge.
Biological role of TLQP-21: in vitro studies
The best characterized second messenger elicited by TLQP-21 treatment in various cell lines is calcium mobilization [4, 11, 12, 25,26,27,28]. The source of calcium, i.e., extracellular vs intracellular, as well as the signaling cascade(s) downstream of calcium influx seems to vary among cell lines—although little direct cross cellular comparison has been attempted thus far.
One of the best characterized cellular functions of TLQP-21 is the potentiation of adrenergic-induced lipolysis in adipocytes [4, 5, 15, 28]. Specifically, TLQP-21 is not a lipolytic molecule per se but dose-dependently increases βAR (adrenergic receptors)-induced lipolysis with a mechanism leading to calcium influx from transient receptor potential cation channels (TRPC) from the extracellular compartment and downstream activation of CaMKII/ERK1/2 (calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II/Extracellular signal-regulated kinases) [4, 5, 28]. While this pathway is insufficient to mediate hormone sensitive lipase (HSL) activation and cause lipolysis, it potentiates phosphorylation of HSL elicited by βAR activation, causing a sustained pro-lipolytic effect. Interestingly, it was shown that the mouse TLQP-21 (mTLQP-21) sequence is more potent than the human TLQP-21 (hTLQP-21) sequence in potentiating adrenergic-induced lipolysis in both rodent and human adipocytes [4], a result consistent with the lower potency of hTLQP-21 reported for other assays [4, 11, 15] and its evolutionary history (see above). As discussed below, albeit the human and mouse peptides have different potency in most (but not all [29]) assays, the molecular pathway is conserved and the mouse peptide has been proposed an ideal template for translational studies and drug design [4, 15].
Another cellular model that has been often used to probe TLQP-21 activity is microglia [29,30,31]. TLQP-21 increases the phagocytic potential of microglia via the uptake of fibrillar amyloid-β (fAβ) or fluorescently labeled beads, as well as by increasing cell migration in a wound healing assay [29]. One study in particular showed that TLQP-21 impairs microglial P2Y-mediated purinergic signaling while modulating phagocytic activity [30].
Aside from adipocytes and microglia, other studies confirmed a functional role for TLQP-21 in other cell types including: neuroprotection in cerebellar granule cells [25]; a trophic effect on GH3 cell line [27]; and finally, enhancement of β-cell survival and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion [9].
Biological role of TLQP-21: in vivo studies
TLQP-21 has been implicated in various physiological processes including but not limited to metabolic regulation [3, 9, 28, 32, 33], nociception [6, 34], sexual behavior [35], anxiety/stress-related behavior [36, 37] (In this review, we will only highlight the major physiological functions of TLQP-21. Readers are directed to systematic review papers for a comprehensive discussion on the biological role of this neuropeptide [1, 38,39,40]).
The first report on the biological role of TLQP-21 derived from chronic intracerebroventricular (icv) infusion in mice, whereby the peptide increased resting energy expenditure and rectal temperature, coupled with prevention of diet-induced obesity [3]. Molecular analyses suggested that this effect is mediated by activating the sympathetic outflow pathway to adipose fat pads [3]. Follow-up studies confirmed this initial observation in mice and hamsters [3, 8, 18, 32, 41]. In contrast to mice, TLQP-21 reduces food intake in Siberian hamsters. Chronic peripheral TLQP-21 injection decreases body weight and fat mass in diet-induced obese mice without changes in food intake or, surprisingly, energy expenditure measured with indirect calorimetry [28], as well as in hamsters where hypophagia is also observed [18]. The TLQP-21-induced anti-obesity effect is prevented by germline C3aR1 knockout in mice [28]. Moreover, experiments conducted on lean hamsters through TLQP-21 administration exposed to short photoperiods caused reduced food intake, while the same was not seen in hamsters exposed to long photoperiods [18, 32]. At variance, a recent report showed no anti-obesity effect of TLQP-21 in diet-induced obese mice [23]. Several methodological differences must be noted among these studies, including the duration of high-fat diet (HFD) (9 [28] vs 32 [23] weeks) and peptide infusion (28 [28] vs 11 days [23]). Furthermore, in the recent study [23], but in no previous study, TLQP-21 was dissolved in Polysorbate-80 (Tween-80) a solvent known to cause inflammation and metabolic syndrome [42] and to increase C3a activation (the originally identified ligand for C3aR1) [43, 44]; overall, this suggests a potential interference of Tween-80 with the mechanism of action of TLQP-21 which remains to be investigated.
Another prominent function of TLQP-21 is to regulate pain behavior and nociception. In mouse models of nerve injury and inflammation, VGF expression was shown to drastically increase in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia neurons [45]. Intraplantar injection of TLQP-21 leads to hyperalgesia in rodent models of inflammatory pain induced by formalin [34], while TLQP-21 elicits an analgesic response when administered icv in the same pain model [34]. On the other hand, intrathecal TLQP-21 injection elicits hyperalgesia and contributes to nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity with a mechanism that requires C3aR1 expression in microglia and is mediated by calcium influx and p38 activation [6, 7]. While the mechanism for this differential effect has not been firmly established yet, it is hypothesized that the central effect of TLQP-21 can be due to activation of downstream pathways regulating pain behavior, while peripheral injection could directly activate the receptor in nerve terminals and/or local immune cells activating an inflammatory response.
