Skip to main content
Log in

Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper begins with an introduction to the philosophy and methodology of Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH). Following this, various citicisms of CSH are reviewed. One particularly important criticism is that CSH should not be seen as a replacement for other systems approaches, but as complementary to them. It is this idea of complementarity that has led several Critical Systems thinkers to take CSH, along with a number of other systems methods, and try to show that they are most appropriately used in different contexts. CSH, it is said, is at its most useful when we are confronted with coercive situations. However, in this paper it is argued that coercion is usually characterised by closure of debate. Therefore CSH, which depends upon the possibility of communication (or arbitration) between stakeholder groups, becomes redundant when coercion is experienced. It is further argued that coercion can only be addressed adequately by widening our definition of systems practice to include campaigning and direct political action. There is still considerable scope for developing these areas in the systems domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981).Creating the Corporate Future, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. (1957). Soziologie und Empirische Forschung. In Zeigler, K. (ed.),Wesen und Wirklichkeit des Menschen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, H. (1971). Theorie und Praxis: Max Weber und das Problem der Wertfreiheit und der Rationalität. In Albert, H., and Topitsch, E. (eds.),Werturteilsstreit, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesselschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1996). A framework for assessing participation. In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1970). Kant—A decision theorist?Theory Decis. 1, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979).The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C., and Midgley, G. (1994).The North Humberside Diversion from Custody Project for Mentally Disordered Offenders: Research Report, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990).Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1995).Solving Problem Solving, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991a).Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. and Jackson M. C. (1991b). Critical systems heuristics: Application of an emancipatory approach for police strategy toward the carrying of offensive weapons.Syst. Pract. 4, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991c).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (1995). Enhancing the process of choice in TSI, and improving chances of tackling coercion.Syst. Pract.,8, 377–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (1996a).Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (1996b).Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems theory between two systems practitioners.Syst. Pract. 3, 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980).Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writtings, 1972–1977, Gordon, C. (ed.), Harvester Press, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J. (1992).Critical Systems Thinking and Pluralism: A New Constellation, Ph.D. thesis, City University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J. (1996). Dealing with diversity. In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.),Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J., Romm, N. R. A., and Walsh, M. P. (1994).The Trent Quality Initiative: A Multi-Agency Evaluation of Quality Standards in the National Health Service, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974).Theory and Practice, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1976).Communication and the Evolution of Society, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1937). Traditionelle und Kritische Theorie.Z. Sozialforsch. 6, 245–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, K. (1991). Critical systems thinking and information technology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 18, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). The itinerary of a critical approach: Review of Ulrich's “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning.”J. Operat. Res. Soc. 36, 878–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987a). Present positions and future prospects in management science.Omega 15, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987b). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C. and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991).Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, A., Cattermole, M., and Markova, I. (1989). Day services for people with memtal handicaps: A purpose in life?Ment. Handicap 17, 136–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1787),The Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd ed. (Smith, N. K., trans.), Macmillan, Basingstoke (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1788).Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy, (Beck, L., trans.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. (1969).Normative Logic and Ethics, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1989).Ecological Communication, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1992a). Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science.Syst. Pract. 5, 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1992b). Power and languages of co-operation: A critical systems perspective. InSistsemica '92: Ira Conferencia Internacional de Trabjao del Instituto Andino de Sistemas (IAS), Lima, Peru, 23–28 Aug.

  • Midgley, G. (1995).Mixing Methods: Developing Systemic Intervention, Research Memorandum 9, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., Munlo, I., and Brown, M. (1997).Sharing Power: Integrating User, Involvement and Multi-Agency Working to Improve Housing for Older People, Policy Press, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1980). Toward an appropriate social theory for applied, systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 7, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1992). Recent developments in critical management science.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 43, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1972).Strukturprobleme des Kapitalistischen Staates, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1988). Methodological foundations of systems methodologies.Syst. Pract. 1, 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1992). Review of “Critical Issues in the Lives of People with Severe Disabilities” edited by Meyer, L. H., Peck, C. A. and Brown, L.Syst. Pract. 5, 475–476.

  • Popper, K. R. (1972).Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1994).Continuin Tensions Between Soft Systems Methodology and Critical Systems Heuristics, Working Paper Number 5, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1995a). Some anomalies in Ulrich's critical inquiry and problem-solving approach. In K. Ellis, A. Gregory, B. Mears-Young and G. Ragsdell (eds.),Critical Issues in Systems Theory and Practice, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1995b). Knowing as intervention: Reflections on the application of systems ideas.Syst. Pract. 8, 137–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinner, H. (1974).Pluralismus als Erkenntnismodell, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983).Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Haupt, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1986).Critical Heuristics of Social Systems Design, Working Paper 10, Department of Management Systems and Sciences, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988a). Systems thinking, systems practice, and practical philosophy: A program of research.Syst. Pract. 1, 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1988b). Churchman's “Process of unfolding”—Its significance for policy analysis and evaluation.Syst. Pract. 1, 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1993). Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism.Syst. Pract. 6, 583–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1994). Can we secure future-responsive management through systems thinking and design?Interfaces 24, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1996).A Primer to Critical Systems Heuristics for Action Researchers, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmer, A. (1970).The Critical Theory of Society, Herder & Herder, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, A., Gardner, S., and Kershaw, J. (1991).Service Evaluation by People with Learning Difficulties, King's Fund Centre, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1989). OR as a problem situation: From soft systems methodology to critical science. In Jackson, M. C., Keys, P., and Cropper, S. A. (eds.),OR and the Social Sciences, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Midgley, G. Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond. Systems Practice 10, 37–57 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557850

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557850

Key Words

Navigation