Abstract
In social systems science generally, and in management science particularly, recent developments in the variety of types of specific problem-solving methodologies (under the rubric of “hard” and “soft” systems approaches) have given an impetus to a line of inquiry, as well as debate on the nature of those methodologies. On the one hand, there has been the view that what we are witnessing is a form of “Kuhnian crisis.” On the other hand, a complementarist view of developments has been argued and a contingency approach proposed. But one thing has been common among the competing views: a belief that the prospects for further advances in the design and application of those methodologies, and in resolving the current controversies, lie in serious attempts to reconsider and clarify the underlying metatheoretical assumptions and concerns. This paper is an attempt to contribute to such an endeavor. A brief exposition of three methodological foundations (namely, empiricism, hermeneutics, and critique) is made, not only with the purpose of highlighting the nature as well as the limits of their epistemological and ethical claims, but also as a basis for illuminating both the nature of contemporary work on systems inquiry, design, and problem solving and the ongoing debate on what constitutes appropriate criteria for choice of specific methodologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. L. (1981).Creating the Corporate Future, Wiley, New York.
Apel, K. O. (1967).Analytic Philosophy of Language and the Geistewissenschaften, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Apel, K. O. (1971).Hermeneutik and Ideologiekritik, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Apel, K. O. (1980).Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Banathy, B. (1984).Systems Design in the Context of Human Activity Systems, International Systems Institute, San Francisco.
Banathy, B. (1986). The design of design inquiry. In Dillon, J. A., Jr. (ed.),Mental Images, Values and Reality, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Banathy, B. (1987). Choosing design methods. InProceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 54–63.
Bauman, Z. (1978).Hermeneutics and Social Science, Hutchinson, London.
Beer, S. (1979).The Heart of Enterprise, Wiley, New York.
Beer, S. (1981).Brain of the Firm, Wiley, New York.
Betti, E. (1955). In Giuffre, D. A. (ed.),Teoria Generale della Interpretazione, Instituto di Teoria della Interpretazione, Milan. [Translated (1967) asAllgemeine Auslegungslehre als Methodik der Geistewissenschaften, Mohr, Tübingen, JCB.]
Betti, E. (1962).Die Hermeneutik als Allgemeine Methode der Geistewissenschaften, Mohr, Tübingen, JCB. [Translated (1980) in Bleicher J. (1980), asHermeneutics as the general methodology of the Geistewissenschaften, pp. 51–94.]
Beyleveld, D. (1975).Epistemological Foundations of Sociological Theory, Ph.D. dissertation, University of East Anglia.
Bhaskar, R. (1979).The Possibility of Naturalism, Humanities, Hassocks, England.
Bleicher, J. (1980).Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy, and Critique, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Blumer, H. (1969).Symbolic Interactionism, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Bryer, R. A. (1979). The status of systems approach.Omega 7, 219–231.
Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann, London.
Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, Chichester, England.
Checkland, P. B. (1983). OR and the systems movement: Mapping and conflicts.J. Operation. Res. Soc. 34, 661–675.
Checkland, P. B. (1985). From optimising to learning: A development of systems thinking for the 1990's.J. Operation. Res. Soc. 36, 757–767.
Christenson, C. (1983). The methodology of positive accounting.Account. Rev. 58, 1–22.
Chua, W. F., Laughlin, R. C., Lowe, E. A., and Puxty, A. G. (1981). Four perspectives on accounting methodology. Paper presented at The Workshop on Accounting and Methodology, EIASM, Brussels.
Churchman, C. W. (1971).The Design of Inquiring Systems. Basic Books, New York.
Churchman, C. W. (1979).The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.
Cohen, P. S. (1968).Modern Social Theory, Heinemann, London.
Dahrendorf, R. (1967).Class and Class Conflict in an Industrial Society, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Dando, M. R., and Bennett, P. G. (1981). A Kuhnian crisis in management science?J. Operation. Res. Soc. 32, 91–103.