In parallel to a prominent function of TLQP-21 on microglia (discussed above), a recent study demonstrated that icv infusion of TLQP-21 can reduce the amount of amyloid plaques present in brain parenchyma, improving overall neuropathology in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [29].
Overall, the versatile biology of TLQP-21 in functions as diverse as lipolysis, neurodegeneration and metabolism, suggests an important role in several human diseases.
The identity of the TLQP-21 receptor
Pharmacological and biophysical studies conducted before the first receptor was identified in 2013 suggested a unique binding site for TLQP-21 in 3T3-L1 and CHO cells [5, 26]. Furthermore, two independent studies used 125I-TLQP-21 or 18F-JMV5656 (a TLQP-21 derivative) to explore the in vivo binding and distribution of these peptides upon intravenous (iv) injection [46, 47]. High binding in pancreas, liver, adipose, kidney, adrenal glands and heart was observed, with negligible binding in the brain, indicating that the peptide does not cross the blood–brain barrier when peripherally injected. Although these studies did not directly probe the binding in knockout models for the proposed TLQP-21 receptors, they indirectly support the existence of cells expressing the receptors in those organs.
Three putative binding targets of TLQP-21 have been identified. The first receptor identified was C3aR1 [11], with gC1qR [12] and HSPA8 [13] being described shortly thereafter (Figs. 1 and 2). The following sections critically review the published evidence in support of each of these targets and evaluate the notion of multiple receptors and mechanisms responsible for TLQP-21 biological activity.
Identification of C3aR1 as the TLQP-21 receptor
C3aR1 is a 7-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that was first identified as the receptor for the complement activation product C3a [48] (Fig. 2). C3aR1 is expressed in various tissues including adipose, brain and pancreas with higher expression seen in high-fat diet fed obese rodents [4, 28, 46, 49,50,51]. The predominant cell type in which C3aR1 is expressed are macrophages and other immune cells, while expression in other stromal cells and adipocytes has also been reported [4, 28, 46, 49,50,51]. Regarding expression in the CNS, multiple studies have shown robust C3aR1 expression in microglia [7, 29,30,31, 52].
The C3aR1 molecular pharmacology is incompletely understood. In general, ligand-mediated C3aR1 activation leads to Gi/o protein activation and βarrestin1/2 recruitment [4, 7, 51, 53, 54]. However, a few studies also suggest the activation of alternative G proteins (e.g., Gs, Gq) [4, 7, 51, 53, 54] and a number of downstream signaling pathways, among which increased intracellular calcium is the most commonly reported [4, 11, 24, 51, 52, 55,56,57,58].
There is currently no resolved 3D structure of C3aR1. Human C3aR1 (hC3aR1) shares approximately 57% sequence homology to C5aR1, whose structure was previously solved by X-ray crystallography and which provided the first glimpse of the orthosteric binding site and was used as a template for homology modeling of C3aR1 [4, 59].
Experiments conducted on CHO-K1 and O-342 cell lines have led to the identification of C3aR1 as the TLQP-21 receptor [11]. Following its original identification, an independent study confirmed the identity of C3aR1 as the TLQP-21 receptor using photoaffinity labeling of N-terminal biotin-conjugated TLQP-21 peptides in membranes from CHO and 3T3-L1 cells [15].
Evaluation of C3aR1 as the TLQP-21 receptor
RNA-Seq screening of putative GPCRs, pharmacological experiments and siRNA screens were used by Hannedouche and co-workers to confirm the necessary role of C3aR1 for TLQP-21 mediated biological effects [11]. Furthermore, NMR studies demonstrated that TLQP-21 undergoes a disorder-to-order transition from random coil to α-helix in the presence of cells expressing C3aR1, an effect that is absent in C3aR1 KO cells and can be antagonized pharmacologically [15]. In the same study, the TLQP-21 pharmacophore was identified at its C-terminus using Alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Mutations in the last four amino acids caused a progressive decrease in functionality, while mutation or amidation of the C-terminal Arginine blocks the biological activity and receptor activation [15]. Furthermore, molecular modeling studies showed the C-terminal -AR motif to interact and form salt bridges with 3 residues in the mouse or human C3aR1: R161, R340 (R333 in mouse), and D417 [4]. This mode of binding is consistent with C3a binding to C3aR1, highlighting a conserved mechanism of ligand-mediated receptor activation [60]. Sequence analysis demonstrated that the dominant C-terminal motifs of C3a and TLQP-21 both contain a terminal—AR (Fig. 1). Amongst 82 mammalian sequences examined, 71% expressed the C-terminal—AR motif for C3a [4]. Overall, these data suggest that the C-terminal arginine of C3a is the pharmacophore for C3aR1 activation, forming a salt bridge at D417. Consistently, site-directed mutagenesis of D417 and other key binding site residues (R161 and R340) results in inability of C3a to bind and activate C3aR1 [4, 53, 61]. Interestingly, in addition to the two endogenous ligands also the SB290157 and JR14a contain a chemically modified uncapped Arginine [62], further supporting the requirement of this motif for C3aR1 binding and suggesting that the remaining portion of the peptides or small molecules confers specificity and regulates signaling and μM or nM potency.
Overall, pharmacological and structural analyses demonstrate that C3a and TLQP-21 are both full agonists at C3aR1 [4, 11] (This review focuses primarily on studies relevant for the identification of TLQP-21 receptor, the reader is referred to excellent reviews discussing details of C3aR1 and C3a pharmacology and physiology [51, 60, 63, 64]). A systematic and extensive pharmacological comparison between C3a and TLQP-21 has not been performed yet, and the signaling activated by TLQP-21 has only been investigated in a handful of studies and cell lines. However, the two peptides can pharmacologically antagonize each other [15], and elicit similar physiological effects in adipocyte and microglia cell lines [28, 29], with C3aR1 expression being require for biological function of the two ligands [4, 49, 52]. Specifically, several studies used in vitro and/or in vivo genetic loss of function approaches or used C3aR1 antagonists to probe the role of this receptor on TLQP-21 biological activity. TLQP-21 activates microglia to induce calcium mobilization [7], uptake of fibrillary amyloid-β [29] and, finally to regulate inflammatory pain [7]. Two independent studies demonstrate that knocking down (KD) C3aR1 using siRNA in the BV2 microglial cell line [31] or microglia from C3aR1-deficient mice [29], result in decreased basal phagocytosis, prevents TLQP-21 induced uptake of fibrillary amyloid-β and prevents TLQP-21 evoked calcium mobilization. It was also observed that the differentially expressed genes upon TLQP-21 administration were abrogated by C3aR1 deletion in primary microglia [29]. Furthermore, C3aR1 KD using shRNA in 3T3L1 prevents TLQP-21-induced calcium influx, substrate phosphorylation and pro-lipolytic activity [4]. It should be noted that, similar to several other cases of loss of function of GPCRs [65], C3aR1 KD adipocytes manifested increased basal and isoproterenol-induced lipolysis [4], suggesting that a comprehensive multifactorial experimental approach should be used to fully understand the role of C3aR1 in ligand-mediated lipolysis. Finally, and consistent with the effect seen in adipocytes, C3aR1 knockout prevented the TLQP-21-induced anti-obesity effect seen in wild-type mice [28].
Although mode of binding, mechanism of receptor activation and signaling mediated by C3a or TLQP-21 are largely conserved, the two peptides are also known to have different physiology. Indeed, TLQP-21 exerts a predominantly "beneficial" metabolic and neurological effect [9, 28, 29, 66] while C3a exerts a predominantly "negative" proinflammatory and anaphylactic-like effect [51, 52, 58, 61, 63]. The source and mechanism of this differential effect remain to be established.
The C3aR1 antagonist SB290157 [67] has been shown to antagonize several TLQP-21 biological effects in cultured primary microglia, microglia cell lines, mast cells or 3T3-L1 cells [4, 7, 30, 31, 62]. For example, TLQP-21-evoked potassium currents in microglia cells were blocked by SB290157 inhibition with only 1/11 cells tested showing a small TLQP-21 response in the presence of the antagonist [30]. However, SB290157 also exerts an agonist effect on C3aR1-mediated functions such as calcium influx, β-lactamase activity and ERK signaling [57, 68]. Evidence that SB290517 can act both as an antagonist and an agonist depending on cellular context suggests that experiments based only on SB290157 to infer (or exclude) a role for C3aR1 on TLQP-21 induced effects should be considered with caution. Other C3aR1 antagonists have been proposed [61, 62], but the most potent molecules, e.g., JR14a family of compounds, are derivative of SB290157, and their validation is thus far limited.
To the best of our knowledge, only two studies report data which are partially inconsistent with a necessary role of C3aR1 for TLQP-21 induced effect. In the first study, partial C3aR1 KD obtained by using siRNA did not reduce calcium influx elicited by the TLQP-21 derivative JMV5656 (TLQP-21 was not used in this study) [69]. However, the alternative mechanisms to C3aR1 activation were not investigated. In a second study, the evidence was presented that an anti-C1qBP monoclonal antibody mAB-C1qBP (see below for the detailed review on the role of gC1qR) but not SB290157, inhibits TLQP-21-induced inhibition of ATP-evoked outward potassium currents in microglia [30]. This evidence has been used to suggest that C3aR1 mediates some, but not all functions of TLQP-21. The concerns on the exclusive use of SB290157 to rule out a role for C3aR1 have been discussed above. Furthermore, the use of an antibody against a receptor to infer ligand-mediated activation and its impact on downstream signaling, in the absence of independent verification of its specificity and function blocking activity, provide less rigorous support for the activation of gC1qR by TLQP-21, compared to C3aR1.
Overall, a critical assessment of published loss of function or pharmacological experiments from multiple laboratories, provide substantial evidence for a necessary and sufficient role of C3aR1 to explain the biological activity TLQP-21 (summarized in Fig. 3).
