Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Sphere packing and quantum gravity

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 December 2019
  • Volume 2019, article number 48, (2019)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Sphere packing and quantum gravity
Download PDF
  • Thomas Hartman1,
  • Dalimil Mazáč  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2613-09062,3 &
  • Leonardo Rastelli2,4 

  • 967 Accesses

  • 64 Citations

  • 18 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We establish a precise relation between the modular bootstrap, used to con- strain the spectrum of 2D CFTs, and the sphere packing problem in Euclidean geometry. The modular bootstrap bound for chiral algebra U(1)c maps exactly to the Cohn-Elkies linear programming bound on the sphere packing density in d = 2c dimensions. We also show that the analytic functionals developed earlier for the correlator conformal bootstrap can be adapted to this context. For c = 4 and c = 12, these functionals exactly repro- duce the “magic functions” used recently by Viazovska [1] and Cohn et al. [2] to solve the sphere packing problem in dimensions 8 and 24. The same functionals are also applied to general 2D CFTs, with only Virasoro symmetry. In the limit of large central charge, we relate sphere packing to bounds on the black hole spectrum in 3D quantum gravity, and prove analytically that any such theory must have a nontrivial primary state of dimension \( {\Delta}_0\underset{\sim }{<}c/\mathrm{8.503.} \)

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

High-dimensional sphere packing and the modular bootstrap

Article Open access 10 December 2020

Thurston’s sphere packings on 3-dimensional manifolds, I

Article 15 May 2023

Sphere partition functions & cut-off AdS

Article Open access 20 May 2019
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. M.S. Viazovska, The sphere packing problem in dimension 8, Ann. Math.185 (2017) 991 [arXiv:1603.04246].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Cohn et al., The sphere packing problem in dimension 24, Ann. Math.185 (2017) 1017 [arXiv:1603.06518].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Hellerman, A universal inequality for CFT and quantum gravity, JHEP08 (2011) 130 [arXiv:0902.2790] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Friedan and C.A. Keller, Constraints on 2d CFT partition functions, JHEP10 (2013) 180 [arXiv:1307.6562] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Collier, Y.-H. Lin and X. Yin, Modular bootstrap revisited, JHEP09 (2018) 061 [arXiv:1608.06241] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Afkhami-Jeddi, T. Hartman and A. Tajdini, Fast conformal bootstrap and constraints on 3D gravity, JHEP05 (2019) 087 [arXiv:1903.06272] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. Conway, N.J.A. Sloane and E. Bannai, Sphere-packings, lattices, and groups, Springer, Berlin Germany (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.C. Hales, A proof of the Kepler conjecture, Ann. Math.162 (2005) 1065.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Hales et al., A formal proof of the Kepler conjecture, in Forum of mathematics, Pi, volume 5, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Cohn and N. Elkies, New upper bounds on sphere packings I, Ann. Math.157 (2003) 689 [math/0110009

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Cohn, New upper bounds on sphere packings II, Geom. Topol.6 (2002) 329.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Mazac, Analytic bounds and emergence of AdS 2physics from the conformal bootstrap, JHEP04 (2017) 146 [arXiv:1611.10060] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Mazac and M.F. Paulos, The analytic functional bootstrap. Part I: 1D CFTs and 2D S-matrices, JHEP02 (2019) 162 [arXiv:1803.10233] [INSPIRE].

  15. D. Mazac and M.F. Paulos, The analytic functional bootstrap. Part II. Natural bases for the crossing equation, JHEP02 (2019) 163 [arXiv:1811.10646] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Mazáč, A crossing-symmetric OPE inversion formula, JHEP06 (2019) 082 [arXiv:1812.02254] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Mazáč, L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, An analytic approach to BCFT d , arXiv:1812.09314 [INSPIRE].

  18. A. Kaviraj and M.F. Paulos, The functional bootstrap for boundary CFT, arXiv:1812.04034 [INSPIRE].

  19. H. Cohn et al., Universal optimality of the E8 and Leech lattices and interpolation formulas, arXiv:1902.05438.

  20. J.D. Bekenstein, Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems, Phys. Rev.D 23 (1981) 287.

  21. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, JHEP10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Maldacena, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP08 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1503.01409] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. L. Susskind, Computational complexity and black hole horizons, Fortsch. Phys.64 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Höhn, Selbstduale vertexoperatorsuperalgebren und das babymonster (self-dual vertex operator super algebras and the baby monster), arXiv:0706.0236.