Denzin, N. K. (1970). Symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology. In Douglas, J. D. (ed.),Understanding Everyday Life, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Dilthey, W. (1976). In Rickman, H. P. (ed.),Selected Writings, Cambridge University Press, London.
Ellis, R. K., and Flood, R. L. (1987). Managing technological change: Systems theory or systems technology? InProceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 270–277.
Fay, B. (1975).Social Theory and Political Practice, Allen and Unwin, London.
Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1988).Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, Plenum, New York.
Friedman, M. (1953).Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Gadamer, H. G. (1975a). Hermeneutics and social science.Cult. Hermeneut. 2(4).
Gadamer, H. G. (1975b).Truth and Method, Seabury, New York.
Gadamer, H. G. (1980). The universality of the hermeneutical problem. [Translated (1980) by Linge, D., in Bleicher, J. (1980), pp. 128–140.]
Garfinkel, H. (1967).Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Giddens, A. (1976).New Rules of Sociological Method, Hutchinson, London.
Giddens, A. (1977).Studies in Social and Political Theory, Hutchinson, London.
Gould, J., and Kolb, W. F. (eds.) (1964).A Dictionary of the Social Sciences, Tavistock, London.
Habermas, J. (1970a). On systemically distorted communication.Inquiry 13, 205–218.
Habermas, J. (1970b). Towards a theory of communicative competence.Inquiry 13, 360–375.
Habermas, J. (1971).Der Universalitatsanspruch der Hermeneutik. [Translated in Bleicher, J. (1980), as The hermeneutic claim to universality, pp. 181–211.]
Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.
Habermas, J. (1973).Theory and Practice, Beacon, Boston.
Habermas, J. (1976a). A positivistically bisected rationalism. In Adey, G., and Frisby, D. (eds.),The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, Heinemann, London, pp. 198–225.
Habermas, J. (1976b). The analytic theory of science and dialectics. In Adorno, T. W.,et al. (eds.),The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, Harper Torchbooks, New York.
Habermas, J. (1979). What is universal pragmatics? InCommunication and the Evolution of Society (translated by McCarthy, T.), Heinemann, London, pp. 1–68.
Hales, M. (1974). Management science and the “Second Industrial Revolution.”Radical Sci. J. 1, 5–28.
Hall, A. D. (1962).A Methodology for Systems Engineering, Van Nostrand, New York.
Heidegger, M. (1962).Being and Time, Harper and Row, New York.
Heidegger, M. (1966).Discourse on Thinking, Harper and Row, New York.
Horkheimer, M. (1972).Critical Theory (translated by M. O'Connellet al.), Herder and Herder, New York.
Jackson, M. C. (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: The work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–28.
Jackson, M. C. (1983). The nature of soft systems thinking: Comments on the three replies.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 10, 109–113.
Jackson, M. C. (1985a). Social systems theory and practice: The need for a critical approach.Int. J. Gen. Syst. 10, 135–151.
Jackson, M. C. (1985b). Systems inquiring competence and organisational analysis. InProceedings of the 1985 Meeting of the Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Jackson, M. C. (1987a). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.),New Directions in Management Science, Gower Press, Aldershot, England.
Jackson, M. C. (1987b). Creating a “Centre for Community Operational Research” at Hull University, UK. InProceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 513–519.
Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies.J. Operation. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.
Jayaratna, N. (1986). Normative information model-based systems analysis and design (NIM-SAD): A framework for understanding and evaluating methodologies.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 73–87.
Jenkins, G. M. (1964). The systems approach. In Beishon, J., and Peters, G. (eds.),Systems Behaviour, Harper and Row, London.
Keat, R. N. (1981).The Politics of Social Theory: Habermas, Freud and the Critique of Positivism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Laughlin, R. C., Lowe, E. A., Puxty, A. G., and Chua, W. F. (1981). The function of subject makers in the epistemology and methodology of accounting. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Association of University Teachers in Accounting, Dundee, Scotland.
Lockwood, D. (1956). Some remarks on the “social system.”Br. J. Social. 7, 134–143.
Marcuse, H. (1964).One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Societies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Marcuse, H. (1968).Negations, Penguin Press, Harmondsworth.
Mattessich, R. (1978).Instrumental Reasoning and Systems Methodology-An Epistemology of the Applied and Social Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Melucci, A. (1985). The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements.Soc. Res.
Miller, J. G. (1978).Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mingers, J. C. (1980). Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: Critical theory and soft systems methodology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 7, 41–49.
Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle-solving in organisational theory.Admin. Sci. Q. 25, 605–622.
Morgan, G. (ed.) (1983).Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, Sage, London.
Morgan, G., and Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research.Acad. Manage. Rev. 5, 491–500.
Oliga, J. C. (1986a). Methodology in systems research: The need for a self-reflective commitment. In Dillon, J. A., Jr. (ed.),Mental Images, Values, and Reality, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Oliga, J. C. (1986b). World economic recession: Contradictions in the development of societal systems. In Dillon, J. A., Jr. (ed.),Mental Images, Values, and Reality, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Oliga, J. C. (1986c). Accounting and cybernetic control in human activity systems: Contradiction or a coherent system of values and images of social order? In Dillon, J. A., Jr. (ed.),Mental Images, Values, and Reality, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Oliga, J. C. (1987a). Control, systems stability and social change: The architecture of power and ideology. InProceedings (Supplement) of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 49–65.
Oliga, J. C. (1987b). The quantitative vs behavioural aspects of management accounting: Wings of dichotomy or dialectic? InProceedings (Supplement) of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Oliga, J. C., and Samuels, J. M. (1987). Towards development accounting in Third World countries. InProceedings of the 1987 Annual Meeting of the American Accounting Association, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Popper, K. R. (1959).The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York.
Puxty, A. G., Soo, W. F., Lowe, E. A., and Laughlin, R. C. (1980). Towards a critical-theoretic perspective for an epistemology of managerial theory. InProceedings of the Workshop “Towards an Epistemology of Management Research,” Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.
Rosenhead, J. (1982). Why does management need management science? In Troncale, L. (ed.),A General Survey of Systems Methodology, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Rosenhead, J., and Thunhurst, C. (1982). A materialistic analysis of operational research.J. Operation. Res. Soc. 33, 111–122.
Samuelson, P. A. (1962). Problems of the American Economy (Stamp Memorial Lecture).
Schutz, A. (1967).The Phenomenology of the Social World (translated by Walsh, G., and Lehnert, F.), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill.
Spear, R. (1987). Towards a critical systems approach. InProceedings (Supplement) of the 31st Annual Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Thomas, A. (1980). Generating tension for constructive change: The use and abuse of systems models.Cybernet. Syst. 11, 339–353.
Thomas, A. R., and Lockett, M. (1979). Marxism and systems research: Values in practical action. In Ericson, R. F. (ed.),Improving the Human Condition: Quality and Stability in Social Systems, Society for General Systems Research, Louisville, Ky.
Tinker, A. M., and Lowe, E. A. (1984). One dimensional management science: The making of a technocratic consciousness.Interfaces 14, 40–49.
Touraine, A. (1981).The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Warren, M. (1984). Nietzsche's concept of ideology.Theory Soc. 13, 541–565.
Weber, M. (1949).The Methodology of Social Sciences, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.
Whitley, R. D. (1974). Management research: The study and improvement of forms of co-operation in changing socio-economic structures. In Roberts, N. (ed.),Information Sources in the Social Sciences, Butterworths, London.
Wood, S., and Kelly, J. (1978). Towards a critical management science.J. Manage. Stud. 15, 1–12.
Zimmerman, D. H., and Wieder, D. L. (1970). Ethnomethodology and the problem of order. In Douglas, J. D. (ed.),Understanding Everyday Life, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oliga, J.C. Methodological foundations of systems methodologies. Systems Practice 1, 87–112 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059890
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059890