Identification of gC1qR as the TLQP-21 receptor
gC1qR, also known as p33, is a cellular homotrimer protein of 33 kDa that was identified as a receptor for the globular head of the complement protein C1q [70] (Fig. 2). gC1qR is produced as a pre-protein and assembles into a donut-shaped homotrimer with acidic ligand and cell-binding surfaces [70]. gC1qR is found predominantly in the mitochondrial matrix and in cellular compartments such as the endoplasmic reticulum, the nucleus, and at the cell surface in some cells [71]. Classic studies demonstrated that the globular head of gC1qR is secreted in response to immune cell activation and it can be considered to be a regulator of complement activation [72]. The original ligand identified for gC1qR, C1q is a 460 kDa hexameric protein that is the first recognition subcomponent in the classical complement pathway [73, 74] (Fig. 1). C1q is formed from 18 polypeptide chains (2 each of chains A, B, and C) that form a ‘bouquet of flowers-like structure’ consisting of a collagen-like stem domain and 6 globular flower heads which are important for ligand recognition [74].
Chen and co-workers identified gC1qR as an alternative receptor for TLQP-21 using affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry-based approaches [12]. The study utilizes a chemically modified TLQP-21 consisting of a biotinylated label added to the N-terminus of the peptide with an extended cysteine residue at the C-terminus, cross-linked to sulfo-EMCS (N-ε-maleimidocaproyl-oxysulfosuccinimide ester). Incubation of the modified biotin-TLQP-21-C-sulfo-EMCS peptide enables covalent binding to membrane proteins from the brain and spinal cord of adult rats, and protein separation using avidin monomeric column. Bottom-up proteomics analysis by nano-LC–MS/MS analysis of the eluents identified three distinct fragments belonging to the gC1qR [12]. It should be noted that TLQP-21 binding to and activation of C3aR1 requires an uncapped C-terminus [15]. The study by Chen and co-workers did not report the presence of C3aR1. Thus, it is possible that the addition of a cysteine residue to the C-terminus of TLQP-21 with a chemically reactive cross-linker favored binding to gC1qR and impacted the binding to and identification of C3aR1.
Evaluation of gC1qR as the TLQP-21 receptor
To the best of our knowledge, only two studies directly tested the role of gC1qR in TLQP-21-mediated effects. After identifying gC1qR as a putative receptor for TLQP-21, Chen and co-workers used siRNA or incubated macrophages with a monoclonal antibody against gC1qR to demonstrate inhibition of TLQP-21-mediated effects [12]. The increase in intracellular Ca2 + levels elicited in macrophages by TLQP-21 was attenuated by either siRNA or neutralizing antibodies against gC1qR. Similarly, a neutralizing antibody directed against gC1qR was used in rats following partial sciatic nerve ligation, resulting in a delayed onset of TLQP-21-mediated and nerve injury-associated mechanical hypersensitivity [12]. A separate study suggested that both C3aR1 and gC1qR could contribute to the function of TLQP-21 in modulating microglia [30]. However, in this latter study, only one experiment was provided to support a role for gC1qR in TLQP-21 signaling, while several other experiments proved a direct role for C3aR1 (see above). This experiment focused on TLQP-21-induced inhibition of ATP-evoked outward potassium currents. While SB290157 did not prevent the TLQP21-induced effect, preincubation of microglia with mAB-C1qBP blocked its effect [30]. Concerns about the mixed agonist/antagonist profile of SB290157 (see above) and the use of a blocking antibody against gC1qR suggest these potentially interesting findings should be verified by additional experimentation utilizing different loss of function approaches.
Another aspect should be considered in this critical assessment of available evidence supporting the identity of gC1qR as a TLQP-21 receptor. Sequence alignment of the chain A of C1q (from PDB: 6FZC) with m/hTLQP-21 show limited overall amino acid similarity, and no sequence similarity at the C-terminus of TLQP-21 (Fig. 1), which represents the peptide hot spot for its biological activity [4, 7, 15, 29].
Overall, considering published evidence to date, only one study has provided direct evidence in support of a necessary role of gC1qR for TLQP-21 activity. Other studies have provided some suggestive evidence of the involvement of this receptor in TLQP-21 activity, but these studies were mostly based on either unclear or negative outcomes using the C3aR1 antagonist SB290157 or the use of neutralizing antibodies against the gC1qR. This led us to conclude that strong support for gC1qR as a specific TLQP-21 receptor is lacking. The possibility exists that, similar to many other small peptides [70], TLQP-21 engages in non-selective binding to gC1qR.
Identification and evaluation of HSPA8 as the TLQP-21 receptor
HSPA8, a 646-amino acid-long protein, is known by many names, such as heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein, heat shock 70 kDa protein 8, HSC70, and HSP73 [75] (Fig. 2). HSPA8 is a constitutively and ubiquitously expressed protein, found both intracellularly, in the cytoplasm and nucleus and extracellularly on the cell membrane. One of its major cellular functions is in protein folding of newly synthesized polypeptides and reducing protein aggregation [75, 76]. Evidence points towards the presence of multiple binding sites of HSPA8 to various cofactors and ligands (e.g., NRLLLTG), conferring upon it a variety of functions. For example, EWI-2, an early activation marker of dendritic cells, was identified as a ligand of HSPA8 by binding to HSPA8-expressing cells and the immobilized HSPA8 protein [77].
Using affinity chromatography, mass spectrometry as well as molecular dynamics, a recent study suggested that hTLQP-21 binds to HSPA8 expressed on the plasma membrane of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells [13]. Similar to the study identifying gC1qR as an alternative receptor for TLQP-21, this study also employed cysteine addition to the C-terminus of TLQP-21 (the peptide hot spot for biological function). Furthermore, docking and simulation study of the TLQP-21 bound homology model of HSPA8 was not followed up with experimental validation studies.
After its initial identification, no additional study has been published on the role of HSPA8 in TLQP-21 biological activity, and as a result, the significance of TLQP-21 binding to HSP8 cannot be fully evaluated at this time.
Summary
Interest in the TLQP-21 neuropeptide has significantly increased after its original identification in 2006 [3], and following the recognition of multiple potential receptors or binding partners in subsequent years [11,12,13]. The existence of multiple putative binding partners for TLQP-21 requires the undertaking of a critical evaluation of the available evidence in support of this multi-receptor model. This is an important step in the mechanistic analysis of its mode of action and a full evaluation of its potential for pharmacotherapies.
Biophysical and biochemical data are inconsistent with multiple TLQP-21 binding sites [5, 24, 26]. Furthermore, structural/molecular determinants of TLQP-21 binding, the requirement for uncapped C-terminal arginine for its biological activity, and the evidence that C3aR1 deletion abrogates TLQP-21 induced activity in vitro and in vivo, conclusively support the identity of C3aR1 as a TLQP-21 receptor (e.g., [4, 7, 28]). Conversely, evidence in support of gC1qR and HSPA8 as specific cognate receptors is very limited thus far, based on the use of C-terminally modified peptides that can interfere with its biological function, and some of the experiments are based solely on the use of incompletely characterized neutralizing antibodies against the receptor to probe the signaling pathway. It is, thus, possible that binding of TLQP-21 to gC1qR could be non-specific since this receptor binds to a plethora of proteins and peptides found in plasma, on the cell surface and on microorganisms [70]. Similarly, HSPA8 is a molecular chaperone for several proteins and no loss or gain of function experiment has been published in relation to TLQP-21 activity.
Overall, based on experimental evidence published to date, we conclude that: 1) the only receptor for which sufficient experimental evidence has been obtained by multiple independent groups supporting its identity as the TLQP-21 receptor is the C3aR1; and 2) the multi-receptor model is not supported by independent replication of experimental data.
Gaps of knowledge, limitations and future directions
The identification of C3aR1 as the TLQP-21 receptor is a major step forward for future studies aimed at mechanistically disentangling its biology as well as in probing its potential for translational and drug discovery and development.
Yet, gaps of knowledge and weaknesses in the existing literature were noted. First, the use of the putative C3aR1 receptor antagonist SB290157 remains problematic because of its reported partial agonist activity; further research should address its molecular mechanism(s) of action and attempts should be made to develop novel C3aR1 antagonists [62]. Second, there is an incomplete knowledge of TLQP-21 and C3aR1 expression (and a lack of specific reagents to assess it) [49], and it has been difficult to determine under which physiological conditions and in which organs this peptide and its receptor are regulated. Third, since TLQP-21 and C3a are two endogenous ligands of C3aR1, it is essential to define whether the signaling pathways they activate are similar, as well as to identify the conditions favouring local tissue availability of each of them. Fourth, how ligand-mediated C3aR1 receptor activation differs to cause similar but not fully overlapping physiological effects in vivo is not presently understood. Fifth, with the emergence of microglial C3aR1 as potentially the predominant TLQP-21-activated receptor in the CNS, future studies will need to determine how/whether this microglial signaling pathway contributes to the control of energy homeostasis, nociception, sexual behavior, anxiety/stress-related behavior, and the development and progression of neurodegenerative disease, bioactivities all demonstrated for TLQP-21. Finally, evidence suggesting that the TLQP-21/C3aR1 sequence co-evolved in mammals [4], with the human peptide/receptor system representing the ancestral form characterized by low pharmacological potency, should be addressed by follow-up experiments designed to fully investigate the potential of C3aR1 as a new target for human diseases.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Change history
20 February 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04718-7
References
Bartolomucci A, Possenti R, Mahata SK et al (2011) The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications. Endocr Rev 32:755–797. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2010-0027
Levi A, Ferri GL, Watson E et al (2004) Processing, distribution, and function of VGF, a neuronal and endocrine peptide precursor. Cell Mol Neurobiol 24:517–533
Bartolomucci A, La Corte G, Possenti R et al (2006) TLQP-21, a VGF-derived peptide, increases energy expenditure and prevents the early phase of diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14584–14589. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606102103
Sahu BSBS, Rodriguez P, Nguyen MEME et al (2019) Peptide/receptor co-evolution explains the lipolytic function of the neuropeptide TLQP-21. Cell Rep 28:2567-2580.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.101