  26. G. Höhn, Conformal designs based on vertex operator algebras, Adv. Math.217 (2008) 2301.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. E. Witten, Three-dimensional gravity revisited, arXiv:0706.3359 [INSPIRE].

  28. R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP12 (2008) 031 [arXiv:0807.0004] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. T. Hartman, C.A. Keller and B. Stoica, Universal spectrum of 2d conformal field theory in the large c limit, JHEP09 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1405.5137] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. C.A. Keller and H. Ooguri, Modular constraints on Calabi-Yau compactifications, Commun. Math. Phys.324 (2013) 107 [arXiv:1209.4649] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. J.D. Qualls and A.D. Shapere, Bounds on operator dimensions in 2D conformal field theories, JHEP05 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1312.0038] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. J.D. Qualls, Universal bounds in even-spin CFTs, JHEP12 (2015) 001 [arXiv:1412.0383] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. N. Benjamin, E. Dyer, A.L. Fitzpatrick and S. Kachru, Universal bounds on charged states in 2d CFT and 3d gravity, JHEP08 (2016) 041 [arXiv:1603.09745] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Ashrafi and F. Loran, Non-chiral 2d CFT with integer energy levels, JHEP09 (2016) 121 [arXiv:1607.08516] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin, Genus two modular bootstrap, JHEP04 (2019) 022 [arXiv:1705.05865] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. E. Dyer, A.L. Fitzpatrick and Y. Xin, Constraints on flavored 2d CFT partition functions, JHEP02 (2018) 148 [arXiv:1709.01533] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Belin, A. Castro, J. Gomes and C.A. Keller, Siegel paramodular forms and sparseness in AdS 3/CFT 2 , JHEP11 (2018) 037 [arXiv:1805.09336] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. T. Anous, R. Mahajan and E. Shaghoulian, Parity and the modular bootstrap, SciPost Phys.5 (2018) 022 [arXiv:1803.04938] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. J.-B. Bae, S. Lee and J. Song, Modular constraints on superconformal field theories, JHEP01 (2019) 209 [arXiv:1811.00976] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Y.-H. Lin and S.-H. Shao, Anomalies and bounds on charged operators, Phys. Rev.D 100 (2019) 025013 [arXiv:1904.04833] [INSPIRE].

  41. A. Maloney and E. Witten, Quantum gravity partition functions in three dimensions, JHEP02 (2010) 029 [arXiv:0712.0155] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. C.A. Keller and A. Maloney, Poincaŕe series, 3D gravity and CFT spectroscopy, JHEP02 (2015) 080 [arXiv:1407.6008] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. N. Afkhami-Jeddi et al., Constraints on higher spin CFT2 , JHEP05 (2018) 092 [arXiv:1707.07717] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. J.-B. Bae, S. Lee and J. Song, Modular constraints on conformal field theories with currents, JHEP12 (2017) 045 [arXiv:1708.08815] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. I.B. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky and A. Meurman, A natural representation of the Fischer-Griess Monster with the modular function j as character, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.81 (1984) 3256.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. T. M. Thompson, From error-correcting codes through sphere packings to simple groups, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1983).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. H. Cohn, A conceptual breakthrough in sphere packing, Not. AMS64 (2017) 102 [arXiv:1611.01685].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. D. de Laat and F. Vallentin, A breakthrough in sphere packing: the search for magic functions, arXiv:1607.02111.

  49. G.F. Tóth, Packing and covering, in Handbook of discrete and computational geometry, J. Goodman, J. O’Rourke and C.D.Tóth eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, U.S.A., (2017), chapter 2.

  50. E. Hlawka, Zur geometrie der zahlen, Math. Zeit.49 (1943) 285.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. H.F. Blichfeldt, The minimum value of quadratic forms, and the closest packing of spheres,” Math. Ann.101 (1929) 605.