Possenti R, Muccioli G, Petrocchi P et al (2012) Characterization of a novel peripheral pro-lipolytic mechanism in mice: role of VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21. Biochem J 441:511–522. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20111165
Fairbanks CA, Peterson CD, Speltz RH et al (2014) The VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21 contributes to inflammatory and nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity. Pain 155:1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.03.012
Doolen S, Cook J, Riedl M et al (2017) Complement 3a receptor in dorsal horn microglia mediates pronociceptive neuropeptide signaling. Glia 65:1976–1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23208
Lewis JE, Brameld JM, Hill P et al (2017) Hypothalamic over-expression of VGF in the Siberian hamster increases energy expenditure and reduces body weight gain. PLoS One 12:e0172724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172724
Stephens SB, Schisler JC, Hohmeier HE et al (2012) A VGF-derived peptide attenuates development of type 2 diabetes via enhancement of islet β-cell survival and function. Cell Metab 16:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.05.011
Severini C, La Corte G, Improta G et al (2009) In vitro and in vivo pharmacological role of TLQP-21, a VGF-derived peptide, in the regulation of rat gastric motor functions. Br J Pharmacol 157:984–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00192.x
Hannedouche S, Beck V, Leighton-Davies J et al (2013) Identification of the C3a receptor (C3AR1) as the target of the VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21 in rodent cells. J Biol Chem 288:27434–27443. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.497214
Chen Y-C, Pristerá A, Ayub M et al (2013) Identification of a receptor for neuropeptide VGF and its role in neuropathic pain. J Biol Chem 288:34638–34646. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.510917
Akhter S, Chakraborty S, Moutinho D et al (2017) The human VGF-derived bioactive peptide TLQP-21 binds heat shock 71 kDa protein 8 (HSPA8)on the surface of SH-SY5Y cells. PLoS ONE 12:e0185176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185176
Petrocchi-Passeri P, Cero C, Cutarelli A et al (2015) The VGF-derived peptide TLQP-62 modulates insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis. J Mol Endocrinol 54:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-14-0313
Cero C, Vostrikov VV, Verardi R et al (2014) The TLQP-21 peptide activates the G-protein-coupled receptor C3aR1 via a folding-upon-binding mechanism. Structure 22:1744–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2014.10.001
D’Amato F, Noli B, Angioni L et al (2015) VGF peptide profiles in type 2 diabetic patients’ plasma and in obese mice. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142333
Brancia C, Noli B, Boido M et al (2016) VGF protein and Its C-terminal derived peptides in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: human and animal model studies. PLoS One 11:e0164689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164689
Lisci C, Lewis JE, Daniel ZCTR et al (2019) Photoperiodic changes in adiposity increase sensitivity of female Siberian hamsters to systemic VGF derived peptide TLQP-21. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221517
B ND, L WJ, W M et al (2020) Multiscale causal networks identify VGF as a key regulator of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-020-17405-Z
S N, O K, R ASC (2019) VGF: a biomarker and potential target for the treatment of neuropathic pain? Pain Rep. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000786
Lin W-J, Jiang C, Sadahiro M et al (2015) VGF and its C-terminal peptide TLQP-62 regulate memory formation in hippocampus via a BDNF-TrkB-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci 35:10343–10356. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0584-15.2015
Jiang C, Lin WJ, Labonté B et al (2019) VGF and its C-terminal peptide TLQP-62 in ventromedial prefrontal cortex regulate depression-related behaviors and the response to ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 44:971–981. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0277-4
Dalbøge LS, Jacobsen JM, Mehrotra S et al (2020) Evaluation of VGF peptides as potential anti-obesity candidates in pre-clinical animal models. Peptides. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170444
Molteni L, Rizzi L, Bresciani E et al (2017) Pharmacological and biochemical characterization of TLQP-21 activation of a binding site on CHO cells. Front Pharmacol 8:167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00167
Severini C, Ciotti MT, Biondini L et al (2008) TLQP-21, a neuroendocrine VGF-derived peptide, prevents cerebellar granule cells death induced by serum and potassium deprivation. J Neurochem 104:534–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05068.x
Cassina V, Torsello A, Tempestini A et al (2013) Biophysical characterization of a binding site for TLQP-21, a naturally occurring peptide which induces resistance to obesity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.10.023
Petrocchi Passeri P, Biondini L, Mongiardi MP et al (2013) Neuropeptide TLQP-21, a VGF internal fragment, modulates hormonal gene expression and secretion in GH3 cell line. Neuroendocrinology 97:212–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339855
Cero C, Razzoli M, Han R et al (2017) The neuropeptide TLQP-21 opposes obesity via C3aR1-mediated enhancement of adrenergic-induced lipolysis. Mol Metab 6:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2016.10.005
El Gaamouch F, Audrain M, Lin WJ et al (2020) VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21 modulates microglial function through C3aR1 signaling pathways and reduces neuropathology in 5xFAD mice. Mol Neurodegener 15:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-0357-x
Elmadany N, de Almeida SF, Wendt S et al (2020) The VGF-derived peptide TLQP21 impairs purinergic control of chemotaxis and phagocytosis in mouse microglia. J Neurosci 40:3320–3331. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1458-19.2020
Cho K, Jang YJ, Lee SJ et al (2020) TLQP-21 mediated activation of microglial BV2 cells promotes clearance of extracellular fibril amyloid-β. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 524:764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.111
Jethwa PH, Warner A, Nilaweera KN et al (2007) VGF-derived peptide, TLQP-21, regulates food intake and body weight in Siberian hamsters. Endocrinology 148:4044–4055. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-0038
Stephens SB, Edwards RJ, Sadahiro M et al (2017) The prohormone VGF regulates β cell function via insulin secretory granule biogenesis. Cell Rep 20:2480–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.050
Rizzi R, Bartolomucci A, Moles A et al (2008) The VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21: a new modulatory peptide for inflammatory pain. Neurosci Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.06.018
Pinilla L, Pineda R, Gaytán F et al (2011) Characterization of the reproductive effects of the anorexigenic VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21: in vivo and in vitro studies in male rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 300:E837–E847. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00598.2010
Razzoli M, Bo E, Pascucci T et al (2012) Implication of the VGF-derived peptide TLQP-21 in mouse acute and chronic stress responses. Behav Brain Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.038
Jiang C, Lin WJ, Sadahiro M et al (2018) VGF function in depression and antidepressant efficacy. Mol Psychiatry 23:1632–1642. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.233
Bartolomucci A, Possenti R, Levi A et al (2007) The role of the vgf gene and VGF-derived peptides in nutrition and metabolism. Genes Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-007-0047-0
Bresciani E, Possenti R, Coco S et al (2020) TLQP-21, A VGF-derived peptide endowed of endocrine and extraendocrine properties: focus on in vitro calcium signaling. Int J Mol Sci 21:130
Bartolomucci A, Moles A, Levi A, Possenti R (2008) Pathophysiological role of TLQP-21: gastrointestinal and metabolic functions. Eat Weight Disord 13:e49
Bartolomucci A, Bresciani E, Bulgarelli I et al (2009) Chronic intracerebroventricular injection of TLQP-21 prevents high fat diet induced weight gain in fast weight-gaining mice. Genes Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-009-0110-0
Chassaing B, Koren O, Goodrich JK et al (2015) Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature 519:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14232
Weiszhár Z, Czúcz J, Révész C et al (2012) Complement activation by polyethoxylated pharmaceutical surfactants: cremophor-EL, tween-80 and tween-20. Eur J Pharm Sci 45:492–498
Liu Z, Qiu S, Liu Z et al (2013) Complement activation associated with polysorbate 80 in beagle dogs. Int Immunopharmacol 15:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2012.10.021
Riedl MS, Braun PD, Kitto KF et al (2009) Proteomic analysis uncovers novel actions of the neurosecretory protein VGF in nociceptive processing. J Neurosci 29:13377–13388. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1127-09.2009
Guo Z, Sahu BS, He R et al (2018) Clearance kinetics of the VGF-derived neuropeptide TLQP-21. Neuropeptides 71:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2018.06.003
Turolla EA, Valtorta S, Bresciani E et al (2018) Study of the tissue distribution of TLQP-21 in mice using [18F]JMV5763, a radiolabeled analog prepared via [18F]aluminum fluoride chelation chemistry. Front Pharmacol 9:1274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01274
Hollmann TJ, Haviland DL, Kildsgaard J et al (1998) Cloning, expression, sequence determination, and chromosome localization of the mouse complement C3a anaphylatoxin receptor gene. Mol Immunol 35:137–148
Quell KM, Karsten CM, Kordowski A et al (2017) Monitoring C3aR expression using a Floxed tdTomato-C3aR reporter knock-in mouse. J Immunol 199:688–706. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700318
Mamane Y, Chung Chan C, Lavallee G et al (2009) The C3a anaphylatoxin receptor is a key mediator of insulin resistance and functions by modulating adipose tissue macrophage infiltration and activation. Diabetes 58:2006–2017. https://doi.org/10.2337/db09-0323
Klos A, Wende E, Wareham KJ, Monk PN (2013) International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. [corrected]. LXXXVII. Complement peptide C5a, C4a, and C3a receptors. Pharmacol Rev 65:500–543
Litvinchuk A, Wan YW, Swartzlander DB et al (2018) Complement C3aR inactivation attenuates tau pathology and reverses an immune network deregulated in tauopathy models and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 100:1337-1353.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.031
Sun J, Ember JA, Chao TH et al (1999) Identification of ligand effector binding sites in transmembrane regions of the human G protein-coupled C3a receptor. Protein Sci 8:2304–2311. https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.8.11.2304
Vibhuti A, Gupta K, Subramanian H et al (2011) Distinct and shared roles of β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2 on the regulation of C3a receptor signaling in human mast cells. PLoS One 6:e19585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019585
Lim J, Iyer A, Suen JY et al (2013) C5aR and C3aR antagonists each inhibit diet-induced obesity, metabolic dysfunction, and adipocyte and macrophage signaling. FASEB J 27:822–831. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-220582
Razzoli M, Frontini A, Gurney A et al (2016) Stress-induced activation of brown adipose tissue prevents obesity in conditions of low adaptive thermogenesis. Mol Metab 5:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2015.10.005
Mathieu MC, Sawyer N, Greig GM et al (2005) The C3a receptor antagonist SB 290157 has agonist activity. Immunol Lett 100:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2005.03.003
Li K, Anderson KJ, Peng Q et al (2008) Cyclic AMP plays a critical role in C3a-receptor mediated regulation of dendritic cells in antigen uptake and T-cell stimulation. Blood 112:5084–5094. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-05-156646
Robertson N, Rappas M, Doré AS et al (2018) Structure of the complement C5a receptor bound to the extra-helical antagonist NDT9513727. Nature 553:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25025
Klos A, Tenner AJ, Johswich KO et al (2009) The role of the anaphylatoxins in health and disease. Mol Immunol 46:2753–2766
Reid RC, Yau M-K, Singh R et al (2013) Downsizing a human inflammatory protein to a small molecule with equal potency and functionality. Nat Commun 4:2802. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3802
Rowley JA, Reid RC, Poon EKY et al (2020) Potent thiophene antagonists of human complement C3a receptor with anti-inflammatory activity. J Med Chem 63:529–541. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00927
Coulthard LG, Woodruff TM (2015) Is the complement activation product C3a a proinflammatory molecule? Re-evaluating the evidence and the myth. J Immunol 194:3542–3548. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1403068
Hugli TE, Müller-Eberhard HJ (1978) Anaphylatoxins: C3a and C5a. Adv Immunol 26:1–53
Housden BE, Muhar M, Gemberling M et al (2016) Loss-of-function genetic tools for animal models: cross-species and cross-platform differences. Nat Rev Genet 181(18):24–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.118
Fargali S, Garcia AL, Sadahiro M et al (2014) The granin VGF promotes genesis of secretory vesicles, and regulates circulating catecholamine levels and blood pressure. FASEB J 28:2120–2133. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.13-239509
Ames RS, Lee D, Foley JJ et al (2001) Identification of a selective nonpeptide antagonist of the anaphylatoxin C3a receptor that demonstrates antiinflammatory Activity in animal models. J Immunol 166:6341–6348. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.166.10.6341
Li XX, Kumar V, Clark RJ et al (2021) The “C3aR Antagonist” SB290157 is a partial C5aR2 agonist. Front Pharmacol 11:2241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.591398
Molteni L, Rizzi L, Bresciani E et al (2017) Pharmacological and biochemical characterization of TLQP-21 activation of a binding site on CHO cells. Front Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00167
Ghebrehiwet B, Geisbrecht BV, Xu X et al (2019) The C1q receptors: focus on gC1qR/p33 (C1qBP, p32, HABP-1)1. Semin Immunol 45:101338
Ghebrehiwet B, Lim BL, Peerschke EIB et al (1994) Isolation, cdna clonlng, and overexpression of a 33-kd cell surface glycoprotein that binds to the globular “heads” of clq. J Exp Med 179:1809–1821. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.179.6.1809
Peterson KL, Zhang W, Lu PD et al (1997) The C1q-binding cell membrane proteins cC1q-R and gC1q-R are released from activated cells: subcellular distribution and immunochemical characterization. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 84:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1006/clin.1997.4374
Kouser L, Madhukaran SP, Shastri A et al (2015) Emerging and novel functions of complement protein C1q. Front Immunol 6:317
Ugurlar D, Howes SC, De Kreuk BJ et al (2018) Structures of C1-IgG1 provide insights into how danger pattern recognition activates complement. Science (-80) 359:794–797. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4988
Stricher F, Macri C, Ruff M, Muller S (2013) HSPA8/HSC70 chaperone protein: Structure, function, and chemical targeting. Autophagy 9:1937–1954
Bonam SR, Ruff M, Muller S (2019) HSPA8/HSC70 in immune disorders: a molecular rheostat that adjusts chaperone-mediated autophagy substrates. Cells 8:849
Kettner S, Kalthoff F, Graf P et al (2007) EWI-2/CD316 is an inducible receptor of HSPA8 on human dendritic cells. Mol Cell Biol 27:7718–7726. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00180-07
B G, Y L, K A, A GR (2013) Human C3a and C3a desArg anaphylatoxins have conserved structures, in contrast to C5a and C5a desArg. Protein Sci 22:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/PRO.2200
Z P, L JI, M ME et al (2014) Crystal structure of the stress-inducible human heat shock protein 70 substrate-binding domain in complex with peptide substrate. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0103518
K BG, S A, M KR et al (2020) Factor XII and kininogen asymmetric assembly with gC1qR/C1QBP/P32 is governed by allostery. Blood 136:1685–1697. https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD.2020004818
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge current and past members of the Bartolomucci and Salton Labs and several colleagues and collaborator for their significant contribution to the research described in this review. We would also like to acknowledge the BSS lab members for valuable feedback on the manuscript.
Funding
Supported by DK117504 (AB, SRS), DK118150 (AB), DK102496 (AB), AG062355 (SRS), AG062661 (SRS), Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (SRS), University of Minnesota Informatics Institute graduate assistantship program (MEN), T32DK083250 (JPP), BT-/RLF/Re-entry/38/2016, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, NBRC core funds (BSS).
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sahu, B.S., Nguyen, M.E., Rodriguez, P. et al. The molecular identity of the TLQP-21 peptide receptor. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 7133–7144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03944-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03944-1