  52. G.A. Kabatiansky and V.I. Levenshtein, On bounds for packings on a sphere and in space, Probl. Pered. Inf.14 (1978) 3.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. H. Cohn et al., Sphere packing bounds via spherical codes, Duke Math. J.163 (2014) 1965.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. P. Delsarte, Bounds for unrestricted codes, by linear programming, Philips Res. Rep.27 (1972) 272.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. D.V. Gorbachev, Extremal problem for entire functions of exponential spherical type, connected with the levenshtein bound on the sphere packing density in r n (in Russian), Izv. Tula State Univ. Ser. Math. Mech. Inf.6 (2000) 71

  56. A.M. Odlyzko and N.J. Sloane, A theta-function identity for nonlattice packings, Stud. Sci. Math. Hung15 (1980) 461.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. J. Qiao and S. Rychkov, Cut-touching linear functionals in the conformal bootstrap, JHEP06 (2017) 076 [arXiv:1705.01357] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. M. Viazovska, Sharp sphere packings, in the proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, August 1–9, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2018).

  59. D. de Laat and F. Vallentin, A semidefinite programming hierarchy for packing problems in discrete geometry, Math. Prog.151 (2015) 529.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. H. Cohn and A. Kumar, Optimality and uniqueness of the Leech lattice among lattices, Ann. Math.170 (2009) 1003.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. S. Torquato and F.H. Stillinger, New conjectural lower bounds on the optimal density of sphere packings, Exp. Math.15 (2006) 307.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. O. Lunin and S.D. Mathur, Correlation functions for M N/S(N ) orbifolds, Commun. Math. Phys.219 (2001) 399 [hep-th/0006196] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, Causality constraints in conformal field theory, JHEP05 (2016) 099 [arXiv:1509.00014] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. S. Caron-Huot, Analyticity in spin in conformal theories, JHEP09 (2017) 078 [arXiv:1703.00278] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. M.S. Costa, V. Goncalves and J. Penedones, Conformal Regge theory, JHEP12 (2012) 091 [arXiv:1209.4355] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Looking for a bulk point, JHEP01 (2017) 013 [arXiv:1509.03612] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. B. Mukhametzhanov and A. Zhiboedov, Modular invariance, tauberian theorems and microcanonical entropy, JHEP10 (2019) 261 [arXiv:1904.06359] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. C. Zong, Sphere packings, Springer, Germany (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  69. V. Levenshtein, Bounds for packings in n-dimensional Euclidean space, Sov. Math. Dokl.20 (1979) 417.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. G. Parisi and F. Zamponi, Amorphous packings of hard spheres for large space dimension, J. Stat. Mech.03 (2006) P03017.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. G. Parisi and F. Zamponi, Mean-field theory of hard sphere glasses and jamming, Rev. Mod. Phys.82 (2010) 789.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Light-ray operators in conformal field theory, JHEP11 (2018) 102 [arXiv:1805.00098] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The analytic bootstrap and AdS superhorizon locality, JHEP12 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1212.3616] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, Convexity and Liberation at large spin, JHEP11 (2013) 140 [arXiv:1212.4103] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. B. Mukhametzhanov and A. Zhiboedov, Analytic euclidean bootstrap, JHEP10 (2019) 270 [arXiv:1808.03212] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. D. Zagier, Elliptic modular forms and their applications, in The 1-2-3 of modular forms, D. Zeiger ed., Springer, Germany (2008).

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    Thomas Hartman

  2. C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

    Dalimil Mazáč & Leonardo Rastelli

  3. Simons Center for Geometry and Physics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA

    Dalimil Mazáč

  4. CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland

    Leonardo Rastelli

Authors
  1. Thomas Hartman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dalimil Mazáč
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leonardo Rastelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalimil Mazáč.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1905.01319

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartman, T., Mazáč, D. & Rastelli, L. Sphere packing and quantum gravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2019)048

Download citation

  • Received: 18 September 2019

  • Accepted: 20 November 2019

  • Published: 05 December 2019

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2019)048

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • AdS-CFT Correspondence
  • Conformal Field Theory
  • Black Holes
  • Conformal and W Symmetry
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature